by whipstitch » Mon Sep 05, 2005 6:31 pm
I've been doing some research on the net to see how credible this is. Here's some of what I've come up with so far. Some are redundant to what has been posted elsewhere. One thing is for sure - I certainly don't remember seeing pentagrams inside the eye of hurricanes when I was growing up...<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.enterprisemission.com/weblog/uploaded_images/Isabel-MSFC-2003-737681.jpg">www.enterprisemission.com...737681.jpg</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>============================<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/1997/t042897_t0428coh.html">www.defenselink.mil/trans...28coh.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>DoD News Briefing Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen Monday, April 28, 1997 - 8:45 a.m. EDT <br><br>...[other scientists] are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves. <br><br>=============================================<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=s109-517">www.govtrack.us/congress/...l=s109-517</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>S. 517: A bill to establish a Weather Modification Operations and Research Board, and for other purposes<br>Introduced:        Mar 3, 2005<br>Sponsor:        Sen. Kay Hutchison [R-TX]<br>Status:        Introduced (By Sen. Kay Hutchison [R-TX])<br>Last Action:        Mar 3, 2005: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (text of measure as introduced: CR S2025-2026)<br><br>=============================================<br>What is that 'beam'?<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2005/images/katrina-eyewall-4-08-28-2005.jpg">www.noaanews.noaa.gov/sto...8-2005.jpg</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>=============================================<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.newscientistspace.com/article.ns?id=dn7929">www.newscientistspace.com...?id=dn7929</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Satellite images of Hurricane Katrina indicate the storm experienced several "hot tower" clouds during its development, say NASA.<br><br>Thunderstorms surround the eye of hurricanes and hot towers are tall rain clouds that reach far above the rest of the hurricane near the wall of the eye. They stretch at least to the ceiling of the troposphere – the atmosphere's lowest layer. The heat in the "hot tower" is generated by water vapour condensing into liquid water.<br><br>The hot towers, also known as convective bursts, are significant because scientists think they could be a precursor to a hurricane intensifying, a process that is still not well understood.<br><br>"We think they may form right before storms intensify – and intensity change is one of the Holy Grail processes,” says Marshall Shepherd, deputy project scientist of the Global Precipitation Measurement Mission (GPMM) and research meteorologist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Green Belt, Maryland, US. “Over the years in hurricane forecasting, we've gotten fairly good in forecasting where the storm's going to track."<br><br>But predicting hurricane intensity is not as easy. If people in coastal cities could get a better warning of when hurricane winds speeds are about to increase, they might be able to prepare their communities for a stronger storm.<br><br>Supercharged pistons<br><br>The vigorous convection of the hot towers releases a lot of energy in a short amount of time into the centre of a hurricane, acting like supercharged pistons in the hurricane's engine. This can result in a lower surface pressure, which causes the wind speed to increase.<br><br>This is what appears to have happened with Katrina. As well as the GPMM images, the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) satellite, run by NASA and the Japanese space agency, also saw at least two hot towers. The tower closest to the eye’s wall measured 16 kilometres high. Soon after the TRMM image was taken, Katrina intensified to a Category 4 storm on the Saffir-Simpson scale. <br><br>================================================<br><br>Summer 2005 Hurricane Season Animation: <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.nasa.gov/mpg/126449main_katrina_fred_animation.mpg">www.nasa.gov/mpg/126449ma...mation.mpg</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>=====================================<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/wsj/access/22578219.html?dids=22578219:22578219&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT">pqasb.pqarchiver.com/wsj/...MTS=ABS:FT</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>"Malaysia to Battle Smog With Cyclones", <br>By Chen May Yee<br>The Wall Street Journal<br>Nov 13, 1997<br><br>"KULA LUMPUR -- Malaysia's war on smog is about to get a new twist. The government wants to create man-made cyclones to scrub away the haze that has plagued Malaysia since July. 'We will use special technology to create an artificial cyclone to clean the air', said Datuk Law Hieng Ding, minister for science, technology and the environment. The plan calls for the use of new Russian technology to create cyclones -- the giant storms also known as typhoons and hurricanes -- to cause torrential rains, washing the smoke out of the air. The Malaysian cabinet and the finance minister have approved the plan, Datuk Law said. A Malaysian company, BioCure Sdn. Bhd., will sign a memorandum of understanding soon with a government-owned Russian party to produce the cyclone."<br><br>"Datuk Law declined to disclose the size of the cyclone to be generated, or the mechanism. 'The details I don't have', he said. He did say, though, that the cyclone generated would be 'quite strong'. Datuk Law also declined to disclose the price of creating the cyclone. But, he said, Malaysia doesn't have to pay if the project doesn't work."<br><br>=============================================<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/wsj/access/4304655.html?dids=4304655&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS">pqasb.pqarchiver.com/wsj/...S&FMTS=ABS</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Rain, Rain, Go Away, Go Soak Someone Less Willing to Pay<br>By Ignatius, Adi<br>The Wall Street Journal<br>Oct 2, 1992<br><br>Elate Intelligent Technologies Inc, a small Russian company, promises that, for a fee, it can control weather patterns over a 200-mile range for $200 per day. Commercial director Igor Pirogoff says that the company has pioneered "weather extortion," in which it can guarantee outdoor organizers perfect weather. The company was founded by physicist Lev Pokhmelnykh, and its reputation for accuracy is mixed. A test-run also provided mixed results.<br><br>==============================================<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/harnessing_weather.html">www.americanfreepress.net...ather.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>HARNESSING WEATHER<br>ALLEGATIONS SURFACE THAT U.S. & RUSSIA HAVE TECHNOLOGY TO MANAGE HURRICANES<br><br>By Mike Blair<br><br>Author Sydney Sheldon said, “The old adage that everyone talks about the weather but no one does anything about it is no longer valid,” in an afterword to his fascinating novel Are You Afraid of the Dark?<br><br>“Today,” Sheldon continued, “two superpowers have the ability to control weather around the world: the United States and Russia. Other countries, probably China and North Korea, are working feverishly to catch up.”<br><br>As this article was being written the after effects of Hurricane Katrina were still being felt in the southeastern United States, after it caused billions of dollars in damage along the Gulf of Mexico coast, and the death toll from the killer storm was still being tabulated.<br><br>Could this devastation have been avoided? Could Katrina itself have been avoided as a death-dealing hurricane?<br><br>The answers to both questions are probably “Yes.” The ability of Russia and the United States to create storms of this magnitude definitely exists.<br><br>The big question that remains is, why, then, wasn’t Katrina stopped before it devastated three states—Louisiana, Alabama and Mississippi—along the Gulf Coast?<br><br>There could be any number of reasons, but all would be mere speculation, as the fact is nothing was done to stop Katrina.<br><br>Those who doubt that Katrina, or any other hurricane, could be stopped—or created—can find substantiation in a long-forgotten article by Chen May Yee in the Nov. 13, 1997, issue of The Wall Street Journal.<br><br>The article recounts an offer by the Russians to aid Malaysia to create a typhoon to dissipate a pall of smoke that hung over the country—and still does—caused by the burning of large sections of the rain forests in Indonesia and Sumatra.<br><br>To quote from the article: Datuk Law Hieng Ding, Malaysia’s minister for science, technology and the environment at the time, said his country “would use special technology to create an artificial cyclone to clean the air.”<br><br>The article went on to say that a Malaysian company, BicCure Sdn. Bhd., would sign a memorandum of understanding with a government-owned Russian company to create a cyclone that would cause torrential rains and thus cleanse the air over Malaysia of the smoke and ash.<br><br>What Russian company was the Malaysian official talking about?<br><br>On Oct. 2, 1992, The Wall Street Journal reported that a Russian company, Elate Intelligent Technologies, Inc., has weather control equipment for sale and uses the advertising slogan of “weather made to order.”<br><br>Igor Pirogoff, director of the company, said “Elate is capable of fine-tuning weather patterns over a 200-squaremile area for as little as $200 U.S. per day,” the newspaper reported.<br><br>A year before the article was written, Hurricane Andrew caused $30 billion in damages as it plowed through the South. Pirogoff said Andrew could have been turned into “a wimpy little squall.”<br><br>According to a UN pamphlet, titled Basic Facts about the United Nations, which was published in 1994, the world body negotiated the Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques in 1977. This “prohibits the use of techniques that would have widespread, long-lasting or severe effects through deliberate manipulation of natural processes and cause such phenomena as earthquakes, tidal waves, and changes in climate and in weather patterns.”