by gotnoscript » Fri Apr 21, 2006 1:22 pm
Just this, which is a rehash of the Pravda article:<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.regnum.ru/english/615727.html">www.regnum.ru/english/615727.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><br>I found this on Lexis-Nexis<br><br>Copyright 2006 British Broadcasting Corporation<br>All Rights Reserved<br>BBC Monitoring Trans Caucasus Unit<br>Supplied by BBC Worldwide Monitoring<br><br>March 27, 2006 Monday<br><br>LENGTH: 678 words<br><br>HEADLINE: Daily says outgoing US envoy failed to establish democracy in Azerbaijan<br><br>BODY:<br><br><br>Excerpt from Rauf Mirqadirov's report in Azerbaijani newspaper Zerkalo on 25 March headlined "Reno Harnish leaves an unenviable legacy"<br><br>Reno Harnish is very satisfied with his work as the US ambassador to Azerbaijan. His mission had to expire in the summer. However, in connection with his appointment to a higher post in the State Department, he will end his mission before the due date, the head of the embassy's public relations department, Jonathan Henick, has told APA news agency.<br><br>[Passage omitted: about former US envoys to Azerbaijan]<br><br>As for Reno Harnish, one can assume that most likely he has failed to "live up" to the expectations. The diplomat tried to be on both sides of the fence, which is impossible in countries with "transition democracies", just as it is impossible to be "half-pregnant". As a result, [he] has often been caught in the "crossfire".<br><br>From the point of view of the global geopolitical interests of the USA, the launch of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline can be regarded as his achievement, even though to be precise, the implementation of the project is rather the achievement of the untiring Steven Mann [US envoy on Caspian issues].<br><br>And now more details about, let us say, shortcomings.<br><br>First, Reno Harnish failed to realize the idea of establishing democracy in Azerbaijan through evolution. Both the 2003 presidential election and the 2005 parliamentary election ended in a post-election confrontation between the opposition and the ruling elite with very harsh consequences, that is with an ordinary brawl. It must be mentioned for the sake of justice that the 2003 events cannot be entirely "credited" to the incumbent US ambassador because he came to Azerbaijan literally on the eve of the presidential election. But the 2005 parliamentary election which practically all international organizations described as "wasted opportunities" is fully Harnish's "achievement". The US ambassador was one of the active and extremely interested political players on whose "advice" mass rallies were scheduled and cancelled.<br><br>Before the [6 November 2005 parliamentary] election representatives of the ruling elite criticized him bitterly and some members of parliament even proposed to declare the US ambassador persona non grata. Subsequently, the opposition also decided to "boycott" its former "patron" but it did not last long. In a nutshell, Azerbaijan did not set an example of an evolutionary development of democracy to the whole world. Democratic processes in Azerbaijan following the parliamentary election turned out to be at the same level or most likely even at a much lower level than at the time when Reno Harnish took the helm as US ambassador in Baku.<br><br>Second, attempts have failed to involve Azerbaijan fully in the US sphere of interests. On the contrary, during Harnish's tenure, Azerbaijan's foreign policy became more "balanced", that is more pro-Russian. What is important is that efforts have failed, at least for now, to convince Baku to sign a peace agreement on the settlement of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict over Nagornyy Karabakh, which is the main obstacle to achieving Washington's geopolitical aim of bringing the South Caucasus under complete US control.<br><br>Third, plans to establish a powerful pro-American, pro-democracy lobby within Azerbaijan's ruling elite have completely failed. Harnish's "protege", [former] Minister of Economic Development Farhad Aliyev, who was "put in charge" of this role, is on "lengthy leave" [jailed] now. Therefore, it is a bit surprising that "Mr Reno Harnish is fully satisfied with his work as the US ambassador to Azerbaijan". Briefly, Reno Harnish has left an unenviable legacy to his successor.<br><br>But we should note for the sake of justice that Harnish is one of a few US ambassadors who was very open for the press. He, unlike Escudero, at least tried to explain Washington's actions and statements, including those that were highly unpopular in Azerbaijan, even though most often he tried to behave like a real "governor-general".<br><br>Source: Zerkalo, Baku, in Russian 25 Mar 06 pp 6, 7<br><br>Also schema-root seems to have links to news on him:<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://schema-root.org/region/americas/north_america/usa/government/officials/ambassadors/reno_harnish/">schema-root.org/region/am...o_harnish/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>His "promotion"?<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.azernews.net/view.php?d=8082">www.azernews.net/view.php?d=8082</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br> Outgoing US envoy to tackle space exploration<br><br>Deputy US ambassador to Azerbaijan Jason Hyland will take over as head of the US diplomatic mission in the country until a permanent replacement for ambassador Reno Harnish is approved, a source from the US embassy said.<br><br>Harnish will leave Baku on April 24 and on the following day he is expected to start working as principal deputy assistant secretary of state for oceans and international environmental and scientific affairs. His normal term of ambassadorial duty would have ended in August, 2006, but he has been asked to depart Baku on April 24 and assume his new duties on April 25, as the officer he is replacing left the job in December 2005.<br>In his new post, Amb. Harnish will be responsible for managing 200 Department of State employees that lead in the foreign policy aspects of such issues as global climate change, the reaction to avian influenza, and space exploration.<br><br><br>And apparently, Azerbaijan is to be used as a launching base against Iran...<br><br>Copyright 2006 Financial Times Information<br>All Rights Reserved<br>Global News Wire - Asia Africa Intelligence Wire<br>Copyright 2006 BBC Monitoring/BBC Source: Financial Times Information Limited<br>BBC Monitoring International Reports<br><br>April 19, 2006 Wednesday<br><br>ACC-NO: A2006041919-10C4D-GNW<br><br>LENGTH: 469 words<br><br>HEADLINE: AZERI POLITICIAN WARNS OF "SECRET US PLAN" ON IRAN, KARABAKH<br><br>BODY:<br><br><br>Excerpt from E. Mammadli report by Azerbaijani newspaper Yeni Musavat on 18 April headlined "Azerbaijan is face-to-face with terrorism" and subheaded "PCC says new situation is threatening Karabakh"<br><br>A round-table conference "On the influence of the regional situation on Azerbaijan and changes expected in the Karabakh issue" was held yesterday [17 April]. The Political Coordination Centre (PCC) organized the conference.<br><br>Farac Ulusoy, leader of the National Revival Movement which is a member of the PCC, said that the political situation in the region might require changes in Azerbaijan's approach to the Karabakh conflict. "A new idea has emerged - let the war start regardless of who will eventually possess Karabakh. We would like to know the current stage of the Karabakh talks and the government policy on how to settle the conflict. On the other hand, we demand that the government account for prophylactic measures taken to resolve a possible humanitarian disaster in the event that plans against Iran are implemented," he said.<br><br>[Passage omitted: MP Nasib Nasibli urged the Azerbaijani authorities to revise their foreign policy]<br><br>Isgandar Hamidov, chairman of the NDPA [National Democratic Party of Azerbaijan], said that Azerbaijan's foreign policy was at the level of "blind optimism" of the 1970s. "If Azerbaijan had a foreign policy, it would not be in this situation. The invitation of the Azerbaijani leadership to the USA is the biggest threat to Karabakh," he said.<br><br>The USA has drawn up a plan to return Zangilan, Qubadli and Cabrayil districts [along the border with Iran, currently controlled by Armenia] to Azerbaijan. "Because America needs this area as a foothold to hit Iran. They want to deploy peacekeeping forces in Karabakh if the Azerbaijani authorities do not agree to this option. The danger is that the peacekeepers will be stationed not on the border between Azerbaijan and Armenia, but between Agdam and Askaran [town in breakaway Nagornyy Karabakh]. Therefore, we demand that the Azerbaijani authorities disclose their position to the public," Hamidov said.<br><br>Azerbaijan's economy will be dealt a big blow if there is an attack on Iran, he said. Measures must be taken now to prevent a humanitarian disaster. "America wants to topple the mullah regime in Iran and create a confederation with the leaders of the Persian and Kurdish communities," Hamidov said.<br><br>It is also beyond doubt that many terrorists from organizations controlled by Iran will come to Baku, Hamidov said. "We must be ready for that. Azerbaijan is face-to-face with terrorism," he said.<br><br>"All of this is bound to affect Karabakh," Hamidov said and announced that the PCC plans to stage a rally devoted to the threat to Karabakh on 6 May.<br><br>Source: Yeni Musavat, Baku in Azeri 18 Apr 06, p 11<br><br>BBC Monitoring<br><br>LOAD-DATE: April 19, 2006<br> <p></p><i></i>