by sceneshifter » Sat Feb 11, 2006 10:25 pm
<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong><br><!--EZCODE FONT START--><span style="color:maroon;font-family:helvetica;font-size:medium;"><br>My two cents' worth<br><br>Trying to gather all the threads in this thread together<br><br>My take <br><br>Americans are people, same as everywhere - Maybe the average IQ is a bit lower than some other places, because America opened its arms to the poor and downtrodden, the oppressed and impoverished, the religious extremists, the radicals, the ones who got suckered by the better brains in the old countries - I dont think anyone will quarrel with the theory that the poor have a slightly lower IQ than the rich exploiters, the more cunning thieves - People who got transported to America were the unsuccessful thieves - It was the successful thieves who transported them - <br><br>Generally, the people of America are no more bloodthirsty, no more easily fooled than elsewhere - <br><br>America has one handicap other countries dont have - And every nation would have the same handicap in the same circumstances - That is, being topdog leads to sitting on laurels, leads to selfcongratulation, complacency - Every people in the world will get more relaxed and laidback about working when they are topdog - Even the idealism that America had will contribute to the temptation to think that America and Americans are better - to think that prosperity has everything to do with quality of people and nothing to do with resources and nothing to do with ignoring the unprosperity - While the rest of the world is getting lean and mean and keen, trying to compete with the topdog, the topdog is going to be under the handicap of spending part of its time basking in the sweet glow of its topdoggery - Everybody's got egos, everybody's a sucker to some extent to flattery, to buy and pay for pleasant news about oneself, and not for bad news about self - Humanity hangs between the pleasure principle and the reality principle, between sweet dreams and maturity/realism<br><br>Every topdog empire has plundered the world with sadism, with hypocrisy and selfdeception - [And every topdog nation has become the most attractive place for the world's poor, and the world's criminals - And the plunder has MADE the poverty and crime mentality that is most attracted to the richest country - Pity the conquerors! They make their enemies, and they make themselves 'most attractive nation' to their enemies - America being conquered by Sicily was predictable - The greatest wretchedness makes the toughest crims, who go where the pickings are best, and pick, pick, pick their way from bottom to top - the Mafia bigger than the 5 biggest corporations put together - conquering their way through the working class, the middle class and the superthief class]<br><br>America ran away from tyranny and called where they arrived: freedom - But they didnt know the iron rule of freedom - Like all people everywhere, they said in their hearts: The landlords oppress the peasants, may I be a landlord, not a peasant - Being stolen from, conditioned them to stealing - Being robbed, they learned to rob in return, in revenge, in justice - A sense of justice spurred them on to a theft ethic - The Mafia were just the most extreme example of a pattern that was to poison the well of freedom in every American heart: The greater the having been stolen from, the stronger was forged the will to steal - Too many caught the disease - Too many sought their revenge for years and lifetimes of poverty and slavery and indignity in pursuit of riches, in pursuit of unlimited fortunes - Both wealth and poverty taught people to love wealth - So everyone climbed over everyone else to get to the top - Exacerbating wealth and poverty, tyranny and slavery - Making the crests and troughs of history further and further apart, the ride rougher and rougher and rougher for all - Making the power and corruption and sadism greater - Racing to revolution's repeated rough-handed, partial and temporary adjustment towards justice and fairpay to all - Racing to atomic war's much rougher, and not-to-be-repeated equality, the equality of the dead, the extinct human species - <br><br>When you read of the fortunes made in Jamaican sugar, we should all read thieves - Stealing labour, stealing lives, stealing money from everyone, stealing peace from everyone - Some poor guy has to die in the slave rebellions - But we dont read thieves - The history books we are given do not teach 'Thief' - The history books defer to the ruling class, and avoid moral judgement - <br><br>People work on average 50 hours a week, and no one can work more than 100 hours a week average longterm - So anyone with income more than double the average is definitely a thief - A thief of the national wealth, and a thief of the