by heath7 » Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:32 am
<!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/09/25/MNGD7ETMNM1.DTL" target="top">FAMILY DEMANDS THE TRUTH New inquiry may expose events that led to Pat Tillman’s death</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br>Its old news that Tillman's death was fratricide. Now we know that <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>three</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> shots to Tillman's head is what killed him; we now know that Tillman kept a journal that disappeared upon his death; we now know that Tillman was unhappy with the regime in DC, and was expecting to meet with, among others, Noam Chomsky when he got back from Afghanistan, where he died...of fratricide. <br><br>To read the above article, Pat Tillman was an amazing specimen. When we lost Pat Tillman, we lost a <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>real</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> hero.<br><br>Seeing as how Tillman wanted to go to Afghanistan to catch Bin Laden, I wonder if he became aware of how much Bushie didn't want to capture Bin Laden. Its got to be common knowledge in that part of the world that Bush and Rumsfeld warned Bin Laden for two weeks before actually going into Tora Bora. <br><br>Pat had a brother serving with him. If Pat was so dangerous 'they' rubbed him out, it'd seem his brother would have some clue why. If I were ever to meet his brother, I'd explain how I admire Pat because he was so classy; he didn't complain and make a big show about the fight, he just tried to make the fight honest. Then I'd ask him why Pat ended up with three bullets in his head, his uniform burned, and his journal immediately missing. Then I'd ask him what Pat was going to do when he got back to the states. Then I'd ask him if Pat suspected unusual danger around him. I'd then ask him if Pat sacrificed himself for the truth. Then I'd ask him if that truth is going to die with Pat Tillman.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>