"Bizarre Sex Habits of The Extreme Right-Wing"

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

"Bizarre Sex Habits of The Extreme Right-Wing"

Postby Rigorous Intuition » Tue May 10, 2005 11:04 am

From <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.newshounds.us/2005/05/06/bizarre_sex_habits_of_the_extreme_rightwing.php#more" target="top">Newshounds</a><!--EZCODE LINK END-->, May 6:<br><br>Bizarre Sex Habits of The Extreme Right-Wing<br><br>Last night, anti-abortion extremist Neal Horsley was a guest on The Alan Colmes Show, a FOX News radio program. The topic was an interesting one - whether or not an internet service provider should allow Horsley to post the names of abortion doctors on his website. Horsley does that as a way of targeting them and one doctor has been killed. In the course of the interview, however, Colmes asked Horsley about his background, including a statement that he had admitted to engaging in homosexual and bestiality sex.<br><br>At first, Horsley laughed and said, "Just because it's printed in the media, people jump to believe it."<br><br>"Is it true?" Colmes asked.<br><br>"Hey, Alan, if you want to accuse me of having sex when I was a fool, I did everything that crossed my mind that looked like I..."<br><br>AC: "You had sex with animals?"<br><br>NH: "<!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Absolutely. I was a fool. When you grow up on a farm in Georgia, your first girlfriend is a mule</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->."<br><br>AC: "I'm not so sure that that is so."<br><br>NH: "You didn't grow up on a farm in Georgia, did you?"<br><br>AC: "Are you suggesting that everybody who grows up on a farm in Georgia has a mule as a girlfriend?"<br><br>NH: It has historically been the case. You people are so far removed from the reality... Welcome to domestic life on the farm..."<br><br>Colmes said he thought there were a lot of people in the audience who grew up on farms, are living on farms now, raising kids on farms and "and I don't think they are dating Elsie right now. You know what I'm saying?"<br><br>Horsley said, "You experiment with anything that moves when you are growing up sexually. You're naive. You know better than that... <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>If it's warm and it's damp and it vibrates you might in fact have sex with it</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->."<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
Rigorous Intuition
 
Posts: 1744
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 3:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Um

Postby Irony » Tue May 10, 2005 11:12 am

I don't even have words to describe my reaction to this. WHO's so far removed from reality? Us? And I thought masturbating in an apple pie was far-fetched... <p></p><i></i>
Irony
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 11:12 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

where is the outrage?

Postby RDR » Tue May 10, 2005 11:52 am

<br>Since RI is well in the running as THE website for posting about the Unthinkable, I may as well confess my fears about a possible occult purpose for the US Special Forces deployment in Afghanistan- as a "breaching experiment" on the sexual mores of the American advisers on the ground there, by bonding them in "combat brotherhood" with men from cultures that favor decidedly wide-ranging tastes in sexual conduct, ranging from bestiality to pederasty, with an emphasis on separation of the sexes and misogyny in the bargain. <br><br> <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.queer-journal.com/spring2004/essays1.htm">www.queer-journal.com/spr...ssays1.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><br> <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.homa.org/Details.asp?View=Detail&ContentID=2137352826&TOCID=2083225445">www.homa.org/Details.asp?...2083225445</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Onward, Christian soldiers?<br><br>"Avoid entangling alliances"<br><br> <br><br> <p></p><i></i>
RDR
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 9:33 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Kinsey Report

Postby chiggerbit » Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm

Actually, I think the Kinsey Report found, clear back in the forties that something like 30% of males (may have been males on farms) had engaged in sex with animals. Just pulling these figures from old memory. Jeff, you may find this piece on Kinsey interesting. Still mulling this new information myself, gives me a new perspective on the report.<br><br>clip<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=3">www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/...e.asp?ID=3</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>"An effective foot soldier in the subjugation of the masses was the Rockefeller-funded Alfred C. Kinsey, the co-author of the highly influential Sexual Behaviour In The Human Male, and other volumes. One technique of eugenics (selective breeding) and control is the destruction of traditional morality, and Kinsey may have accomplished more in that respect than any other man this century. Kinsey studied at the Bussey Institution at Harvard in the 1920s (at the time a hotbed of eugenics research), then moved on to teach at Indiana University, where his work in cultural deconstruction would ultimately succeed in decimating American sexual mores, help to fragment the family, and would leave the population far more vulnerable to reproductive, cultural, familial, and mind programming. Kinsey, always portrayed in the press as a wholesome “leave it to Beaver” style family man, was “one of the scholarly eugenicists of pre-World War II”, according to biographer James Jones. Kinsey recommended that a portion of the “lower classes” be sterilized to foster a more robust gene pool. Among his intimates was Dr. Ewen Cameron, the infamous CIA-funded mind control doctor. Another of Kinsey's influences was Dr. Herrmann Muller, one of his colleagues at Indiana University. Muller, who had begun receiving Rockefeller funding from the National Research Council in 1925, received a Guggenheim grant in 1932 to pursue his work in the genetics department of the Rockefeller-funded Kaiser Wilhelm Brain Resarch Institute in Berlin. Muller studied under Ernst Rudin, who was to become the head of the Nazi Racial Hygiene Society. One of the benefits of Rudin's policy for the extermination of hereditary undesirables in Germany was that it provided a continual harvesting of fresh brains for the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute. <br><br><br>Influenced by the Great Beast<br><br>Another of Kinsey's apparent influences was the occultist Aleister Crowley, “the Great Beast,” known in the press as “the wickedest man alive.” Kinsey visited Crowley's Thelema Abbey shortly before his death in 1955. Although it has not been established that Kinsey used Crowley as a research source in his books, they shared many friends and acquaintances, such as occultist film maker Kenneth Anger, American Nazi George Sylvester Viereck, and French pedophile Rene Guyon. Anger has said, “Kinsey was obsessed with obtaining the Great Beast's (Crowley's) day-to-day sex diaries...” To obtain grant monies and maintain the support of the university, Kinsey needed the excuse of research to validate his twenty-four-hours-a-day obsession with sex. However, Prok's (Kinsey's nickname) battle cry of ‘Do your best and let other people react as they will’ seemed a variation on Crowley's ‘Do what thou wilt’ maxim. (i.e. “Do what thou wilt is the whole of the law”).............. "<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Kinsey

