by human » Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:44 pm
<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em> Sorry, human, but the facts are against you on this.<br><br>Were the numbers of sacrifices exaggerated by the conquerors? Most likely. But if you argue that the Mayans and Aztecs didn't sacrifice humans, you're closing your eyes to the written codices, the chemical traces linked to blood on temple floors, and the artistic depictions of the practice.<br><br>And bringing in the slaughter of the Native peoples of the Americas has nothing to do with this discussion.<br><br>I'd accept the studies of archaeologists in the field over Manley Hall's fanciful histories any day.</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>at no point did i say human sacrifices didnt occur.<br><br>what i said is that they are statistically insignifigant when compared to the European peoples ritual sacrifice s of Native peoples....<br><br>so no, the facts arent actually against me at all...<br><br>the slaughter of Native American people has EVERYTHING to do with this discussion....<br><br>why is it that human sacrifice is the accepted norm for the Aztec & Maya, yet whenever it is brought to the surface in modern western culture, it is ignored like it doesnt happen?????<br><br>that is my point.<br><br>it is propaganda, so you consider these people savages, and can jusify in your head the ritual massacre of entire nations.....<br><br>as for Manly P Hall, id say his info is a bit more reliable than a Cortez foot soldier anyday... lol..<br><br><br><br>i love it how all of a sudden a bunch of yall are defending Spanish Conquistadors, Luciferians of the highest degree.... lol... bizarro world for sure...<br><br>one<br>human? <p></p><i></i>