antiaristo mini-interview

by **antiaristo** » Thu May 25, 2006 7:24 am

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>still puzzled over police looking for you. for a police force to look for someone at the behest of another force, there would have to have been a crime - ie wanted for questioning in respect of "x" at least. what was criminal in writing letters to board members wives? crude overkill is par for the course - but how did the heavies identify themselves to you?<hr></blockquote> blanc, In the middle of March 1995 the Labour MP Dale Campbell-Savours questioned Prime Minister John Major on the Anglia Inquiry. Major replied "Lord Archer is my friend. Lord Archer has been my friend. Lord Archer will continue to be my friend" After some consideration I decided to sneak back to England to try to find out what was going on. I'd already had the forged court order. More than anything I wanted to see Victoria and georgia. At that time they were in Stoke-on-Trent. I admit I arrived from out of the blue. I knew the situation was potentially dangerous, and I did not want anybody to know I was coming. I arrived in Stoke and peered in through the front window. Both Victoria and Georgia saw me and screamed "Daddy". I went round to the side door, where my wife met me. I knew things were strained with her (think about what had been going on) but I was completely unprepared for what happened. "You're not seeing them. You're mentally ill, you are, and you're not seeing them. The police were here, looking for you, and they told me you were mentally ill. And there's two other forces looking for you as well." My blood ran ice-cold. Mentally ill? Oh my God. I turned on my heels and fled back to the car, and just drove. I went on to the familly home in Norfolk. When I got back to Ireland I wrote to the Lord Chancellor and the Queen. This is an excerpt from the letter to Lord Mackay of Clashfern dated 8 April 1995. <blockquote>Quote:<hr>I have of course known since January thet the toffs had been running round the country trying first to serve the gagging writ and then the gagging order. I knew that Ian Scott would send his goons after me - it was why I fled the country. But what I didn't know until a little over a week ago was that the enforcers despatched by Mr Scott would be none other than the boys in blue. I have mainly the word of my estranged wife, but there seems no reason to doubt her on this. There were two police firces looking for me. So far as she know they still are. The police did not tell her that I was to be arrested, or that any charges were to be laid. The police told her I was mentally ill. I cannot bring myself to explore what might have happened - might still be happening - had I not had the foresight to depart those shores. Where would I be now if the police had caught me and I had been incarcerated as "mentally ill"?<hr></blockquote> And the Queen on 19 April 1995 <blockquote>Quote:<hr>Your Majesty, With the deepest sorrow I bring news that your government can no longer, nor for some time past, govern within the law. I have given ample opportunity to senior Cabinet members to demonstrate an appreciation of the difference between right and wrong. The Cabinet has shown no inclination to heal itself, and no opportunity has been grasped. Therefore, and this is no disrespect to yourself or the Monarchy, I recognise no authority in the Crown or its agents. There has been no income for nearly a year while my faith in Britain's institutions was tested to destruction. For my next step I must take my complaint on to the international stage for early resolution. On top of everything else, the knowledge that exalted Minister(s) of the Crown can stoop so low as attempted abduction and probable murder, and for purely private gain, leaves me no alternative but to seek legitimate authority elsewhere. Yours sincerely etc cc The president of Ireland The Heir The Cabinet<hr></blockquote> The reply, from the Court Service <blockquote>Quote:<hr>28 April 1995 C.95/9/2 Dear Mr Cleary, Thank you for your letters of 18 March and 8 April to the Lord Chancellor and your letter of 19 April to Her Majesty the Queen. Your letters have been passed to me, as the Court Service is responsible for the administration of the courts. The contents of your letters have been noted and they have been placed on file. Yours sincerely Anna Lee Customer Service Unit<hr></blockquote>

