by Dreams End » Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:25 am
Some time ago on this forum I began posting on the topic of global resource depletion/global collapse as themes being promoted by those with fascist and eugenicist goals. Most here were sophisticated enough to understand that this did not mean I thought anyone who believed in peak oil or peak food was necessarily a fascist. Some others decided that WAS my point. And some others, being fascists themselves, were rather offended. <br><br>The very post by proldic, the quotes from Abernethy, etc, were posted by me quite some time ago. I don't know if he remembered that or rediscovered them himself. I'm not saying this to take credit. These things need to be repeated. And often.<br><br>But for whatever reasons, people whose toes I've stepped on, people I've called out, and people whose ideas really do much better when not exposed to daylight began to come to threads started by Dreams End and just fight. It wasn't argument. It was simply noise.<br><br>I wrote a tongue in cheek piece confessing my employment with the government, while at the same time posting some of the greatest hits from our resident fascists or those who are not discerning enough to see them as such. "Why can't we point out Jews? We can point out anyone of any other ethnicity or religion and no one complains."<br><br>Most of us know that their posts complaining about those of other ethnicities or religions seem to get lost in the mail. <br><br>I've learned a great deal by following these lines of thought. The primary thing I've discovered is that a very great deal of modern conspiracy theory tracks back to age-old Jewish Blood Libel and the thoroughly discredited Protocols. There are those this site who still argue the validity of the Protocols on . And more than one person has suggested that it doesn't matter if they are forgeries or not, they are still true.<br><br>Whatever.<br><br>But it grew wearying having really good threads get drowned out by the brown-shirted, zeig heil chorus. Hence my "confession." It was hard to get whatever "work" done that can be accomplished in such a forum. <br><br>But right after I decided to take a break from this board, I saw a post from "Free Zundel Now." To my great shock, no one seemed that upset about THAT person. Didn't draw nearly the heat I did. Go figure. <br><br>So I looked up ole FZN. I found the post at stormfront where they discuss how to infiltrate non-fascist websites, what topics to discuss and how to make their hatred more palatable to those truth seekers out there who rely on the internet as their primary information source.<br><br>I decided to post this but not under "Dreams End" because then it becomes about Dreams End finding Nazis everywhere. Nevermind that this guy WAS an actual, self-professed nazi, the point would have been lost.<br><br>So I used "Not Zundel." In order to restrict flames and attacks further, I utilized a minimalist, rather cryptic writing style to keep the focus on the information copied and quoted from others. It led to a fruitful discussion. <br><br>I did not intend to develop a full-scale alternate online persona, though we all do that to some degree, do we not? (Robert D. Reed and Jeff Wells excepted...at least as far as name useage goes...I've never met them in real life.) How many one time posters who are "unregistered users" have popped in to criticize me or my posts? None of them, you imagine, have other names on this board? And how many post as "anonymous" on the comments? In fact, I was first "outed" there by someone who posts on this board by another name.<br><br>But veritas was mostly about limiting flame wars. I began this post by explaining how I'd posted the Heinberg/Abernethy stuff some time ago. I didn't discover it myself, but I linked directly to an article that was written by the person who had. Needless to say, it did not go over well. <br><br>After proldic's post, I dug some more. If my instincts were correct, there was another agenda at work here. Putting forward an ideology of imminent collapse combined with the idea that there is no hope to forestall it is dangerous stuff. Yes, ideas CAN be dangerous. Or didn't you know that?<br><br>But I don't call for censorship...just exposure. Let us unravel these threads and see where they lead. If I'm write, they should turn up some pretty dark stuff.<br><br>Oh..and they did. And the links go further and further still. Heinberg is really not even that big a player in all this, but he is important as a popularizer of this theme. <br><br>The Nazi mythos is important, of course, on its face. No, those of you who couldn't catch it on your own, it doesn't mean anyone who meditates or searches for Atlantis is a Nazi. But any scholar of these myths, especially one trying to combine many of these ideas into proof of a single northern, Indo-European Golden Age for which we all secretly yearn, must know of the history of these myths and how they've been appropriated and to what purpose they've been put. And it is the purpose that is the concern here, not the myths themselves. I like myths. Some of my best friends are myths.<br><br>Christianity can be used for the same reasons. And has been. But the Nazi mythos is so specific, especially as articulated by Heinberg, that there is no mistaking its authorship. He has to know this. And the connection to Dugin, which SHOULD make him very uncomfortable indeed, is left hanging. Dugin is a larger story, but one not too familiar in the West, and one I'm just learning. Search on "Alexander Dugin" as Heinberg must have done at some time, and see the hits that come up. Many, if not most of them are his metaphysical musings about Hyperborea, Thule, and the like. His links to the fascist NBP is also clear. The second hit on google is the one that includes his description of the Jews I included in the thread. Yet, to this day, not a caveat, not even a Watchful Waffle of "sure, he hates Jews, but his position on caviar is EXACTLY RIGHT." Nothing.<br><br>So he should have been able to find this info easily. In fact, except for the compiling of this info, the research into ALL of this, Heinberg and Dugin both, took a total of about 3 hours. I recommend such scrutiny of all sources. ESPECIALLY THE ONES YOU AGREE WITH. If, in fact, I post here or on my blog from a questionable source PLEASE LET ME KNOW. And tell me why, with examples. It's really important. And I won't flame you...I'll thank you and either explain why I decided to utilize that source or re-evaluate it.<br><br>My comments about Dugin and Heinberg and the Nazi and anti-Semitic strains in both New Age and conspiracy thought will be confined to my blog from here on out. There's a comments section. Stop by if you like. It's an ongoing series and I can't even keep up with the material I'm finding. Much of it isn't my discovery of course, but it's only now making sense to me. The Maurice Strong story is one that I should pursue. Interestingly, many of the forces opposing "one worlders" like Strong are themselves in the same stream of thought as Heinberg and Dugin. Surely there are alternatives to the New World Order that do not include fascist extremism and eugenic population plans. But they are hard to find, online anyway, as this stream of thought has bubbled into that important discourse in myriad and surprising ways. (Ever wonder WHY Patrick Buchanan hooked up with Lenora Fulani? But that's another story.)<br><br>And this bullshit has also almost...ALMOST hopelessly contaminated the even darker areas of conspiracy theory. For example, the most recent case in this thread: <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm10.showMessageRange?topicID=1699.topic&start=61&stop=73">p216.ezboard.com/frigorou...61&stop=73</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>I took the time to email Bradley Hamlin directly. I started to post on the discussion board but stopped before I said too much. With the way things are around here, I simply didn't think that my posting as "Dreams End" was a good idea.<br><br>He wrote back and told me that Richard Hamlin's wife had specifically said she was part of a "Bavarian Satanic Cult" and Bradley Hamlin had heard of the "Illuminati" and......crap. <br><br>I am not saying this case is bullshit. Far from it. A man is in jail and there are police reports that can be examined. Richard Hamlin would not go to jail for a hoax. The truth, whatever it turns out to be, is very, very dark. It may yet involve the Finders. And the key may be Fresno...but that, too, is another story.<br><br>But the Bavarian Illuminati idea is so incredibly contaminated with unsourced speculative and usually anti-Semitic strains that whatever truth there may have been is hopelessly lost. See Fritz Springmeier's "Bloodlines of the Illuminati for an example." Then google Springmeier. Then see who all quotes HIM. <br><br>So, these sources, about which people glibly say ("Hey, it has SOME truth in it, so we shouldn't just dismiss it, right?") have tangled the truth in such a maze of disinformation and outright falsehoods (there's a difference) that real, human tragedies result. I hope people can learn this if nothing else: Partial revelations of the truth, in skillful hands, do more to obscure the truth than outright lies do. <br><br>And so. Back to veritas. All the information I wanted to put out about RH got put out there. And I wasn't attacked as veritas, though the thread was eventually derailed. The new discussion is fairly interesting, but I wish people would try to stay on topic for those trying to follow the main thread. Anyway, the information made it out there and my cryptic writing style pretty much kept it from being about MY thoughts. Look for yourself. It is clear! Clear! If there was anything to this line of thinking, people would have to work it out for themselves.<br><br>After Homeless and Gouda and yet another unregistered user named observer outed me, it was time to 'fess up and take whatever attacks will come. The thread was already dead anyway, so no harm now. <br><br>I only ask one favor from any who are angry at my charade, and that is to leave off carrying any animosity onto the above thread about Hamlin. I may post there from time to time if I find out anything. Already there is some strange side topic on there that finally got put back to rights. It's too important. And maybe there should too be a caveat that he who is without false moniker should cast the first stone...<br><br>But now it is time for veritas to go. He/she has served his/her purpose but any future posts by veritas would simply be lost in concerns about if that is my 'real' identity. No, it's 'Dreams End.' And Mrs. End is right beside me to confirm it. Kudos to the detective work of Gouda and HH, or at least their intuitions. Obviously, since I posted a very long article about Heinberg on my blog I knew that veritas was not long for this world. <br><br><br>So I will sign off this thread with a last message from veritas:<br> <br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>It has been an honor to spend time among you. Yes!<br><br>Truthseekers, all. <br><br>Does my name change ? Yes.<br><br>Does my name change what IS? No!<br><br>My name is in Latin. Salvete, amici!<br><br>It means truth. <br><br> The 'v' is ALWAYS little.<br><br>But the truth is very, very big.<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>