Anyone know what's up with this?

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Anyone know what's up with this?

Postby Rigorous Intuition » Fri Dec 23, 2005 9:14 pm

I discovered <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.wgtcsmv.com/" target="top">this site</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> today which seems to mirror my blog, without credit or link. (Though it lists me as a "contributor" on the sidebar.) Checking out the categories, they seem to be mostly compilations of spam hyperlinks.<br><br>I haven't seen a site like this before. Anyone have an idea what the deal is here? <p></p><i></i>
Rigorous Intuition
 
Posts: 1744
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 3:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

omfg. I was right. YOU ARE 'SPAMJACKETED.'

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Fri Dec 23, 2005 9:23 pm

Jeff, I accidentally found out that info The Powers That Be don't want spread around by email is being embedded in spam to sensitize the spamblocking software to the text.<br><br>I posted this here and at ProgressiveIndependent.com a few weeks ago so I repost it now:<br>----------------<br><br>Imagine that who killed JFK was hidden in spam so that when you sent it to your spam-blocking filter you were also inoculating your email provider against this information.<br><br>I recently posted here and over at Rigorous Intuition on 11/3/05 that AOL was somehow blocking content when I sent 'subversive' topics to friends with AOL email addresses:<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm10.sh...">p216.ezboard.com/frigorou...rm10.sh...</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>I've found out much more about how and perhaps why.<br><br>Just like electronic voting, filter packages sold to parents, schools, and libraries have been found to secretly filter out many things not advertised by the software's vendors. Teachers have found things filtered out on school computers that have nothing to do with porn or white-supremecist websites. What a surprise.<br><br>Remember earlier this year when the activist website AfterDowningStreet.org found out their event organizing emails weren't going through due to 'spam filtering' by Comcast?<br>www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/794<br><br>I think I might have just discovered another sneaky internet censorship mechanism which I'm calling "spamjacketing" after the FBI cointelpro tactic of 'badjacketing' the most effective leaders in a resistance group by portraying them as double agents or some other smearing repellent status to neutralize them.<br><br>I just found that spam has text (and very probably url links) imbedded in them so that when we use an email provider's spam software we are in fact helping the rejection of the information in the embedded url or text. We ourselves are "spamjacketing" info the Powers That Be want to suppress. Sometimes the embedding is hidden such as white lettering on white background so you don't see it but your software does.<br><br>I found this out when I couldn't email this url-<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/2807/emspecial.html">www.geocities.com/Capitol...ecial.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>of an article about Truman starting the 1951 Psychological Strategy board (set-up to coordinate CIA's use of media for psy-ops) to several AOL email addresses. It bounced right back to me with a '554' error message from AOL-<br>"There is at least one URL in your email that is<br>generating substantial complaints from AOL members."<br><br>Hmmm. But the article's text with the url omitted did go through AOL successfully. Perhaps only url's are blocked for now, not text. But spam-blocking filters are evolving to identify the text used as camoflage by spammers and might block text content soon perhaps using key-word frequency or juxtaposition or even source article from a database of 'subversive' links and websites. Here's an article about the use of "hash-busters" and spam-blockers which mentions the danger of badjacketing a website with false-flag spamming against it by including its url:<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,61012,00.html">www.wired.com/news/busine...12,00.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>(Wired News: Spam Wars: Filters Strike Back)<br><br>I think this is already being anticipated by The Powers That Be and here's why:<br><br>When I put "Psychological Strategy Board" into a search engine I accidentally found an article all about mailing lists and spam that coincidently included an example of embedded text called "hash-busters" used to 'fool' spam filters.<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.honet.com/Nadine/M030625-1.htm">www.honet.com/Nadine/M030625-1.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>(The Story of "Nadine" -- A Tale of Mailing Lists)<br><br>The spam's embedded text was several paragraphs stretched out multi-screens wide (another programmer's trick to obscure) and thus barely readable so I pasted it into MSWord to make it readable.<br><br>I searched up a sentance from the text to source it. Interestingly, it was text from chapter two of Webster Tarpley and Anton Chaitkin's must-read online history of the Bush family's role in Nazi-CIA American history called 'The Unauthorized Biography of George Bush' which came out during the Bush I presidency (I think) and thus has long been a thorn in the side of the Bush-CIA cabal. Admittedly, It has been spread all over the internet which allows both explanations, it is a high-profile target for "spamjacketing" and it has very likely also been spammed to people who don't want it, a chicken-or-egg situation.<br>Be sure to read it here:<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://tarpley.net/bushb.htm">tarpley.net/bushb.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>But the other article's AOL-rejected url had the exact same subject as the spam-embedded text, Truman's 1951 Psychological Strategy board, Prescott Bush, Allen Dulles, and- most importantly- CIA use of psycholocical warfare against Americans in the so-called mainstream media. This doesn't seem to me to be "random-generated text" as the 'Nadine' mailing list abuse of spam article dismissively suggests.<br><br>Here is that spam-embedded Tarpley text from the 'Nadine mailing list' article-<br>"Prescott S. Bush.<br>A central focus of the Harriman security regime in Washington (1950-53) was the organization of covert operations, and `` psychological warfare. '' Harriman, together with his lawyers and business partners, Allen Dulles and John Foster Dulles, wanted the government's secret services to conduct extensive propaganda campaigns and mass-psychology experiments within the U.S.A., and paramilitary campaigns abroad. This would supposedly ensure a stable world-wide environment favorable to Anglo-American financial and political interests.<br>The Harriman security regime created the Psychological Strategy Board (PSB) in 1951. The man appointed director of the PSB, Gordon Gray, is familiar to the reader as the sponsor of the child sterilization experiments, carried out by the Harrimanite eugenics movement in North Carolina following World War II (see Chapter 3).<br>Gordon Gray was an avid Anglophile, whose father had gotten controlling ownership of the R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company through alliance with the British Imperial Tobacco cartel's U.S. representatives, the Duke family of North Carolina. Gordon's brother, R.J. Reynolds chairman Bowman Gray, Jr., was also a Naval Intelligence officer, known around Washington as the `` founder of operational intelligence. '' Gordon Gray became a close friend and political ally of Prescott Bush; and Gray's son became for Prescott's son, George, his lawyer and the shield of his covert policy.<br>But President Harry Truman, as malleable as he was, constituted an obstacle to the covert warriors. An insular Missouri politician vaguely favorable to the U.S. Constitution, he remained skeptical about secret service activities that reminded him of the Nazi Gestapo."<br>(end spam-embedded Tarpley text)<br><br>Well that's a hell of a lot of unusually damaging information on the US government and Bush family to send around in spam. On the positive side, this could be an infowar freedom fighter's tactic of stealth-pamphleting suppressed history OR a way to badjacket the text to put it in spam-blocker's 'deny' blacklists to prevent grassroots emailing education about who runs this country and how.<br><br>Given that the url blocked by AOL is pretty obscure while the Unauthorized Biography of George Bush is practically a 'greatest hit' amongst the internet parapolitics history community, I think the "spamjacketing" explanation makes the most sense since both the examples I've outlined here are about EXACTLY the same topic, the Pschological Strategy Board and the institutionalization of psychological warfare used by the US government against its own people.<br><br>So I suspect content filters have been secretly weaponized against the internet truth movement to prevent grassroots education of our fellow citizens on the topic of fascist secret government tactics to insulate the mostly middle-class internet community and keep them listening to 'watchdog left gatekeepers.' Who those gate-keepers are is a whole other scrum.<br><br>Sneaky, ay? <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=hughmanateewins>Hugh Manatee Wins</A> at: 12/23/05 10:07 pm<br></i>
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Anyone know what's up with this?

Postby Iroquois » Fri Dec 23, 2005 9:25 pm

Just to get things started, here's the result from whois wgtcsmv.com:<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Registrant:<br> N/A<br> Baton Strasse 922<br> Berlin, NA 21-552<br> DE<br><br> Domain name: WGTCSMV.COM<br><br> Administrative Contact:<br> Becker, Franz franzbecker@wgtcsmv.com<br> Baton Strasse 922<br> Berlin, NA 21-552<br> DE<br> +49.302825521<br> Technical Contact:<br> Becker, Franz franzbecker@wgtcsmv.com<br> Baton Strasse 922<br> Berlin, NA 21-552<br> DE<br> +49.302825521<br><br> Registration Service Provider:<br> Everyones Internet, domains@ev1servers.net<br> <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.ev1servers.net">www.ev1servers.net</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br> Registrar of Record: TUCOWS, INC.<br> Record last updated on 18-Nov-2005.<br> Record expires on 11-Nov-2006.<br> Record created on 11-Nov-2004.<br><br> Domain servers in listed order:<br> NS1.WGTCSMV.COM 69.57.131.131<br> NS2.WGTCSMV.COM 69.57.131.131<br><br> Domain status: ACTIVE<br><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <p></p><i></i>
Iroquois
 
Posts: 660
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Michigan
Blog: View Blog (0)

My experience

Postby Mentalgongfu » Fri Dec 23, 2005 9:47 pm

HTML Comments are not allowed <p></p><i></i>
Mentalgongfu
 
Posts: 171
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 9:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Franz Becker

Postby Iroquois » Fri Dec 23, 2005 9:47 pm

Googling "Franz Becker" turns up a lot of links to this early 1930's German film by a director named Fritz Lang. The title was "M" and the subject was "based on a real-life manhunt in Dusseldorf for a serial child-murderer, Peter Kurten." (from <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.sover.net/~ozus/m1931.htm)">www.sover.net/~ozus/m1931.htm)</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> Franz Becker was the name of the character in the film portraying Kurten.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
Iroquois
 
Posts: 660
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Michigan
Blog: View Blog (0)

My experience

Postby Mentalgongfu » Fri Dec 23, 2005 9:50 pm

HTML Comments are not allowed <p></p><i></i>
Mentalgongfu
 
Posts: 171
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 9:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Franz Becker

