<!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://911review.com/denial/gatekeepers.html">911review.com/denial/gatekeepers.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><br>I have thought same..<br>he sounds good BUT so do mega salaries..<br><br>"Perhaps you should look more closely at Sheen. Afterall he is employed by CBS/Westinghouse."<br><br><br><br><br>"The Left Gatekeepers Phenomenon "<br><br><br>The denial that 9/11/01 was an inside job is nowhere deeper than in the traditional Left and the established Left media. Respected commentators for the Left, such as David Corn of the Nation, pooh-poohed challenges to the official story of the attack, or at most suggested complicity of the Bush administration by pointing to Saudi connections to the Bush family, all while staying within the confines of the official myth of the hijackers, crumbling skyscrapers, etc. <br><br>Researcher Mark Robinowitz devotes much of his vast website to tracking the Left gatekeeper phenomenon. <br><br>e x c e r p t <br>title: Denial is not a river in Egypt: 'Not See's,' Nazis and the psychological difficulty in facing the truth about 9/11 <br>authors: Mark Robinowitz <br><br> <br>Both the corporate, mainstream media and most of the foundation-funded "alternative" media have sought to restrict investigative journalism and dissident opinions about the so-called "War on Terror." Since 9/11, the Left media -- including The Nation, Z magazine, The Progressive, Mother Jones, Alternative Radio -- have shied away from examining the pretext for endless war. They have ignored the national "Deception Dollar" campaign, which has printed over three million DD's listing websites of the independent investigations of 911, despite a massive distribution effort across the country, especially at peace rallies. <br><br>Worse, several of these institutions have gone on the attack against independent media and journalists who have done excellent work exposing the lies behind the official stories of 9/11. In the spring of 2002, when some of the material documenting official foreknowledge of 9/11 began to surface in the corporate media, The Nation, Z and Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting attacked independent investigators who are piecing together the evidence, instead of helping those who have done the best work. <br><br>... <br> <br>site:
www.oilempire.us page:
www.oilempire.us/denial.html <br> <br><br>Hypocrisy Now!<br>One of the most notable cases of Left denial is that of the respected journalist Amy Goodman and her show Democracy Now. Goodman has long rebuffed requests that she interview an expert on the subject. Instead she has tiptoed around the core facts of the attack and addressed only peripheral issues, such as the EPA's fraudulent assurances that the air in Lower Manhattan was safe to breathe while Ground Zero was still smouldering. Finally, after a concerted campaign by the 9-11 Visibility Project, Goodman featured David Ray Griffin, author of The New Pearl Harbor, on her May 26, 2004 show. Goodman pitted Chip Berlet against Griffin, and gave the last word and closing summary to Berlet, who spun the myth that the attack was strictly blowback. Nonetheless, Griffin was allowed to make the case that the attack was an inside job for the first time ever on the nationally syndicated show. <br><br>Mark Robinowitz recounts confronting Amy Goodman about her refusal to cover the issue prior to the Griffin interview. <br><br>e x c e r p t <br>title: Amy Goodman's Not-So-Good Coverage of 9/11 <br>authors: Mark Robinowitz <br><br> <br>... <br><br>In the fall of 2002, Ms. Goodman spoke in the same room at the University of Oregon during a previous speaking tour. After her speech (which was very similar to her May 2004 speech), I asked her after the event if she would help investigate the recently disclosed story of how the Air Force, CIA, NORAD and National Reconnaissance Office were conducting "war games" similar to 9/11 during the 9/11 "attacks," which were apparently used to confuse the air defense response. She would not reply, and looked at me in apparent fear. It was a particularly strange response considering she had just spoken eloquently about her tremendous courage in reporting on the massacre in East Timor. (The issue of the 9/11 war games on 9/11 has not ever been mentioned on Democracy Now -- and it is likely that if they were, DN would run the risk of losing their foundation funding, which would force them to lay off much of their staff.) "<br><br><br><br> <br> <br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.leftgatekeepers.com/chart.htm">www.leftgatekeepers.com/chart.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
by tigre63 » Mon Apr 03, 2006 7:33 pm 