by Nymarya » Mon Sep 19, 2005 11:21 pm
<!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=13620&hed=">www.redherring.com/Articl...13620&hed=</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>Katrina%2BCorpses%2BGet%2B%E2%80%98Chipped%E2%80%99<br><br>I don't get this paragraph:<br><br>"Critics also point to the fact that millions of pets already have a similar system with implanted ID tags. As the critics see it, implanting chips in humans could lead to negative associations and might deter customers from getting chipped."<br><br>...does it mean humans won't want chips due to the association with animals, or vice versa? How about the association with corpses?<br><br>I'm sure the advertising machine can figure out a way to sell them till they become mandatory anyway--"Hey kids get yer new Mark'o'daBeast chip and a free hoodie that says Chips are Hip!"<br><br> <p>=======<br>Oh, I enjoy an egg myself, yes. They don't make good pets, though; you can never get them in at night. <br> ~Doctor Pratt (played by Peter Sellers), "The Wrong Box"</p><i></i>