by thoughtographer » Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:11 pm
<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Lot's of the bad guys have huge private databases on private citizens. Wackenhut for one. I see no reason why we shouldn't do the same. Namebase is kinda a start in the right direction really. Probably could throw up a wiki use ssl and accounts. community based reliability rating on sources/posters, automaticly assign another to fact check and so on. Call it perhaps: wikifacts.org perhaps? A large current events clearing house basicly.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>If this community serves as any example of the consensus that will be used to rate the reliability of people, then I'll stick with something like Namebase, which doesn't taint the data so much with opinion.<br><br>Anyway, I'm suggesting you put up or shut up, as is the law of the land on the Internet. The tools are there as the result of persistent, collective hard work and motivation in the software community, so it shouldn't be too hard to put together the bare bones of what you're proposing. If you were to go that far, I might even consider helping if the project seemed fair and useful.<br><br>P.S. - Nice Eris reference. <p><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"A crooked stick will cast a crooked shadow."</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=thoughtographer>thoughtographer</A> at: 4/20/06 5:18 pm<br></i>