Anagrams, Sacred Geometry, and the Dollar bill.

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Oh and.......Starroute....

Postby slimmouse » Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:50 am

<br><br> <br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr> Frankly, I think someone has *way* too much time on their hands.<br><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br> When it comes to attempting to articulate to others, that which the few have attempted to conceal for their own selfish ends, Ive got all the time in the world.<br><br> At least you got that bit right.<br><br> How about you ? <p></p><i></i>
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

Re: Except of course.

Postby thoughtographer » Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:52 am

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Except of course, that this Geometry forms the basis of understanding how this whole game is played.<br><br>Youre take on the Double Tetrahedron Starroute ?<br><br>To the uninformed of course, this is "The star of David";<br>But one of many such religious symbols that has caused more than enough suffering to satisfy those who truly understand the nonsense that is organised religion - To those few, who wish to control the many thru such mechanisms.<br><br>Instead, how about explaining what this really means ?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>I actually agree that this pretty much amounts to a whole lot of nothing, especially if you look at the history and evolution of the Great Seal over the years.<br><br>I do think that you have your terminology confused, slimmouse. A tetrahedron is not a hexagram, though the two are mathematically related. <p></p><i></i>
thoughtographer
 
Posts: 724
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 12:12 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Here we go.

Postby slimmouse » Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:56 am

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>I do think that you have your terminology confused, slimmouse. A tetrahedron is not a hexagram, though the two are mathematically related.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br> " Now you understand me, now you dont"<br><br> What does a tetrahedron look like in a 2 dimensional surface ?<br><br> A triangle is my best guess. What do two of them look like ?<br><br> Interlocking Tetrahedra to anyone who can see beyond the veneer.<br> <br> Enough already. Goodnight. <p></p><i></i>
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

Re: Here we go.

Postby thoughtographer » Wed Mar 15, 2006 1:00 am

I understand you, I just don't share your opinion. I honestly didn't mean to put you off the discussion. By all means, carry on with your studies in whatever way you see fit. <p></p><i></i>
thoughtographer
 
Posts: 724
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 12:12 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Anagrams, Sacred Geometry, and the Dollar bill.

Postby OnoI812 » Wed Mar 15, 2006 2:23 am

What is it with these freaks and guys named OSMAN?<br><br>... <p></p><i></i>
OnoI812
 
Posts: 528
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Anagrams, Sacred Geometry, and the Dollar bill.

Postby sunny » Wed Mar 15, 2006 3:07 am

I'm sure you all know there is a certain way you can fold a twenty to make it look like the Twin Towers-complete with perfectly positioned plumes of smoke billowing out of them. <br><br>A little silly, I know, but it shocked me quite a bit when it was shown to me soon after 9/11. <p></p><i></i>
sunny
 
Posts: 5220
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Alabama
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: Anagrams, Sacred Geometry, and the Dollar bill.

Postby starroute » Wed Mar 15, 2006 1:22 pm

My take?<br><br>Certain things grab the human mind in a peculiar way. They tantalize with hints of a higher meaning that is just beyond the reach of rational understanding. As a result, they can have a Zen koan-like effect of leading the mind to higher levels of integration.<br><br>However, those things work in this consciousness-expanding way only when they are still new and surprising and a little too large for our present understanding to encompass. Once they become known and familiar, they no longer have the same effect. <br><br>Much of religion -- all religions -- consists of the fossilized remains of what were at one time "active" systems and are now merely jujus or sentimental reminders.<br><br>Sacred geometry was an active system at the time when people were first discovering what wonders you could perform with a straight-edge and a compass -- say, from about 2500 to 1000 BC. Many of our current religious symbols, from the Star of David to the yin-yang symbol to mandalas in general, derive from that period of discovery. But by the time Euclid wrote down his "Elements," sacred geometry was no longer magical. It had been rationalized and reduced to punitive exercises for school children.<br><br>In a similar way, when people first started writing with alphabets -- whose letters could be freely rearranged and swapped with numbers -- they became entranced by the possibilities of anagrams and gematria for suggesting higher levels of connection and meaning, beyond those of ordinary appearance. But that was 2000 years ago. It's been a long time since anybody gained enlightenment from an anagram.<br><br>One additional function for these systems -- even when they're starting to show their age -- is that they're useful as codes and cyphers for expressing heresies in times of enforced orthodoxy. I believe that's why so many of them remained popular through the Middle Ages and the early modern era.<br><br>But once the witch-hunts and the burning of heretics ceased in the late 1600's, the need for that sort of encypherment did as well. A lot of the hidden systems went public then. The Invisible College became the Royal Society. The Freemasons stepped out of the shadows. And the old occult symbology and word-games became just a relic of times past.<br><br>The impulse that produced them is still around -- but its points of focus always move on. Throughout the 20th century, people tweaked their sense of higher connectivity with Einsteinian relativity and quantum theory. In the 1950's, the Boomers projected their half-formed dreams of subversion and liberation onto the incomprehensible lyrics and nonsense refrains of rock 'n' roll. <br><br>But it's been a long time since we saw the development of a highly organized system of deliberate occult references similar to sacred geometry or gematria -- and I don't know what sort of conditions (if any) could bring something like that about again. <p></p><i></i>
starroute
 
Posts: 341
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:01 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Thanks for that.

Postby slimmouse » Wed Mar 15, 2006 3:52 pm

<br> Thanks for your perspective Starroute. I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree on your overall perspective.<br><br> I found your comment on the history of all of this particularly interesting, particularly the dating of around 2,500 BC to 1000 BC.<br><br> A quick perusal of the history found in the Temple of Seti should bury those myths ( no pun intended )<br><br> Much of the ancient knowledge and lore was of course meanwhile destroyed at Alexandria way back then, preparing mankind for the Usurpation ( is that a word ? ) of knowledge of his creation and various other widely known facets of the nature of life and all the rest of it, by the various schools of Organised Religion.<br><br> It is my personal opinion, that such knowledge has of course been retained - but not for general consumption of course by "The profane" , ( useless eaters, One Food Units ), rather for those who wish to use us all as their whipping folks. <p></p><i></i>
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

Re: Thanks for that.

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Wed Mar 15, 2006 4:30 pm

Starroute, you wrote-<br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>But it's been a long time since we saw the development of a highly organized system of deliberate occult references similar to sacred geometry or gematria -- and I don't know what sort of conditions (if any) could bring something like that about again.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>The conditions that indeed did bring that about again were the development of psychology as a tool of the National inSecurity State.<br><br>The US government and its corporate owners use symbols to rule the masses.<br><br>That's exactly what TV, movies, and other "mainstream" media really are, social engineering symbols and myths using narratives that tap into primal social instincts like a "highly organized system of deliberate occult references."<br><br>I tried to line this out in many movies in the thread called "How to Not Be Diverted, Demoralized, or Diffused."<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm10.showMessage?topicID=3427.topic">p216.ezboard.com/frigorou...3427.topic</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>And that's why Jeff's website is so subversive to power and thus, as he wrote himself, "an anti-fascist website."<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>'Breaking the Code Breaks the Spell.'</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>And Starroute says just this here-<br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>However, those things work in this consciousness-expanding way only when they are still new and surprising and a little too large for our present understanding to encompass. <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Once they become known and familiar, they no longer have the same effect.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=hughmanateewins>Hugh Manatee Wins</A> at: 3/15/06 2:03 pm<br></i>
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Thanks for that.

Postby thoughtographer » Wed Mar 15, 2006 4:37 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>'Breaking the Code Breaks the Spell.'<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Or it leads to madness.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
thoughtographer
 
Posts: 724
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 12:12 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Madness

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Wed Mar 15, 2006 4:59 pm

Thoughtographer (great username) wrote-<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Or it leads to madness.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>It should make you mad, as in 'The truth will upset you free.'<br><br>All this is understandable and communicable. <br>Personally, I think people who tell you otherwise are probably themselves just confused, demoralized, naive, or even perhaps an impeding naysayer acting out personal or professional motives.<br><br>Bumper sticker: "Those who will tell you to give up your dreams have lost theirs."<br><br>I don't consider this info to be "dreamy" but you get the idea.<br>Blanket cynicism is nihilism masquerading as pragmatism. <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Madness

Postby thoughtographer » Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:48 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Thoughtographer (great username) wrote-<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Thanks, but I got it from Jule Eisenbud.<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>All this is understandable and communicable.<br>Personally, I think people who tell you otherwise are probably themselves just confused, demoralized, naive, or even perhaps an impeding naysayer acting out personal or professional motives.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Just to clarify, I meant "madness" as in "lunacy". Regardless, the number of people I choose to share my opinions with gets smaller by the day, and that's a direct result of an extremely negative series of personal experiences in my recent history. Unchecked enthusiasm can lead to trouble if you're not careful, or at least, that's my experience. <p></p><i></i>
thoughtographer
 
Posts: 724
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 12:12 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Interesting.

Postby slimmouse » Wed Mar 15, 2006 6:23 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Just to clarify, I meant "madness" as in "lunacy". Regardless, the number of people I choose to share my opinions with gets smaller by the day, and that's a direct result of an extremely negative series of personal experiences in my recent history. Unchecked enthusiasm can lead to trouble if you're not careful, or at least, that's my experience.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br> Thoughtographer;<br><br> Youre the guy who pointed me, and a few others to the MadCabbie blogspot a while back.<br><br> How would you describe him ?<br><br> A lunatic, or a man expressing his opinions to too many folks ? <p></p><i></i>
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

Wisdom

Postby antiaristo » Wed Mar 15, 2006 6:42 pm

Did Shakespeare not deal straight with this when he wrote of "Those twin impostors, triumph and disaster"?<br><br>If it is SPIRITUAL warfare, one can do naught else.<br><br>It's not whether you win or lose (this round).<br>It's how you play the game.<br><br>In case you have not noticed, they (the NWO) try to show that to fight back is futile. <p></p><i></i>
antiaristo
 
Posts: 2555
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 9:50 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Interesting.

Postby thoughtographer » Wed Mar 15, 2006 6:42 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Thoughtographer;<br><br>Youre the guy who pointed me, and a few others to the MadCabbie blogspot a while back.<br><br>How would you describe him ?<br><br>A lunatic, or a man expressing his opinions to too many folks ?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>He's a person with opinions, and he's sharing them. That's a good, and normal thing to do, as far as I'm concerned. As for my feelings on his blog, I don't really have any.<br><br>I'm no good to anyone in a psychiatric hospital, so for the sake of my own hapiness and productivity, I'm cautious about what I say and to whom. <p></p><i></i>
thoughtographer
 
Posts: 724
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 12:12 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to UFOs and High Weirdness

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests