rigorousintuition.ca

First, a warning:<br>AOL is filtering THIS content out of my emails. I can't send this to an AOL address the last two days. Content like "support our troops" and "God Bless America" went right through. But this link or keywords returned it as "delivery failure." So use the internet while you still can.<br><br>Related, here's some history of who runs American media and to what ends.<br><br>The Council on Foreign Relations uses CIA control of media as one large psy-ops project to achieve what the military terms 'Stability Operations.'<br><br>WWII Nazi radio propaganda tactics were studied by<br>Edward Murrow and many others to assist the Council on<br>Foreign Relations in running the US media (and entire<br>culture)as a military psychological operations<br>project.<br>We really are living Orwell's 1984. Happy Halloween in the House of Horrors.<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/2807/emspecial.html">www.geocities.com/Capitol...ecial.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>>snip<<br><br>In the 1950's Psychological operations, were<br>coordinated by a Governmental agency called the<br>Psychological Strategy Board. The architect of the<br>Psychological Strategy Board was Gordon Gray. Gray had<br>a consultant named Henry Kissinger. Kissinger was the<br>paid political consultant to the Rockefeller family.<br>Gordon Gray, Henry Kissinger, and many members of the<br>Rockefeller family belonged the Council on Foreign<br>Relations. On Thursday 26 July 1951, President Truman<br>would tell the press that the Psychological Strategy<br>board was a part of the Central Intelligence Agency.<br><10><br><br>In the book 1984 Big Brother controlled the people by<br>invading their privacy and using psychological<br>manipulation to control and change reality through<br>conscious deception, deliberate lying, and an official<br>ideology that abounded in contradictions. Council on<br>Foreign Relations and Royal Institute of International<br>Affairs members employ the same techniques to control<br>people -- including their fellow countrymen.<br><br>Hadley Cantril and Lloyd Free were Princeton<br>University Social Psychologists; researchers; and<br>members of the intelligence community. Council on<br>Foreign Relations Member Nelson Rockefeller funded<br>them to develop psycho-political policy strategies and<br>techniques. Council on Foreign Relations Member Edward<br>R. Murrow, would, with Rockefeller Foundation Funding<br>conduct a research project to perform a systematic<br>analysis of Nazi radio propaganda techniques and the<br>political use of radio. This study would result in a<br>world wide monitoring and broadcasting Government<br>agency called the Foreign Broadcast Intelligence<br>Service (FBIS).<br><br>The FBIS would become the United States Information<br>Agency (USIA). The USIA was established to achieve US<br>foreign policy by influencing public attitude at home<br>and abroad using psycho-political policy strategies.<br>The USIA Office of Research and reference service<br>prepares data on psychological factors and propaganda<br>problems considered by the Policy Planning Board in<br>formulating psycho-political information policies for<br>the National Security Council.<br><br>The Psychological Strategy Board became the renamed<br>super-powered Operations Coordinating Board (OCB). The<br>OCB had a vague ambiguous name that didn't provoke<br>curiosity. It had more members than the Psychological<br>Strategy board. It had the same mission, to use<br>psychological strategy, propaganda, and mass media, to<br>manipulate huge groups of individuals. It had a<br>psychological warfare machine -- the United States<br>Information Agency at its disposal. The USIA would be<br>responsible for foreign policy propaganda for the NSC.<br><br>The National Security Council is responsible for<br>recommending national security policy. The President<br>for having the policy approved. The Operations<br>Coordinating Board for coordinating interdepartmental<br>aspects of operational policy plans to insure their<br>timely and coordinated execution.<br><br>The National Security Council's recommended national<br>security policy is the de facto foreign policy of the<br>United States.The Department of State's Policy<br>Planning Board scripted the policy for the NSC. The<br>USIA Office of Research and Reference service prepared<br>data on psychological factors and propaganda problems.<br>The Policy Planning Board used the data in formulating<br>psycho-political information policies for the NSC. In<br>1955 the Director of the USIA became a voting member<br>of the Operations Coordinating board; USIA<br>representatives were invited to attend meetings of the<br>NSC Planning Board; and the USIA Director was invited<br>to Cabinet meetings. <11><br><br>From 1950-1953 CFR member Nitze directed the<br>Department of State Policy Planning Board. Nitze and<br>crew scripted psycho-political operations for the<br>National Security Council. <12 ><br><br>>snip<<br><br>more... <p></p><i></i>

perhaps you could spell the offending words incorrectly.<br><br>ie, the CIeA? and put an explanation in the email, or just substitute another word, as in code for the CIA.<br><br>how about concil of forin relations or somthing like that.<br><br>I mean we cannot have citizens talking with freedom to disclose lies and deceptions by governments now can we, this is a democracy you know.<br><br>Control the media and you control the citizens. They do it because its worked over the centuries.<br><br>Google has been dropping sites by the thousands regarding evidence to government lies and deceptions. if you dont know the web address of such sites then the search will not bring it up. <p></p><i></i>

