by Hugh Manatee Wins » Mon Jul 03, 2006 5:21 pm
Check out this hijack/hack report from what is now proparanoid.NET...used to be '.com' but not since a neutralizing attack.<br><br>(The rest of the site is has lots of info worth reading, too.)<br><br>Seems this site was first hacked in 2001 over info on the 'friendly fire' evidence involving the explosion of Flight TWA800 <br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.proparanoid.net/800i.htm">www.proparanoid.net/800i.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>...and then again in early 2005.<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.proparanoid.net/hijack.htm">www.proparanoid.net/hijack.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>This article will explain:<br><br> What happened to the original proparanoid.com Web site<br> How domain name hijacking (cybersquatting) works<br> How activists Web sites are suppressed by hijacking<br> How to see it coming if a deliberate attack strategy<br> What proxy domain name registry is and why it is a bad thing<br> Who is involved in Web piracy <br> Multiple indicators that military-intelligence community is involved<br> Why proparanoid.com was targeted by hijackers<br> How everyone is a victim<br> What to do about it <br> Note: Colored words are 'first use' key words or concepts<br><br>Navigational headings in this article:<br><br> 1. Introduction<br><br> 2. How as site is hijacked (background)<br><br> 3. The principle players (background)<br><br> 4. How activist site hijacking works<br><br> 5. Politically motivated or legitimate business?<br> Victims would rather fight than pay<br> Arbitration example #1: inept defense<br> Arbitration example #2: charges <br><br> 6. Is there evidence suggesting targeting?<br><br> 7. Is there evidence of conspiracy?<br><br> 8. Is there evidence of SPAM attacks?<br> The SPAM Russians is coming<br> Federal SPAM investigation<br><br> 9. Is there evidence of military-intelligence?<br> Front trait: Multiple firms same address<br> Front trait: Excessive security<br> Military connections?<br> Terrorist Web sites<br> Flock of proprietaries: Vulture's nest<br> Front trait: More bedfellows<br><br>10. Evidence of a pattern of deceit and fraud?<br> CIA porn?<br> Fraud in name only<br> Specific fraud charges<br> Fraud summary: Fight back<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=hughmanateewins>Hugh Manatee Wins</A> at: 7/3/06 3:44 pm<br></i>
