Cremaster Cycle by Matthew Barney

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Cremaster Cycle by Matthew Barney

Postby FourthBase » Mon Dec 05, 2005 6:05 am

Happened upon this description of Cremaster 3:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.tucsonweekly.com/gbase/cinema/Content?oid=oid%3A50684">www.tucsonweekly.com/gbas...id%3A50684</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>At only 42 minutes, Cremaster 4 is also one of the shortest films of the cycle. The longest is Cremaster 3, which, while no doubt the masterpiece of the series, probably could have used some trimming. Ostensibly the story of an apprentice Freemason working his way into the inner circles of the organization, it's more a visual summation of the entire series. Incredibly gorgeous scenes on the Isle of Man, wherein two giants fight while babbling in an unknown language, lead into a scene in the lobby of the Chrysler building. <br><br>There, after a corpse crawls out of muck and makes its way into the back of a Chrysler Imperial New Yorker, five 1967 Chrysler Crown Imperials engage in a brutal demolition derby until only a compacted cube of metal remains. Meanwhile, Barney, dressed nattily, fills the elevator with cement. This turns out to be a bad idea, as a field of decomposing horses races by while evil Freemasons knock out Barney's teeth and then force them down his throat and out the other end of his digestive track. <br><br>After that, things get a little bizarre, as a battle of the bands ensues inside the spiral rotunda of the Guggenheim Museum. While '80s punk favorites Agnostic Front and Murphy's Law fight it out with guitar and bass, '80s art favorite Richard Serra tosses hot Vaseline about and Barney tries to climb the rotunda. Then some really weird shit happens.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br><br>Here's the official site for Cremaster 3:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.cremaster.net/crem3.htm">www.cremaster.net/crem3.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>It says on IMDB that Barney went to Yale.<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0056030/">www.imdb.com/name/nm0056030/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>The rest of the cycle seems very fucking strange, too.<br>Strange in a way that probably we'd see better than others. <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
FourthBase
 
Posts: 7057
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 4:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Cremaster Cycle by Matthew Barney

Postby steve vegas » Mon Dec 05, 2005 8:12 am

what the hell is this? <p></p><i></i>
steve vegas
 
Posts: 185
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 12:11 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Yikes

Postby steve vegas » Mon Dec 05, 2005 8:17 am

just started watching the trailer when we had a mini-earthquake over here...(i'm in asia)...the guy dates bjork...trrrrriiiiiipppppyyyyyy <p></p><i></i>
steve vegas
 
Posts: 185
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 12:11 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Cremaster Cycle by Matthew Barney

Postby FourthBase » Mon Dec 05, 2005 8:19 am

Contemporary art. Paul McCarthy, Bill Viola...<br>He's right up there with them...<br>Respected up the ass by New York MOMA types.<br><br>He's married to Bjork.<br><br>And like I said, went to Yale, and is alleged to be a Mason.<br>But he seems more like a Kenneth Anger than a Bill Viola. <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
FourthBase
 
Posts: 7057
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 4:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Yikes

Postby steve vegas » Mon Dec 05, 2005 8:23 am

OK...this takes the strangeness award for the week...go see the <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.cremaster.net/books.htm">trailer</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> if you haven't....it looks as if seriously large bucks went into these movies... <p></p><i></i>
steve vegas
 
Posts: 185
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 12:11 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Yikes

Postby NewKid » Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:53 am

As that weird guy in the sugarless gum ads used to say:<br><br>"Intense. . . . Maybe a little too intense!"<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
NewKid
 
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Chrysler himself

Postby FourthBase » Mon Dec 05, 2005 10:59 am

Did I mention Walter Chrysler was a Shriner?<br>I mean, of course he was, why else would Barney set it there?<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.shriners.bc.ca/shriners/chrysler.shtml">www.shriners.bc.ca/shrine...sler.shtml</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Inventor of the Chrysler Automobile repaired a Steam Locomotive in record time and built the Plymouth and De Soto. Walter Percy Chrysler intimidated other car dealers and made them stronger with better ideas for their cars. Chrysler felt that innovations were important to technology. That heritage continued in the 1960's with the Apollo moon-landing program. <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>The Chrysler Corporation was the only automobile manufacturer to have a prime NASA contract</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->, building the first stage of Saturn I booster. <br><br>Walter Chrysler, born April 2, 1875, was a member Isis Shrine at Salina, Kansas. He was an affiliated member of Cedar Lodge, Oshawa, Ont. Canada, the mother lodge of his former employer and fellow Shriner Sam McLaughlin, president of General Motors of Canada. Walter Chrysler passed away August 18, 1940.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br><br> <br> <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
FourthBase
 
Posts: 7057
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 4:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Yikes

Postby orz » Mon Dec 05, 2005 11:00 am

I've seen most of the Cremaster Cycle on bootleg DVD, and bits + pieces in galleries... It's pretty amazing work, tho not always particularly watchable... The trailer makes it look more exciting than parts of it are; the movies are very slow-for-art's-sake! <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> But really beautiful despite being shot on video.<br><br>Loads of interesting symbolism for sure... but I would think twice before getting too worked up about it; I mean, these films are very much high art, and specifically overtly about Freemasonry etc... it's not like this weird + loaded imagery is being covertly slipped into a mainstream movie or something.<br><br>I'm sure there's all sorts of politics and connections to power in the world of high art, but I don't think Barney is part of the illuminati or anything... I mean, Bjork is going out with him and that's good enough for me. <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> I don't believe she'd get involved with anyone evil...<br><br>He may well be a Mason I guess... He's certainly at least researched it heavily for his art.<br><br>You guys should certainly see his films if you get a chance, lots of food for thought! <p></p><i></i>
orz
 
Posts: 4107
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 9:25 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Synopsis from the official Cremaster 3 page

Postby FourthBase » Mon Dec 05, 2005 11:02 am

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>CREMASTER 3 (2002) is set in New York City and narrates the construction of the Chrysler Building, which is in itself a character - host to inner, antagonistic forces at play for access to the process of (spiritual) transcendence. These factions find form in the struggle between Hiram Abiff or the Architect (played by Richard Serra), and the Entered Apprentice (played by Barney), who are both working on the building. <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>They are reenacting the Masonic myth of Hiram Abiff, purported architect of Solomon's Temple, who possessed knowledge of the mysteries of the universe. The murder and resurrection of Abiff are reenacted during Masonic initiation rites as the culmination of a three-part process through which a candidate progresses from the first degree of Entered Apprenticeship to the third of Master Mason</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->. <br> After a prologue steeped in Celtic mythology, the narrative begins under the foundation of the partially constructed Chrysler Building. A female corpse digging her way out of a grave is the undead Gary Gilmore, protagonist of Cremaster 2. Carried out of her tomb by five boys, she is<br>transported to the Chrysler Building's lobby. The pallbearers deposit her in the back seat of a Chrysler Imperial New Yorker. During this scene, the camera cross-cuts to images of the Apprentice troweling cement over carved fuel-tank caps on the rear chassis of five 1967 Chrysler Crown Imperials, each bearing the insignia of a Cremaster episode. Packed with cement, these caps will serve as battering rams in a demolition derby about to begin. The Apprentice then scales one of the building's elevator shafts until reaching a car resting between floors. Using this cabin as a mold, he pours cement to cast the perfect ashlar, a symmetrically hewn stone that symbolizes moral rectitude in Masonic ritual. By circumventing the carving process to create the perfect ashlar, the Apprentice has cheated in his rites of passage and has sabotaged the construction of the building.<br> The ensuing scene in the Chrysler Building's Cloud Club bar is a slapstick routine between bartender and Apprentice. Almost everything goes wrong; and these humorous mishaps result in the bartender playing his environment like a bagpipe. The various accidents leading up to this are caused by a woman (played by Aimee Mullins) in an adjoining room, who is cutting potatoes with blades on her shoes and stuffing them under the foundation of the bar until it is no longer level - a condition that echoes the corrupted state of the tower. This interlude is interrupted by a scene shift to a racetrack, where the Apprentice is accosted by hitmen who break all his teeth in retribution for his deception. Back in the Cloud Club, he is escorted to a dental office, where he is stripped of his clothes, under which he is wearing the costume of the First Degree Masonic initiate. An apron of flesh obtrudes from his navel, referencing the lambskin aprons worn by Masonic candidates as a symbol for the state of innocence before the Fall. <br> The Architect confronts his opponent in the dental suite, fitting the compressed remains of the Imperial New Yorker into the Apprentice's mouth like a pair of dentures. At that moment, the Apprentice's intestines prolapse through his rectum. This ceremonious disembowelment symbolically separates him from his lower self. For his hubris he is simultaneously punished and redeemed by the Architect - whose own hubris, however, equally knows no bounds. <br>Returning to his office, and anxious about the tower's slow progress, the Architect constructs two pillars that allude to the columns, Jachin and Boaz, designed by Abiff for Solomon's Temple. Meanwhile, the Apprentice escapes from the dental lab and climbs to the top of the tower. The Architect uses his columns as a ladder and climbs through an oculus in the ceiling. The next scene describes an apotheosis, the Architect becoming one with his design, as the tower itself is transformed into a maypole.<br> <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>At this point in the narrative the film pauses for a choric interlude, which rehearses the initiation rites of the Masonic fraternity through allegorical representations of the five-part Cremaster cycle</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->, all in the guise of a game staged in the Guggenheim Museum. Called “The Order,” this competition features a fantastical incarnation of the Apprentice as its sole contestant, who must overcome obstacles on each level of the museum's spiraling rotunda. <br>In the ensuing scene, which returns to the top of the Chrysler Building, the Architect is murdered by the Apprentice, who is then killed by the tower. Both men have been punished for their hubris and the building will remain unfinished. The film ends with a coda that links it to Cremaster 4. This is the legend of Fionn MacCumhail, which describes the formation of the Isle of Man, where the next installment of the Cremaster cycle will take place.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
FourthBase
 
Posts: 7057
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 4:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Bjork

Postby FourthBase » Mon Dec 05, 2005 11:06 am

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>I don't believe she'd get involved with anyone evil...<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>A la the Kubrick thread, Barney may be depicting evil...<br>But not evil himself...or...he could be evil himself, a little or a lot.<br>If so, Bjork could be fooled by him, or not care...<br>Or she might be evil herself...you never know.<br>I wouldn't use Bjork as a litmus test, personally. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=fourthbase>FourthBase</A> at: 12/5/05 8:09 am<br></i>
User avatar
FourthBase
 
Posts: 7057
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 4:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Synopsis from the official Cremaster 3 page

Postby orz » Mon Dec 05, 2005 11:08 am

By the way, you can buy a short DVD of 'The Order' segment from Cremaster 3... the rest of the films are unavaliable but shown and/or projected in galleries quite often. Bootlegs are avaliable from various sources, including probably Bittorrent somewhere? <p></p><i></i>
orz
 
Posts: 4107
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 9:25 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Bjork

Postby orz » Mon Dec 05, 2005 11:15 am

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>I wouldn't use Bjork as a litmus test, personally.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>That's where we differ! <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>Nah, I understand what you mean...<br> but it's just a gut feeling... as with Kubrick's films, I just feel strongly that Bjork could not make the amazing and human music she does and still be part of anything truely sinister.<br><br>The grotesque way in which masonic imagery is depicted in Barney's work could certainly imply a level of criticism... It's pretty obtuse stuff tho so it's hard to say what the real message is...<br><br>Lots of info at <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.cremasterfanatic.com/">www.cremasterfanatic.com/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>(please note that that site is itself a work of art... a semi-fake parody of internet fan site culture applied to an unlikely target! but also it's actually quite a useful set of synopsys, links, images etc!) <p></p><i></i>
orz
 
Posts: 4107
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 9:25 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Barney

Postby Col Quisp » Mon Dec 05, 2005 12:31 pm

I posted something about this a few months ago, but now I can't remember what thread it was in! I think I talked about the weird Masonic symbolism and I also questioned the funding for this project. <br><br>Why do you think that just because Bjork dates him he's OK? Don't get me wrong, I happen to like the Cremaster series. More power to him for getting so much funding to create such a solipsistic work. <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Col Quisp
 
Posts: 734
Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 2:52 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Barney

Postby orz » Mon Dec 05, 2005 1:17 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Why do you think that just because Bjork dates him he's OK?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>Because I think Bjork's OK! <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :lol --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/laugh.gif ALT=":lol"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> Like I said above, just my gut feeling. <p></p><i></i>
orz
 
Posts: 4107
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 9:25 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

matthew barney

Postby saintsimon » Mon Dec 05, 2005 5:19 pm

matthew barney has been for some time a darling of the new york art scene (although i think his glamor has faded a bit recently), and was honored not too long ago with a solo retrospective which occupied the entire guggenheim museum in manhattan. an interesting show, if ultimately a bit repetitive and disappointing. definitely worth catching a few of the cremaster films: visual stunning, sometimes disturbing, always interesting.<br><br>i believe the new york times art critic michael kimmelman called him "the most interesting living artist," or some words to that effect, and whatever that means.<br><br>here i agree completely with orz: barney's work is awash with symbolism, some of it taken from the masons, but he is not trying to be covert about anything, and i also doubt he is part of the "illuminati." nothing here really to get worked up about from a conspiracy standpoint. rather, possibly a path to explore what happens when occult visual symbols are juxtaposed to the other more common visual symbols of our age, including those of sex, commercialism, and power.<br><br><br>i also have to agree wholeheartedly with orz regarding bjork: his status in my book jumped significantly when i heard they were seeing each other -- now there is a couple that would be fun to get to know!<br><br>just as an aside, any RI'ers ever see bjork in lars von trier's dancer in the dark? amazing movie, amazing performance. bjork was nominated for an academy award, and then honored by joan rivers as "worsed dressed" for wearing an interesting swan dress. god this country is so fucked up.... <p></p><i></i>
saintsimon
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 1:25 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Next

Return to Media and Information Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest