by Gouda » Wed Dec 07, 2005 4:37 am
Starroute said: <!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>I suspect the importance of Serrano's ideas is less in where they came from than in where they're going. What particularly bothers me is a sense that fascism may yet become "hip" among certain cultural sectors.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br>Yes, I think that is the point, the point in tracing the history of this, overlaying with present trends, and preparing to fight it now and in the future. <br><br>For those of us who can travel to the past: do something, damn it! <br><br>***<br><br>albion - i recall that in my copy of LaRouche's 2004 "campaign newsletter", titled something like: "Satanic congress for sexual freedom part III", LL really goes off on the synarchists (and perceived heirs of today, who are usually the ones attacking him personally). I may have to re-read that thing. Yeesh. <p></p><i></i>