<br><br>Getting back to Malaysia, where the potential for creating or dissipating cyclones seems to have made its first appearance, there was never any follow-up to the stories about Elate and whether in fact the cyclone was created, although it was approved by the Malaysian government.<br><br>A call by American Free Press to the Malaysian Embassy in Washington found no one there with any knowledge of the subject.<br><br>However, there was more success when the Malaysian delegation to the UN was contacted in New York. There, a spokesman claimed to have no knowledge of the creation of a cyclone, but was willing to discuss weather control in his country.<br><br>The official said that, by using weather control technology, rain could be created and was being created over the nation’s capital of Kuala Lumpur.<br><br>He said that often rain was created over the city to cleanse the air of the smoke emanating from Indonesia, and particularly Sumatra.<br><br>He indicated he did not know if the technology being used had been obtained from Russia, but it would appear that such technology to create rain on demand would not have been developed in a Third World country like Malaysia.<br><br>There have been numerous reports in recent years about strange changes in the jet stream, which have created alterations in the weather.<br><br>In 1982 a report by a Pentagon researcher, identified as L. Ponte, noted that “the Soviets have made advances in bending the all-important jet stream that sweeps across Siberia to set global wind patterns. By using explosive devices in the jet stream, scientists are trying to make it dip and rise in a wave that could replace the frigid Siberian winters with milder air from the South.”<br><br>How this would affect weather in other parts of the world was not reported by Ponte, but there have been dozens of reports since his 1982 report about changes in the jet stream’s normal behavior.<br><br>In 1996, a group of seven U.S. Air Force officers, who had prepared a research paper about weather warfare, issued a report, which concluded that there was technology under development that would provide “warriors of the future” with the means to control the course of military conflicts, including through the use of weather modification.<br><br>The study also states that manipulation of precipitation, storms and fog could improve America’s own weather but could also involve controlling the ionosphere to guarantee U.S. dominance of worldwide communications.<br><br>Is major weather control really possible? Is weather manipulation a means of conducting war? If not, why in 1977 did the United States, the then-Soviet Union and dozens of other countries believe it was a good idea to enact a UN treaty banning weather manipulation as a means of conducting war?<br><br>In the afterword of his book, Sheldon concludes:<br><br>“Weather is the most powerful force we know. Whoever controls it can disrupt world economies with perpetual rainstorms or tornadoes; wipe out crops in a drought; cause earthquakes, hurricanes and tsunamis; close world airports and cause devastation on enemy battlefields. “We could all sleep better if a world leader said, ‘Everyone talks about the weather, but no one does anything about it, and it was true.” =====================================<br>Soviet Weather Engineering over North America<br><br>This taped presentation, which was made in 1985, is included for historical reference purposes only. Since then, the technology has been developed into more rigorous longitudinal EM wave interferometry, which is the exact nature of those earlier weather engineering weapons. The foundations of scalar electro-magnetics are well explained in this presentation. (Beardon)<br><br>VIDEO: <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://209.113.172.33/sovietweather.rm">209.113.172.33/sovietweather.rm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> (195MB)<br><br>=====================================<br>Richard Hoagland on recent Hurricane Manipulation<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.enterprisemission.com/hurricane1.htm">www.enterprisemission.com/hurricane1.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.enterprisemission.com/weblog/2005/08/hyperdimensional-katrina.html">www.enterprisemission.com...trina.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.enterprisemission.com/weblog/2005/09/hyperdimensional-katrina-new-evidence.html">www.enterprisemission.com...dence.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>====================================<br>Weather Wars/ Scott Stevens<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.weatherwars.info/bio.htm">www.weatherwars.info/bio.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>====================================<br>Tom Beardon / Scalar Weapons<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.cheniere.org/">www.cheniere.org/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>(currently appears that server is slammed)<br><br>====================================<!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.enterprisemission.com/weblog/uploaded_images/Isabel-MSFC-2003-737681.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <p></p><i></i>