Postby chiggerbit » Tue May 10, 2005 12:29 pm

To be fair, I think Keith gave WAAAAY too much credit to Kinsey for his part in "cultural deconstruction." My own personal opinion is that the wars of the twentieth century are to blame for the amount of dramatic change. Kinsey was just a penny in that pile of change. <p></p><i></i>
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

rdr

Postby chiggerbit » Tue May 10, 2005 12:38 pm

Wow, rdr, "misogyny" has been coming to mind a lot for me this past week, especially in relation to Karpinsky (sp?), as well as Martha Stewart. (Let me get my foil hat on, or I might beging to think you are reading my mind.) Makes me wonder if we are being almost conditioned to accept denigration of women. Is this possibly in prepearation for Hillary's run for prez? Just wondering, at this point. <p></p><i></i>
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

"Bizarre Sex Habits of The Extreme Right-Wing"

Postby tabasco1776 » Tue May 10, 2005 1:39 pm

As someone who grew up deep in the deepest South, I can tell you that sex with livestock goes on <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>all the time</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END-->, and it isn't just a right-wing thing. I was never very popular with my farmboy peers, because of my refusal to partake in such activities. <br><br>It's so much more common than most people think, that it might as well be another world entirely. <p></p><i></i>
tabasco1776
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 7:00 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

sex with cows

Postby chiggerbit » Tue May 10, 2005 1:49 pm

As someone who lives in a very rural area of the Midwest, I have to say that I suspect that sex with farm animals isn't restricted to the South. Don't think that mules would be our boys first choice, though. <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rollin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/roll.gif ALT=":rollin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Wow

Postby Qutb » Tue May 10, 2005 2:28 pm

While this is something I may have suspected (I've seen "Deliverance", after all) I wasn't aware that it was such a common thing. Well, I guess if no one's hurt by it then anything goes... I wonder about the credibility of this fellow after this admission, though, in the pro-life circles. You'd think they'd frown on this type of activity. <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rollin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/roll.gif ALT=":rollin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
Qutb
 
Posts: 1203
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 2:28 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

pro lifers

Postby chiggerbit » Tue May 10, 2005 2:35 pm

Depends on how many of those pro-lifers have themselves had sex with animals. <p></p><i></i>
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Poor animals

Postby Project Willow » Tue May 10, 2005 2:35 pm

Where is PETA?<br><br>Sometimes I am so glad I don't have a penis.<br><br>We girls are vegetarian <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :p --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/tongue.gif ALT=":p"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Project Willow
 
Posts: 4793
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Seattle
Blog: View Blog (1)

PETA

Postby chiggerbit » Tue May 10, 2005 2:39 pm

Amen to that, although, judging from a video link someone sent me once, anything is possible, I guess. Still wondering if the video wasn't fudged. Stallions? <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :eek --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/eek.gif ALT=":eek"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Ugh, I know

Postby Project Willow » Tue May 10, 2005 2:51 pm

I've seen it. I didn't want to go there.<br><br>With human behavior it seems, if you can imagine it, it's already been done, and quite possibly someone's made a huge ceremony out of it!<br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :( --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/frown.gif ALT=":("><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br> <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Project Willow
 
Posts: 4793
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Seattle
Blog: View Blog (1)

exactly

Postby chiggerbit » Tue May 10, 2005 2:59 pm

I think it was supposed to shock me. It grossed me, but didn't shock me. Too old for that, I guess. <p></p><i></i>
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Bizarre indeed!

Postby GDN01 » Tue May 10, 2005 3:10 pm

What I find even more bizarre is that Horsley (funny that he has an animal name!) thought this was something he could openly admit to, without suffering any negative consequences. This man openly admitted to having sex with animals - which is a criminal act in most states (but not all!). He also didn't deny having participated in homosexual activity. And all this on national tv - as if he is beyond reproach for his actions! Are we being conditioned to accept anyone's past behavior, if they claim to have been "young and a fool with raging hormones" and now "know better"? Just as the priests should be forgiven and suffer no consequences for their past sins of child abuse - because they have repented to God? And I have seen many suggestions that people who are now in the right-wing religious fundamentalist camp should not be held accountable for their past actions - because they are born again. What a convenient thing this being "born again" is. If someone who was not "born again" admitted to these things, and was a political figure - would these actions be considered an insignificant part of their past? <p></p><i></i>
GDN01
 
Posts: 410
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 3:10 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Next

Return to Deep Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests