WWIII another fake on the masses

by **dbeach** » Thu Dec 15, 2005 7:16 pm

Christain zionism = endless war in the name of their christ.. Jesus Christ to me is the true God for me and that does not mean He is the one for all.. many paths to God consciousness "Christian Zionism: Terror In Jesus' Name By Yoginder Sikand 04 December, 2005 Countercurrents.org Represented by literally hundreds of small denominations and churches today, particularly in America, Christian Zionism is today a formidable force and a major actor in global politics. Christian Zionism comes in various shades, but the core of its message is total, unflinching support to the state of Israel and the Zionist imperialist project. Christian Zionists today exercise an enormous clout in the Bush administration. Bush, too, may himself be characterised in some sense as a Christian Zionist, for his policies in the Middle East and elsewhere clearly reflect or tally with the Christian Zionist agenda. War, conquest and imperialist domination, based on a fanatic insistence on the absolute truth of Christianity and the racial superiority of the Jews lie at the very heart of Christian Zionism. Christian Zionists believe that the Jews are God's 'Chosen People' and that God has given the Jews the absolute right to complete control over not just Palestine but, indeed, a vast stretch of territory, extending from present-day Egypt to Iraq, the so-called 'Greater Israel'. God, they claim, has selected the Jews above all other people. Hence, they insist, those who oppose the imperialist project of the advocates of 'Greater Israel' or the Zionist occupation of Palestine are 'God's enemies', deserving to be crushed by every available means, including outright war and decimation. Advocating Israel does not mean, however, that Christian Zionists accept Judaism as a legitimate means of salvation after Jesus. Nor does it translate into genuine love for the Jews, a departure from the traditional teachings of the Church that, for centuries, viewed Jews as 'Christ-killers'. Since Christian Zionists believe that Christianity is the only religion acceptable to God, and that, as the Bible claims, salvation is possible only through Jesus, they insist that Jews cannot be 'saved' unless they convert to Christianity. Yet, because Christian Zionists are dogged defenders of the state of Israel and are fiercely anti-Arab and anti-Muslim, they have been able to establish a close nexus with right-wing Jewish groups and with the Israeli state and are today an integral part of the American-Israeli axis. Christian Zionism is a call for global war. The belief that Christianity is the sole truth, that all other faiths are 'Satanic' or 'false', that the Jews must all gather in Palestine to fulfil so-called Biblical prophecies, and that a grand global war will soon erupt leading to the massacre of hundreds of millions and heralding the 'second coming' of Jesus, who will establish his Christian kingdom extending till the four corners of the world, clearly indicate the hate-driven, global expansionist project of Christian Zionism. As Hagee's book clearly indicates, Christian Zionism, rooted in tradition of the Crusades and a long history of Church triumphalism, is a recipe for global war and Christian imperialism. Moreover, it reflects a total lack of genuine spirituality, seeking to reduce the notion of God into a petty, whimsical and racist dictator who willingly urges the slaughter of innocents in order to protect the expansionist designs of his supposedly 'Chosen People'. Of course, Christian Zionism is hardly unique in its use of religion for such blatantly political ends, but given the immense clout enjoyed by its advocates today, especially in America, it is a much more menacing threat to world peace than is sometimes imagined and cannot be simply dismissed as the ravings of lunatics on the fringe. "

by **Trifecta** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 5:55 am

And history repeats, same script, same players and always the same victims.

by **dbeach** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 12:27 pm

divide and conquer and smirk on your way to the bank or is that the hidden swiss accounts??

by **Trifecta** » Wed Dec 21, 2005 6:10 am

U.S. Warns Turkey Of Air Strike On Iran And Syria The Turkish press reported last week that CIA Director Porter Goss went to Ankara recently and informed the Turkish government that Iran already has nuclear weapons and they should be ready for "a possible US air operation against Iran and Syria <a href="http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=3948">www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/...sp?ID=3948</a> Report: Syria agrees to hide Iran nukes Syria has signed a pledge to store Iranian nuclear weapons and missiles, reports the World Tribune. Thus providing justification for the US to take out both of Israel's prime enemies in one move <a href="http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=3950">www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/...sp?ID=3950</a>