Postby Iroquois » Fri Dec 23, 2005 9:51 pm

<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>Here's the full text to the review of "M" linked in my comment above.</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>"Peter Lorre became a recognized star as a result of this film."<br><br>Reviewed by Dennis Schwartz<br><br>Fritz Lang was a leading German filmmaker by 1931 before the Nazi regime got full control of the country. In 1933, when they did get full control, he emigrated to America, worrying that he might become out of favor with the Nazis due to having Jewish relations and would also be reduced to making propaganda films if he stayed. He left behind his pro-Nazi wife Thea von Harbou--the screenwriter of all his films in the '20s and '30s, including "M."<br><br>In Lang's first talkie, a film about a child-murderer, it was made with surprisingly the highest sound quality. This is quite an achievement if you keep in mind how this was Lang's first experience with that new medium. The film was at first called Murderers Among Us. Because of that title, Lang was denied permission to use any of Germany's film studios, that is, until he changed the title to "M" (the initial standing for Murderer) when he discovered that the Nazis had taken the original title to refer to them.<br><br>In the following articles, one in the Los Angeles Herald Express, 12 August 1947 and the other an article by Lang entitled "Why I am interested in Murder" New York, 1947, Lang stated why he has such an avid interest in murder: "Gradually, and at times reluctantly, I have come to the conclusion that every human mind harbors a latent compulsion to murder." He goes on to state: "I have tried to approach the murderer imaginatively to show him as a human being possessed of some demon that has driven him beyond the ordinary borderlines of human behavior, and not the least part of whose tragedy is that by murder he never resolves his conflicts."<br><br>You can chalk "M" up as a lasting masterpiece, created with a passion for detail and a successful transitional film from the silents to the talkies. It took into its mise en scene the best of both those worlds. At its best, "M" emulates the accomplishments found in all the great works of poetry. It is still the greatest of all the serial killer films made, even if it is erroneously considered by some to be now only a museum piece. Lang's film spawned the serial killer genre. The worthwhile modern films to follow were such as Psycho and The Silence of the Lambs. But Lang's thriller has the advantage of not only understanding the psycho's motivations but encompassing how an entire society was drawn into finding the murderer, as most of the other films revolve only around a narrow search for the serial killer. And when you compare it to a slick thriller like the recent "American Psycho," it is not difficult to see how shallow that one is in comparison.<br><br>This thriller was based on a real-life manhunt in Dusseldorf for a serial child-murderer, Peter Kurten. The film is subversive in many ways; it expresses Lang's many long-held opinions on why the murderer can't help doing what he does and how society has become debased. It also explores the responsibility a mother has to watch her own children, the pros and cons of capital punishment; and, he also aims to point out what goes beyond the scope of human interest and emotions, as he wanted to make a statement relating the murders to the unequal distribution of wealth. He shows how the rich have more free time to look after their children because they have the financial resources, while the poor are busy working. He, thereby, purposefully, opens and closes the film with the children playing unsupervised games in their working-class neighborhoods.<br><br>The big German city is aghast at the number of little girls reported murdered in the newspaper, as Lang's camera sweeps the different city sections. There are different wide-angled shots and shots from his signature overhead sweeps (something he used first, despite Orson Welles taking so many bows for this kind of shot and never acknowledging that Lang did it first). He also uses long close-ups, as each group is shown with their own reaction to the events.<br><br>The little girls play outside in their yard and sing songs about the bogeyman who will come and take them away. Their mothers react with pained expressions on their faces, while they are busy scrubbing clothes. The police, under the leadership of the corpulent Inspector Lohmann (Otto Wernicke), complain that they have no clues to help them and that the public is not helping them by giving them false leads. This is wearing the police down, as they are pressured to be working around-the-clock to catch the culprit.<br><br>The underworld is upset that the police are cracking down on their illegal establishments by repeated raids and arresting them at will, and thereby putting a big dent into their business. They are particularly upset that the police should think that it is one of them who is committing this low-life crime. Under the leadership of a renown gangster, Schranker (Gustaf Grundgens), the various gangs get together with the beggars' organization called in to help. They plan to capture the killer and take care of him with their own method of justice. What is noteworthy to observe, is how Lang draws parallels between the police investigation and the underworld's. The police take fingerprints from a letter the killer wrote the newspaper; they have a psychologist profile the killer as someone who is a pathological sex pervert; they note the type of pencil he used, the brand of cigarettes he smoked, and the type of wood table he wrote on. While, on the other hand, the underworld has everyone in their organization become their eyes and ears, as they put someone on every block to watch for the killer.<br><br>The murderer, Franz Becker (Peter Lorre), is first heard telling the girl he is about to kill, what a beautiful ball she has and then asking the little girl her name. His face is not seen, it is only seen that he is wearing a fedora as a cute little girl, Elsie Beckmann (Inge Landgut), tells him her name. She is bouncing a brightly colored ball off a post that has an announcement for a $10,000 marks reward for information about the killer. He lures the innocent girl away by buying her candy and a balloon from a blind vender (Georg John), as the vender will recognize him later by his distinguishable whistle taken from a few bars of Grieg's "In the Hall of the Mountain King." This tune will become the ominous leitmotif throughout the film. Since Lorre couldn't whistle, it was Lang's whistling that was used. Her death will first be telegraphed to the viewer by her balloon blowing in the wind as it is stuck on the telegraph wires, and with her mother's sad expression as she stares at her empty chair by the dining table that has her plate and silverware on it.<br><br>Panic reaches across the city anew with the discovery of Elsie Beckmann's death, with citizens accusing others of being the killer for illogical reasons, of petty criminals being picked up for minor offenses who challenge the police by saying: 'Better catch the child murderer.' Because of the murders people are willing to go to any extreme to blame someone for the crime, even if they have no proof, as an innocent man is attacked by a mob after just talking to a little girl. It is evident that Lang saw here the festering wounds Nazism would later on fully exploit to its own advantages, in a society that was already decadent and had lost its sense of responsibility. He sensed the masses were looking for law and order and would even readily accept the Nazi dictatorship that limited their freedom, just because they wanted a change.<br><br>The police and the underworld begin to close in on the killer using their different styles of tracking him down. But, what remains striking is how similar they are in character, as Lang shows how each of them meet to handle the problem -- with Schranker representing the underworld being equal to Lohmann, who represents the police.<br><br>The earthy Lohmann being a stickler for details finds spelling errors in the newspaper note the killer sent, indicating the killer is not well-educated. He also gets a list of all the mental patients released in the past few years and has his men check them out. One of his men goes to Becker's apartment and will bring back evidence of Ariston cigarettes, the same brand found at the crime scene; and, he will later on show that the killer wrote the note on the windowsill of Becker's apartment. The police will have a stakeout in that apartment, waiting for the killer's return.<br><br>Meanwhile, the blind balloon vender recognizes the whistle of the killer's, as the killer is again luring a little girl with his friendly ways. The vender has his helper follow the killer and too make the tail easier, a large 'M' chalk mark is placed on the shoulder of the killer's coat by the young helper as he bumps into the Murderer. The whole scene with the citizens in pursuit of the killer, was reminiscent of the leftist Bertold Brecht's "The Three Penny Opera." All the venders signal each other with whistles and chase the killer into an office building. Later in the night, the underworld criminals overtake the two watchmen and eventually find the killer in the attic.<br><br>What gives this film its power, is how the entire city is analyzed by how they react to the crime. When the underworld corners Lorre, trapping him like an animal, the audience watches him scurry around for dear life in the office building. When they capture and take him to an abandoned warehouse, they give him a mock trial in a dark dungeonlike basement. This is just the right atmosphere to bring the film to a climax. With the criminal element getting to him first, the question becomes what is the proper punishment for such a misfit. The criminals, an unofficial jury of his peers, respond the way 'the man in the street' would, that it is better off for society if he were dead. The answer for Lang, is that the people themselves must decide in a court of law what kind of punishment is warranted. The only thing Lang does with his objective camera is try to understand the killer, not sympathize with him. For this stance, he even earned praise from the Nazis through their propaganda minister, Goebbels, who called the film "fantastic, free of phony humanitarian sentiments."<br><br>Inspector Lohmann grills a burglar caught in the office building who won't say what he was doing there until the inspector tricks him by telling him he will be charged for murdering the watchman. He then tells the police that the underworld was there to get the killer and then tells them where they took him to trial.<br><br>The film is expeditious in its stark treatment of the innocuous Lorre, who does not stand out from the crowd. He is physically a small and fragile man, who defends himself to his fellow jurors by basically borrowing Jesus' words: "Who is without sin to cast aspersions on another." As he cries out that he can't help himself, the criminals look at him intently. Some are jeering at his pleas, appalled to hear him use the same excuses many of them have used. He finally screams out, getting the pity of a few, "I have no control over my urges. I want to escape from myself, but it is impossible." Facing a certain lynching, the police come in, supposedly, to get him a trial where he will either be executed or sent away to a mental institution. But, as noted by the mourning mothers of the victims, his punishment can't bring back their little girls (this version was eliminated from the later showings of the film).<br><br>Peter Lorre became a recognized star as a result of this film and deservedly so, even though his speaking part was minimal and came only toward the end of the film. He movingly confesses how evil sits inside him. His image in the film fits a description the public could readily identify from now on as that of a child-killer, of a creepy man and a loner, unable to function in society, who lures children by pretending to be their nice uncle who will buy them candy. Lorre, being Jewish, fled Germany for America in the early thirties, and was typecast for this kind of role his entire Hollywood career as a result of this film.<br><br>REVIEWED ON 5/7/2000 GRADE: A+<br><br>Dennis Schwartz: "Ozus' World Movie Reviews"<br><br>© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED DENNIS SCHWARTZ <p></p><i></i>
Iroquois
 
