by sunny » Sun Jun 18, 2006 2:56 am
Just as an example, <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/06/13/hey-bob-wheres-your-letter/" target="top">From here</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>June 13th, 2006 at 3:31 pm <br><br>I’ve been accused of being short-tempered for the past couple of days, but I would argue that there have been a bonanza of things to be short-tempered about. Put at the top of that list accusations that somehow Patrick Fitzgerald is a bag man for the GOP. I’m announcing now that I have just a little less tolerance for this site devolving into that than Kos does turning his over to the 9/11 conspiracy theorists. <br><br>Yer forewarned. Just so nobody is surprised when it happens.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>June 13th, 2006 at 3:40 pm <br><br>huffy 103 — a) No it’s NOT about schadenfreude. Being about something larger doesn’t preclude schadenfreude as well, but that isn’t the bottom line. Never has been.<br><br>and b) watch your mouth. Either find another way to express yourself or take a hike. If you want to cry and piss yourself in disappointment, go over to Red State, I think they have a large supply of toilet paper on hand for all the chronic bedwetters they host. You’ll be very happy there.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>June 13th, 2006 at 4:13 pm <br><br>the patriot 156 — I’ve provided a place for this particular discussion. I am going to be quite firm about people dragging it into every new thread, as I’ve said before. Now knock it the fuck off or I will ban you, that’s a promise. If you want to discuss it you know where to do it. I will be as firm as I have to be to keep this in check, hijack another thread and you are out of here. Do I make myself clear?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/06/13/some-things-to-contemplate/#comments" target="top">And from here:</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br>Oh boy. SHE WENT BACK AND CLEANED UP THE COMMENTS. I KID YOU NOT.<br>This is what it says now;<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>June 13th, 2006 at 11:33 am <br><br>rat bastahd 285 — “our side?” I don’t think that excuses anything. Every time there is a big disappointment — and I mean EVERY time — people show up here and take their frustrations out on us. Somehow we’ve been responsible for building their hopes up, and now that things have not played out the way they want they try to refashion history (never with any links) and take a pound of flesh. Well you know, that’s just not fair. And then when we answer directly — that this response is quite patently “bullshit” — people suddenly take the opportunity to “delurk” (like Porta Bella 261) who want to offer us the clear-eyed wisdom of their “reality” and accuse us of banning and deleting people simply because they don’t agree with us (we don’t, and for the record). People are evidently supposed to be able to say whatever they want to us or about us, but if we call bullshit others accuse us of having an “Aravosis moment” (Ed’n'Sted 271). <br><br>People need to grow up. You don’t like the news? Tough shit. That’s the real world, I’m not your mommy and it’s not our fault. This is what I’m saying this time, it’s what I said the last time and it’s what I’ll say again. You can take it to the bank.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br><br>I specifically remember her comments to Porta Bella, in which she called her "fucked up" "libellous" so on.<br><br>I went through all her comments- they have all been cleaned up. That IS some fucked up shit. She can take that site and shove it. And if any of her commenters happen to be reading here who were on the threads that day, YOU KNOW I'M TELLING THE TRUTH.<br><br><br><br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>