William Henry's "“George W. Bush and the Seal of Atlant
I could only find this September thread on William Henry's “George W. Bush and the Seal of Atlantis” through Google and had trouble accessing it directly. It wouldn't let me post, so I thought I'd better respond to Jeff's mention of it on the main page today directly.<br><br>The earlier thread:<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm12.showMessage?topicID=112.topic">p216.ezboard.com/frigorou...=112.topic</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>“One thing, perhaps, they didn't count on, was the eruption of signs, for those who can see” — Jeff Wells <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>The Higher Coincidence</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> <br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2005/11/higher-coincidence.html#comments">rigorousintuition.blogspo...l#comments</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Which doesn't seem to include William Henry, if this example of visual illiteracy of Henry's, taken at face value here, is any example.<br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>“William Henry is one of the world's cutting edge mythologists, is perhaps one of the most credible experts available when it comes to the secret sciences and technologies of our ancient ancestors. An authority on ancient mythology and the Holy Grail, he's conducted 21 years of intensive scientific, archaeological and historical research. What he's discovered is truly amazing. His working hypothesis is that Stargates and wormholes are at the center of all the world's myths and religions. William is the author of 9 books on ancient mysteries and spirituality. During this exploration of Egypt, William will be drawing on information contained in all of his books.”</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> — meta description from source code at <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://site.williamhenry.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=31&Itemid=41">site.williamhenry.net/ind...&Itemid=41</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>A primary rule of thumb: if someone online is using a visual image as being or representing something, yet that person is unable to give an accurate verbal description of what they are asking you to look at, you can bet that their conclusions that they draw will be similarly inaccurate. It's a clause that should be added to "as above, so below" -- as identified wrong, so analyzed wrong.<br><br>It is a serious mistake to accept this (or any other alleged symbol) without looking at it VERY carefully.<br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>“In preparation for the president’s speech the throng of supporters on the convention floor was parted. The sea of people surrounded a red carpet ‘c.’ Inside the ‘c’ was a platform formed of concentric rings. Painted upon its flat surface was the Seal of the President of the United States. A long blue plank extended from the concentric rings… Little did any one notice that when the president gave his speech he was standing in the Seal of Atlantis combined with the early Christian symbol of the Messiah.”</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://site.williamhenry.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=31&Itemid=41">site.williamhenry.net/ind...&Itemid=41</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>If William Henry was the “credible expert” he claims to be, he’d be able to talk coherently about what he is seeing on both a mundane and symbolic level. His claims in “George W. Bush and the Seal of Atlantis” are so wrongheaded it’s hard to know where to start. When questioning whether arcane symbolism is being used in this political context, you need to be able to ascertain whether the alleged symbols are being described accurately, and what their meaning might be in this context.<br><br>Let’s compare the two images presented, that of the so-called “Seal of Atlantis” and that of the central dais from the 2004 Republican convention.<br><br>“Seal of Atlantis”: 6 concentric rings<br>Convention platform: 10 concentric rings<br><br>“Seal of Atlantis”: St. Peter’s Cross overlaid<br>Convention platform: No cross overlaid. Blue walkway appears to be part of dumbbell shape<br><br>“Seal of Atlantis”: Cross offset on concentric rings so that checkerboard pattern occurs<br>Convention platform: No checkerboard<br><br>“Seal of Atlantis”: Black and white<br>Convention platform: Polychrome<br><br>William Henry description: “red carpet ‘c’.”<br>Reality: red carpet seems to totally surround platform with no break, and extend further back under the blue walkway. This is not a C shape.<br><br>William Henry has not shown any congruence whatsoever between the “Seal of Atlantis” and George W. Bush’s 2004 convention dais on a strictly visual level. Let’s see if the alleged symbolic issues show any more clarity.<br><br>The upside down cross is also known as St. Peter’s Cross. Peter was said to have requested that his crucifixion be in that position. It is not, as William Henry says, a symbol of “the Messiah,” but of St. Peter.<br><br>I don't know if you all are naively thinking there is some sort of mystical occult symbol called the "Seal of Atlantis," but a Google search of the millions of postings on the newsgroups gives no mention of it at all. <br><br>Searches of webpages show that other than a stationery design by Lonnie Weems and a Danish website titled “Indiana Jones and the Seal of Atlantis,” the only mention besides William Henry’s is that of Jiri Mruzek's pet sacred geometry hobbyhorse, a hideous, tortured attempt to link Nazca with paleolithic Europe and Atlantis. <br><br>As happens so often with many self-proclaimed breakthroughs in esoteric analysis, Mruzek doesn’t value his work enough to get it its own website. As a consequence, most efforts to view his work will be met with a stern admonition from Geocities that he has overspent his bandwidth allowance and you will have to wait an hour to view it.<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Lab/5586/seat1.htm">www.geocities.com/CapeCan.../seat1.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Mruzek’s “Seal of Atlantis” seems to be based on frenzied electronic crayoning and diagramming of sketches of what are likely to be poor black and white reproductions from the 1950’s or 1960’s of engraved slabs from the caves at La Marche. As Mruzek has not credited the source for his image drawings, we must assume that they are probably ripped off in some way from the original publication in the <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>Bulletin de la Societe Prehistorique de France</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> . The stone slabs themselves are not on public view at the Musee de l’Homme in Paris.<br><br>Two other sites with versions of the same “Athena” [sic] image from which Mruzek draws his conclusions can be found at <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.atlantisquest.com/CaveDrawing.html">www.atlantisquest.com/CaveDrawing.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> and <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.anomalies-unlimited.com/Lussac.html">www.anomalies-unlimited.com/Lussac.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>It’s instructive to look at all three offerings of the same sketches of paleolithic engravings to see what sort of objective information can be gleaned from them. The answer, alas, is “not much,” other than as cautionary material. Working only from someone else’s sketches puts the viewer at the mercy of the artist’s ability to accurately draw what they are seeing. There is no way of determining from the sketches what lines are truly artifacts of human work, and what are naturally “incised” lines in the rock or attempts to indicate rock contours. As you see, these three sites above pick and choose which lines they are going to use to illustrate their points, take parts out of context, and speculate far beyond where the data can honestly lead them. Without accurate information to start with, there is no chance of making accurate assumptions based on the flawed original information. Garbage in, garbage out.<br><br>All that these claims show me is that William Henry ‘s scholarship is both sloppy and shoddy. “George W. Bush and the Seal of Atlantis” is not work that leads me to want to look further into his research.<br><br>If any of you have any information on a “Seal of Atlantis” that doesn’t have such bogus roots, please do post illustrations and citations here. So far, there is nothing available online that supports William Henry’s claims.<br><br>For the record:<br>Indiana Jones and the Seal of Atlantis from a Danish website<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://medlem.jubii.dk/torben5544/">medlem.jubii.dk/torben5544/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Seal of Atlantis by Lonnie Weems<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.ellenmilliongraphics.com/fantasyart/emgproduct.php?id=315">www.ellenmilliongraphics....php?id=315</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>And while I am fact-checking William Henry, I should point out that while he claims that his first book, the 1992 <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>Junior Cosmic Egg</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> “won rave reviews,” not a single review is to be found on the Internet, it is not listed on amazon.com even as a used book, and a search of the comprehensive addall.com rare book database turns up no copies whatsoever.<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.addall.com/SuperRare/submitRare.cgi?author=henry&title=Junior+Cosmic+Egg+&keyword=&isbn=&order=TITLE&ordering=ASC&dispCurr=USD&binding=Any+Binding&min=&max=&timeout=20&match=Y&StoreAbebooks=on&StoreAlibris=on&StoreAntiqbook=on&StoreBiblio=on&StoreBiblion=on&StoreBibliophile=on&StoreBibliopoly=on&StoreBooksandcollectibles=on&StoreHalf=on&StoreILAB=on&StoreMaremagnum=on&StorePowells=on&StoreStrandbooks=on&StoreZVAB=on">www.addall.com/SuperRare/...oreZVAB=on</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>