CitizenSpook calls Daniel Hopsicker a Govt Mole

[chiggerbit]

Well, I suppose it would be logical to turn the tables on CS and ask if he couldn't be what he is accusing Hopsicker of being. When did he fist appear and what was going at at that time? Let's see, who else has he accused of being an "antidote"? Fitzy, wasn't it? Or do I have him confused with someone else? He smears the professional reputation of a man whose background and identity is public information, based on what looks to me like disconnected logic (more than a few dots missing), but won't put his own identity on the line so that we can assess his history in order to come to any conclusions on his credibility. So, here we have an anonymous person trying to discredit two people who appear to be actually doing what they can about bits and pieces of this corrupt government. Hmmm, why would anyone want to undermine these two people? Oh, yes, and as he does so, he also announces that it was MIHOP.<br><br>Just playing devil's advocate here. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=chiggerbit@rigorousintuition>chiggerbit</A> at: 6/2/06 4:37 pm<br></i>

[StarmanSkye]

Good GAWD the irony here is thick enuff to slice-n-dice --<br><br>Criticism of CS's wacky theory based on little more than free-association and an obscure speculation by Hopsicker from 4 1/2 years ago, taken as a personal 'attack' on the messenger, while alleging, "Stick with your annointed sources like Hoppi ..the former MM darling ... "??<br><br>Nomo's use of the rhetorical 'you' is, was readily understood as a stylistic device denoting the inclusive 'us'.<br><br>From what I've seen, Hopsicker's researches are far better sourced and rigorously critical than most of CS's musings. It's also incredibly ironic that CS is damning Hopsicker for the Very Same thing, spreading unsubstantiated disinfo, that CS is doing.<br><br>CS's post isn't analytical -- it's a malicious hatchet job. My regard for him sure took a hit.<br><br>This isn't pot calling the kettle black stuff -- more like Bush calling Chavez an illegitimate leader, or the Pentagon complaining that Iraq had WMD.<br><br>DBeach, you WERE trying to be sarcastically funny here, weren't you?<br>Starman<br> <p></p><i></i>

[dbeach]

SS <br>I was stirring the pot and waiting for a tasty brew<br><br>Of course CS could be labeled in same manner as his labeling of Hoppi<br><br>I ALWAYS thought Hop was OK <br><br> HOWEVR I see the 9/11 moveme nt of which you and most here are a part of as loaded with govt snoop types and knowing further that Operation Mockingbird is in full deployment . WHY NOT USE HOPPI also??<br><br> <br>Feeding Truths with disinfo is a classic Nazi agenda .<br> Did not Herr Goerbells even admit to that???<br><br>CS is an editorial armed with his own opinions as we all are.<br><br>Last yr CS was a temp darling at RI ... now he has not produced much<br><br>BUT what has anybody produced close to the TRUTH while the fascist elect Heyden to be Spooko commander is not <br>my idea of moving in the rt direction<br><br>I will invite CS to defend his opinions rather than gettin me to act as spokesperson for CS .Iam NOT!!<br><br>Guess I am feelin big disappointment but not surprised in the whole scene<br><br>Bama Beck said it for me and SS you know me a lil .<br><br>TRUTH is painful and so is watching our remaining Freedosm removed cuz the rich and privleged think its their majic moment in His/Her/story<br><br>I think that waiting for MM to deliver us from the fascismos is one HELL of a wait <p></p><i></i>

[slimmouse]

<br><br> What I find interesting about the entire discussion is as follows.....<br><br> Is strikes me as painfully obvious that so many "intellectuals" on this board are at pains to dismiss the blatently fucking obvious........namely that which stares us all in the face with regards to 9/11.<br><br> OK...lets ignore the pod theory for a moment...though no-one has fully explained that to me to my satisfaction.....but the controlled demolition , and the Pentagon stuff .......not to mention the mysterious mound of earth that was apparently the now ingrained on the consciousness tale of bravery that (never) was flight 93.....<br><br> What exactly does ANYONE achieve in the attempt to wake THE MASSES , as opposed to the minutia of "intellectuals" up with regards to 9/11, by suggesting that we "intellectuals" ignore the physical evidence.<br><br> Intellectual arrogance ? Practical stupidity ? C'mon guys, its your fucking shout, cos its one or the other !<br><br> I can get into the sophisticated side of 9/11 with the best of them - Im a 9/11 anorak.<br><br> But to suggest for one moment that in order to give credibility to the movement , we need to dismiss the physical evidence as some kind of "disinfo" stool which discredits the endeavours of 9/11 truthseekers ?<br><br> Are you people fucking serious or what ? <p></p><i></i>