"Google has been dropping sites by the thousands regarding evidence to government lies and deceptions. if you dont know the web address of such sites then the search will not bring it up."<br><br>Do you have any examples? Should we compile a list of them and post them in the data dump? <p></p><i></i>

i had a list made and i cannot find it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br><br>not much help, sorry.<br><br>This topic came up on another forum and i spent days looking for my list, this was about 8 months ago and i still havant come across the dam thing.<br><br>I had about 7 great sites, 3 on dr john dee, when i first visited the sites no problem, i used to go there a lot, then when i changed computers i did a search and the addresses had disappeared from the search engine, this got the alarm bells ringing and i started making a paper list of my trusted addressess!!!! i had a few on and sure enough over the months google has dropped them from its search engine. <br><br>Its a bit like all mention of michael meiring on CNN's search, its just gone. <p></p><i></i>

Can you give a more detailed example? Like, give us a URL of one (or preferably more) of those "dropped" sites/pages. Then we can use Google to search for terms on those pages and see what happens.<br><br>I'm wary of Google and how big it's become, but this just strikes me as overblown paranoia. Maybe the site owners just stopped paying the bills, you know. <p>--<br>When all else fails... panic.</p><i></i>

<!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://google-watch.org/">google-watch.org/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Much info on ties to the 'intelligence community' with recording of all your searches and cookies that last 38 years and former spooks working there.<br><br>And Yahoo recently helped the Chinese government put a journalist in prison. Yahoo says they just obey the laws of the countries they do business in.<br><br>Again, use the internet for all it's worth while you can and prioritize what you really want people to know. Then spread it everywhere you possibly can.<br><br>Personally, I'm focused on the national security state using psy-ops to shape the entire American 'experience.'<br><br>YES. A database of The Verboten would be useful. <br>We might learn something from the shadows.<br><br>At democraticunderground.com the moderators won't tell you which websites they don't allow to be linked to, they just delete and lock. Nice.<br><br>Guess someone at AOL is too. <p></p><i></i>

Thank heavens for the library. The library is a peerless resource.<br> <br>As for AOL, I recommend that the abused consumer find another Internet provider. Not that this isn't a matter for civil libertarians to take up with the government. <br><br>Consider the US Congress. They're going to the mat on librarians not allowing lists of books that people check out be looked at by law enfor cement- but they let this go on. To me, it's tantamount to an admission that they're reading your mail. Obviously, if they're censoring it, that entails reading it.<br><br>I don't care that much, that's my situation. But other people should be outraged. People's business can be pilfered. They can bust people out economically. <br><br>Ironically, I'd bet that mail covers are harder to do than ever. from the sheer volume. And any teror cell looking for instructions can easily get their messages via a mass mailing. There's no hope of covering those.<br><br>Interesting that it's a "private" company doing that. It's almost like an experiment to find out what people will put up with. That's implicit in what's being done, right?<br><br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=robertdreed>robertdreed</A> at: 11/2/05 5:31 pm<br></i>

When the NSA was revealed in the early 70s people soon realized that Echelon monitoring of all communications had made none of us free from unwarrranted search of our homes and effects.<br><br>Some people react with scorn at the idea of trying to resuscitate the idea of privacy in this age of supercomputer datamining.<br><br>This is a cultural norm that must not be allowed to die, like the unreasonable expectation to have one's vote count or the Constitution adhered to.<br><br>Though I've found a William Turner book I didn't know existed at the library recently, many books on hidden history have been disappeared and many more are published as disinformation.<br><br>Have you been to Borders and looked at the 'New Non-Fiction' table lately? Yikes. I hope most of that stuff doesn't end up in libraries unless filed under 'bad examples.' <p></p><i></i>

AOHell sucks and always has--Fatboy Case is a winger.<br><br>Basically, anything that originated with the Department of Defense is probably not something we should all be relying on to stand us in good stead come the revolution.<br><br>Use it while you can, but know what you're dealing with and always have been. What the DoD giveth, the DoD can and will taketh away. <p></p><i></i>

Have you studied the AOL logo? It's a pyramid and an eye... I think you know what symbology THAT is...<br>Someone on the Icke forum was also complaining yesterday that AOL forbids certain chatrooms from being made!! Antyhing about secret societies and Illuminati etc is forbidden! <p></p><i></i>

It really is AOL.<br><br>My friend has two email addresses and so we tried my sending him 'subversive content' about alphabet agencies to both addresses. The AOL one bounced back immediately.<br><br>That's conclusive evidence for me. Bastards. <p></p><i></i>

That's really not very conclusive at all, there are many reasons email can bounce. Can you post the full headers of the email in question? <p></p><i></i>

Nuf said. <p></p><i></i>

I'd love to have someone savvy do an autopsy but personal sender and sendee info is in it, of course.<br><br>Having the exact same email successfully go to non-AOL addresses but bounce back instantly from two AOL addresses<br>AND then have 'benign' email saying things like "God Bless America Support Our Troops" go right through to same AOL addresses and then have the 'subversive' stuff fail immediately following the 'White House-friendly' email is I think pretty damn conclusive.<br><br>That's all I've got for ya, sorry. I warned my friends who do use AOL. <p></p><i></i>