by havanagilla » Fri Jul 14, 2006 1:19 pm
I mostly agree with RI's blog, except two things stand out (for me)<br>1. Iran's posture is far from "rational", in the sense that they too want to be part of the nuclear club. We cannot change the standards to side with the enemy's enemy. From what I hearing from refugees who fled Iran, the regime is very bad for women (which for me is a sign of deeper issues) and joining the nuke world is not exactly a noble goal. I agree, thatin light of the balance, they want to pose a bit of a resistance to the US "democracy exports, inc", but all in all, and standing on its own feet, their goal is reproachable as much as any other gov, imposing its war policies on its citizens.<br>2. Since I totally agree that this war was preplanned and only needed a pretext, how about some compassion to the israeli citizenry (and the kidnapped token chips) who are hostages of such a military leadership. Since there WAS NO public support for nothing like this operation, the most dirty old trick was used, and apparently we are looking at two VERY BIZARRE accidents that led to the kidnap. The two cases are now under "official invstigation" to see how come, response was delayed in more than hour, allowing the kidnap to happen.<br>I don't want to be paranoid, but I will not rule out a "shooting in the leg" for the necessary public support. And following this, I will not rule out a "minor 9/11" in ISRAEL to provide the excuse for the desired goal - hitting Iran. Mind you, if the Israeli public was so bloodthirsty, this would not have been necessary. I am not hearing any support for the other hostages here. Its the usual one dimensional parapolitical digging, that goes very deep, but stops on the surface when it comes to ...well...will not say the J word here. <br><br>Except this reservation, yes, this was coming, with a without an excuse, but now 10 people are gone for this farce. And at least one family, Shalit, is aware of its victimization and speaking loud. (not that anyone cares). <p></p><i></i>