Inside the US's regime-change school

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Inside the US's regime-change school

Postby Qutb » Tue Mar 14, 2006 8:22 am

<!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/HC14Ak04.html" target="top">Asia Times</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Inside the US's regime-change school</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>From a Special Correspondent <br><br>TEHRAN - When the invitation to attend a human-rights workshop in Dubai in the United Arab Emirates came, it was a complete surprise for Nilofar, an attractive Iranian woman in her early 30s who works for an international organization in Tehran and claims to be apolitical. <br><br>"I got the invite through a press officer at another international organization who clearly did not know the real nature of the workshop," Nilofar told Asia Times Online over a series of three interviews from last September to February. "When I arrived in Dubai, the other participants were very surprised to see me and told me that these workshops are only for activists. So I don't know how I got in, really, except if their selection process is not as stringent as they would make it out to be." <br><br>Once in Dubai, Nilofar was booked by one of two organizations running the program into the Holiday Inn. She recounts that the course organizers were a mixture of Los Angeles-based exiled Iranians, <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Americans who appeared to supervise the course and whose affiliation remained unclear throughout, and three Serbs who said they belonged to the Otpor democratic movement that overthrew the late Serbian president Slobodan Milosevic in 2000.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> <br><br>The highly secretive nature of the workshops meant that they were misleadingly advertised in the lobby of the hotel as a conference by the "Griffin Hospital". The organizers, instructors and students identified themselves through aliases and were instructed to communicate with one another after the course was over through Hushmail accounts, an encrypted e-mail service that claims to be hack-proof. <br><br>In class, the Serbian instructors organized role-playing games in which the participants would assume the personas of characters such an Iranian woman or a Shi'ite cleric. Throughout these exercises in empathy and psychology, stress was laid on the importance of ridiculing the political elite as an effective tool of demythologizing them in the eyes of the people. <br><br>(...)<br><br>Last week, State Department deputy spokesman Adam Ereli announced that a newly established Office of Iranian Affairs within the department would focus on introducing democracy in Iran. The top officials behind the new policy are said to be Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Nicholas Burns, Elizabeth Cheney (Vice President Dick Cheney's daughter), Scott Carpenter and David Denehy, in addition to the secretary of state herself, Condoleezza Rice. <br><br>(...)<br><br>"The logic of putting people out in the field [is] to use the language, to develop the on-the-ground expertise so that 10, 15, 20 years from now, we've got - just like we have Arab experts ... we used to have Soviet experts - we've got a cadre of Iran experts." <br><br>(...)<br><br>The State Department's initiative will presumably complement the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) officers specializing in Iran who are based out of neighboring countries, such as the UAE, Turkey and Azerbaijan. <br><br>One such agent was Reuel Marc Gerecht, a CIA case officer in the 1980s who worked under diplomatic cover in the US Consulate in Istanbul. His job was to debrief would-be Iranian defectors and - as he describes in his book Know Thine Enemy - it often felt like a "chance to play God". <br><br>"I'd let hundreds of desperate Iranians languish in Turkey. People who'd given me insights never found in books. I'd watched mothers with children drop to their knees and beg for my help," he wrote. "They didn't want money, just a little kindness, a visa out of their personal hell ... [they met] a sympathetic man waiting in a warm room full of food, coffee, tea, alcohol and cigarettes. A US official who'd politely strip them of all their memories and every corpuscle of information and then reopen the street-side door." <br><br>more <p></p><i></i>
Qutb
 
Posts: 1203
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 2:28 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Inside the US's regime-change school

Postby Gouda » Tue Mar 14, 2006 8:51 am

Yep.<br><br>Otpor. <br><br>Reuel Marc Gerecht. AEI resident fellow and PNAC specialist. CIA too? I'm shocked. <br><br>Otpor + Gerecht. Balkans to the Middle East. Another example of NeoLibConism, underwritten by the underworld from Reagan to HW to Clinton to W and beyond.... <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Gouda
 
Posts: 3009
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:53 am
Location: a circular mould
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Inside the US's regime-change school

Postby starroute » Tue Mar 14, 2006 3:08 pm

I don't know about this specific example, but many training sessions of this sort are conducted by the International Republican Institute, which seems to work in partnership with Morton Blackwell's Leadership Institute. (That's the fine organization which trained both Karl Rove and Jeff Gannon, among others.) For example, here's some stuff I came up with by googling on a fellow names Ron Nehring:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.cagop.org/leadership_content.aspx">www.cagop.org/leadership_content.aspx</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Ron Nehring is a leader who has volunteered to teach campaign strategy and tactics to others at campaign seminars throughout the United States and Canada, and even in such troubled areas as the Middle East and Haiti, through the International Republican Institute and the Leadership Institute.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.kuwaittimes.net">www.kuwaittimes.net</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>12/14/2005<br><br>These were some of the points raised by Ronald Nehring, vice-chairman of the California Republican Party, in his address at a roundtable talk held by the Kuwait Journalist Association on Monday. In the diwaniya-like discussion focusing on the issue of the 'Middle East's current political arena', a visiting panel made up of US-based journalists, legal advisors and a former CIA officer addressed issues ranging from America's view of the Middle East, the transformation the region is undergoing and the role of the media in the United States. Other topics that were raised were the war in Iraq, the public perception of the Bush administration, democracy and women's political rights along with the US presence in the region in the long run. Nehring said, "Americans hold a very positive view of Kuwait." However, he stressed that this had not always been the case. "Before 1990 most Americans would not have been able to locate Kuwait on the map," he added.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.motherjones.com/news/outfront/2004/11/11_401.html">www.motherjones.com/news/...1_401.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>In early 2004, chaos overwhelmed Haiti. In January, a rebellion erupted against President Jean-Bertrand Aristide, the former slum priest who had frequently angered the United States with his leftist rhetoric. Aristide had twice been elected, but he had alienated many Haitians with his increasing demagoguery and use of violence against the opposition. Yet polls showed that Aristide remained relatively popular, so even experienced Haiti watchers were surprised when, in late February, armed militias marched on the nation’s capital while demonstrators shut down the streets. In the violence, some 100 Haitians were killed. At dawn on February 29, with the militias closing in, Aristide left Haiti on a U.S. government plane.<br><br>But did the rebellion really spring from nowhere? Maybe not. Several leaders of the demonstrations -- some of whom also had links to the armed rebels -- had been getting organizational help and training from a U.S. government-financed organization. The group, the International Republican Institute (IRI), is supposed to focus on nonpartisan, grassroots democratization efforts overseas. But in Haiti and other countries, such as Venezuela and Cambodia, the institute -- which, though not formally affiliated with the GOP, is run by prominent Republicans and staffed by party insiders -- has increasingly sided with groups seeking the overthrow of elected but flawed leaders who are disliked in Washington.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=starroute>starroute</A> at: 3/14/06 12:09 pm<br></i>
starroute
 
Posts: 341
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:01 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Inside the US's regime-change school

Postby StarmanSkye » Tue Mar 14, 2006 3:41 pm

America's largely unacknowledged history of grievious hypocrisy, irresponsibility, dishonesty and duplicious alterior motives in its foreign policy is the basis for greater and greater frauds that now affects almost every political office --it's the elephant in the room everyone is aware of but that most people prefer to ignore. The result is a pragmatic cynicism and tacit accomodation to government in which lies, corruption and fraud have become normalized.<br><br>Fifty years ago, the State Dept. was keen to undermine Iran's nascent democracy and install a resurrected Monarchy because the President was going to nationalize its US and British-run oil industry. The US-installed and staunchly-supported Shah banned political pluralism and brutally repressed all dissent. If the US was sincere (cough, gag) about 'bringing' democracy to Iran, it should FIRST re-establish its credibility by thoroughly reviewing and revising its hypocritical, illegal and morally illegitimate Foreign Policy -- and fully prosecuting everyone who was involved in the policy, planning and covert ops that violated Iran's sovereignty by overthrowing Iran's democratically-elected President and actively endorsing the resulting despotic 25-year rule. Essentially, the US should acknowledge and apologize for its monstrous sabotage of authentic democratic principles and its betrayal of the Iranian people -- a similiar script repeated in many dozens of nations during the past 50+ years and which arguably has greatly contributed to the nation and the world's present political and economic crises.<br><br>That's the crux of what keeps sticking in my gut, the more I learn about the US's two-faced role in the post-war world imposing conditions that are counter to the ideals of national sovereignty, self-determinism and self-governance, rule of law and social justice, respect for human and civil rights, respect for all persons, and valuing peace as the most desired and widely beneficial state of human society.<br><br>The most basic precept of moral behavior, 'Do unto others as you would have them do into you' seems not just to be discounted, but to have become a singularly most despised and reviled principle that is inimical to US foreign policy. The positions and policies the US has to other nations are often those it would NEVER accept itself -- which leads to the most specious rationalizations and devious reasonings like those we've increasingly seen, ie., picking and choosing WHICH parts of the human rights conventions the US will observe, inventing the doctrine of pre-emptive 'defense', disguising military intervention as 'humanitarian aid', vastly expanding and developing its Nuclear weapon inventory -- and formalizing a new first-use doctrine (while hpocritically demonizing select enemy-nations who are developing their nuclear capability), employing a military doctrine of scorched-earth total-warfare (ie., 'fear-and-awe') including 'acceptable' torture, reprisals and the terrorizing of civilians, and intervening in other nation's domestic political and economic affairs (openly as well as covertly).<br><br>Perhaps as despicable, an offshoot of this national 'policy' of hypocrisy and fraud is a popular public attitude of pride and even enthusiasm that disguises arrogance and contempt as courage and generosity. An oft-seen phenomenon among many people who ought to know better about some truly awful things their government has done or is doing is a seemingly-willful denial of fact, or even such self-deluding idiocies as reviling or discrediting the messenger by way of dismissing the message. For instance: HOW can anyone justify the scorched-earth/free-fire-zone treatment of the entire city of Fallujah, with a population of 200,000 - 250,000 -- with women, children and old men allowed to evacuate to unsupplied refugee camps (at the beginning of winter, 2004!), and the US military bombing the hospital and then the entire city, utterly destroying or severely damaging most homes and businesses?<br><br>To any rational, civilized person, this is clearly a huge war crime, made even worse by the specious premise of the war as a kind of 'self-defense' -- and now the US is agitating military violence against Iran because it is messing-around with nuclear stuff -- or more probably, the oil bourse threatens the sanctity of the dollar as the world's reserve currency, necessary to keep the whole ponzi-scheme floating and that the world's biggest globalist gangsters are dependant on.<br><br>As for a single moment when the US collectively took the 'wrong' path -- the Johnson coup d'etat of '63 works for me. Everything that has happened since can be traced to that single act of treason -- even tho it was likely bought-and-sold by most of those involved as a kind of 'noble' patriotic act that would be good for 'business'.<br><br>The NWO and Global War on Terra are legacies of that hostile takeover.<br><br>Starman <p></p><i></i>
StarmanSkye
 