Posts: 660
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Michigan
Blog: View Blog (0)

11/11

Postby Iroquois » Fri Dec 23, 2005 9:53 pm

By the way, notice the creation date in the whois entry for the domain:<br><br>11-nov-2004<br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=iroquois@rigorousintuition>Iroquois</A> at: 12/23/05 7:06 pm<br></i>
Iroquois
 
Posts: 660
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Michigan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Anyone know what's up with this?

Postby Et in Arcadia ego » Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:00 pm

Jeff, it lists you as a contributer..Maybe you wanna log in as yourself and see what pops up..<br><br>Then again..It could be a means of obtaining your l/p. If you do so, change your l/p first to a dummy, keep your own blog ID detials handy in a tabbed window, log in, and <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>IMMEDIATELY</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> change back to your original l/p, then see what's in there..<br><br>Appears this only mirrors your blog's front page and no archives, unless you're ghostwriting about 'women dildo masturbation' stuff..<br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :p --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/tongue.gif ALT=":p"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>Which I don't have a personal problem with in any way, mind you..I'm just saying..<br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :D --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/happy.gif ALT=":D"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>PS: Why does that person in this thread keep saying HTML is not allowed? <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Et in Arcadia ego
 
Posts: 4104
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: The Void
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Franz Becker and validating a threat to power.

