Alan Watt, (the thinking man's David Icke) - video

Moderators: DrVolin, 82_28, Elvis, Jeff

Alan Watt, (the thinking man's David Icke) - video

Postby yesferatu » Thu Aug 03, 2006 12:11 am

Alan Watt, (the thinking man's David Icke) in this video talks about how the illuminati uses mind control on the Profane to set up the New ... all » World Order. Here is a small extract. "Charles Galton Darwin the grandson of Charles Darwin, said that "every civilization has really been a form of slavery for the people," and he was all for it. That was a NATURAL ORDER according to him and of course those who are trained in power and control of the people are trained in this technique since birth. They're brought up listening to a different version of reality than someone brought up in a local housing area. They're told that the realities of life the predators should be at the top the natural order. They're predators of course because they're such hypocrites. As good predators they can't tell the children how they're really feeding off them or manipulating them for different ends because children don't understand these things and those with the low IQ's you know the little people at the bottom of the hill you've got to keep them in the dark". <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://cuttingthroughthematrix.com">cuttingthroughthematrix.com</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> «<br><br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8908917218303944474&q=ALAN+WATT">Alan Watts video</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
yesferatu
 

Re: Alan WATT not Watts...

Postby Jezebelladonna » Thu Aug 03, 2006 12:23 am

I jumped right on your "Alan Watts video" link thinking it was, uhm, Alan Watts, the late, the great zen buddhist trickster-guru.<br><br>What a disappointment. Nonethless, Mr. Watt is interesting. Check out his website: cuttingthroughthematrix.com<br><br> From the website:<br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>For those who wish information on Reptilian people, rather than waste my time, please check the entertainment sections of major bookstores or visit the local zoo and look up these particular categories: Crocodilia, Squamata, Rhynchocephalia, and Testudines. If the department head is in good form he may answer some questions, depending on how hot or cold-blooded he feels at the time, but generally he's a good egg. Don't show off your knowledge on the subject, because he may become green with envy and give you a watered down story.<br>Failing that, have a hypnotist see if you're highly suggestible or ponder this profound statement by Adam Weishaupt -<br><br>"Oh, foolish man, what can you not be made to believe?"</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> <p></p><i></i>
Jezebelladonna
 
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 8:05 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Alan WATT not Watts...

Postby Jezebelladonna » Thu Aug 03, 2006 1:04 am

Looks familiar:<br><br>From Watt's website:<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/transcripts/Mass_Mind_Control_Alan_Watt.html">www.cuttingthroughthematr..._Watt.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>So they went back to the drawing board and worked steadily for years to get the pill and with the pill they introduced it the same time the drug culture that was revived again. That’s why the religion that runs all religions at the top is called THE PERENNIAL RELIGION. It keeps popping up down through time, it's the same one.<br><br>You can find in the1960s for instance they came out with Timothy Leary who always wore a white coat showing that he was a scientist and give stage appearances and he wrote books on the wonders of drugs and how it expanded the mind and this was pushed down the throats of the young people who just gobbled it up eagerly you see. He’s an older guy, a scientist no doubt, telling you that drugs were wonderful for you that they expand your brain and do wonderful things for you. Give you great experiences.<br><br>He wasn’t the only one put out there. It’s interesting to bring his name down to the MASONIC CODING because Tim, is time your see and he you also have Leary - Leary in Britain was the man who went around lighting the gas lamp in the street at night in the 1800s. So another little reference to the Illuminati. A little tongue and cheek HIGH MASONIC JOKE and he was one of many put out there to promote that.<br><br> * * *<br><br>Going back to Aldous Huxley, he gave a speech at Berkeley University to do with the wonders of drugs and electronic control of the brain through possible implants or wires in the brain. Anything which would take away, as he said, the incredible loneliness and anxiety that everyone feels. This apartness and this is again going back to the Masonic Doctrine of ONENESS. We’re all oneness, they teach you. They themselves at the top don’t believe that they’re all one, that they tell you down below that we’re all one, that way we act is like a school of fish, you know. A school of fish that all move at the same time, in the same direction, they are in a sense one. That’s not what human beings are all about but they will have us all move in the same direction and makes it easier to control.<br><br> * * *<br><br>Bob Dylan did a version of "Cocaine Blues." Others did it too. Nick Drake did it and of course we had Simon & Garfunkel who came out with one of the most beautiful songs that everybody sang and hummed along to and whistled to in the days when they use to whistle and it’s called "Bridge Over Troubled Waters."<br><br>Most people to songs on a subliminal conscious level. They’re downloaded with words and ideas and symbols which they never rationally or consciously think about but it works on them inside.<br><br>"Bridge Over Troubled Waters" has nothing to do with a woman or anything like that. IT WAS TO DO WITH THE NEEDLE OR HEROIN. The "Bridge Over Troubled Waters" was a SHOT OF HEROIN going into the arm. <br><br></em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br><br>I know there was a discussion about the 60's icons being dupes or shills of the PTB to dope up the nation, but it was to distract us, no? Watts says it was to distract us AND convince people that we are all ONE, which according the Watt is a "masonic doctrine" of control. Hence, christianity and hinduism. Hence all the new agey stuff.<br><br>Uhm...does that mean we're not one?<br><br>I touched God's face and God LIED to me about that?<br><br>Well, crap. <p></p><i></i>
Jezebelladonna
 
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 8:05 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Alan WATT not Watts...

Postby yesferatu » Thu Aug 03, 2006 1:13 am

Watts the difference? ba-bum<br><br>ok, sorry for the added s. <br><br>. <br><br> <p></p><i></i>
yesferatu
 

Re: Alan WATT not Watts...

Postby professorpan » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:20 am

What terrible writing and inane speculation. "Thinking man" my ass! <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
professorpan
 
Posts: 3592
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 12:17 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Alan WATT not Watts...

Postby yesferatu » Thu Aug 03, 2006 9:51 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>"Thinking man" my ass!<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>whoa.<br>Not my words. Jes so you know. <br> <br>No better or worse than Icke who is discussed here. <br>I consider Icke speculative....and thus on some level...inane. So what does a thinking man's inane speculations sound like? I thought I was warning people who don't enjoy inane speculation NOT to waste their time if they are not into Icke and speulative topics...thus the Icke reference in the title. <br><br>I guess it is like passing a car wreck when some people see the name Icke, though. Have to slow down and check it out.<br><br>Sorry for the car wreck video. Seemed like topics bantered about here, so I shared. "And now I wish I were dead." <br> <br> <p></p><i></i>
yesferatu
 

Sorry

Postby professorpan » Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:33 pm

Didn't mean to suggest they were your words. Apologies if it came across wrong. <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
professorpan
 
Posts: 3592
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 12:17 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Sorry

Postby Cosmic Cowbell » Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:45 pm

Applying a little RI here...<br><br>Mr. Watts site is vaguely reminiscent of Val Valerian's 'Leading Edge/Matrix' effort.<br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.trufax.org/">www.trufax.org/</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br>The use of the term 'Matrix', references to 'Reptoids', very expensive books and talk about 'Chemtrails' which Mr. Valerian has espoused in other 'guises' should not be discounted. I noted an interesting connection to all this on this fine board. Let's see if you can figure out what I mean.<br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://chem11.proboards2.com/">chem11.proboards2.com/</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.goodsky.homestead.com/files/deception2.html">Major Deceptions on Contrails Unmasked(Part 2)- Val Valerian Exposed</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br>The following taken from here...<br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://forums.ariannaonline.com/archive/index.php/t-397-p-10.html">forums.ariannaonline.com/archive/index.php/t-397-p-10.html</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br>(07-22-2004, 08:04 AM)<br><br>Revealing poll over at chemtrailcentral.com:<br>http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6702<br>I had to laugh my ass off when I saw "chem11"(AKA. Val Valerian) try to buly the site owner 'Thermit'(Mark Steadham) about his claim that "chemtrails" were for biological innoculation.<br><br>'Chem11' wrote:<br>"And who the hell voted for biological innoculation..??? REVEAL YOURSELF!!"<br><br>Mark Steadham wrote:<br>"I voted for it old Chem-Boy, and there's nothing you and your ugly little rubusto-smoking insult puppy can do about it, now, is there?"<br><br>Mr. Reynolds has accused Chem11 of being none other than Val Valerian, who has by all accounts promoted Chemtrails in the past.<br><br>Is there one among us here who can possibly clear this up?<br><br>Sorry to go a little off topic here, but if Chem11 is indeed Val Valerian, might Mr. Watts be Mr. V, or at the least, one of his minions. Either way, do not doubt that these guys make a shitload of cash peddling this stuff.<br><br>~Cowbell <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Cosmic Cowbell
 
Posts: 1774
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 5:20 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Sorry

Postby bvonahsen » Fri Aug 04, 2006 4:03 pm

note that "silvergirl" was slang for hypodermic needles. The voice in the song is that of a pusher reassuring his junkie. "I'm sailing right behind", like with dope, the dealer uses with the buyer. I remember singing this in church back in the 70's.<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>When you're weary, feeling small,<br>When tears are in your eyes, I will dry them all;<br>I'm on your side. when times get rough<br>And friends just cant be found,<br>Like a bridge over troubled water<br>I will lay me down.<br>Like a bridge over troubled water<br>I will lay me down.<br><br>When you're down and out,<br>When you're on the street,<br>When evening falls so hard<br>I will comfort you.<br>I'll take your part.<br>When darkness comes<br>And pains is all around,<br>Like a bridge over troubled water<br>I will lay me down.<br>Like a bridge over troubled water<br>I will lay me down.<br><br>Sail on silvergirl,<br>Sail on by.<br>Your time has come to shine.<br>All your dreams are on their way.<br>See how they shine.<br>If you need a friend<br>I'm sailing right behind.<br>Like a bridge over troubled water<br>I will ease your mind.<br>Like a bridge over troubled water<br>I will ease your mind.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <p></p><i></i>
bvonahsen
 

