More on the Crowley - RA connection (triggers)

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: understanding RA

Postby jmregister » Mon Jul 04, 2005 11:39 am

The is perhaps my problem, but the only thing I am coming away from this thread with is an indifference toward certain victims of ritual abuse. I hate saying it, of course, but I really don't feel like I have any other option here.<br><br>If your experiences are so bad that they prevent you from engaging them intelligently, then I feel bad for you, but then there's nothing else I can really say, because I still feel intelligent engagements are important, even essential, and that's what I'm interested in.<br><br>What I had to say was simple and, I would think, helpful. By calling the perpetrators "Thelemite fundamentalists", you are immediately turning off the people who have contrary associations with that term (read: practically everybody who doesn't already believe "there is no question - these perpetrators are Thelemic fundamentalists"), and these people will be immediately less likely to care about what you have to say, and immediately less likely to believe you're telling the truth. Does that really seem too academic to you? It is completely reasonable to say that you should find another term or provide some substantial backing against all those associations, for your own sake, not mine. I'd like it if you could communicate your experiences better with the unaffected world, because I do care about justice being done, but if you aren't interested in that, then good luck with your troubles.<br><br>That's all it seems anybody can tell you: good luck. <p></p><i></i>
jmregister
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 10:38 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Well, it has to be said...

Postby Seventhson » Mon Jul 04, 2005 12:50 pm

Once again your circular inane logic and argument derives totally from an ad hominem attack on the original poster. A personal attack which is clearly a serious attempt to discredit him and ALL abused persons.<br><br>This stinks.<br><br>A most effective tool of the extreme blackoperators is "rational argument" based on to6tally fraudulent arguments and diversions.<br><br>Your posts oin this topic from the start have been completely geared towards discreditting the poster and all victims of RA. To try to discredit the persons who care and who run this board, seems pretty clear to me.<br><br>Blackoperators often work in tandem or in tag teams of three or four. Rotating shifts at all hours from global positions (my most serious attackers were on a military base in or near japan and the4y attacked me using shockwave accounts).<br><br>I battled them continuously on DU and they were tolerated by naive or complicit mods and a blind owner of the site, who swallowed their fraudulent bile and vomit whole.<br><br>The ONLY real purpose of your arguments, jmregister, is to attempt to convince those who might peruse this site and take an interest that it is all fictional bullshit.<br><br>The ONLY purpose for soing THAT is to defend the perpetrators.<br><br>There is no good faith arguing here on your part. No rational or intelligent debate. No honest disagreements.<br><br>Just a blatant attempt to cover up crimes against humanity and to promote an agenda which protects the vile beasts who commit these heinous acts against women, children and innocents.<br><br>Shame on you and anyone who defends you on this count.<br><br>I don't believe a word you say and I'd bet you take your marching orders from the Naval observatory.<br><br>Peace all,<br><br>seventhson<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
Seventhson
 
Posts: 152
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 8:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Disruptors and policy

Postby Seventhson » Mon Jul 04, 2005 1:11 pm

It is clear to me as an investigative journalist with more than 30 years experience (and as an attorney with more than 30 years experience in the legal field both before during anfd since law school) that RI has become a target of the RA perpetrators who are now attempting to discredit RI and those who are disussing what may be very real scenarios and experiences but who are afraid to do so publicly for obvious reasons (the threat of imminent death of oneself or one's loved ones to name a few.)<br><br>The posters attacking Bio are disingenuosy and diversionary despite their elaborate but rather thin veneer.<br><br>I went so far as to personally contact Jeff Wells directly to let him know who I am and what my bona fides are.<br><br>I had to do this with Bob Fertik at Democrats.com after the freeper blackops BFEEites got me banned there.<br><br>Bio could certainly provide detailed info to Jeff dirtectly. Could give him verifying dsetails. Could even give him copies of sworn affidavits (the best weapon to fight these injustices because they do not have to be made public but they do have a substanital reliability because lies are punishable by imprisonment for false statement.<br><br>If Tabasco and jm and avalon want to provide their bona fides to Jeff so Jeff can google them and see who they really are (as I did because, whether it was wise or not, I trust Jeff immensely and I did not want to get badjacketed here as I was at DU and Dems.com and else where the evil necrophilic trolls whose souls will be eternally wiped from creation unless they do a turnabout had been tracking me) then show your f*cking cards.<br><br>Jeff is a busy fellow but I am sure he's be happy to hear from real people with real stories to tell on this subject.<br><br>And if any trolls out there are ready to come over from the dark side and spill their guts (because, rats, the Bush's ship of empire is sinking fast) then I advise you contact Former US Attorney John Loftus in St. Petersburgh Florida, pay him the $1 retainer and gain his complete confientiality. He can protect you somewhat.<br><br>The assholes you work for would slice your bowels open in a heartbeat because they do not give one iota of sh*t about you.<br><br>But we on the other side do.<br><br>We fucking care about each other.<br><br>So show your cards, people,<br><br>Send your verifiable personal info to Jeff.<br><br>Or shut up.<br><br>And for those who are victims who are afraid to do this (altho if you are posting here the bad actors already know who you are) I completely understand.<br><br>But I would like everyone to have the cojones or ovaries to at least tell Jeff who they REALLY are if they expect to have ANY real credibility on this board.<br><br>I see no real good reason not to unless you are a slimey, bush-sucking spook. <p></p><i></i>
Seventhson
 
