VIDEO clip & story- Alex Jones investigates Cheney shoo

[BannedfromDU]

<!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://infowars.com/video/clips/ballistics_test/images/abt_09_tb.jpg"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--><br><br>SYNOPSIS OF VIDEO NEWS REPORT DOCUMENTING SHOOTING TEST<br>by Alex Jones<br><br>Below is a ten minute "see-for-yourself" report that conclusively shows that Vice President Dick Cheney's claims to Kennedy County Sheriff's Deputies in south Texas is a total fabrication.<br>A massive cover-up has been conducted concerning the shooting. We know that most of the facts that have been told to the public are manufactured frauds.<br><br>Cheney claims that he shot Whittington at 90 feet, ballistic tests from the spread of the shotgun pellets to their penetration depth is 100% conclusive.<br><br>Harry Whittington was shot at close range, between 15 and 18 feet, not the 90 claimed by Dick Cheney and the Secret Service. It is now clear why they refused to let Sheriff's Deputies interview Cheney for over 13 hours and why they claimed that Whittington's injuries were superficial when in truth they were grievous.<br><br>The mainstream media is ignoring this literal smoking gun evidence. Anytime they wish, the local police can conduct their own ballistics tests and they will have the exact same findings. The media can conduct their own tests. The ballistics of shotguns and birdshot is well known to tens of millions of Americans who hunt fowl.<br><br>We have now scientifically proved with an engineer and a police officer on-site conducting the test that the American people are being lied to and a cover-up is in progress.<br><br>---<br>Video and full report-<br>http://infowars.com/articles/us/cheney_shooting_scientific_proof.htm <p></p><i></i>

[robertdreed]

Unlike a complex phenomenon of wholesale destruction like a bombing, this shooting is fairly easily to reconstruct, and little or no technical expertise is required to figure out what happened. <br><br>It's patently absurd that Whittington could have sustained those wounds from 30 yards off. <br><br>You wouldn't expect Faux News shill Britt Hume to bring that up in a face-to-face interview with Dick Cheney. But somebody should. <p></p><i></i>

[marykmusic]

Didn't the police report show the point of impact being on the LEFT side of the shoulder and face? In the videos of Whittington speaking, as well as the still pictures, the damage is on his RIGHT side.<br><br>Someone didn't actually see the victim when they wrote up the police report? --MaryK <p></p><i></i>

[StarmanSkye]

Mary K:<br><br>Quite right -- I've read about the 'error' that mainstream media have been repeating without question, w/o asking myself HOW such a stupido thing could have happened. WHO described the location of the wounds which featured in the accident report? Didn't the investigating sherrif's deputy or Wildlife Officer even check with the victim and note the diagram was flat-wrong?<br><br>But it's even worse, more bizarre than that -- and which I didn't even catch, tho I knew the basics.<br><br>Cheney reportedly swung to his right (where Whittington woulda been 'cept he had gone off to retrieve a bird his dog couldn't find) and shoots -- hitting Wittington in his RIGHT SIDE? So Wittington was facing BACKWARDS? 'Way to GO, deadeye.'<br><br>From the DailyKos diary Prof. Pan recommended on another thread (BTW, QUITE excellant):<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/2/20/45756/6926">www.dailykos.com/story/20...45756/6926</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>--quote--<br>and one last thing <br>the whole shooting story still does not make sense. <br><br>Cheney swings to his right and shoots his pal in the right side. You do the math. This means that Whittington was facing to the rear. WTF?<br><br>An election does not make a democracy.<br><br>by seesdifferent on Mon Feb 20, 2006 at 10:13:32 AM PDT<br>--unquote--<br><br><br>Katherine Armstrong's claim that Whittington didn't 'announce' himself is ludicrous if one assumes he really WAS the 90 feet away which Cheney initially claimed (two semi-trailer lengths) -- especially problematic given Katherine claims to have been 300 feet from the incident -- a football field away. But as we've since seen, evidence points to Cheney (or whoever's gun it really was) was no more than 15 - 18 feet from the hapless victim. It's remarkable (but damnably routine) that MSM can't put two-and-two together themselves -- Just plain common-sense hunting-savvy is enough to see this story stinks.<br><br>Any wonder Cheney's legacy of frauds and lies and cover-ups have gotton a pass, if MSM is so bamboozled or coopted they won't call him on this?<br><br>Disgusted;<br>Starman <p></p><i></i>