national peace and survival - None of the reasons for paying a higher-than-average hourly payrate stand up to scrutiny by good sense - And inequality of hourly payrate can only grow - Can only grow to greater and ever greater wealth and poverty [injustice, theft], and social disturbance, waste, grief and cost - And now, thanks to e=mc2, to a crescendo of atomic bombs, followed by an everlasting silence - A temperature drop 3 times more severe than an ice age - And just us chimanzee-brains to wake ourselves up and stop it - <br><br>We think slavery is at an end - That is what we are taught - that is what our teachers, suffering from ignorance - ignore-ance - tell us, or let us think - Yes, a moral triumph, the end of slavery - Today, 90% of people are paid between a 10th and 1000th of the world average pay - 90% of people are full slaves - Can you wonder that the German people, with state terrorism, were fooled, when we are fooled without state terrorism? - <br><br>The German rulers were responsible for the killing of 100,000 Germans who were brave enough to stand up to state terrorism, and then for killing 6 million people - But they believed [quite wrongly of course, but more or less sincerely, if bigotry can be sincere] that Communism/Jewry were trying to destroy them - They had experienced hyperinflation after the Russian revolution - All the savings of a nation were wiped out - They had some excuse for desperate remedies for such desperate times - Whereas we destroy 50 million a year in the same way, without believing that the people we destroy are planning to destroy us, without any such stimulus to fear and panic as hyperinflation, and without any inhibition of our kindness by state terrorism - We just have to write a decent-sized check, say, 1% of net income - Which would provide $0.75 trillion a year - We, the people, are protestless at the locking up of people in countries and letting them starve to death - A sui-genocide of 1% of humanity every year - Forget compassion - It is very rare and cannot be manufactured - What about good sense? - What would being permanently put on a 100th of your present income do to you in terms of turning you into a desperate desperado, a dynamo of hatred and revenge and violence, a handler of explosives? - <br><br>As a citizen, and as a voter, as a person who is one of the people who rule, have you been keeping an eye on your nation's behaviour, making sure your nation was not breeding superpowerful, superrich, superarrogant, supercorrupt, who were making enemies for you by stealing? [The 1% overpaid, the 0.001% superoverpaid, take 90% of world income.] Were you teaching and practising the good sense of not making enemies by not allowing unlimited overpay/underpay? [Both the overpaid and the underpaid being thieves of liberty, safety, happiness and peace.] Were you thinking that an increase of fortune by $18 billion in one year was possibly overpay, and possibly causing underpay, and thereby causing social disturbance? Was anyone alerting you to the wide-open legal ways in which money moves automatically and ceaselessly from earners to nonearners? Or were you forgetting that in a democracy you are a ruler, and just putting your head down and going for gold? - Were you unhesitatingly concurrring in the 'accepted idea' that any amount of money that comes to you legally is all yours, and need bear no relation to your contribution to the social pool of wealth by wealth creation by your work? - Were you thinking that the social pool of wealth, consisting of the wealth made by work, would not be made too shallow for others if you took out more than you put in? - If so, you were making enemies, making violence, attacking the foundations of the state, you were hammering your head, hammering the heads of your descendents, you were not using your brains, you were driving to extinction with the top down, you were unwittingly betraying the dream of freedom from tyranny, you were breeding evil and evils - Is honesty the best policy? Certainly the grab-all-you-can of world human society has caused super hyper extreme overpay and underpay, from a million times to a 1000th of the average hourly pay. Certainly the world has been growing war and weaponry for the same 1000s of years it has been growing overpay-underpay. Certainly the bombs we have can destroy all the world's lifeforms 60 times over. Is honesty, taking out no more than you put in, a good policy? Is goodness good? Is honesty good? Is theft good? Or is theft the gross misery of unnecessary violence and danger crescendo-ing to extinction? Are we lovers of selfdestruction? Are we head-in-the-sand fools? Are we the flattered and pre-extinct?</span><!--EZCODE FONT END--></strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--></em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> <p></p><i></i>