Anyone know what's up with this?

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Money, We Don' NEED No Stinkin' Money

Postby Floyd Smoots » Sat Dec 24, 2005 12:49 am

anotherdrew, if the gubmint's behind it, they don't CARE what it costs to monkey with ANYBODY'S site/blog/email/name-your-internet poison. I know, as well as you do, that the PTB is all about power and money, but when you've ALREADY GOT most of the money, it then becomes only about retaining the POWER!!! Jist mah ol' redneck opinion, Ah culd be rong.<br><br>Floyd's Alter Ego, Bubba<br> <p></p><i></i>
Floyd Smoots
 
Posts: 548
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 11:50 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Money, We Don' NEED No Stinkin' Money

Postby anotherdrew » Sat Dec 24, 2005 12:59 am

It isn't the gubamint, it's the "coup people" currently running the show.<br><br>One a these days bush... bang! zoom! striaght to the moon!<br>(or mars now I guess)<br><br>Yeah they can just make more money as they please the fed has been pumping a lot of new cash in lately. And soon the M3 figure will no long be available, so no one will know how much funny money they're adding to the pie... This can not possibly do anything to help the dollar. Oddly, they'll be moving that statistic behind the curtain the same time Iran starts it's euro priced oil market up. hmmm... could their be a connection? maybe the great bust is finally almost here. <p></p><i></i>
anotherdrew
 
Posts: 528
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 6:06 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Damn the Cookies, Full Speed Ahead!

Postby Floyd Smoots » Sat Dec 24, 2005 1:00 am

anotherdrew, thanks for the info. I'll check it out, but it really, really doesn't matter. I'm more interested in your (and others') response(s) to my more important assertion that some clown in the great state of Taxes (sic), Untied States uv Amerika, is trying to get Islamic Arabs to send them $$$$$$$ while masquerading as one of their own. I also don't think there really are that many "tourists" out there trying to kill us (or steal our luggage). I believe that it is largely a disinfo ruse by our own beloved NWO PTB. But that's just my opinion, yadda, etc. <p></p><i></i>
Floyd Smoots
 
Posts: 548
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 11:50 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Believe it Or NOT

Postby Floyd Smoots » Sat Dec 24, 2005 1:06 am

Yeah, anotherdrew, I also saw that info about the M3, petro-dollars, euro-petros, etc. You are correct, sir, "Something Wicked This Way Comes"!!! <p></p><i></i>
Floyd Smoots
 
Posts: 548
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 11:50 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Just stop it

Postby GDN01 » Sat Dec 24, 2005 1:13 am

With the "dialect" crap writing. It is annoying and insulting. <br><br>If the mirror site is supposed to be a distraction from the truth, it is failing. The many articles from the WTC Demolition site are just as eye-opening as reprinting Jeff's blog. They are just increasing the likelihood that the stuff will be stumbled upon. If someone was trying to create a distraction, wouldn't they find a way for people doing a google search for this info to be directed to a site with either nonsense, or a site discrediting the theories that are considered to be dangerous?<br><br>I'm not sure why the site is set up but as far as I know, and I did some internet research on this before, anything written on a person's blog is considered copyrighted, whether or not there is a copyright notice displayed. You can demand the material be removed - especially since it is reproduced in full and not referred to with an excerpted quote that is credited. And you, Jeff, should have been asked if you wanted to be a contributor to that site before listed as one with your material used. <p></p><i></i>
GDN01
 
Posts: 410
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 3:10 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Now I'll be disappointed if my spamjacketing thesis duds.

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Sat Dec 24, 2005 1:17 am

It still makes sense to me to for PTB to sensitize blockers using subversive text.<br><br>I thought that's what that old Wired article said was a new spammer tactic, using text as a stealth signature to sneak through the blocker.<br><br>Maybe I'm more suspicious than I am cyber-savvy but I still don't think it is a coincidence that Webster Tarpley's Unauthorized Biography of George Bush was imbedded in spam. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=hughmanateewins>Hugh Manatee Wins</A> at: 12/23/05 10:24 pm<br></i>
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Likes, Dislikes, and Total Lack of Humor

Postby f » Sat Dec 24, 2005 2:08 am

"Hugh", I couldn't agree more with your assertions.<br><br>"G-Danged Number One", Iff'n yew don' lahk mah dialecticisms, wh'on 'chew jis g'wan 'n' stick yer ol' punkin' haid on over in thet-thar durned ol' Fahr-Pit 'n' bitch 'bout it y' ol' Bircher!!!<br><br>Smoot on Ya, Dang It!<br> <p></p><i></i>
f
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 2:08 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Likes, Dislikes, and Total Lack of Humor

Postby anotherdrew » Sat Dec 24, 2005 2:27 am

<!--EZCODE FONT START--><span style="font-size:large;">Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer In waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny imrpoetnt tihng is that frist and lsat ltteer is at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by it slef but the wrod as a wlohe.</span><!--EZCODE FONT END--> <p></p><i></i>
anotherdrew
 
Posts: 528
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 6:06 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

'At's Whut Ah' Talkin' 'Bout!

Postby Floyd Smoots » Sat Dec 24, 2005 4:21 am

Dat dere ol' 'nutherdrew, he fer sure got dat 'un rite, dang his ol' smartass se'f! And yes, drewster, I'm totally blown away and amazed that you made your point better than you might realize, because, I just started "radenig" your post, and it flowed into my cognitive center almost as easily as if it were "slpeled crotrecly". Dang you.<br><br>But, seriously, fellow R.I.ers, what should we, or more to the point of Jeff's OP, what CAN we do about it? The government created what we now call the internet. They effectively own it, and the only reasons we are allowed on it at all are, at least, twofold. There may be more "folds", so feel free to weigh in here.<br><br>1. There is some serious money to be made from this technology, advertising, on-line shopping, failed dot-com's, etc.<br><br>2. How better to keep track of what the better educated and/or patriotic people are really talking and thinking about? Not to mention (from "their" point of view), the ability to spread any and all forms of disinformation. Remember, the Communists (just another historic branch of "business as usual" by the PTB), first came for the intellectuals, followed by the partisans, and then the religious folk of any stripe.<br><br>This, I think, gets close to the nub of what's really going on behind the curtain.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
Floyd Smoots
 
Posts: 548
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 11:50 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'At's Whut Ah' Talkin' 'Bout!

Postby pugzleyca3 » Sat Dec 24, 2005 5:26 am

I don't have anything to add to this thread except a question. <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> (not that great with computers)<br><br>I had an account with Earthlink for a few months. Then I cancelled it. Then I had no internet for about 6 months, I turned it off. <br><br>Then I called AOL about getting internet hooked up through them. The guy who answered the phone to take my order says "Do you want to keep the same user name you had before?" And he proceeds to quote the user name I had used at Earthlink. I said, "How the hell did you get that information?" He never answered me and heehawed around and I never got anything out of him of substance. He sounded as if he'd eaten a canary or something after he said it. <br><br>How could this possibly be that he knew this? I didn't know this type of information was shared between these two companies. I wonder what else he had on me.<br><br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=pugzleyca3>pugzleyca3</A> at: 12/24/05 2:27 am<br></i>
pugzleyca3
 
Posts: 726
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 4:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Anyone know what's up with this?

Postby Sepka » Sat Dec 24, 2005 5:57 am

NS1.WGTCSMV.COM 69.57.131.131 is a pointer to ns2.dwdhost.us. That's Deatherage Web Development, owned by Philip Deatherage. They're a legitimate web development company, who host a wide variety of customer sites. <br><br>The website www.dwdonline.com has been "down for Development" since Sept 23rd, 2004 according to the Wayback Machine. Most webhosting companies will have an AUP that addresses content-thievery, etc., but I can't find Deatherage's. Regardless, he's been on the receiving end of attempts to steal his intellectual properties before ( <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/decisions/html/2002/dbiz2002-00249.html">arbiter.wipo.int/domains/...00249.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> ), so I'd imagine that if you contacted him, he'd be sympathetic.<br><br>Phone: (865) 686-5498 <br>Cell: (865) 748-9471 <br>Email: pd@dwdonline.com<br>AIM: dwdsupport<br><br><br>Registrant Name: Philip N. Deatherage<br>Registrant Organization: Deatherage Web Development<br>Registrant Address1: HC 73, Box 74-A<br>Registrant City: Drury<br>Registrant State/Province: MO<br>Registrant Postal Code: 65638<br>Registrant Country: United States<br>Registrant Country Code: US<br>Registrant Phone Number: +1.4172612110<br>Registrant Facsimile Number: +1.4172612951<br>Registrant Email: sales@dwdonline.com<br><br>-Sepka the Space Weasel <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Sepka
 
Posts: 1983
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 2:56 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

yer downright Faulknerian floyd

Postby anotherdrew » Sat Dec 24, 2005 7:43 am

yer downright Faulknerian floyd, but I can't tell if you're more The Sound and the Fury or a Light in August. Light in August I'd have to guess. <p></p><i></i>
anotherdrew
 
Posts: 528
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 6:06 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Faulkner 'Em All Iff'n Dey Cain't Tak Uh Joke

Postby Floyd Smoots » Sat Dec 24, 2005 8:12 pm

Brother 'another'. Thank you, but I will confess knowing somewhat about Faulkner the person's bio, while never having actually read any of his now-classic works. My only excuse is that none of us can read everything; and most of us, unless forced by schools or employers, will tend to read that which we find most interesting, like Jeff's 'blog and your (and others') well thought out posts. As well as good literature, trashy fiction, space operas, news(?)papers, etc.<br><br><br><br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=floydsmoots>Floyd Smoots</A> at: 12/24/05 5:14 pm<br></i>
Floyd Smoots
 
Posts: 548
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 11:50 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Faulkner 'Em All Iff'n Dey Cain't Tak Uh Joke

Postby Dreams End » Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:59 pm

I actually sent an email to one of the guys listed on the "blogroll" of this site. All the folks listed there are associated with "wordpress" so I thought he'd be interested and maybe take some action. He wrote back and just said, "I can't help who links to my site." <br><br>Made me wonder if Wordpress itself is in on this. Could it be that hits somehow increase the value of their blogging software or whatever it is?<br><br>Anyway, it's scummy. <p></p><i></i>
Dreams End
 

Re: Faulkner 'Em All Iff'n Dey Cain't Tak Uh Joke

Postby Et in Arcadia ego » Sat Dec 24, 2005 10:46 pm

If they're violating copyrights give em hell, Jeff.<br><br>Start Monday; I'm a natural-born Holiday Curmudgeon.<br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :evil --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/devil.gif ALT=":evil"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Et in Arcadia ego
 
Posts: 4104
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: The Void
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to Media and Information Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests