by Homeless Halo » Tue Nov 15, 2005 11:48 pm
Icke's theorizing has always been my biggest problem with his writings. He seems to lack understanding of basic science, yet strains to give his theories scientific explanations.<br><br>Chameleons can't do anything even remotely similar to what is being described.<br><br>Why would extradimensionals be reptilian?<br><br>The only "shape shifting" animals we know of on this scale are Octopi. The big head is to run the nervous system interface that allows them to shift color, texture, and shape on an otherwise unprecedented scale. The point being, that a human sized being with a human head who did this sort of actual shape shifting, assuming it was a "physical being" wouldn't have enough of a nervous system at human proportions.<br><br>How is it the "reptoids" happen to have an otherwise human shape?<br><br>I don't know, there are just too many holes in this line of thinking, forcing one to adopt all sorts of "theorys" to explain all the issues involved. This is not the sort of "research" method that gets much approval, largely because it leaves no method for disproving the theory.<br><br>Essentially, I'm saying that no physical apparatus like this CAN exist given what we've seen of the capabilities of nature. Extradimensionals COULD exist, but why go to all that trouble? Especially, if as Icke contends, they "need" us somehow for sustenance, why aren't we conquered yet?<br><br>That is, why didn't they conquer the Maya? <p></p><i></i>