by marykmusic » Mon Oct 24, 2005 1:17 pm
This is not a new issue.<br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://xroads.virginia.edu/~MUSEUM/Armory/galleryA/a_90_673.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--><br>Quote: Gallery A<br>American Sculpture and Decorative Art<br><br>Another artist who translated Ashcan principles into sculpture was Abastenia St. Eberle. Eberle was so taken with immigrant life on Manhattan's Lower East Side that in 1914 she set up two rooms, one for a studio, the other for a recreational area for the tenement children. Her rooms took on the character of a settlement house, the most famous of which was Jane Addams' Hull House in Chicago.<br><br>Eberle's White Slave (left) drew an investigation during the Armory Show by a Chicago censure committee for its open portrayal of the sex industry. At the time of the Armory Show, there were a number of American organizations set up to eradicate prostitution: the National Vigilance Committee, the American Purity Federation, and the Alliance for the Suppression and Prevention of the White Slave Traffic, among others (Casteras 33). However, some felt Eberle's model was "too realistic a portrayal of greed and lust; the seamy side of life was still deemed inappropriate for sculpture." (Fort 7<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START 8) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/glasses.gif ALT="8)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> Eberle, unlike many Ashcan painters, did not study with Robert Henri but with Kenyon Cox, one of strongest opponents to many of the works shown at the Armory Show.<br><br>(From <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://xroads.virginia.edu/~MUSEUM/Armory/galleryA/tour.a2.html" target="top">xroads.virginia.edu/~MUSEUM/Armory/galleryA/tour.a2.html</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> )<br><br>This sculpture (gee, I hope the image works!) was at the 1913 Armory Show, the first public exhibit of modern art in New York City. It was extremely controversial; considered by many to be immoral and "not a fit subject for Art." <br><br>Getting this issue into the public eye may be meant as a fear-mongering effort, but what if it simply raises the awareness level? Probably not altogether a Bad Thing... --MaryK <p></p><i></i>