by slimmouse » Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:58 pm
<br><br> This is a perfect analysis of exactly how, under the guise of impartial news coverage, the much vaunted BBC toe the company line.<br><br> Far more subtle than the US for sure, which of course makes it about the best kind of disinfo there actually is, as several posters are continuously pointing out.<br><br> What say you Dreams end ? ;<br><br> <!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Thus in the instance of the BBC’s presentation of (entirely legitimate) Palestinian resistance to occupation, it becomes "armed confrontation", a phrase which is not only inaccurate but provocative as it implies that it is the Palestinians who are instigating the violence in trying to obtain their legitimate rights to a national home. The 'confrontation’ is entirely one-sided consisting only of Palestinian "armed confrontation". Israel has been completely removed from the equation. <hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br> Full article ;<br><br> <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=4098">www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/...sp?ID=4098</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br> I can see thru certain ruses. The 'impartial-all-staff-vetted-by-UK intel- BBC being one of the bigger ones. I wonder who pulls their chain ?<br><br> <p></p><i></i>