by HMKGrey » Sat Jul 15, 2006 3:03 pm
From the usually quite witty and worthwhile Americablog:<br><br><br>Is Israel going to attack Syria and Iran?<br>by John in DC - 7/15/2006 10:20:00 AM<br><br>Rumors have started.<br><br>A few weeks ago, Israeli had its fighters buzz the Syrian presidential palace. That was rather gutsy, and in-your-face. There's speculation in some circles that Israeli may bomb Damascus or Tehran in the coming weeks, and I have to say, I'm not sure I'd have a problem with that.<br><br>My logic is this. Israel bombing civilians, bad. Israel bombing Lebanon when Hezbollah is the problem, bad (and I have a hard time believing Lebanon has the ability to do jack about Hezbollah). But the real culprits here are not the Lebanese, they're Syria and Iran who have been causing hell in Lebanon for decades.<br><br>If Israel has concrete proof that Syria and Iran are directly responsible for supporting Hezbollah and supplying them weapons, etc. (and I'd be surprised if they didn't), then it's difficult to say that Israel can't, or shouldn't, counterstrike against two countries that are attacking Israel via proxies.<br><br>Controversial, yes. But while I'm not 100% committed to this strategy, particularly because of the possibilities of any attack on Damascus or Tehran possibly spinning things out of control, it surely makes a lot more sense than the approach we took to dealing with Iraq. Perhaps there's a way to "contain" Iran and Syria.<br><br>Thoughts?<br><br>Comments (411) | Permanent Link | <br><br>=================================<br><br>My comment is #411. <br> <p></p><i></i>