by **Trifecta** » Wed Dec 21, 2005 6:26 am

Until you throw in the Peak Oil scam, straight out of the Rockafeelers bible <a href="http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2005-03/08/content_2669150.htm">news.xinhuanet.com/englis...669150.htm</a> TEHRAN, March 8 (Xinhuanet) -- Iranian Oil Minister Bijan Namdar Zanganeh announced here Tuesday that Iran has discovered two new oil and gas fields in the south of the country. The new oil field, with an estimated capacity of 5.7 billion barrels, was located in the southern province of Khuzestan, 40 km northeast of the provincial capital of Ahvaz, Zanganeh told reporters. "The field also holds 242 billion cubic meters of gas, of which 36 billion cubic meters are recoverable," he said. Zanganeh said that the gas field is situated east of the great South Pars gas field in another southern province of Bushehr and the capacity is estimated at 168 billion cubic meters of gas and 183 million barrels of gas condensate. The minister added that the oil field belonged solely to Iran while the gas field was shared with another country. Iran previously boasted that it has 132 billion barrels of oil and 26,800 billion cubic meters of gas in proven reserves, both at the second in the global list. Enditem

by **Trifecta** » Wed Dec 21, 2005 6:27 am

<a href="http://www.antiwar.com/orig/hirsch.php?articleid=7649">www.antiwar.com/orig/hirs...cleid=7649</a> Israel, Iran, and the US: Nuclear War, Here We Come by Jorge Hirsch The stage is set for a chain of events that could lead to nuclear war over chemical weapons in the immediate future. If these events unfold, the trigger will be Israel, the target Iran, the nuclear aggressor the U.S. These are the reasons: The U.S. State Department determined in August 2005 that "Iran is in violation of its CWC [Chemical Weapons Convention] obligations because Iran is acting to retain and modernize key elements of its CW infrastructure to include an offensive CW R&D capability and dispersed mobilization facilities." According to the CIA, "Iran likely has already stockpiled blister, blood, choking, and probably nerve agents – and the bombs and artillery shells to deliver them – which it previously had manufactured." According to (then undersecretary for arms control and international security, now U.S. ambassador to the UN) John Bolton's testimony to the House of Representatives (June 24, 2004), "We believe Iran has a covert program to develop and stockpile chemical weapons," and on Iran's ballistic missiles, "Iran continues its extensive efforts to develop the means to deliver weapons of mass destruction," and "The 1,300-km range Shahab-3 missile is a direct threat to Israel, Turkey, U.S. forces in the region, and U.S. friends and allies." In the IAEA resolution of Sept. 24 [.pdf], Iran was found to be in "noncompliance" with its NPT safeguards agreements. Members of the Israeli parliament from across the political spectrum are urging the United States to stop Iran's nuclear programs, or Israel will "act unilaterally." Statements of grave concern about Iran's nuclear program have been made by Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz, Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom, and Mossad chief Meir Dagan (Iran poses an "existential threat" to Israel). Shin Bet chief Avi Dichter accuses Iran of plotting relentlessly to attack Israeli targets. According to the head of the Russian Atomic Energy Organization, Alexander Rumyantsev, Russia will ship the first cargo of nuclear fuel for Iran's Bushehr's reactor at the end of 2005 or early 2006. Israel bombed Iraq's Osirak nuclear reactor (which was under IAEA supervision) in 1981 just before nuclear fuel was loaded into it (to prevent nuclear fallout). President Bush has said that "all options are on the table" if diplomacy fails to halt Iran's nuclear program. The U.S. House of Representatives on May 6, 2004, by a vote of 376-3, called on the United States to use all appropriate means to deter, dissuade, and prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. In the recently released draft document "Doctrine for Joint Nuclear Operations" [.pdf], the Pentagon states that it will respond to the threat of WMD (which includes chemical and biological weapons) with nuclear weapons. Conclusion: according to Israel, the U.S. administration, and 99.2 percent of the U.S. House of Representatives, Iran will not be allowed to have access to any nuclear technology. No diplomatic options to achieve that goal will remain when Russia and China veto Security Council sanctions, or if the IAEA refuses on Nov. 24 to refer Iran to the Security Council. Military action will occur before Russia ships uranium fuel to Iran, and will inevitably lead to the use of nuclear weapons by the U.S. against Iran. How will it all get started? No matter how much Bush and Cheney want it, the U.S. Senate is unlikely to authorize the bombing of Iranian installations out of the blue. Unless there is some major disturbance in Iraq that can be blamed on Iran, Israel is likely to pull the trigger. It knows how to and has every motivation to do so. Once Israel drops the first bomb on an Iranian nuclear facility, as it did with Iraq's Osirak reactor in 1981, there is no return. Bushehr is likely to be the first target; other installations will follow. Iran will respond – how can it not? At a minimum, it will shoot missiles at Israel. It may or may not shoot at U.S. forces in Iraq initially, but given the U.S.