RI a "CIA fake site?"

[RebelYell]

Would you mind if I posted this list in my CIA data dump thread? <p></p><i></i>

[glooperoo]

As far as whether or not the network of alternative communities is of any real importance, I've definately noticed a serious uptick in the amount of conspiratorial rabble-rousing on the mainstream blogs I regularly peruse, especially since 7/7. I mean, just look at what's happening with <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.dailykos.com">dKos</a><!--EZCODE LINK END-->. They great post-7/7 "purge" is still underway. They had a special election in Ohio this week that was unexpectedly close with some (expectedly) anomalous incidences. Basically one of the areas, Clermont, found that they had way undercounted the number of votes for the GOP candidate, breaking the near 50/50 split at the last minute. And that very evening after the votes are counted the main Moderator, Armondo, writes <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://armando.dailykos.com/story/2005/8/3/03619/14280">this diary</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> pre-emptively telling anyone that writes a "there was fraud" and any other "bullshit conspiracy theory" diaries will be banned, as part of the ongoing purge. <br><br>That's progress, as far as I can tell. The desire by the operators of sites that strive to be "legitimate" and "taken seriously" to keep conspiratorial thought out of their communities is nothing new. But the need to pre-emptively try to stop such rabblerousing <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>is</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> a new development, as far as I can tell. <br><br>Another forum I like to frequent, <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://forums.therandirhodesshow.com/">the Randi Rhodes message board</a><!--EZCODE LINK END-->, (Randi actually does a good job of subtly hinting to her audience about the dirty-lil' 9/11 secrets) is literally overrun with 9/11 Truth-movement types. We're the dominant force on that topic on that forum, and this is the forum for what is probably the first or second top-rated show on Air-America. <br><br>Democratic Underground, which I've never frequented much, is notorious for having to keep a lid on this stuff (didn't you start of at DU Jeff?). Have they successfully purged the place or are they still having to maintain their online police state?<br><br>The point is that, at least on the Lefty sites, I've been witnessing a gradual, but increasing, awareness that at the very least the official 9/11 story is total BS. It's mostly just the same hardcore opponents of anything that that smacks of conspiracy that seem to be actively arguing against it anymore. That's progress, and it's progress I'd have to imagine the establishment types that are terrified of seeing their reality-matrix break down are <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://p097.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm10.showMessage?topicID=26.topic">increasingly concerned</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> with. And if they're aren't concerned with us dissident like us, all the better! This ruling class won't be the first one to fall due to pride and arrogance. <br><br>I'm probably just viewing this with my "the cup is 1/10th full instead of 9/10ths empty" attitude, but hell, movements for change have to start somewhere if they're going to get anywhere. And <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>something</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> has started here. Who knows where it's headed, or if it just implodes, but it's here now and it's growing. And like Jeff likes to point it, our awareness is our most potent weapon, and if there's a single over-arching theme to what we're a part of here, it's a theme of growing awareness: awareness that we've been seriously lied to and managed like sheep in the past, and awareness that we're being seriously lied to and managed today. So maybe what we're seeing now is an Management Awareness Movement because it really does feel like, all of a sudden, people are realizing that we, the people, definately are <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>not</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> The Boss. And when we look around, groping for answers, trying to determine who <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>is</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> The Boss, what we find makes <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://kfcplainfield.com/tv/whoboss.html">Tony Danza</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> look like all the best parts of Jesus, Mohammed, Buddha all wrapped up into one. <p></p><i></i>

[Sweejak]

Fintan Done has "jumped the shark"<br><br>Here is his analysis of smoke.<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.breakfornews.com/articles/PhotoFakingTheWTCFall.htm">www.breakfornews.com/arti...TCFall.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>BTW the photo of the leaning tower was released by the 12th of September 2001 if not earlier.<br><br>Aside from the above display I'll still listen to his interviews of interesting people, if he gets any. <br> <p></p><i></i>

[albion]

wow, fintan's come a long way since "the split-second error". talk about painting yourself into a corner, jeez...<br><br>must be something in the neem. <p></p><i></i>

[anon]

From Breakfornews July 22, 2005<br><br>Head-Up Ripoff alert:<br><br>Brief note. If we incorporate the work of others into our WagNews articles, we link/credit the original. Not everybody does. Some even do the reverse. Dude at nascarblue.blogspot is reprinting our articles. Wouldn't mind so much that he is ripping us -but he is dissing Nico Haupt also.<br><br>In our article 'Giuliani Linked to London Terror Drill Boss', we reported how:<br><br>"Meanwhile the competent Nico just found exactly how well connected is Mr. Power."<br>But in nascarblue's version of the article, he claims:<br><br>"Meanwhile I've just found out exactly how well connected is Mr. Power."<br>Naughty, naughty. And it doesn't end there. Even the pedophilia-stories-obsessed Jeff Wells at rigorousintuition has run a version of our 'Greenspan Fingerprint Found on London Bombs', saying that "Fintan Dunne of breakfornews.com has also picked up the story."<br><br>Not really "also," dude. More like two days earlier.<br><br>Let's be careful out there.<br><br>******************************************<br><br>I stopped going to his site after I read this.<br>I had stopped going to his site once before, because I found the sci-fi picture of the woman made me uncomfortable. <p></p><i></i>

[Dreams End]

to point us to whom he's working for.<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Even the pedophilia-stories-obsessed Jeff Wells at rigorousintuition <hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <p></p><i></i>

[LibertyorDeath]

Well said dbeach<br><br>" silencing of critics is the totalitarian way<br><br><br><br>big bro is watChing all activity with their overstuffed budget for security..your taxdollars being used to spy on law abiding citizens.. Money that could be used to help instead of hurt<br><br>homeland seCurity and the pentagon budget are bigger than ever..AND THE BIGGEST OF all OTHER GOVT AGENCIES COMBINED.."<br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>

[seemslikeadream]

if anyone would like to discuss this with him.<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=125x47972#48024">www.democraticunderground...7972#48024</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i></i>

[professorpan]

Sheesh is right... so any nutjob who doesn't agree with Jeff or any other's take on things is in the employ of THEM?<br><br>Grow up, folks. Just because someone disagrees with you does not mean they are a tool of the government. <br><br>I'm seeing more totalitarian group-think from the supposed anti-conspirators these days, who align to protect their pet theories from any critical commentary, than from organized disinformation agencies.<br><br>But, having said that, I suppose that makes me one of THEM, too! <p></p><i></i>

[Rigorous Intuition]

earlier."<br><br>Really, dude.<br><br>The Cunning Realist story I cited is dated <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.cunningrealist.blogspot.com/2005/07/following-money.html" target="top">July 12</a><!--EZCODE LINK END-->. His story is dated <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://wagnews.blogspot.com/2005/07/greenspan-fingerprint-found-on-london.html" target="top">July 16</a><!--EZCODE LINK END-->.<br><br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p097.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=rigorousintuition>Rigorous Intuition</A> at: 8/5/05 5:57 pm<br></i>

[Starman]

GodDAMn whatta self-aggrandizing whiney-faced overpretentious head-up-rectum Asshole Mr. Dunne is -- in his smarmy own-trumpet-blowing manner presuming to 'warn' people to 'be careful', when as Jeff points-out Finton didn't even do the most elemental date-checking to make sure his facts are correct.<br><br>On top of which, what's up with his characterizing RI as 'pedophilia obessed'? I think it would be MUCH more accurate, if one ABSOLUTELY was driven to simplistically describe Jeff's posts, as concverning exo-para/political crimes and frauds and mysteries.<br><br>Kurt Nimmo's excellant observations help reveal Dunne's subtle biases concerning his belief in the essentially-exclusive involvement of US actors from the military/intelligence/political/corporate sectors in the 911 attacks (denying the shadow government aka Octopus aka Globalists aka New World Order consists of foreign intelligence members, International Banks, 'foreign' Bilderbergers and members/agents of foreign governments and militaries, members of International/non-US Corporations & NGOs, Think-Tanks and groups, etc.), as well he seems to deny prominent Israeli officials are ever involved in false-flag terrorism acts. Thus, Dunne seems to have a pretty narrow, oversimplified view who the real criminal NWO protagonists are -- seems like he definitely has an agenda and interests he might be protecting, which goes some way towards explaining why he possibly might be invite so much scrutiny and criticism over his heavy-handed accusative gatekeeping suggestive of rude McCarthyite divide-and-conquer muckraking.<br><br>His credibility took a couple deep hits with his own example-by-ommission of rigorous critical-thinking.<br><br>Above all, disseminating the hard kernal of truth is an arduous undertaking that requires us to develop our own tools of discretion, and depends on sifting among a range of information sources in order to develop perspective and hone one's personal conviction-- as if anyone with Dunne's evidence-lacking conceit has the perfect 'insiders' knowledge of what the Truth really looks like and expects to be taken seriously. As Dreams End points out, 'Nice of him to point us to whom he's working for.'<br><br>Sheesh indeed.<br><br>Thanks for the Heads-Up anon 3:49 pm.<br><br>Starman<br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :smokin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smokin.gif ALT=":smokin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

[greencrow0]

Is a Foooonnnnneeeeee<br><br>I listened to a taped broadcast of one of his radio shows 'breakfornews.com' the other day about the London Bombing.<br><br>Everytime he came back on air he said in this very phoney voice<br><br>"You're very welcome'.<br><br>Also, he kept badmouthing Alex Jones saying he had destroyed the credibility of the 'conspiracy theorists' by questioning the 'Exercise Drill' that was held in London the very same day and at the very same stations that were bombed.<br><br>Dunne opined that 'everyone' knew that these drills were only 'paper drills' and that by thinking they were anything else, Jones made the movement look 'stupid'.<br><br>Firstly, where does Dunne presume to speak for what he calls the 'conspiracy theorists'?<br><br>Secondly, his little bit of devious circle thinking made me doubt not Jones but Dunne. I did not know that the Drills were only 'paper drills'. I have not heard that designation or any other reference to the Drills made by any London authority.<br><br>The mere fact these Drills are not be discussed openly in the media in conjunction with the investigation is definitely a red flag for me...as it obviously was for Jones. I was and am glad Jones is trying to get to the bottom of the 'Drills'.<br><br>My overall impression of this newcomer to the Blogosphere... who pretends he's been around forever is that I think HE's the disinformation agent<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START 8) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/glasses.gif ALT="8)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> . I think he posted the 'CIA list' on his website as a red herring to get the Blogs all arguing amongst themselves as to why they were or were not on his silly list. I believe Dunne dearly needs to be ignored...as he will only deter the true investigators of the neoCon criminality from their tasks now that they [we] are, IMO, finally in the home stretch. <br><br>Dunne is not the first nor will he be the last of the disinformation agents. It reminds me of something I read on the web a couple of months ago. Apparently the Bushie Cabal had set aside a couple mil for just such a propaganda campaign...so where did the Dunnester get his flashy webpage with all the juicy ads?<br><br>....and I have to make do with this:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://greencrow.iuplog.com/default.asp">greencrow.iuplog.com/default.asp</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Regards,<br><br>greencrow<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START 0] --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/alien.gif ALT="0]"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

[robertdreed]

...and I'm sure they'll find <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>something</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> to do with it. <p></p><i></i>

[human]

id like to say that fintan dunne is retarded on this one.....<br><br>although not half as retarded in general as most of the websites he listed....<br><br><br><br>sometimes people are just people with bad ideas.<br><br>one<br>human?<br> <p></p><i></i>

[ZeroHaven]

I just visited that breakfornews site, and actually READ their GRAPHIC. - technically it's on WagNews but most of the links lead there.<br>I don't want to link to it to give them more hits, but its a picture of Bush ala MAD magazine saying:<br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>"Either you're with us on this.. or.. you're intelligent."</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>This is the tagline of the site. Either we believe them and get upset, or be intelligent and realize they're psycho. That's my take on it and I hope you can share that perspective.<br><br><br> <p><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a239/ZeroHaven/tinhat.gif"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--></p><i></i>