Posts: 152
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 8:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Disruptors and policy

Postby jmregister » Mon Jul 04, 2005 1:59 pm

Seventhson, I'm sorry, but you truly <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>are</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> being hysterical. I am not, nor would I think Tabasco or Avalon, a "black operator". This is because, unlike you it seems, I can analyze the things people say and determine the logical structure behind their words, and nothing we have said has been as you say. If I hadn't seen Jeff speak for you in another thread, I might think <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>you</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> a "black operator", because I can't imagine somebody who has been to law school, somebody who is a practicing attorney, showing such a terrible grasp on basic logic. Maybe this is an effect of English being your second language? I don't know--it really is hard to tell. I am honestly baffled by your response to this thread.<br><br>But whatever. I'm just a depressive 20 year old kid typing on my sister's laptop for a few days before I head off on a trip to get away from things. I'm going backpacking along the continental divide--I really enjoy the outdoors (so after the next couple of days, I fear you will not hear from me again. Maybe that is a good thing). If you want, you can read the journal I've been keeping over the past couple of weeks here: <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.livejournal.com/users/no_language/">www.livejournal.com/users/no_language/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> , or I have older writing on Blogger: <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.blogger.com/profile/3696379">www.blogger.com/profile/3696379</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> . It's all personal stuff, though, so you probably won't be interested. I know this isn't conclusive evidence of my identity, but I really don't want to be talking to people on the phone, even Jeff, because I pretty much qualify as agoraphobic and fear people like the plague. I'll tell you my first name is Joshua, however, and I went to Idaho State University for a year a couple of years ago. I'm not a very important person. If that's not enough, well, I understand, but that's what I am willing to give. Oh, I also really enjoy cooking--Indian food especially--and decorating, and I am a huge lover of art in general, but music in particular. I don't have a permanent address because I have more or less dropped out of civil society and have been living on the charity of others. I'm currently at my parent's house in Columbia, Maryland, but after I get done backpacking I'm going to go stay with a friend in Logan, Utah, where I went to high school (before I dropped out of it, anyway). My e-mail is grimnfrostie at google's free e-mail service, and lately I have been on AIM a lot as grimnfrostie. I am a lot of things, but I am not a "black operator". But go ahead and believe I am, if you need to.<br><br>Note: edited to fix links from breaking and to change e-mail to make it more spam proof <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p097.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=jmregister>jmregister</A> at: 7/4/05 1:18 pm<br></i>
jmregister
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 10:38 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Blackops and blackoperators

Postby Seventhson » Mon Jul 04, 2005 2:52 pm

Once again you cast aspersions.<br><br>My grasp of the language that bad?<br><br>My logic is poor?<br><br>This coming from an alleged kid with one year of college and whose an agoraphobic?<br><br>Who won't reveal their true bona fides to Jeff???<br><br>See - any blog could be a fabrication or a cover story. So could any email address.<br><br>So the only way to susss it out is to turn it over to Jeff. Let him suss you out and then let him decide if you are acting in good faith.<br><br>I never said anyone WAS a black operator. Because I am not sure who is or not.<br><br>People have their own agendas sometimes that serve the BFEE.<br><br>But those who defend the attacks here on vinctims and witnesses (on the basis of the fact that this is an anonymous board and anyone could be lying through their teeth --- is just disingenuous when the purpose oif the posters original posts on the subject are to share info and get advice and to share.<br><br>Sure Biao could be a bvlack operator too. So I invite him/her to do the same as I have done. Strip to the bone for Jeff re: your real identity and supporting evidence (articles, copies of affidavits, etc.)<br><br>What makes one LOOK like a blackoperator is the constant demeaning slurs againsts peoples' characters when there is no real good basis for doing so (except to discredit and degrade the poster). Disruption, getting the topic offtrack with persoanal attacks and "challenges" to credibility on an anonymous board, is just that: disruption.<br><br>If Biao is pretending to be a victim or is a naive or very uninformed victim/victim's partner, then he/she should be subject to the same test of good faith as the rest of us and see if the story holds water.<br><br>But, again, I understand completely why victims are afraid of revealing their identities (I am a victim of death threats for my political postings so I know why I remain anonymous -- but I kinda trust Jeff and figure the real assholes and their lackies (and even some legit political/security operators) know who I am already and can hack all they want to get at my info and data.<br><br>I assume my computer is an open book and I operate it in a way that permits me to try and "turn" agents of the fascists to the right side.<br><br>But I am not going to be a target for fundie extremist pinheads and would not want people whove faced death threats to be threatened by sharing their actual info with Jeff or anyone here.<br><br>I would not respond top your email either. That is a spiders web proposal. I ain't given out my email address again ever online (once was enough to fill my inbox with threats and harassment).<br><br>Nor will I respond top folks I do not know.<br><br>But Jeff can if he wants to.<br><br>He is a much more courageous soul than me, I believe.<br><br>Peace all.<br><br>seventhson<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
Seventhson
 
Posts: 152
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 8:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

jmregister, both your links are dead

Postby Peachtree Pam » Mon Jul 04, 2005 3:00 pm

What's the explanation? <p></p><i></i>
Peachtree Pam
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 9:46 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: jmregister, both your links are dead

Postby jmregister » Mon Jul 04, 2005 3:14 pm

The commas. I wasn't aware of how this board formats links, so you just have to remove that last character. <p></p><i></i>
jmregister
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 10:38 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

No commas in the site address

Postby Peachtree Pam » Mon Jul 04, 2005 4:10 pm

jmregister, both links are dead. What is the reason? There are no commas involved. <p></p><i></i>
Peachtree Pam
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 9:46 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: No commas in the site address

Postby jmregister » Mon Jul 04, 2005 4:57 pm

I'm not sure, then. They work for me. *shrug* This must look very bad indeed :/ <p></p><i></i>
jmregister
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 10:38 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: No commas in the site address

Postby GDN01 » Mon Jul 04, 2005 5:22 pm

both links work for me, too. <p></p><i></i>
GDN01
 
Posts: 410
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 3:10 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

accusations, distractions, criteria, credibility, comments

Postby Starman » Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:07 pm

Oh Come ON ?!<br>Nobody's been 'attacking' Biao -- Get a grip, pleeze. But what's really odd is that, from my POV, you yourself have been exhibiting more of these very patterns than anyone else: disruptions, 'constant' demeaning slurs and challenges to credibility -- like, HullO?????<br><br>And what's this harping about volunteering Jeff to arbitrate people 'proving their bonafides?? From what I've seen, the intimidation and name-calling hasn't come from those you've listed. It's like, having started-off on a track of criticizing JM for questioning Biao's conclusions on a trivial point and slamming him for use of the qualified descriptor 'hysterical' (for which he's apologized at-least -twice- : a more appropriate word to describe the apparant jumping to a hasty conclusion based on a very weak evidence link not even supported by a testable argument might have been impulsive, desperate, reactionary, over-eager or presumptuous -- and the distinction has to be made that JM wasn't making a character-slur but stating his impression of the impulse itself by which a leap of logic is made) you just can't back down or get back on-topic, but elevated this apparant but silly disagreement into a conspiracy including Tabasco and Avalon, even alleging some kind of sinister, organized black-ops agenda. I just don't see it.<br><br>The escalating argument about intentions and accusations that developed over the relatively innocuous stating of opinion and asking for elaboration has been little more than silly, entirely off the point and from what I can see, argumentative for the sake of being combative; not constructive at all.<br><br>For myself, I would have appreciated a better-developed argument or at least direct links to sources backing-up the assertion that menstrual-blood harvesting (and victim's mental programming) is a well-established satanic cult practice. As too with info on linking these practices to something called 'Thelamic Fundamentalism', something I didn't know anything about and couldn't even evaluate without spending a frustrating two hours searching web resources. And I'm not even sure this 'point' is directly relevant or of primary importance to the larger issue of systemic RA crimes -- although it does connect some RA perps to occult groups influenced by Crowley's ideas and at least associated with ritual practices of the OTO cult.<br><br>To get more on 'track' here -- From what I've learned, I think it's appropriate to refer to blood-ritual and RA practices as 'Thelamic Fundamentalism'. Too bad a frank discussion of this issue couldn't have been more directly addressed instead of all the digressive and tangential distractions that resulted -- although I have to say that a lot of good points and comments WERE made, and so I think Biao can be commended for instigating a very active discussion. It sure inspired me to think more deeply about some of these things and articulate what I thought about them -- as well as addressing the trend of intimidation and intolerance to the stating of skeptical questions. It clearly doesn't just involve those speaking about the incredible horrors of such unimaginably-foul crimes. But since credibility IS such a very basic issue here with respect to the greater public's aversion to acknowledging how pervasive but hidden and effectively protected RA perp networks are, disparaging those who are legitimately skeptical about certain points is NOT helpful at all. <br><br>For what it's worth (and since addressing these various points is making this a rambling commentary), Biao's latest comment in response to Tabasco's questions was far more instructive and helpful than I thought they'd be -- I took the 'value' of Tabaco's 'points' in providing an example of fleshing-out background information to put the perp intimidation and stalking etc. in a more real-world context, but not necessarily the 'key' or a formula to be followed -- Nevertheless Biao's 'answers' went a long way to resolving some of my inherant (and natural) doubts and suspicians (that I have about ALL people with information that is remarkable for challenging contemporary pop-culture conventions). I'd hope that acknowledging what folks find especially incredible and hard-to-believe would be found helpful, so that anybody speaking about RA crimes will do so more compellingly and convincingly. The key here, I think, is civil engagement -- being coherant, direct, and responsive. I don't think anybody is 'making demands' or requiring a sworn-testimony degree of personally-identifiable details, but at least sufficient complexity of information to lend the weight of supporting statements to make it harder for folks to simply discredit it as thin or ludicrous. But (as a number of commenters have stated) this topic is just so bizarre that a lot of folks are going to deny it no matter what's said or how -- Jeez, even a lot of victims have a hard time accepting what's happened to themselves. The nature of RA doesn't lend itself to believability, esp. in the context of a deliberately dumbed-down, misinformed and intentionally deluded, decieved society that has been sold a very fake version of history and reality. Folks have the problem of extricating themselves from the comfortable nodule of popular belief systems they've been programmed and conditioned to accept. Churchs, schools, social organizations, cultural institutions, texts, commercial entertainment and media programs, they've all been enlisted and modified towards creating a pop-culture paradigm in which things like RA and shadow governments and global conspiracies and political assassinations and deliberate wars and genocidal policies and sanctioned secret experiments on unwilling citizens and corporate control of public policies and top-level protection of unimaginably-horrible crimes, aren't supposed to happen and are simply written out of the 'officially-allowable' script -- But until people begin questioning their assumptions and what they've been 'told' is possible or even likely, they're gonna have a hard time accepting a lot of claims about RA.<br><br>Thanks to SW, GDNO1 and Jenz for directly addressing some issues I raised --they do add to my greater understanding and provide greater insight into some of these things, notably confirmation that menstrual blood outrages (harvesting) aren't uncommon and have been documented. IMO, exposing such incidental details which directly implicate RA crimes may be one of the best ways to force cracks in the facade of 'nothing here, folks!' by which RA crimes and extended networks hide. (and thanks Avalon for 'reminding' me that paragraphs are my friend! ( : )<br><br>I guess some of these points directly concern the 'criteria' each of us have about evaluating whether something is true, or somewhat true, or mostly false or out-and-out false. It has to do with how the things we are told 'fit' into our overall scheme of what we've already accepted and tested and so 'know' on a continuum from 'definitely-true' to declining probabilities of truth. This doesn't necessarily involve lurid details -- but rather, its the way a story/comment hangs-together, concerning incidental details and even relatively trivial things that provide a context. A lot of comments on this thread are about that very thing -- suggestions for how we can be more compelling in saying things we know are true for a fact, real for us, or 'likely' true based on what we've learned over time. <br><br>The certainty of RA has definitely been shown to me to be very real, although other things, like how extensive it is, how well-protected from individuals and groups in gov. and society and law enforcement, what their over-all goals and motives are, how these groups function and cooperate among themselves, their tactics and history and etc., are less established. It's like a master rabbit-hole -- the further in one goes, the more twisted and strange and gruesome it gets, and the more questions that result. The asking of questions isn't by itself a measure of disbelief, esp. for many/most posters on this board (as I see it), but an interested, sincere grappling with the effort of trying to put the various pieces of RA evidence, claims, testimony, observations, etc., into some kind of better, more comprehensible form.<br><br>I've learned most of what I know about RA just in the last 6 months, largely from reading Jeff's website and the Board -- so I'm still having a hard time putting it in context and getting a good handle onnit. Most of it's so far from my personal experience that some aspects are very hard to relate to anything else. <br><br>Likely, if it wasn't for my cynicism and understanding of and interest in and research over the last 6-ten-years (esp. the last 4 years) of hidden history and the reality of a covert shadow-government and global conspiracy of wealth and power and influence that works behind the scenes to stage-manage world events, and my reading of the military-industrial and banking/security/resource etc. special interests and secret wars for economic and geopolitical conquest, the history of CIA and MiLIntel operations re: Paperclip, COINTELPRO, Monarch-MKULTRA, Gehlen Network/Gladio, funding of wars and opposition sides, false flag ops, manipulated war on terror and drugs, 50+ year financing and extensive use of terrorism for hidden geopolitical purposes, deliberate economic indenture and political subversion of 3rd world nations contrary to all principles of human rights and social justice, and etc., I would be far less credulous about how extensive and organized RA crime and networks are -- but I see enough bits of the big picture that I can note many of the links and ties to blackmail and manipulation of public opinion and coercion of political figures and underming social institutions and like that, that I can see some aspects of how RA fits into the globalist agenda and military-type thinking about end-driven ideology. <br><br>It's almost if RA didn't exist, the PTB elites and their functionary cronies would have had to invent it to meet their purposes -- but of course, they precisely DID create/invent it, which is a noteable reason they go to great lengths to keep it covered up. RA may be one of the elite Globalists most vulnerable achilles heel to reveal just how thoroughly foul and corrupt they and their agenda are -- a danger to everything we think of as good and decent and best in the world, in our nation, and each other.<br><br>And then there's the whole good-evil paradigm thing in which RA and cult/occult practices is located, by which both organized faith institutions (ie. Christian) and Satanic groups are organized and which people use to define-describe what's going on, what it's all about. I'm less invested in this POV, although I have a latent guarded distrust of secret occult and self-described Satanic organizations/ideas, as having the potential for abuse, misuse of power and for provoking people with a-social and even anti-social destructive, abusive and vain- imaginings and goals, for power and influence and material benefits; The thing is, from my overview of many of these cultic associations, they directly repudiate the qualities of mercy, compassion, selfless love, respect, grace, cooperation, empathy, peace, and like that, instead providing the basis for such things as selfish indulgence, lustful desires that are inherantly destructive and deceptive and that can easily lead to the manipulation and abuse and harming of others, 'excusing' lies and deception, corruption and fraud, and likewise damaging and 'dark' things, unimaginable cruelties and barbarisms, horrors and unspeakably foul, noxious crimes, ie. "evil" as ordinarily defined.<br><br>So, to my mind, there's definitely something 'there' that people deliberately cultivate in their pursuit of 'Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law", giving little credence (in its more extreme expressions) to 'harm not another' -- this scruple against transgressing seems to be the subtle unacknowledged exception which is at core where many 'dark' practices cultivate the energy of their victims, delighting in taking their full measure of perversions by way of bestial, horrible crimes:<br><br>For further info (first link is VERY detailed with descriptions and testimony of child-abuse RA victims, graphic and deeply disturbing, to be avoided by RA victims for possible triggering cues) on what's at issue here, and why holding occult groups in suspician is just good, decent common sense:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.the7thfire.com/new_world_order/Freemasonry/satanic_ritual_abuse.htm">www.the7thfire.com/new_wo..._abuse.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>US child-victim testimony of blood-sacrifice, torture and ritual abuse practices related to Egyptian Book of the Dead, with victim-drawn crude illustrations<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.thewatcherfiles.com/mind_control_slavery.html">www.thewatcherfiles.com/m...avery.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>Mind Control Slavery and New World Order<br>-- According to this extremely disturbing report, Monarch Program<br>mind-control survivors claim to have been used as high-tech slaves by<br>certain intelligence agencies and top-ranking politicians. Extracted from Nexus Magazine, Volume 6, Number 2 (February-March 1999).<br>From our web page at: <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.nexusmagazine.com//MindControlNWO.html">www.nexusmagazine.com//Mi...olNWO.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>. . .<br>"Given the ghastly mind-control experiments constantly being conducted<br>by the CIA, and its past connections to fiendish monsters like Dr<br>Campbell and Dr Sidney Gottlieb, it does not take much to conclude that<br>the CIA follows satanic roads," Coleman concludes in his monograph,<br>"Illuminati in America".<br><br>Also, esp. appropriate to analysing the nexus of US Military prison torture practices with Satanic/occult practices/tradition and CIA/MiLIntel mind-control research/ops:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.kathleen-sullivan.com/Iraq%20Revelations%20Part%203.htm">www.kathleen-sullivan.com...rt%203.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>Kathleen Sullivan identifies and analyzes the Abu Ghraib torture/abuse practices that are common to those the CIA and Military Intelligence perfected and used through MKULTRA mind-control research, comparing and contrasting the effect to prisoners and ritual-abuse/mind control victims. <br><br>NOTE: This is one of the most detailed treatments of the Abu Ghraib prison abuses, giving an accurate sense of how thoroughly foul and detestable those officers are in the chain of command who either authorized or by their criminal negligence allowed these abuses to occur -- as well as serving a powerful indictment of an unaccountable military and political bureaucracy under the corrupt 'leadership' of the neocon clique that deliberately created the specific and necessary legal, military culture and occupation conditions in order to facilitate the enormous abuses that subsequently occurred.<br><br>The reality of America's moral depravity is inescapable, part of the bigger picture of what Abu Ghraib abuse was really all about, providing the main reason why US NWO hegemonic ambitions must fail -- as one considers that Abu Ghraib (and another dozen prisons in Iraq where equal if not greater abuse occurred) was just the latest manifestation of a putrid legacy, in which thousands of mind-control victims were deliberated subjected over decades to some of the most appalling crimes imagineable, while the 'system' of abusers the US Government covertly sanctioned was protected and spread far beyond laboratory confines as budding amateur mind-control neophytes went on to victimize more thousands of children and citizens, creating an underground market economy for mind-controlled sex-servants and torture victims and child-captives -- which incredibly, perversely, shows evidence it too was protected and made-use-of by top public officials and incorporated into secret, satanic and occult organizations -- whether to protect their 'official' programs or obscure the links that led to Government contractors and covert projects, or to cultivate another generation of home-grown perpetrators and victims that could be coopted for Gov. purposes when and if the need arose ...<br><br>The hidden consequences of America's tacit accomodation in perpetuating and institutionalizing the legacy of CIA/MiLInel mind-control/torture crimes are bound to manifest themselves as blowback or in other ways in society, in culture, in Government unaccountability and cover-up and complicity, in organized/subsumed criminal networks, in the glorification and pop-culture media desensitization and commercial-entertainment exploitation and institutionalization of violence and gruesome, self-indulgent abuse and victimization of targetted 'others', ie, outcasts, the 'enemy', minorities, the 'others', the opposition (recall the nutty rightwing parody-hatecrime of bumperstickers reading 'Liberal Hunting License', which sure sounds like a Rovian-neocon propaganda campaign to inspire mindthink hyper-reactionary pop-conformism: part of the 'Liberals are the enemy! Pavlovian conditioning strategy encouraging right-left rote-hating on-cue), and so on. <br><br>During the late-60s and 70s while the US was waging wars and killing and maiming and torturing masses of people in Southeast asia and more covertly in Africa and Latin America, participating and directing the overthrow of Chile and Iraq and Indonesia (among others nations) and putting in-place mercenary killer-terrorists and Death Squads, committing the most foul and depraved brutalities under the Public Relations whitewash banner of 'preserving human rights' and 'liberating' people from tyranny -- the immense hypocrisy wasn't completely hidden and the resulting cognitive dissonance helped create the conditions for America becoming a country of radically-increasing violent domestic crime, where even the police were enlisted to bust-heads of peaceful student-protesters and the CIA/NSA targetted civil-rights and peace protestors as 'enemies of the state' appropriate for legal intimidation, surveillance, infiltration, blackmail, false-arrests, manufactured 'evidence', agent provocateurs, and even worse. <br><br>Likewise, the relatively-recent spate of school shooting and sniper-killings in public places seem a reflection of the violence that America has institutionalized and made a core part of its values system, from manufacturing a massive stockpile of Chemical, nuclear and biological weapons while bemoaning 'other' states for allegedly doing the same (and even other states that were NOT doing the same!), calling for inspections while refusing the same, denouncing terrorism while being the world's leading agent subsidizing terrorism, exploiting arms and drugs-smuggling networks despite the enormous damage they do to communities and states, creating a msssive prison-industry where more citizens per capita are locked up than anywhere else in the world, creating a virtual global gulag system where toture and abuse and violence are endemic and authorities are under little if any oversight or accountability and all due-process protections are ignored, conducting wars and violent covert-ops around the world, and etc.<br><br>LOTTA dots to connect and dirt to excavate and light to put on these critical issues.<br>Distraction and name-calling and strawman jousts aren't IMHO the way to get these things said or better-known.<br>My two-cents, natch.<br>Peace -n- light!<br>Starman<br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :smokin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smokin.gif ALT=":smokin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
Starman
 
Posts: 410
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 3:57 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

If Jeff wants

Postby Avalon » Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:31 pm

"This is the point I've been trying to make - there is no criteria. There is no way to ever know for sure. It is difficult to prove to people in real life - and impossible online."<br><br>You'd be surprised, GDN01, what sort of information can be verified. And yes, there are some guidelines you can use that can help augment your gut instincts about someone's credibility.<br><br>I am in the midst of doing a couple of write-ups that will illustrate what I mean, both in general and in specific.<br><br>If Jeff would like me to privately email him my real name as a matter of accountability beyond that which my words alone reveal, he has only to ask here in this thread and I will do so. My real name comes up about 800 times in a Google search, and I can give him the names of half a dozen published authors who either know me in person or have had considerable online contact with me over the years and would be happy to give me a good character reference.<br><br><br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Avalon
 
Posts: 1529
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 2:53 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

wow

Postby human » Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:43 pm

<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>It is clear to me as an investigative journalist with more than 30 years experience (and as an attorney with more than 30 years experience in the legal field both before during anfd since law school) that RI has become a target of the RA perpetrators who are now attempting to discredit RI and those who are disussing what may be very real scenarios and experiences but who are afraid to do so publicly for obvious reasons.......</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL<br><br>how come i dont get to be a blackoperator???<br><br>I WANT TO BE A BLACK OPERATOR!!!!!<br><br>lololololol<br><br>im sure glad to see everyone jumping all over m constructive dialogue idea...<br><br>seventhson, dude... you make me feel grounded in reality... sometimes, if you look at the computer screen too long, you will see floating spots, but man, that doesnt mean you connected the dots..<br><br>shit, even black operators should be welcome here IF IT IS TRUTH YOU SEEK, because the truth is that we all have a story to tell & it is valid because it is.. and that is how i interpret biao's thing...<br><br>but, he would do well reading "The Dragon Legacy" by Nicholas De Vere.... supposedly my family has drank starfire ever since..<br><br>one<br>human? <p></p><i></i>
human
 
Posts: 169
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 3:21 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Okay Starman - You ASKED for it...