Silver Girl

Postby nomo » Fri Aug 04, 2006 4:51 pm

Time to bring out the rock trivia:<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Originally it had been written as a simple, gospel influenced ballad, with only two verses. Simon, enthused by Larry Knechtel’s piano arrangement and under encouragement from Art and producer Roy Halee, asked him to stretch it out and wrote a third verse inspired by his partner Peggy’s <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>greying hair</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> (‘Sail on, silver girl…’). <br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio2/shows/criticallist/must_have_bridge.shtml">www.bbc.co.uk/radio2/show...idge.shtml</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
nomo
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:48 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Sorry

Postby yesferatu » Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:52 pm

Nah, no need for sorry. I was being silly in my response. Didn't mean to sound like I was seriously offended. <p></p><i></i>
yesferatu
 

Re: Sorry

Postby Joe Hillshoist » Sat Aug 05, 2006 12:11 am

Cowbell don't be an idiot and don't mention JRs name here again, please.<br><br>Edit 4 spelinngg <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=joehillshoist>Joe Hillshoist</A> at: 8/4/06 10:43 pm<br></i>
Joe Hillshoist
 
Posts: 9351
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Sorry

Postby Et in Arcadia ego » Sat Aug 05, 2006 4:34 am

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Cowbell don't be an idiot and don't mention JRs name here again, please.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>No shit..<br><br>As far as Thermit's concerned, whoever chem11 actually is I could care less about, and if he's running multiple online personalities promoting some kind of bake sale, he's not very good at it, cause chem11's board is dead in the water to all but the staunchest en-mod people..<br><br>A question by far more interesting would have to be why thermit decided to delete CTC's entire ban list and let every debunker maniac and creepy freak back in the forum suggesting we shoot down planes again with them IMMEDIATELY showing back up within an hour of him doing so..<br><br>Another question would be this one:<br><br>Why did thermit's ENTIRE moderator crew resign within 6 hours, myself included?<br><br>CTC's a Bad Place. Period. Summoning JR's going to bring hell down around you, so please don't do it again..He is not welcome here. Once he arrives, he will never depart until the forum is destroyed. <p>____________________<br>Some are born to sweet delight, some are born to endless night.</p><i></i>
User avatar
Et in Arcadia ego
 
Posts: 4104
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: The Void
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Sorry

Postby Joe Hillshoist » Sat Aug 05, 2006 4:54 am

Take it from me the VV thing is bullshit.<br><br>Now lets not mention the mega troll or its name ever again.<br><br>Banishing ritual time:<br><br>We want a useful board we want a useful<br>Not a spiteful board not a spiteful board<br><br>Hearts to hearts and hands to hands beneath the southern cross we stand. Hearts are in our native land:<br><br>North Melbourne North Melbourne<br><br>Out we come out we come<br>Out we come to play just for recreations sake to pass the time of day<br>Heaps of fun lots of fun enjoy yourself today<br>North Melbourne Boys are hard to beat when they come out to play so<br><br>Join in the chorus and sing it one and all<br><br>we don't want no bastards here we'll nail em to the wall.<br><br>Good ole RI we're champions you'll agree.<br><br>We do not need that toxic,ugly, not-quite-a personality...<br><br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :o --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/embarassed.gif ALT=":o"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>Personally I never spent much time at CTC. Dunno why, it just didn't feel right.<br><br>Interesting to hear your comments Arc. <p></p><i></i>
Joe Hillshoist
 
Posts: 9351
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Sorry

Postby Et in Arcadia ego » Sat Aug 05, 2006 5:03 am

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>we don't want no bastards here we'll nail em to the wall.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>we don't want no bastards here we'll nail em to the wall.<br>we don't want no bastards here we'll nail em to the wall.<br>we don't want no bastards here we'll nail em to the wall.<br>we don't want no bastards here we'll nail em to the wall.<br>we don't want no bastards here we'll nail em to the wall.<br>we don't want no bastards here we'll nail em to the wall.<br>we don't want no bastards here we'll nail em to the wall.<br>we don't want no bastards here we'll nail em to the wall.<br>we don't want no bastards here we'll nail em to the wall.<br>we don't want no bastards here we'll nail em to the wall.<br>we don't want no bastards here we'll nail em to the wall.<br>we don't want no bastards here we'll nail em to the wall.<br>we don't want no bastards here we'll nail em to the wall.<br> <p>____________________<br>Some are born to sweet delight, some are born to endless night.</p><i></i>
User avatar
Et in Arcadia ego
 
Posts: 4104
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: The Void
Blog: View Blog (0)

Next

Return to Deep Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest