by Sweejak » Fri Jul 15, 2005 10:07 am
I don't see any "anti Semitism" here? I didn't see anyone saying "It's all the Jews' fault." I do see someone raising the anti-semitism flag and trying to guide the discussion though. Are you anti-Wasp? Are you anti- Nordic? Are you anti-German?<br><br>By your criteria of judging what is "Anti" I should be allowed to say that, no?<br><br>Is this anti Semitic?<br><br>Here is a direct quote from the correspondence of Karl Marx with another Jew, Baruch Levy, quoted in the "La Revue de Paris," June 1, 1928, page 574:<br><br>"In the new organization of mankind, the children of Israel [the Jews] will spread over the whole surface of the earth and will become everywhere, without opposition, the leading element, especially if they can impose upon workings classes the firm control of some of the them. The governments of the nations forming the Universal Republic will pass without effort into the hands of the Jews under the cover of the victory of the proletariat, private property will then be suppressed by the rulers of Jewish race, who will everywhere control public funds. Thus will be realized the Talmudic promise that, when come the times of the Messiah, Jews will possess the wealth of all peoples of the world".<br><br>Or is it allowable to bring it up for discussion and research or do we only get to do this for Nordics, Germans, and Bush's? Would it be anti-semitic to point to evidence that Hitler had Rothschild roots? Or would that be OK because he was German.<br><br><br><br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>