Postby Seventhson » Mon Jul 04, 2005 9:08 pm

You say:<br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>Oh Come ON ?!<br>Nobody's been 'attacking' Biao -- Get a grip, pleeze. But what's really odd is that, from my POV, you yourself have been exhibiting more of these very patterns than anyone else: disruptions, 'constant' demeaning slurs and challenges to credibility -- like, HullO?????</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br><br>I beg to differ. An attack on credibility and name calling IS an ad hominem personal attack. My posts have been in RESPONSE to these ad hominem attacks and have focused on the motive for the attacks, i.e. an attempt to harm the credibility of this site as a place where victims can tell their stories with relatively little fear of persecution from their perpetrators. Obviously if this site becomes effective on the RA issue (which really started in many ways with the Johnny Gosch (sp?) stories and the ties of these rings to the White Hoiuse and to the Bushes, then it is going to be a magnet for right wing defenders of the dark slimey evil which is RA. So I am merely pointing out the obvious: those who intend to demean Baio by namecalling and ridicule become suspects as fascist disruptors nd are not acting in good faith.<br><br>The only way to expose the slime is to shine a light on it. If people want to prove they are for real they can provide their bona fides (real name, background, phone, etc., articles they've posted --- verfiable facts and info) that can be used to relatively dispel the taint of their assaultive posts demeaning to Biao and all purported RA vicitms. (And don't get me wrong, purported victims could be blackoperators too, posing as victims)<br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>And what's this harping about volunteering Jeff to arbitrate people 'proving their bonafides?? From what I've seen, the intimidation and name-calling hasn't come from those you've listed</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END-->. <br><br>It is the only means I can see to get people to either put up or shut up. It is directed at possible disruptors who SHOULD have a real and viable cover story even if they are pro-perps --- but at least Jeff will know exactly who you are and keep an eye on you. I have done this and urge others who are sincere to do so. It cuts through a lot of the bullshit quickly. Unless one doesn't trust Jeff or believes their info will be gleaned by the extremists or anyone else: they should ante up their info.<br><br>I imagine that blackoperators will obfuscate on this point and blather, but otherwise, in my mind, they are just dissembling and breaking.<br><br><br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>It's like, having started-off on a track of criticizing JM for questioning Biao's conclusions on a trivial point and slamming him for use of the qualified descriptor 'hysterical' (for which he's apologized at-least -twice- : <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>a more appropriate word to describe the apparant jumping to a hasty conclusion based on a very weak evidence link not even supported by a testable argument might have been impulsive, desperate, reactionary, over-eager or presumptuous -- and the distinction has to be made that JM wasn't making a character-slur but stating his impression of the impulse itself by which a leap of logic is made</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->) you just can't back down or get back on-topic, but elevated this apparant but silly disagreement into a conspiracy including Tabasco and Avalon, even alleging some kind of sinister, organized black-ops agenda</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END-->.<br><br>Interesting - you say the "disagreement is "silly" and you say that instead of hysterical Biao's thoughts should have been called "<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>a hasty conclusion based on weak evidence link not even supported by a testable argument</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END-->" and "<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>impulsive, desperate, reactionary, over-eager or presumptuous</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END-->"<br><br>You compound the insults to Baio and defend the insult argument and then, irrationally, embrace Baio's proposal in some obtuse and transparent false effort at conciliation or alliance with Biao, whom you have further insulted and demeaned. How neat!<br><br>I am not elevating the "silly disagreement" into a conspiracy. I am basically saying that the attack on Baio seems to me to be a concerted effort to throw the discussions off track and to try to discredit those who are investigating and discussing the BFEE related RA issues; the primary purpose being to prevent this movement and this board from growing and having credibility.<br><br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em> I just don't see it.</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>Take your blinders off. Open your eyes. Or wake up.<br><br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>The escalating argument about intentions and accusations that developed over the relatively innocuous stating of opinion and asking for elaboration has been little more than silly, entirely off the point and from what I can see, argumentative for the sake of being combative; not constructive at all.</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>If you think calling a victim hysterical because they identify the RA they have experienced and have discussed here at RI with Thelemic fundamentalism (which is really, after all, just a modest opinion regarding how to best describe the perpetrators) is an "innocuous stating of opinion and asking for elaboration" - then I imagine that you can come up with a thesaurus full of euphemisms for insulting and trying to discredit victims of the BFEE and their necrophile apologists. <p></p><i></i>
Seventhson
 
Posts: 152
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 8:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Blackoperators

Postby Seventhson » Mon Jul 04, 2005 9:36 pm

Okay Human-<br><br>You say:<br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>seventhson, dude... you make me feel grounded in reality... sometimes, if you look at the computer screen too long, you will see floating spots, but man, that doesnt mean you connected the dots..<br><br>shit, even black operators should be welcome here IF IT IS TRUTH YOU SEEK, because the truth is that we all have a story to tell & it is valid because it is.. and that is how i interpret biao's thing...<br><br>but, he would do well reading "The Dragon Legacy" by Nicholas De Vere.... supposedly my family has drank starfire ever since..</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>WHY do you want to be a blackops perpetrator?<br><br>It's not funny.<br><br>They are vile inhuman, inhumane and often necrophilic.<br><br>Their purpose is to harm humanity for filthy lucre and mammon. And perverted necrophilic lust.<br><br>The NEXT characteristic of a blackoperator is to assault someone's perception of reality: to assert that they are nuts or "off their meds" etc.<br><br>Thanks. You COULD be a black operator no problem. You seem to have the knack.<br><br>Call homeland security and I am sure they can hook you up.<br><br><br>I DOUBT Blackoperators would be welcome here by Jeff (except to be exposed)because by definition their whole purpose in life is to spread lies - so your premise is ridiculous.<br><br>As for the book recommended - I will look for it.<br><br>Even blackoperators are people too (despite appearances at times)<br><br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
Seventhson
 
Posts: 152
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 8:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to SRA and Occult Crime

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests