by dbeach » Thu Sep 01, 2005 11:42 am
Scalia was allegedly bribed $ 50 million according to cloakanddagger.de now scalia did have the famous duck hunting trip with ceney in 2003 if ya recall and his 2 kids did benefit directly from bush selection in 2000..SO maybe bush bought Scalia?<br><br><br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.cloakanddagger.de/media/Grossmann/part%202/Criminal_Presidents_Legal_Opinion_Part_2.htm">www.cloakanddagger.de/med...Part_2.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>To all appearance, the bestowal of multi-million dollar of Greenberg Traurig LLP shares to John Scalia on or before January 10, 2001 as reported resulted directly and corruptly in the unethical behavior and constitutionally incomprehensible rulings of Justice Scalia, Sr. in the U.S. Supreme Court decisions on December 9 and 12, 2000 in Bush v. Gore. To my mind, that was a criminal violation of applicable bribery laws, both on the side of the bribe taker (Antonin Scalia) as well as on the side of the bribe giver (Bush Jr. through his aides).<br>Legal Opinion:<br><br><br><br><br>The relevant quote in part 1 to be continued here is the following (from part 1, paragraph 5):<br><br>„It is a carefully hidden secret of the legal profession to what great extent American district attorneys and judges (at the state and the federal levels) are dependent on fixers in the political establishment. Other cultures describe such structures with the word ‘corruption’.”<br><br> <br><br>3. The persons who are meant here are a proto-fascist on the United States Supreme Court and his under-reported fixer in the political establishment in the year 2000 in Bush v. Gore (531 U.S. 98 [200<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START 0] --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/alien.gif ALT="0]"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> ). The names of these two people are Justice Antonin Scalia on the one hand, and attorney Marvin S. Rosen of the Miami law firm Greenberg Traurig LLP (present name of firm) on the other hand.<br><br> <br><br><br>To all appearance, the bestowal of multi-million dollar of Greenberg Traurig LLP shares to John Scalia on or before January 10, 2001 as reported resulted directly and corruptly in the unethical behavior and constitutionally incomprehensible rulings of Justice Scalia, Sr. in the U.S. Supreme Court decisions on December 9 and 12, 2000 in Bush v. Gore. To my mind, that was a criminal violation of applicable bribery laws, both on the side of the bribe taker (Antonin Scalia) as well as on the side of the bribe giver (Bush Jr. through his aides).<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>The absence of comprehensible legal, ethical or factual reasons implies that the true reasons of the five judges were extraneous to the law and the Constitution. I.e., at least one of the judges in the narrow 5-4 majority vote was bribed and sold the country to hell back in 2000. The High Court decision is therefore legally tainted by fraud and other criminal activities and is, in consequence, void and without legal effect. To my mind, this vitiates and nullifies the 2000 and all subsequent elections (i.e. election fraud contests) and places them outside of the law as well.<br><br> <br><br>This is a legal question that should be presented to the appropriate jurors in a criminal court proceeding against Justice Antonin Scalia and any of his possible co-conspirators (grand jury and subsequently trial jury)."<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