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:06 pm

That's a hell of a psychological review which seems to be designed to resonate with the psy-ops themes at this site, perhaps to distract from the tactic of spamblocking software being used to inoculate the internet against information in a plausibly deniable way.<br><br>One tactic I read in the army's manual for 'Psy-ops in Guerilla Warfare' is to suppress subversive info but not in a way that draws attention to it as a threat to power because it confirms that the info is important.<br><br>I contend that Jeff's website has been deemed a threat to power since it has been targeted with spamjacketing.<br><br>Jeff's and our work here has thus been validated as important. <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Anyone know what's up with this?

Postby Et in Arcadia ego » Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:11 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>By the way, notice the creation date in the whois entry for the site:<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>That stood out to me as well. <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Et in Arcadia ego
 
Posts: 4104
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: The Void
Blog: View Blog (0)

re "HTML comments"

Postby Rigorous Intuition » Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:21 pm

<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"Why does that person in this thread keep saying HTML is not allowed?"</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>That's not the poster writing that, that's actually a pissy glitch of ezboard that turns up occasionally if certain characters that could double as code appear in sequence.<br><br>Thanks everyone for your contributions on this. <p></p><i></i>
Rigorous Intuition
 
Posts: 1744
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 3:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

more info

Postby jonvalis » Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:41 pm

Tracerroute for the original domain yields:<br>dwdhost.us <br><br>I am guessing this is the company that hosts the website. <br><br><br><br>I look up the whois for that domain and get <br>Philip N. Deatherage Deatherage Web Development<br>www.dwdonline.com<br><br>If your posts are copyrighted (or even if they are not I suppose..) you could ask the hosting company to either take it down, or perhaps give you info about who they are. <br><br>Personally this is further "into" the internet than I'm usually willing to go (.. unless someone has started using my credit card number, then I'm a bit more willing ..)<br><br>Anyway, not sure how relevant it is. Or even worthwhile..<br><br>I'm starting to get the idea that the internet and perhaps the world as well are really much smaller than I make them out to be (perhaps for my own protection). As I've often heard, "security through obscuirty" rarely works.<br><br>well that was my 2 cents<br> <p></p><i></i>
jonvalis
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Because........

Postby Floyd Smoots » Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:47 pm

"...and the last shall be first." Well, Jeff, you just answered "et" before I could even reach my keyboard. But, why would a stoopid compooter program use such a goofy name as "Mentalgongfu"? Oh, nevermind, I'm sure it was only the crackhead programmers' idea of a jerk-off joke.<br><br>"Hugh", I only tried your first two links. Guess What!! The first one got me a message page from Yahoo.commie that "we ain't nevah hoid o' dis link, go figger, redneck!" The second got me a similar page from Lycos(lycanthropy?).cong that kinda sorta sed, "Who'na hell're YOU, 'n' whut made yer hillbilly fanny think there'd be ANYTHING ta see heer, Cooter?".<br><br>Iroquois, I own a commercial VHS of Fritz's "Metropolis", but, until I read your post concerning "M", I never suspected what a true cinematic genius he was. Thanks bunches, for giving us that review of it.<br><br>But, ALL of you, I think we can expect MORE, and worse forms of these attacks in the very near future!!!<br><br>Para, my fellow Noiacs,<br>Uncle Floyd<br> <p></p><i></i>
Floyd Smoots
 
Posts: 548
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 11:50 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

On edit: fixed those two links. They truncated. oops.

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:56 pm

Someone at progressiveindependent.com recently put up links to articles about NATO from Covert Action Quarterly only to find they didn't work one day later.<br><br>My suspicions about internet psy-ops are becoming less theoretical and more empirical every day. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=hughmanateewins>Hugh Manatee Wins</A> at: 12/23/05 8:37 pm<br></i>
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Next

Return to Media and Information Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest