Anti-gov't text is embedded in spam to sensitize blockers?

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Anti-gov't text is embedded in spam to sensitize blockers?

Postby Watchful Citizen » Wed Nov 09, 2005 4:43 pm

I recently posted here on 11/3/05 that AOL was somehow blocking content when I sent 'subversive' topics to friends with AOL email addresses:<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm10.showMessage?topicID=1782.topic">p216.ezboard.com/frigorou...1782.topic</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>I've found out much more about how and perhaps why.<br><br>Just like electronic voting, filter packages sold to parents, schools, and libraries have been found to secretly filter out many things not advertised by the software's vendors. Teachers have found things filtered out on school computers that have nothing to do with porn or white-supremecist websites. What a surprise.<br><br>Remember earlier this year when the activist website AfterDowningStreet.org found out their event organizing emails weren't going through due to 'spam filtering' by Comcast? <br>www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/794<br><br>I think I might have just discovered another sneaky internet censorship mechanism which I'm calling "spamjacketing" after the FBI cointelpro tactic of 'badjacketing' the most effective leaders in a resistance group by portraying them as double agents or some other smearing repellent status to neutralize them.<br><br>I just found that spam has text (and very probably url links) imbedded in them so that when we use an email provider's spam software we are in fact helping the rejection of the information in the embedded url or text. We ourselves are "spamjacketing" info the Powers That Be want to suppress. Sometimes the embedding is hidden such as white lettering on white background so you don't see it but your software does.<br><br>I found this out when I couldn't email this url-<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/2807/emspecial.html">www.geocities.com/Capitol...ecial.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>of an article about Truman starting the 1951 Psychological Strategy board (set-up to coordinate CIA's use of media for psy-ops) to several AOL email addresses. It bounced right back to me with a '554' error message from AOL-<br>"There is at least one URL in your email that is<br>generating substantial complaints from AOL members."<br><br>Hmmm. But the article's text with the url omitted did go through AOL successfully. Perhaps only url's are blocked for now, not text. But spam-blocking filters are evolving to identify the text used as camoflage by spammers and might block text content soon perhaps using key-word frequency or juxtaposition or even source article from a database of 'subversive' links and websites. Here's an article about the use of "hash-busters" and spam-blockers which mentions the danger of badjacketing a website with false-flag spamming against it by including its url:<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,61012,00.html">www.wired.com/news/busine...12,00.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>(Wired News: Spam Wars: Filters Strike Back)<br><br>I think this is already being anticipated by The Powers That Be and here's why:<br><br>When I put "Psychological Strategy Board" into a search engine I accidentally found an article all about mailing lists and spam that coincidently included an example of embedded text called "hash-busters" used to 'fool' spam filters.<br> <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.honet.com/Nadine/M030625-1.htm">www.honet.com/Nadine/M030625-1.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>(The Story of "Nadine" -- A Tale of Mailing Lists)<br><br>The spam's embedded text was several paragraphs stretched out multi-screens wide (another programmer's trick to obscure) and thus barely readable so I pasted it into MSWord to make it readable.<br><br>I searched up a sentance from the text to source it. Interestingly, it was text from chapter two of Webster Tarpley and Anton Chaitkin's must-read online history of the Bush family's role in Nazi-CIA American history called 'The Unauthorized Biography of George Bush' which came out during the Bush I presidency (I think) and thus has long been a thorn in the side of the Bush-CIA cabal. Admittedly, It has been spread all over the internet which allows both explanations, it is a high-profile target for "spamjacketing" and it has very likely also been spammed to people who don't want it, a chicken-or-egg situation. <br>Be sure to read it here:<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20020124222343/www.tarpley.net/bushb.htm">web.archive.org/web/20020.../bushb.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>But the other article's AOL-rejected url had the exact same subject as the spam-embedded text, Truman's 1951 Psychological Strategy board, Prescott Bush, Allen Dulles, and- most importantly- CIA use of psycholocical warfare against Americans. This doesn't seem to me to be "random-generated text" as the 'Nadine' mailing list abuse of spam article dismissively suggests.<br><br>Here is that spam-embedded Tarpley text from the 'Nadine mailing list' article-<br>"Prescott S. Bush.<br>A central focus of the Harriman security regime in Washington (1950-53) was the organization of covert operations, and `` psychological warfare. '' Harriman, together with his lawyers and business partners, Allen Dulles and John Foster Dulles, wanted the government's secret services to conduct extensive propaganda campaigns and mass-psychology experiments within the U.S.A., and paramilitary campaigns abroad. This would supposedly ensure a stable world-wide environment favorable to Anglo-American financial and political interests.<br>The Harriman security regime created the Psychological Strategy Board (PSB) in 1951. The man appointed director of the PSB, Gordon Gray, is familiar to the reader as the sponsor of the child sterilization experiments, carried out by the Harrimanite eugenics movement in North Carolina following World War II (see Chapter 3).<br>Gordon Gray was an avid Anglophile, whose father had gotten controlling ownership of the R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company through alliance with the British Imperial Tobacco cartel's U.S. representatives, the Duke family of North Carolina. Gordon's brother, R.J. Reynolds chairman Bowman Gray, Jr., was also a Naval Intelligence officer, known around Washington as the `` founder of operational intelligence. '' Gordon Gray became a close friend and political ally of Prescott Bush; and Gray's son became for Prescott's son, George, his lawyer and the shield of his covert policy.<br>But President Harry Truman, as malleable as he was, constituted an obstacle to the covert warriors. An insular Missouri politician vaguely favorable to the U.S. Constitution, he remained skeptical about secret service activities that reminded him of the Nazi Gestapo." <br>(end spam-embedded Tarpley text)<br><br>Well that's a hell of a lot of unusually damaging information on the US government and Bush family to send around in spam. On the positive side, this could be an infowar freedom fighter's tactic of stealth-pamphleting suppressed history OR a way to badjacket the text to put it in spam-blocker's 'deny' blacklists to prevent grassroots emailing education about who runs this country and how.<br><br>Given that the url blocked by AOL is pretty obscure while the Unauthorized Biography of George Bush is practically a 'greatest hit' amongst the internet parapolitics history community, I think the "spamjacketing" explanation makes the most sense since both the examples I've outlined here are about EXACTLY the same topic, the Pschological Strategy Board and the institutionalization of psychological warfare used by the US government against its own people. <br><br>So I suspect content filters have been secretly weaponized against the internet truth movement to prevent grassroots education of our fellow citizens on the topic of fascist secret government tactics to insulate the mostly middle-class internet community and keep them listening to 'watchdog left gatekeepers.' Who those gate-keepers are is a whole other scrum.<br><br>Sneaky, ay? <p></p><i></i>
Watchful Citizen
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 2:52 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

learn to use crypto

Postby glubglubglub » Wed Nov 09, 2005 7:42 pm

widespread crytpo adoption is really the only way to disable this kind of sneaky, anonymous censorship... <p></p><i></i>
glubglubglub
 
Posts: 328
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 5:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

spam + deep politics

Postby anonymoose » Fri Nov 11, 2005 7:20 pm

here's an interesting variation of spam + deep politics keywords:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:OoV-qJ8Hi7UJ<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :p --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/tongue.gif ALT=":p"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> anama-canal-cruise.orgpc.info/+Cabazon+siemer&hl=en&client=safari">64.233.161.104/search?q=c...ent=safari</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>note that the original hostname is panama-canal-cruise.orgpc.info<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
anonymoose
 
Posts: 77
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 4:26 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

oops -- try that again with ezcodes off

Postby anonymoose » Fri Nov 11, 2005 7:21 pm

<!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:0iiuKGdp2pYJ:www.sacbee.com/content/news/story/12291765p-13155583c.html+%22susan+hamlin%22+murder&hl=en&client=safari">64.233.161.104/search?q=c...ent=safari</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
anonymoose
 
Posts: 77
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 4:26 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

crap, 3rd times the .....

Postby anonymoose » Fri Nov 11, 2005 7:22 pm

<!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:OoV-qJ8Hi7UJ<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :p --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/tongue.gif ALT=":p"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> anama-canal-cruise.orgpc.info/+Cabazon+siemer&hl=en&client=safari">64.233.161.104/search?q=c...ent=safari</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
anonymoose
 
Posts: 77
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 4:26 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

oh balls, ok, this one should work. sorry!

Postby anonymoose » Fri Nov 11, 2005 7:23 pm

<!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:OoV-qJ8Hi7UJ<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :p --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/tongue.gif ALT=":p"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> anama-canal-cruise.orgpc.info/+Cabazon+siemer&hl=en&client=safari">64.233.161.104/search?q=c...ent=safari</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
anonymoose
 
Posts: 77
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 4:26 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

I give up

Postby anonymoose » Fri Nov 11, 2005 7:25 pm

<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :x --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/sick.gif ALT=":x"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
anonymoose
 
Posts: 77
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 4:26 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Sometimes it's not nefarious, just mysterious....

Postby banned » Sat Nov 12, 2005 1:33 am

...one time I was trying to send a friend on AOL notification of a contest to win a trip for two to New Zealand. I had entered intending to take her if I won and figured she could do the same. I could NOT get the letter to send, it kept bouncing. There was nothing remotely subversive in the email, just a little harmless chat and the URL to enter the contest. I finally gave up, I couldn't get the URL to go through, so I just spelled the basic site out (I think it was some airline dot com) and told her to click on the box for the contest.<br><br><br><br>******************AOHell SUXor******************** <p></p><i></i>
banned
 
Posts: 912
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 5:18 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to Media and Information Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests