by Hugh Manatee Wins » Fri Oct 27, 2006 4:55 pm
<!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=3544">educationforum.ipbhost.co...topic=3544</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>John Simkin <br>post Mar 27 2005, 03:39 PM<br>Post #1<br><br><br>Super Member<br>****<br><br>Group: Admin<br>Posts: 8534<br>Joined: 16-December 03<br>From: Worthing, Sussex<br>Member No.: 7<br> <br>When I produce a page on any aspect of history, within a few days it is ranked in the first five at Google and other second-generation search-engines (this is because of the large number of websites - 136,000 - that link to my website). This includes people like J. Edgar Hoover (that one gives me a lot of pleasure).<br><br>This is also true of most of the characters I have written about concerning the JFK assassination. However, if my views on the CIA are correct, I would expect they must be involved in manipulating search-results. This is only logical. After all, they have been doing this in other forms of media since the late 1940s.<br><br>I told you about how my page on Bernardo De Torres was removed from the Google database. After making a fuss it was returned to the database.<br><br>Over the last couple of days I have been carrying out some research into the rankings of suspects in the JFK assassination. In most cases they appear in the top five. This is true of all search-engines except of MSN Search. They seem to be running a complete boycott of my pages on the JFK assassination (although I still score highly on other topics).<br><br>However, all of the major search-engines, except AltaVista, are keeping certain of my pages off the first page of search-results. It would seem that the CIA don’t want people to find out about what I have discovered about certain characters. This obviously gives us a clue to the characters the CIA are protecting.<br><br>The following list of suspects appear near the top of searches (the vast majority being ranked in the top 3): David Morales, David Atlee Phillips, Richard Bissell, Gerry Hemming, William Seymour, Bobby Baker, J. Edgar Hoover, Fred Black, Tracy Barnes, Lucien Conein, Roy Hargraves, William Harvey, Howard K. Davis, Eugenio Martinez, John Martino, Roland Masferrer, Clint Murchison, Gordon Novel, William (Rip) Robertson, Johnny Roselli, Felipe Vidal Santiago, Manuel Artime, Ted Shackley, George Smathers, Sergio Arcacha Smith, Eladio del Valle, Santo Trafficante, Antonio Veciana, Malcolm (Mac) Wallace, Mitchell WerBell, Jake Esterline, Dennis Harber, Loran Hall, Charles Willoughby, Dave Yarras, Chauncey Holt, Tony Varona, Virgilio Gonzalez, Herminio Diaz Garcia, Charles Harrelson, James Files, Tony Cuesta, Billie Sol Estes, David Ferrie, Guy Banister, Loy Factor, Rolando Cubela, Clifton Carter, Bernard L. Barker and Desmond FitzGerald.<br><br>That leaves us with the interesting question: Who is the CIA protecting? Here is the list: Frank Wisner, Cord Meyer, Mary Pinchot Meyer, E. Howard Hunt, Edward Bennett Williams, Philip Graham and Katharine Graham.<br><br>Why should they be protecting these people? The thing they all have in common is Operation Mockingbird (this is another page of mine that does not appear in the search-rankings). <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Operation Mockingbird was of course the CIA operation to control the media. It is still clearly in operation. Now it is concentrating on controlling the web pages people visit.<br></strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>It would seem that only AltaVista is not under CIA control.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>...and the thread continues...<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>John Simkin         <br>post Mar 28 2005, 07:47 AM<br>Post #3<br><br><br>Super Member<br>****<br><br>Group: Admin<br>Posts: 8534<br>Joined: 16-December 03<br>From: Worthing, Sussex<br>Member No.: 7<br><br><br><br>        <br>QUOTE(Andy Walker @ Mar 27 2005, 08:59 PM)<br>Either that or the others haven't spidered your site yet, or you have neglected to submit some pages to certain search engines, or you have missed out meta tags on some pages.<br>:lol: :lol: :lol:<br>*<br><br><br><br>Google’s spider arrives at my website every two days. (Other search-engines come on average every four days). This is based on the size of your site and your Google rankings. Every time it visits, he puts every page on my site into its database. I have a facility on my website to check this. This is why I complained to Google about the removal of the Bernardo de Torres page from the database (it had originally been ranked number one). I brought this to their attention. They could not explain it and restored it to the database.<br><br>As I have said, the reason why I am ranked so high is that I have so many sites linked to mine. The BBC have more links than I have and so when they have a “named” page they usually rank higher than me. However, there are other factors involved. One includes the amount of internal and external links that your page has. The quality of these links are also taken into consideration. For example, on my key pages, I link to other high-ranking pages. Most people do not do that as they are reluctant to promote the competition. However, it is a factor in the ranking system. You are being thanked for your generosity, or in other words, you are improving the service you are providing for your visitors.<br><br>Therefore, if you type in “First World War” into Google my site comes 2nd out of 42,080,000 pages. First World War.Com comes 1st (it is because of its domain name). The BBC comes fourth.<br><br>The same is true when you type in Queen Victoria (2nd 4,080,000). It is also true of any other historical character or topic I have written about: Adolf Hitler, Winston Churchill, Second World War, Spanish Civil War, etc.<br><br>Now if you type in “Frank Wisner” you only get 177,000 pages but my page does not appear on the first page. Those that do, are small sites that do not have large numbers of websites linked to it (this can be checked out here:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.marketleap.com/publinkpop/default.htm">www.marketleap.com/publin...efault.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Unlike with the Bernardo de Torres case, they have not removed from the database. What they have done is to find a way to rank it lower than would normally be the case with one of my pages. The way they do this is to look for the phrase “Operation Mockingbird” on the page. That is the thing that Frank Wisner, Cord Meyer, Mary Pinchot Meyer, E. Howard Hunt, Edward Bennett Williams, Philip Graham and Katharine Graham all have in common.<br><br>Operation Mockingbird was the highly secret CIA program started by Frank Wisner in 1948. The program was identified by Frank Church in the 1976 Senate report: “Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities. As a result of this report, George Bush, the Director of the CIA at the time announced a new policy: “Effective immediately, the CIA will not enter into any paid or contract relationship with any full-time or part-time news correspondent accredited by any U.S. news service, newspaper, periodical, radio or television network or station.”<br><br>This did not bring Operation Mockingbird to an end. It still goes on. In the past it concentrated on newspaper and book publishing. Today it concentrates on modern methods of information gathering. It cannot be seen to ban websites. For example, there are 86,000 web pages that includes the phrase “Operation Mockingbird”. Instead it concentrates on ensuring that certain pages do not appear at the top of the list. Therefore, despite my high ranking with searches like the First World War with its 42 million pages, I do not appear on the first few pages of searches on Operation Mockingbird (if you do not appear on the first few pages you are unlikely to be seen. However, I have found a way round this. I have posted about Operation Mockingbird on this forum and JFK Lancer. Those pages are ranked on the second page of Google. Clearly, these forums have yet to come to the attention of the CIA. <hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=hughmanateewins>Hugh Manatee Wins</A> at: 10/27/06 3:27 pm<br></i>