by Anonymous » Sat Aug 27, 2005 1:20 am
Thank you for the link, Antiaristo, although I'd like to suggest that your title is slightly misleading. We were using depleted uranium shells and bombs during Gulf War I. Ever since Gulf War I veterans, my son included, began returning home and complaining of strange symptoms, the Pentagon has denied that any proof exists that there is a correlation between their maladies and DU effects. The veteran mentioned in your linked article is perhaps the "first" casualty to gain any widespread publicity and recognition.<br><br>In spite of the the Pentagon's denials, there is some hope that this horrifying result of modern warfare is being recognized:<br><br>"A Scots ex-soldier has become the first veteran to win a pension appeal after being diagnosed with depleted uranium (DU) poisoning during the 1991 Gulf war.A Pension Appeal Tribunal Service hearing in Edinburgh accepted medical evidence provided by Kenny Duncan, of Clackmannan, previously dismissed by the MoD, which revealed he had become ill after service in the Middle East.<br>"Mr Duncan, 35, a driver with 7 Tank Transporter Regiment, helped move tanks destroyed by shells containing the poisonous dust.<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://denniskyne.com/media/articles/kennyduncan/">denniskyne.com/media/arti...nnyduncan/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Readers might note with some irony that the above appeal and resolution took place in Scotland. <br><br>Those interested in researching "depleted uranium poisoning" (19,900 hits): <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://tinyurl.com/8d6cj">tinyurl.com/8d6cj</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Those interested in researching "depleted uranium" (712,000 hits): <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://tinyurl.com/cuo4k">tinyurl.com/cuo4k</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br> <p></p><i></i>