$500K Seized; Strange Situation Reported At Nuclear Plant

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

$500K Seized; Strange Situation Reported At Nuclear Plant

Postby Et in Arcadia ego » Wed Apr 19, 2006 7:59 pm

Hmm..(from DU):<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.thepittsburghchannel.com/news/8821721/detail...">www.thepittsburghchannel..../detail...</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>Two workers looking for tools set off a security situation at a Beaver County nuclear power plant that drew a response from police and federal investigators, WTAE Channel 4's Paul Van Osdol reported.<br><br>State police said the men drove up to the Beaver Valley Power Station in a tractor-trailer on Tuesday night to pick up two large containers of tools for a contractor for whom they worked.<br><br>Security guards stopped the men for a routine inspection, but they drove away, police said.<br><br>The guards became suspicious and called police, who pulled the truck over about a mile from the plant.<br><br>A state trooper got a warrant to search the vehicle and found a duffel bag, which he said contained $504,230 in mostly small bills.</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>It's amusing watching the average DU'er struggle with Bizzaro World News..<br><br>original thread:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x2236825">www.democraticunderground...02x2236825</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Et in Arcadia ego
 
Posts: 4104
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: The Void
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: $500K Seized; Strange Situation Reported At Nuclear Plan

Postby anotherdrew » Wed Apr 19, 2006 9:13 pm

what we really need for situations like this is our own investivative body. A large organization supported with member donations. Here's how it would operate in this case:<br>two or three private investigators would be hired or known agents would be activated in the area. Everything about this would be followed up on. We need:<br>names of the men in the truck<br>who they were suposed to talk to at the plant<br>who gave them the bag of $500k in Chicago<br>when were they in chicago<br>what were they doing before<br>who owns the truck<br>who pays the drivers<br>what's the name of the contractor whos "tools" they were going to pickup suposedly<br>why did they leave without the pickup<br>where are they now<br><br>for starters. Then all this info needs to go up for all to see and mirror on the website of the Citizen's Intelegence Agency. <p></p><i></i>
anotherdrew
 
Posts: 528
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 6:06 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

$500 to buy a truck?

Postby Asta » Thu Apr 20, 2006 9:55 am

"Thursday, April 20, 2006<br>By Cindi Lash, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette<br><br>When security guards at the Beaver Valley Power Station discovered a bag containing thousands of dollars in a tractor-trailer cab, one of the vehicle's occupants told them his boss planned to use the cash to buy a truck."<br><br>So they're trying to tell us that you can't find a truck for sale in Houston? You gotta go to Pennsylvania via Chicago to find a truck? I had no idea we have a truck shortage in this country.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
Asta
 
Posts: 429
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 2:48 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: $500 to buy a truck?

Postby Et in Arcadia ego » Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:13 am

The truck to have been purchased must be nuclear powered or something.. <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Et in Arcadia ego
 
Posts: 4104
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: The Void
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: $500 to buy a truck?

Postby 4911 » Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:38 am

didnt you guys know that nuclear power plants have built in used car lots? And who WOULDNT spend half a million on a used pickup truck? <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=4911>4911</A> at: 4/20/06 8:39 am<br></i>
4911
 
Posts: 673
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 9:34 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: $500 to buy a truck?

Postby thoughtographer » Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:39 am

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>what we really need for situations like this is our own investivative body. A large organization supported with member donations. Here's how it would operate in this case:<br>two or three private investigators would be hired or known agents would be activated in the area. Everything about this would be followed up on. We need:<br>names of the men in the truck<br>who they were suposed to talk to at the plant<br>who gave them the bag of $500k in Chicago<br>when were they in chicago<br>what were they doing before<br>who owns the truck<br>who pays the drivers<br>what's the name of the contractor whos "tools" they were going to pickup suposedly<br>why did they leave without the pickup<br>where are they now<br><br>for starters. Then all this info needs to go up for all to see and mirror on the website of the Citizen's Intelegence Agency.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>Sounds good -- do it to it. Are you going to offer concrete loafer insurance for your men in the field? <p><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"A crooked stick will cast a crooked shadow."</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--></p><i></i>
thoughtographer
 
Posts: 724
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 12:12 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: $500 to buy a truck?

Postby Lizzy Dearborn » Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:26 pm

Just hearing about how much they pay Katie Curick (sp) makes me sick...they need to pay real investigative reporters, those who report THE FACTS!! <p></p><i></i>
Lizzy Dearborn
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 4:37 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

rule by fear.

Postby slimmouse » Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:37 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Sounds good -- do it to it. Are you going to offer concrete loafer insurance for your men in the field?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br> Rule by fear. As old as the hills. But a sure test of faith, and <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>soul</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> if ever there was one <br><br> Small wonder the "practical realists" in our midst dismiss such ideas as conjecture. <p></p><i></i>
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

Re: rule by fear.

Postby thoughtographer » Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:45 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Rule by fear. As old as the hills. But a sure test of faith, and soul if ever there was one<br><br>Small wonder the "practical realists" in our midst dismiss such ideas as conjecture.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>I didn't dismiss it as conjecture. I was just making a joke, but I'm glad that you seem to at least appreciate my use of common sense.<br><br>This is a good example of you indirectly calling me a coward. I don't really mind, but I figured I would point out your passive aggression for future reference. <p><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"A crooked stick will cast a crooked shadow."</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=thoughtographer>thoughtographer</A> at: 4/20/06 3:54 pm<br></i>
thoughtographer
 
Posts: 724
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 12:12 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

I was actually laughing out loud when I read it.

Postby slimmouse » Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:48 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>I was just making a joke, but I'm glad that you seem to at least appreciate my use common sense.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br> Seriously, I <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>was</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> laughing out loud. On so many levels. <br><br> But Im sure you understand where I was coming from in my reply ? <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

Now I see you.

Postby slimmouse » Thu Apr 20, 2006 6:11 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>This is a good example of you indirectly calling me a coward. I don't really mind, but I figured I would point out your passive aggression for future reference.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br> Would you care to articulate how YOURE suggesting to other members of this board that any kind of action to stand up to the ignorant idiots ( Rhodes scholars etc ) in charge of this world might result in 'concrete loafers', is an implication of <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>your</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> cowardice ?<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

Re: Now I see you.

Postby thoughtographer » Thu Apr 20, 2006 6:21 pm

So, I guess you didn't bother actually reading Cronon's book?<br><br>Here's an articulation for you: I'm not so cowardly as you to conceal my contempt for your way of thinking by using passive-aggressive logic traps. You create enough of those for yourself.<br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm10.showMessage?topicID=4014.topic">Here is a good example of you "playing dumb" instead of just calling me out and looking like the jerk that I think you secretly long to be.</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br>P.S. - I edited that into this comment just to bother you. <p><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"A crooked stick will cast a crooked shadow."</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=thoughtographer>thoughtographer</A> at: 4/20/06 4:27 pm<br></i>
thoughtographer
 
Posts: 724
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 12:12 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Youre post .

Postby slimmouse » Thu Apr 20, 2006 6:36 pm

<br><br> <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>And your answer to my question is ?<br></strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br> Let me repeat my question.<br><br> What exactly do you mean,when suggesting that the 'concrete loafers' post above, which can be readily viewed as a veiled warning which is as old as the hills, be also viewed as a threat to your bravery ?<br><br> And can you not understand yet, how it amuses me on so many levels ?<br><br> I guess its the old 6 degrees of separation again ? <p></p><i></i>
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

Re: $500 to buy wikifacts.org

Postby anotherdrew » Thu Apr 20, 2006 6:43 pm

as soon as this bag of $500k I've been waiting on get's here I'll be able to get started. Not sure what's taking it so long...<br><br>Lot's of the bad guys have huge private databases on private citizens. Wackenhut for one. I see no reason why we shouldn't do the same. Namebase is kinda a start in the right direction really. Probably could throw up a wiki use ssl and accounts. community based reliability rating on sources/posters, automaticly assign another to fact check and so on. Call it perhaps: wikifacts.org perhaps? A large current events clearing house basicly.<br><br>But it's actually easy to see why it hasn't happened, folks on this side would rather pick fights and argue with each other than focus on making plans and executing them. <cough> <cough> The plans that is. Well I'm sure there's more to it than that. Let me know who wins, I've got a golden apple for whoever wins the most arguments. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=anotherdrew>anotherdrew</A> at: 4/20/06 4:45 pm<br></i>
anotherdrew
 
Posts: 528
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 6:06 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

I'm post what?

Postby thoughtographer » Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:11 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Lot's of the bad guys have huge private databases on private citizens. Wackenhut for one. I see no reason why we shouldn't do the same. Namebase is kinda a start in the right direction really. Probably could throw up a wiki use ssl and accounts. community based reliability rating on sources/posters, automaticly assign another to fact check and so on. Call it perhaps: wikifacts.org perhaps? A large current events clearing house basicly.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>If this community serves as any example of the consensus that will be used to rate the reliability of people, then I'll stick with something like Namebase, which doesn't taint the data so much with opinion.<br><br>Anyway, I'm suggesting you put up or shut up, as is the law of the land on the Internet. The tools are there as the result of persistent, collective hard work and motivation in the software community, so it shouldn't be too hard to put together the bare bones of what you're proposing. If you were to go that far, I might even consider helping if the project seemed fair and useful.<br><br>P.S. - Nice Eris reference. <p><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"A crooked stick will cast a crooked shadow."</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=thoughtographer>thoughtographer</A> at: 4/20/06 5:18 pm<br></i>
thoughtographer
 
Posts: 724
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 12:12 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Next

Return to Deep Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests