LaRouche PAC to Publish New Pamphlet:"Soldiers of Satan

[dbeach]

the ole man still full of fire and that old time religion whatever that is...<br><br>He don't like sauron cheney..that is a big qualifier for me.<br><br>"LaRouche PAC to Publish New Pamphlet<br>Exposing "Soldiers of Satan"<br>August 22—The Lyndon LaRouche Political Action Committee (LPAC) announced today that it will be rushing a new pamphlet into production, entitled "Soldiers of Satan." In combination with the current LPAC pamphlet, "The Case of the Vice-President's Mass-Insanity," this new item will be an indispensable part of LPAC's mass mobilization to stop what LaRouche has identified as Dick Cheney's "Guns of August" threat.<br><br>While announcing its own publication plans, LPAC called attention to the publication this week by Executive Intelligence Review of a major feature package exposing the "spoon-bender" faction in the U.S. military. Author Jeffrey Steinberg's review of this military grouping, entitled "Cheney's Spoon-Benders Pushing Nuclear Armageddon," combined with supporting material, is of the highest importance to those who are concerned with the national security of the United States. The article is already causing shock waves among leading political circles in the United States who have seen a pre-publication copy.<br><br>The EIR package will form the core of the LPAC "Soldiers of Satan" pamphlet.<br><br>The Steinberg article can be found on www.larouchepub.com, and www.larouchepac.com, in a prepublication copy."<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.larouchepac.com/pages/press_releases_files/2005/050822_satans_soldiers.htm">www.larouchepac.com/pages...ldiers.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br> <p></p><i></i>

[Dreams End]

I'm pretty nervous about this. When I found out just a few days ago that John DeCamp had been working with someone from EIR on the Franklin Scandal, that made me nervous as well. As I've mentioned before, Larouche had (and probably still does) a very sophisticated intelligence network of his own, and much of his info is good, but often exaggerated bits and questionable conclusions are included. The article about the "spoonbenders" is a case in point, as I showed on another thread. <br><br>My approach to EIR is to verify elsewhere before taking it as given. And I wouldn't actually let anyone from the Larouche organization anywhere near me. I'm sorry, but they are cultish and fascistic and I don't know what their game is. And Larouche himself just keeps morphing...from Communist to fascist to Republican to Democrat. <br><br>Sorry to be the one who keeps "shooting the messenger." Check out what they have to say, but I'd verify it before passing it on to others. <p></p><i></i>

[ZeroHaven]

you're kidding, good info? i'd have never guessed.<br>they used to have volunteers handing out those LaRouche gazettes at the metro. at work we'd read bits to each other and laugh about it.<br>maybe this isn't the same guy, but the big joke was he'd try to run for president every election but most people figured him for a nutjob. *shrug* whacky but well written. <p><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a239/ZeroHaven/tinhat.gif"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--></p><i></i>

[Dreams End]

yeah, that's him. Don't know about these days, but he'd have some serious looking stuff...and then always tie back to the British royal family. Check out the EIR stuff...keeping in mind what I just mentioned, of course.<br><br>Is he a "nutjob"? Some serious "mind control" techniques reported from ex-Larouchians. Don't really know what his agenda is though.<br><br>By the way, two names that emerge a lot who are associated with Larouche are Webster Tarpley and Anton Chaitkin. Tarpley, of course, is also a frequent partner with Skolnick. Skolnick not only seems to put absolutely rumors with no basis in fact on his site (e.g. "US shooting civil war has started") but has "associate sites" listed that include that of Eustace Mullins, a very overt racist/eugenicist. <br><br>So, Larouche==>Tarpley===>Skolnick. What is the agenda then? I don't know, but much of the SRA stuff is coming from Larouche, and Chaitkin and Tarpley (I think) were in the Franklin Coverup stuff in which I worry that the true story (horrible as it is) had some additional elements inserted, such as the idea of project "monarch." Maybe not, but when I found out DeCamp was working with Chaitkin, I was pretty disheartened. <br><br>Really be interested in more insight in this. For example, is it possible that Tarpley is simply an excellent researcher who just bought into Larouche? I wish that was my strongest intuition here, but it's not.<br><br>Still, I don't mean to say all that they publish is wrong (well, I pay no attention to Skolnick...I followed his site for two weeks and NOTHING he publishes panned out. NOTHING.) but if there is an agenda other than getting these stories out, it will be hard to tell what's real and what they added. These games are so complicated and confusing. It gives me a headache. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=dreamsend@rigorousintuition>Dreams End</A> at: 8/28/05 7:46 pm<br></i>

[dbeach]

not his spokesmman in any way..the ole man has been around since bushco was a wee lad dreaming of mushrooms.<br><br>morphing is a great word and it could describe many who are waking up..<br><br>like I said the TRUTHIES need everybody to shine the light..look at many former repubs like Paul O neil who did his part..and Kevin Philips and that commerce sect dude..all repubs who figured out the bushco insanity..<br><br>cults..the VFW could be labeled a cult..wear uniforms..recite prayers..pledge to the flag.<br><br> many meditation groups could be called cults...<br><br>take what ya need and leave or laff at the rest <p></p><i></i>

[Dreams End]

I agree, Dbeach...and by the way I was editing my last post as you were writing, so have a look.<br><br>By cult..I don't mean uniforms...I mean systematic humiliation (especially sexual) and other methods to break down resistance. I say "cultish" because I do realize the loaded nature of the word. However, ex-Larouchians have painted a harrowing picture of life inside.<br><br>Larouche started as a "communist" and then, in operation "mop-up" his followers were ordered to go beat up other communists (in the 70's in NYC). I know people who were there at the time. AS SOON AS a group does something like that, I simply assume they are intelligence fronts. Indeed, his organization was openly providing intelligence to the Reagan administration until it came out in public.<br><br>Notice also that Fred Newman, founder of another, very similar group which became the "New Alliance Party", with very similar methods, worked briefly with Larouche. And Ramsey Clark has been working on Defending Larouche against various fraud charges. This whole circle of people make me nervous...and clearly some games are being played. Just grab the info and don't give them your home address, would be my advice! <p></p><i></i>

[Project Willow]

My favorite line to the young LaRouches handing out literature on the street corner "You can't fight a cult with a cult." It usually gets them going pretty good. I haven't met one who wasn't half out of it, incredibly defensive, even hostile. They know "the truth" and everyone else is a poor dumbass. Who knows what kind of hell some of them have gone through.<br><br>Thing is, the LaRouche street lit. is the place most people first read about cheney/bush/satanism. Works great, eh?<br><br>Just like the first place people hear about mind control is the utlra CT/alien takeover folks at leftie events.<br>Yeah, that works real well too.<br><br>No need to worry about wide exposure of RA/MC with these folks helping. However well intended originally, the plan has been hijacked.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>

[dbeach]

he is out there..still enjoy some of his rants and the "guns of august " was all over the net with many debunkers all over it BUT many listening to the warnings..his basic message dressed up in his lingo is cheny is satans son..ha ha more like satans bride..<br><br>interesting that Tarpley morphed away from Larouche and is more credible than ever..and his book with Antoine Cahkin 'Unauthorized bio of GHW Bush" has stuff about bushs that is rarely published as in the deliberate downing of his<br> WW II plane that killed his 2 comrades <p></p><i></i>

[Rigorous Intuition]

is usually excellent advice.<br><br>Larouche-sourced material has heavy baggage which for a lot of people can render a position suspect, so I prefer not to use it, and go instead with independent corroborative sources when possible. I'm also very wary about his motives, and that of his organization, regardless of any incidental points of agreement I find. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=rigorousintuition>Rigorous Intuition</A> at: 8/28/05 9:10 pm<br></i>

[dbeach]

RI <br><br>not disagreeing just thought the 'guns of august' had some value as it ignited debate about the cheny possible plans..Larocuche also has good background about leo strauss whom as you know is the godfather of the neo-cons..motives are questionable ??but I think he earned his place in the discussion..time will tell if he actually helps the Truthies<br><br>just my spin..my Tarpley thread is a yawner so here tis <p></p><i></i>

[Dreams End]

Well, looking at the last few posts, it occurs to me that if part of the point is a sort of "limited hang out" trick where info that may be discovered is first put out by those of low repute and therefore discredited, then the info itself could be quite real. So now, I admit to you all that I read all such things...EIR, RENSE, WRH...whatever, but always look for that corroboration. But that Jeff Wells guy...I don't know about him... <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :b --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/tongue.gif ALT=":b"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>Seriously, could simply be that Larouche bankrolled these guys who needed a way to get their message out. I don't know... <p></p><i></i>