-Israel "special relationship," there is no way the U.S. will stay out of the conflict. Many of Iran's targeted facilities are underground, and U.S. bombs will be needed to destroy them all. Once the U.S. enters the conflict, 150,000 U.S. troops in Iraq will be at risk of Iranian missiles with chemical warheads, or of being overrun by Iran's conventional forces streaming into Iraq. According to the Pentagon planning [.pdf], nuclear weapons will be used: "To demonstrate U.S. intent and capability to use nuclear weapons to deter adversary use of WMD." "Against an adversary using or intending to use WMD against U.S., multinational, or alliance forces or civilian populations…" "[O]n adversary installations including WMD, deep, hardened bunkers containing chemical or biological weapons or the C2 infrastructure required for the adversary to execute a WMD attack against the United States or its friends and allies" "[T]o counter potentially overwhelming adversary conventional forces…" "For rapid and favorable war termination on U.S. terms…" "To ensure success of U.S. and multinational operations…" That makes six independent reasons for nuking Iran. The first nuclear bomb used in an act of war after "Little Boy" and "Fat Man" should be code-named "Demo" – for "demonstration" that we can do it, don't mess with us, for "democracy" on the rise in the Middle East, and for the "Democrats" in Congress who will go along with the program. As with Hiroshima and Nagasaki, we will be told it saved lives, ours and theirs. You know the script. The upshot: a nuclear superpower will have nuked a non-nuclear state that is an NPT signatory and is cooperating with the IAEA, at the instigation of a state that is not an NPT signatory, that reportedly has over 100 nuclear bombs of its own, and that initiated hostilities with an unprovoked act of military aggression. Given these prospects, the U.S. government should be doing its utmost to restrain Israel, yet it is doing exactly the opposite. It should be trying to achieve a diplomatic solution, but it refuses to even talk to Iran. The ongoing diplomatic effort by the EU is simply designed to provide cover for the planned military action, just as in the case of Iraq. How many times must Bush play the same game before the EU finally learns it is being used? And how many times will it take for the U.S. citizenry to learn? The U.S. public and its representatives in Congress, preoccupied with the deception and subsequent disaster of the Iraq invasion, are blind to the enormously bigger deception and disaster unfolding just before their eyes. Do the majority of American citizens, from whom the authority of the administration is derived, really want to be drawn by Israel into a nuclear conflict? Is this really in the United States' best interest? The sane world needs to tell the U.S. and Israeli governments to back off. And the United States needs to tell Israel, in no uncertain terms, that it will not allow (American-supplied) Israeli bombers carrying (American supplied) bunker-busting bombs over Iraqi airspace, and that it will not aid, abet, or condone such an attack. By not demanding this of the Bush administration, the U.S. Congress is complicit in what is about to happen and is betraying the trust of the people it represents. There is a rational way to avoid this disaster. Let Iran pursue a civilian nuclear program. Over 30 countries have civilian nuclear programs, while only nine have nuclear weapons. Let the Nobel-prize winning IAEA and Mohamed ElBaradei do their job! The U.S. can guarantee Israel's safety by assuring Israel that any threat to its existence from a non-nuclear nation will be met with the full force of U.S. conventional forces, and any threat from a nuclear nation will be met with U.S. nuclear forces. If Iran were to withdraw from the NPT and not allow international supervision of its programs, it would still take several years for it to acquire a nuclear weapon. There would still be plenty of time to act. Otherwise? Welcome to the new world order, where the U.S. can nuke any non-nuclear country at will. Refrain from having a nuclear deterrent at your own risk. All nations that can will become nuclear, others on their way will be nuked, and all-out nuclear war will become an absolute certainty. Bye-bye, world.

by **Trifecta** » Wed Dec 21, 2005 9:13 am

Iran ‘Bent on Having Nuclear Weapons,’ Turk Ambassador Warns By UMIT ENGINSOY, WASHINGTON <a href="http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?F=1424778&C=europe">www.defensenews.com/story...8&C=europe</a> Turkey’s ambassador to Washington said Iran is “irreversibly” on the road toward producing nuclear weapons and called for direct dialogue on the matter between Washington and Tehran. Ankara in the past has voiced concerns about Iran’s potential nuclear capabilities, but Ambassador Faruk Logoglu’s remarks are the first on-the-record comments by a senior Turkish official stating that neighboring Iran is actually preparing to produce an atomic bomb. “In my view, Iran is irreversibly bent on having nuclear weapons,” Logoglu told the Potomac Institute for Policy Studies, a think tank based near Washington, on Dec. 19. “Iran’s nuclear weapons would be a serious threat for security in the Middle East. “The European Union effort [to convince Iran] to give up its nuclear ambitions] is unlikely to succeed,” he said. Logoglu said that for a “carrot and stick” approach to succeed in turning Iran away from the nuclear path, the carrot would have to come from the United States. He urged Washington to launch a direct dialogue with Tehran. “Direct U.S.-Iran talks are needed, but I don’t think this is likely in 2006,” he said. “The Iranian situation will inevitably affect Turkey,” Logoglu said. “Tensions between the United States and Iran will reflect on our relations with the United States and with Iran. This happened on Iraq.” Iran says its nuclear plans are limited to peaceful electricity generation. But it hid potential arms-related technology from a United Nations nuclear watchdog for 18 years. The United States continues to express alarm about Iran’s nuclear ambitions, but has so far let Europe take the lead in trying to resolve the issue. U.S. President George W. Bush says he prefers a diplomatic solution to the nuclear crisis, but warns that “all options are on the table.” Washington has no diplomatic relations with Tehran. Britain, France and Germany, the EU trio holding talks on Iran’s nuclear program, are due to resume low-level talks with Iranian officials in Vienna on Dec. 21, but analysts expressed little optimism that talks with Tehran’s hardline government would yield a breakthrough. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s call for Israel to be “wiped off the map” and his declaration that the Holocaust was a myth have aggravated Western fears about Iran’s nuclear plans.

by **gloworm** » Wed Dec 21, 2005 8:17 pm

Quoting A. Einstein: "I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with stick and stones." So don't forget to pray 'that your flight be not in the winter nor on the sabbath' Matthew 24

by **Trifecta** » Wed Dec 28, 2005 9:43 am

<a href="http://aljazeera.com/me.asp?service_ID=10383">aljazeera.com/me.asp?service_ID=10383</a> Putin’s Show of Strength Triggers Fear of Fresh Nuclear Arms Race <a href="http://mosnews.com/commentary/2005/12/26/armsshow.shtml">mosnews.com/commentary/20...show.shtml</a> It would seem that March is going to be the first hit, the build up is pragmatic, the minds are being manipulated the stage is set. All the preliminaries are in place and all it needs now is a front page catastrophy to bring the will of the dark hearts to fruition, as they have everytime they require the death energy to keep the lies going. And what can we do about it? This form of digital liberalism, pointing to the great hoax, stirring the pot of intrigue, guiding minds to an absolutist view of the quagmire that is the world of the fascists. The only power to stop this is us. For governments only exist in the realms of economic successes and failures. War is a bottom line gain, has no heart, no intelligence, primary focussed on profit and loss and obviously no social respnsibility, nor ethics, let alone morals. Death is profitable. March is a good time to prop up the fake economy's, makes the financial forecasts realistic and keep up the viewing figures, thus, advertising revenues. And here we sit fused to electromagnetic grid Mind controlled reactionaries couch potatoe fits Watch the world continue to fall to bits. Fourth Reich Energy hike nuclear spike Fourth quater earnings And here we sit

by **antiaristo** » Wed Dec 28, 2005 10:55 am

Let's try a little thought experiment here. Suppose you held in your hands a talisman, one which gave you unlimited powers here on Earth. But if you allowed this fact to be widely known, your talisman would be taken away from you by the mob. What do you do, if you have grand ambitions and the will to employ those unlimited powers in pursuit of those ambitions? I'm talking UNLIMITED POWER. The power to start and end war, to unseat rulers, to change the course of history. Here's one possibility. You seek out extraneous forces, narratives and myths which are in alignment with what it is you want to do. You secretly support and promote those extraneous forces. You use your power to achieve those shared objectives, but you cloak your own role, perhaps by creating an alternative persona. You keep your own head down, and let those other forces take responsibility. We can see this in the promotion of all sorts of myths, ancient and modern. Well my friends, THAT is exactly what is going on today - most notably in the Holy Land, but also in the United States and elsewhere. For something like 120 years the British Monarchy has been using such a talisman under cover primarily of Biblical prophecy. That talisman is the Treason Felony Act.

by **bamabecky** » Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:02 am

I don't think you are uneducated. Far from it, and at least I'm quite impressed with your posts. You mentioned that THEY are messing with you through remote viewing and other methods, could you elaborate on that? I too know about Chemtrails - have you figured out WHY (the purpose) they are putting the Chemtrails in the sky? Again for those fixated on the Bible, please read Brian Desboroughs They Cast no Shadows. The discernment from that book will open some eyes. Bama Be the Media! Write a personal essay to your friends and family, telling them what's going on and tell them how and where to find more info.

by **Iroquois** » Wed Dec 28, 2005 2:45 pm

Osculum, maybe self-educated is a better description for yourself than uneducated. My BA does little use to me on this forum anyway. What I contribute comes more a combination of my own self-education in these areas, which is well behind the mean on this forum, and some unique life experiences and social contacts. Bamabecky, I've only been aware that chemtrails may be something other than contrails for a period of several months. But, in that time, I've done a fair amount of travelling and have tried to keep conscious of the phenomenon. One thing I can say for certain is that I have not seen anything remotely approaching the blanket coverage Detroit got on Devil's Night this year. To me that says at least one of the uses is likely to spread behavior modifying chemicals. That does not preclude other uses of the technology, however. The equipment needed to make chemtrails are just the delivery systems. The range of chemicals that they could disperse and, consequently the range of possible applications, is vast. The following is from the FAQ for a 747 supertanker with a high pressure dispersal system "under development" by Evergreen Aviation. See <a href="http://www.evergreenaviation.com/supertanker/index.html">www.evergreenaviation.com...index.html</a> for more information. <blockquote>Quote:<hr>Are there any other markets for the Evergreen Supertanker? Can it operate globally? Evergreen is studying other applications for the Supertanker. Oil spill containment, chemical decontamination and weather modification* are all potential markets for this aircraft. Because the aircraft is pressurized, the Evergreen Supertanker has the capability of any long-range Boeing 747 passenger aircraft. This allows the aircraft to deploy to any international location.<hr></blockquote> *Itallicized emphasis added. Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=iroquois@rigorousintuition>Iroquois</A> at: 12/28/05 10:20 pm

by **osculminfame** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 7:34 am

Imagine the book was written to guide those of secret knowledge, if you follow this path and create these situations your personal outcome will be imortality. With the global support for the fear of death the controlled drone enacts their rituals, are drawn into comprimising situations and manipulated to the point of murder, rape, buggery and self fullfilling phrophesy. The British monarchy are a prime example of making the story fit the scripts. Just look at how many of their births are declared sacred on a certain day, pregnacies induced, extended and the naming ceremony's to fit the imortality route the chosen ones. When a Prince declares he wishes to me know as George before his enthronement, this is a signal of the plan, these signals are everywhere, they are the unwritten code to the acts that are about to come. Imagine the surprise of the truth seeker, when in each book and as if by some shear magnificents of serendipity (insert own expression of the theme) they find a point in the story that matches their personal need to witness. Chemtrails, Microwave/cell/entropy towers, oil peaks, newspeaks and fake intelegence works to the same grand design. We are in a invisible war. As the matrix becomes clearer even to the unknowing and still we sit, do nothing, other than digital liberalism, imagine if the book said. "and by their actions you will know their true intent" Permission must be given in order for the sheeple to be lead to the abottoire. (not a typo) They create the story to fit the script. If you want to know about being remote viewed, psychically attacked, radiated by the towers and sattalites, clicks on the phone, strange ear signals, personal attack from all corners, digitally stalked, boosted by your own myth and ulitmately silenced through ignorance .... Then all you have to do is recognise that we are indeed in an invisible war, start writting, get active do stuff to have your say about what you have learnt to whomever will listen, then you will not need to ask me the question.

by **Trifecta** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 6:55 am

<img src="http://kurtnimmo.com/images/stop.jpg" style="border:0;"/> http://kurtnimmo.com/?p=166 http://cryptome.org/eo13394.txt Executive Order 13394 of December 22, 2005 Providing an Order of Succession Within the Department of Defense By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, 5 U.S.C. 3345 et. seq., it is hereby ordered as follows: Section 1. Subject to the provisions of section 3 of this order, the officers named in section 2, in the order listed, shall act as and perform the functions and duties of the office of the Secretary of Defense (Secretary) during any period when the Secretary has died, resigned, or is otherwise unable to perform the functions and duties of the office of Secretary. Sec. 2. Order of Succession. (a) Deputy Secretary of Defense; (b) Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence; (c) Under Secretary of Defense for Policy; (d) Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics; (e) Secretary of the Army; (f) Secretary of the Air Force; (g) Secretary of the Navy; (h) Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness and the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller); (i) Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology, Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, and Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness; (j) General Counsel of the Department of Defense, the Assistant Secretaries of Defense, and the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation; (k) Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Logistics and Material Readiness and the Director of Defense Research and Engineering; (l) Under Secretaries of the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force; and (m) Assistant Secretaries of the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force, and General Counsels of the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force. Sec. 3. Exceptions. (a) No individual who is serving in an office listed in section 2(a)-(m) in an acting capacity shall act as Secretary pursuant to this order. (b) Precedence among officers designated within the same subsection of section 2 of this order shall be determined by the order in which they have been appointed to such office by the President. Where officers designated within the same subsection of section 2 of this order are appointed on the same date, precedence will be determined by the order in which they have taken the oath to serve in that office. (c) Notwithstanding the provisions of this order, the President retains discretion, to the extent permitted by law, to depart from this order in designating an acting Secretary. Sec. 4. Judicial Review. This order is intended to improve the internal management of the executive branch and is not intended to, and does [[Page 76666]] not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, entities, officers, employees or agents, or any other person. Sec. 5. Revocation. Executive Order No. 13000 of April 24, 1996, and the President's memorandum of June 2, 2005, entitled: ``Order of Succession of Officers to Act as Secretary of Defense,'' are hereby revoked.

by **Trifecta** » Mon Jan 02, 2006 4:21 pm

<a href="http://kurtnimmo.com/?p=176">kurtnimmo.com/?p=176</a> snip: As evidence the CIA has been busy at work in the province, back in 2002 the neocon-Israel friendly DEBKAfile reported “a CIA undercover unit has entered Iran through Zabul, in the Sistan Baluchistan province. Its assignment is to stir up dissent among the largest population in the area, the Baluchi tribes.” Moreover, according to DEBKAfile, in December of 2001 “al Qaeda fugitives, including some 4,000 Saudis, began using these obscure [drug smuggling] routes on their way from Afghanistan and Pakistan to Saudi Arabia, the Gulf States, Lebanon and other points in the Middle East. The CIA’s undercover unit has undertaken the tall order of closing this al Qaeda escape route, while gathering intelligence on its nefarious traffic.” In other words, the CIA is working hand-in-glove with “al-Qaeda” (a term used to describe useful idiot Muslim fanatics and patsies), probably smuggling drugs and also importing “dissent” among the Sunni Baluchi tribes, who hate and distrust the Shia regime in Tehran.

WWIII another fake on the masses

"Christian Zionism: Terror In Jesus' Name"

Re: "Christian Zionism: Terror In Terrors' Name"

Re: "Christian Zionism: Terror In Terrors' Name"

And build it up and build it up

Yeah, yeah I know the public won't buy it this time

Israel, Iran, and the US: Nuclear War, Here We Come

hey, I am not pushing the meme, just the meme pushers

back and on to WWIII & Einstein

And here we sit

Re: And here we sit

Osculum

Re: Osculum

Ah the talisman

all change for readyness

CIA-Mossad Sponsored “Rebels” Attack Iran’s Border

Who is online