by **antiaristo** » Thu May 25, 2006 8:42 am

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>Anti, Are you suggesting that Archer arranged his own reverse "sting”, the one that earned him being found guilty of perjury and perverting the course of justice; & awarding him a 4 year jail sentence? Why would he go to such lengths when he his share dealings had already been investigated by then, (I believe)?<hr></blockquote> Byrne, That's exactly what I'm saying. He didn't expect to be prosecuted. But just in case he took out the witnesses. In fact the wheels did not begin turning for more than a year after he stood down. If you read some of the contemporaneous correspondence in Data Dump you will see a fair number of references to what was going on with Archer. I don't want to get ahead of myself, but the gist of what happened is that he sent another forged court document into Spain in the summer of 2000. The Spanish could not ignore me this time because the Constitutional Court had ruled in 1998 that I was not being persecuted. So rather than prosecute in Spain, the British agreed to put him on trial in Britain. He was sunk by Angela Peppiat, his former secretary. She had good reason to put him away. He had tried to murder her. See here <a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm13.showMessage?topicID=129.topic">p216.ezboard.com/frigorou...=129.topic</a>

by **havanagilla** » Thu May 25, 2006 9:27 am

Oh antia, this seems like a HOrrible horrible ordeal, all starting from a "simple" corporate scam, to bypass the rights of workers. This is the older trick in the hat. Supposedly, if you discreetly met with one of the CEO's, and laid it on the table, demanding to blow it open or maintain your job, you'd probably be still working there, happy and up the ladder (and getting used to the "big guys'" world of "ethics"). Possibly, and although you were pretty savvy, you were pretty naive, to think that donig something about it is possible without getting badly damaged. -- So you can be considered a whistle blower, and naturally, under SOP you should be declared mentally ill. thats how it works with those big corporations. -- So you did the right thing, and paid too dearly. Perhaps, in terms of your wife, you are guilty, guilty of not knowing what you know now etc. not placing security over principles etc. -- and then you went to that oh so known road, to look deeper into how the world works, and you found out. Eurika, it sucks big time, there is really a devil, and rich evil people who do awful things just because they CAN, and even the so called "wars" are fake, they are all in it, from all nations, playing a game with the "little people" on the board. So, the materials that pop up now are "religious", basic, raw images of cosmic forces. -- Sometimes you get justice, sometimes you don't. what is the lesson you are making of it ? Good luck and really, may god/power be with you.

by **antiaristo** » Thu May 25, 2006 9:55 am

Thanks, hava. Big kiss <img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)">

by **Byrne** » Thu May 25, 2006 10:07 am

Anti, I remember reading your posts a while ago about the Jill Dando murder being linked to Archer (ie. the hit man got the wrong girl). So it was because of Angela Peppiat's evidence that Archer went down? Do you think that he reckoned the case would be thrown out? What does Michael Crick (Archer's unofficial biographer, who has hounded him for years) say about this?

by **havanagilla** » Thu May 25, 2006 10:49 am

I always like kisses, AntiA, but I was actually hoping for some initial thoughts on what you make of it. Perhaps those here who know England better can assist you to break the story into manageable (and emottionally containable) bits, with the goal of doing something about it. I can't, know nothing about the UK except what you are writing here. I did, though, have the impression that spritually you were frantically trying to sort it all out by finding visible, identifyable "bad people" who are responsible for all this rotten structure. While we already processed, I hope, the Jewish phase and later the Scot phase, there is still a need (and I am saying this on eye to eye level, as someone who is not "there" yet - to incorporate the information you gathered into an approach. Approach that points to higher understanding of the follies of mankind. -- Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=havanagilla>havanagilla</A> at: 5/25/06 10:23 am

by **mother** » Thu May 25, 2006 3:18 pm

thanks for whomever was tempted to throw off this thread and who resisted! And for hava and co.

by **antiaristo** » Thu May 25, 2006 4:54 pm

Byrne, <blockquote>Quote:<hr>So it was because of Angela Peppiat's evidence that Archer went down?<hr></blockquote> Yes. She was in the witness box for about ten days. The Archer team threw everything at her, but she sttod firm. A remarkable performance. It wasn't until later that the Jill Dando connection came out. It explains her fortitude, don't you think? <blockquote>Quote:<hr>Do you think that he reckoned the case would be thrown out?<hr></blockquote> No, I don't think he believed the case would ever be brought against him. Remember, such decisions are made by the CROWN Prosecution Service. Archer was working for the Queen Mother for most of his life. <blockquote>Quote:<hr>What does Michael Crick (Archer's unofficial biographer, who has hounded him for years) say about this?<hr></blockquote> Crick has written some good stuff, but I think he skirted this. If you look on the back jacket of his Archer biography he gives prominence to that quote from John Major. Hava, I'm forever getting into trouble for how I express myself. I suppose it is because I'm so involved and passions run high. Sir Teddy Taylor and Robin Cook were both heroes in this, and both men were born in Scotland. I'm working on the basis that if everyone knows WHO is behind all this evil stuff they will find it impossible to maintain their Janus stance. So I ask everybody to spread and publicise these threads. Every little helps. <img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"> Furthermore, for me it has been a process of forensic investigation which has led directly to the gates of Buckingham Palace (and Clarence House). Logic, not a predisposition, led me to finger the Queen Mother and her daughter. So please, everybody, keep on asking questions, challenge my logic, point out my errors. Keep the discussion alive, and you keep me alive. Let me just add this. I'm really grateful to rothbardian for starting this. The post that moved him was one he described accurately as from "a broken hearted father". This was the core. <blockquote>Quote:<hr>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 12:33:28 +0100 HTML del mensaje: Why is that all your life you have just ran away? and not faced upto your responsibilites? your the worst father i know. i wish i had a father like my friends have so much just someone to be there for me. when have you ever been there for me? or ever tried to be never...i even gave you the chance to regain something with me but i have lost all faith of anything in you. i wanted to find out things about you myself and not listen to every person that said bad things about you. I ve always done it never judged until i know. you have let me down majorly i doubt you will feel any guilt at all because you dont love me you never have or never will. its all ive ever wanted a 'fathers love' like you say but when have you ever tried to do that? Ypu dont care about me at all its all just words to you with out any meaning. This means nothing to me anymore ive clung on with hope for so many years. But now you have shown me your true character. You just run away and are a coward. You ever heard the phrase actions speak louder than word. Well let me tell you something when have you ever given me any actions to show you love me?All these years its been the daughter chasing after her father, not listening to anyone that stops her and trying to find out for herself. I cannot put into words how betrayed i feel by you. I have done all the chasing and your the adult in this now. I have never listened to those bad words or ever done anything wrong. What have i done wrong as a daughter?More than anything in the world you need to face upto your responsibilites thats Georgia and I. But you wont you say your radio active and just use excuses all the time. You will never come face up to us or do anything for us. Do you know how worthless as a person you make me feel? But again you wont care becuase you have more important things in your life. We will always mean nothing to you and have never come first like we are meant to do.You should be giving us love and support not doing what ever you are doing and living here in the UK. You should also financially support us. but you wont ever do so cause you live on 'charity'. I dont believe that for a moment anymore you cant live off just that you need to be earning something. you just dont want us or responsibilites or to provide for us. My mum shouldn't have to do it all. But still after you doing all this i was willing to give you a chance. But no all you do is throw it back in my face. Showing once and proving them all right that you dont care about us. This has hurt me so much. Well done mission accomplished. I hope your happy with yourself. Victoria C<hr></blockquote> Broken-hearted indeed. But look at what I wrote to the Prince of Wales back in 1999, when Victoria was ten and georgia eight years old. <blockquote>Quote:<hr>please tell me what I should say to my two little girls when they are fully grown. How do I explain why Daddy was not there for them when they needed me the most? Why I failed them in every way as a father? How I never for a moment stopped loving them more than life itself? How Jeffrey Archer, freshly laundered statesman and pillar of democracy, could have been quite the dangerous, ruthless and amoral gang boss that my whole story would attest?<hr></blockquote> I KNEW this was going to happen. There was nothing I could do. So did Prince Charles. There was PLENTY he could have done. Not only did he do nothing to help those two little girls. He did all that he could to make sure they would never see their father again, and grow up in virtual poverty. After all, he needs the money, right? Added on edit hava, You also alluded to spiritual and cosmic forces. Here's the lesson I've learned. We must never give up hope. So long as we are trying, there is always the chance that God (substitute your prefered flavour) will choose to act through us. If we choose to give up, there is nothing that God can do. NEVER believe your enemies when they tell you you have no chance. Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=antiaristo>antiaristo</A> at: 5/25/06 3:56 pm

by **dugoboy** » Thu May 25, 2006 8:04 pm

i guess i dont see how prince charles would even know about your predicament? or how would tony blair who was an MP at the time? hows the queen involved? i am an american so i'm clueless as to how the monarchy works. i am sorry about your family.

by **sussurus2** » Fri May 26, 2006 12:05 am

Anti-- In all sympathy I have wondered why you can't bring your family to Ireland to be with you? Is it a matter of lack of income, or their lack of faith that your side of the story is correct & true, or some other barriers? Strength & fortitude to you. What you've written just above is righteous gospel no matter what book or creed one might personally prefer. S.

by **antiaristo** » Fri May 26, 2006 7:39 am

dugo, I'm sorry, I've got ahead of myself once more. I talked to havansgilla above about a forensic investigation that led to the gates of Buckingham Palace. That has been a twelve year process. What I learned is that Britain is governed in a way that is completely at variance to what is commonly understood. Parliament is pure theatre, a sideshow to comfort and distract the mases. Parliament can do nothing without the approval of Queen Elizabeth. That is the (secret) law. Nothing at all. Queen Elizabeth and her family and their placemen in the bureaucracy micromanage everything. But I didn't know that back in the 1990s. This thread seeks to explain the legal basis which underlies their power. <a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm9.showMessage?topicID=93.topic">p216.ezboard.com/frigorou...D=93.topic</a> <blockquote>Quote:<hr>i am an american so i'm clueless as to how the monarchy works.<hr></blockquote> Get used to it. They are coming your way. sussurus, Thank you. I've not had any income since my salary from Anglia Television in May 1994. All of my possessions have been stolen by the Windsor family, using their control of the courts. I have nothing at all. I live on charity here in Spain (Canary Islands). I'm so fortunate that I have a woman willing to keep me alive, and a supportive (eighty-six years old) mother in London. When the Windsors thought they could do it without too much publicity, they tried to kill me on at least six occassions. Even though I repudiated the Crown in my letter to Queen Elizabeth of 19 April 1995, even though I renounced my British nationality, even though I am an Irish citizen and so not her subject, her possession, they tried to kill me. Now there is all this background out there on the Internet they cannot keep their involvement quiet, so they've stopped trying to kill me. Instead they are hoping to starve me to death, or hoping I will despair of it all and end my own life. My relationship with my wife ended that day the police called on her in January 1995. Victoria thinks I'm making it all up. And who can blame her? Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=antiaristo>antiaristo</A> at: 5/26/06 5:46 am

by **sussurus2** » Fri May 26, 2006 11:48 am

Thanks. Sorry to hear all that, but glad you are in a safe harbor. The Count of Monte Christo comes to mind at the moment. That is the somewhat lefthand path, I acknowledge, but with your skills and background can you not spend some time earning or raising new capital, and then go after them in other ways as well--or at least help to take care of your own in fashion that could mitigate some of the moves where you are blocked? Or are there laws where you can't work in Spain due to your citizenship issues. Have you heard of the Mondragon cooperativas? That might be an option as well for employment if more conventional employers aren't sure what to do with you. Forgive my presumptuousness in making these suggestions, I'm sure you've thought and fought through all this in the past 14 years. S.

by **dugoboy** » Sat May 27, 2006 11:38 pm

an article i think antiristo will appreciate. read it to the very end everyone. link: <a href="http://www.federalobserver.com/archive.php?aid=10569" target="top">Conspiracy Theory?? </a> ___________________________________________ "BUSHCO aren't incompetent...they are COMPLICIT."Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=dugoboy@rigorousintuition>dugoboy</A> at: 5/27/06 9:40 pm

antiaristo mini-interview

Re: up against it

Re: up against it

Re: up against it

Re: up against it

Re: up against it

Re: up against it

up against it

Re: up against it

prince charles

Re: prince charles

Re: prince charles

Re: prince charles

Re: prince charles

Who is online