Posts: 2670
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:32 pm
Location: State of Jefferson
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Inside the US's regime-change school

Postby professorpan » Tue Mar 14, 2006 4:38 pm

Damn well-put, Starman. <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
professorpan
 
Posts: 3592
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 12:17 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Inside the US's regime-change school

Postby Col Quisp » Tue Mar 14, 2006 4:49 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>As for a single moment when the US collectively took the 'wrong' path -- the Johnson coup d'etat of '63 works for me. Everything that has happened since can be traced to that single act of treason -- even tho it was likely bought-and-sold by most of those involved as a kind of 'noble' patriotic act that would be good for 'business'.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Although i pretty much agree, I must ask:<br><br>What about Nixon's claim that Kennedy stole the election? Didn't that tarnish this country as well? Sliminess has always been here, and always will. <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Col Quisp
 
Posts: 734
Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 2:52 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Inside the US's regime-change school

Postby Gouda » Tue Mar 14, 2006 5:07 pm

The NYT Mag had this slightly misleading but informative piece By ROGER COHEN: <br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/library/magazine/home/20001126mag-serbia.html">Who Really Brought Down Milosevic?</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br>"By the time of the October revolution the most important battle - for the hearts and minds of average Serbs - had already been won by student activists operating in the countryside."<br><br>***<br><br>The <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.emperors-clothes.com/news/cialectures.htm">ENC</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> has this: <br>"Is the Balkans the new Latin America? Bulgarian paper says: 'CIA is tutoring Serbian group, Otpor' <br>- From the Bulgarian newspaper, "The Monitor", Translated by Blagovesta Doncheva<br><br>***<br><br>And here's a case study on how the <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/articles.php?artno=1548">CIA-NED-NDI-AID</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> coordinate in the case of Nicaragua and Venezuala. <br>"CIA Electoral Interventions, and Nicaragua as a Model for Venezuela" <br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Summary<br><br>It is no secret that the government of the United States is carrying out a program of operations in favor of the Venezuelan political opposition to remove President Hugo Chávez Frías and the coalition of parties that supports him from power. The budget for this program, initiated by the administration of Bill Clinton and intensified under George W. Bush, has risen from some $2 million in 2001 to $9 million in 2005, and it disguises itself as activities to “promote democracy,” “resolve conflicts,” and “strengthen civic life.” It consists of providing money, training, counsel and direction to an extensive network of political parties, NGO’s, mass media, unions, and businessmen, all determined to end the bolivarian revolutionary process. The program has clear short, medium, and long-term goals, and adapts easily to changes in the fluid Venezuelan political process.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Gouda
 
Posts: 3009
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:53 am
Location: a circular mould
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to Middle East

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest