Abramoff & al-Arian Lobbyists Charity Front for Terror

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Abramoff & al-Arian Lobbyists Charity Front for Terror

Postby seemslikeadream » Fri Jan 06, 2006 12:07 am

<!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.juancole.com/2006/01/abramoff-and-al-arian-lobbyists.html" target="top">www.juancole.com/2006/01/abramoff-and-al-arian-lobbyists.html</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br>Wednesday, January 04, 2006<br><br>Abramoff and al-Arian: Lobbyist's "Charity" a Front for Terrorism<br><br>The guilty plea of fabulously wealthy and highly corrupt lobbyist Jack Abramoff raised the question of whether he would roll over on congressmen involved in illegal fundraising and other crimes with him. Some twenty Republicans on Capitol Hill are said to be in danger.<br><br>Abramoff's dense network of illicit finances and phony charities might end some political careers in the United States. But the investigation into his activities by the FBI also shed light on the ways in which rightwing American Jews have often been involved in funding what are essentially terrorist activities by armed land thieves in Palestinian territory. <br><br>Indeed, it was this terror funding of Israeli far right militiamen that tripped Abramoff up, since the FBI discovered that he had misled Indian tribes into giving money to the Jabotinskyites, and then began wondering if he had defrauded the tribes in other ways. (You betcha!) The Indian leaders were furious when they discovered they had been used to oppress another dispossessed indigenous people, the Palestinians, calling it "Outer Limits bizarre" and saying that they would never have willingly given money to such a cause.<br><br>Newsweek's Mike Issikoff reported last May that Abramoff diverted $140,000 from a charity ostensibly to benefit inner-city youths to militant Israeli colonists who had usurped land in the Palestinian West Bank. Isikoff wrote:<br><br><br>"Among the expenditures: purchases of camouflage suits, sniper scopes, night-vision binoculars, a thermal imager and other material described in foundation records as "security" equipment. The FBI, sources tell NEWSWEEK, is now examining these payments as part of a larger investigation to determine if Abramoff defrauded his Indian tribe clients . . . <br><br>Abramoff, a legendary lobbyist particularly close to DeLay, is also a fierce supporter of Israel—"a super-Zionist," one associate says. That may explain why Abramoff's paramilitary gear ended up in the town of Beitar Illit, a sprawling ultra-Orthodox outpost whose residents have occasionally tangled with their Palestinian neighbors. Yitzhak Pindrus, the settlement's mayor, says that several years ago the town was confronting mounting security problems. "They [the Palestinians] were throwing stones, they were throwing Molotov cocktails," Pindrus says. Abramoff's connection to the town was Schmuel Ben-Zvi, an American emigre who, the lobbyist told associates, was an old friend he knew from Los Angeles. Capital Athletic Foundation public tax records make no mention of Ben-Zvi. But they do show payments to "Kollel Ohel Tiferet" in Israel, a group for which there is no public listing and which the town's mayor said he never heard of.<br><br><br><br>Beitar Illit is a colony that the Israelis plunked down in the northern part of the West Bank, which they conquered militarily in 1967. The partition of Palestine in 1948, tragic as it was, had a United Nations Security Council resolution behind it. And the 1949 armistice lines have been implicitly recognized by Egypt and Jordan in their peace treaties with Israel, as well as by the Arab League in its endorsement of then-Prince Abdullah's peace plan, which offered Israel recognition and peace for a return to 1949 borders. The 1967 Israeli conquest of the West Bank and Gaza is not of the same sort. <br><br>Although some of my readers are under the impression that in the civilized world it is all right to take your neighbor's land by winning it in warfare, actually the United Nations Charter (to which Israel is a signatory) and the whole body of post-1945 international law frowns on that sort of thing. Likewise both the Hague Regulations of 1907 and the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 forbid occupying powers to settle their citizens in militarily occupied territories, or, indeed, to make any major alteration in the structure of the conquered societies. Basically, the idea was that as of the late 1940s your nation is stuck with the land it has and you can't take anyone else's by force. And if you try, the United Nations Security Council has an obligation to stop you. The Geneva Conventions were framed to prevent further atrocities of a sort committed by the Nazis. It is not only the Nazis who were capable of atrocities; everyone is, which is why we need a rule of law, including international law. <br><br>You will note that even though Iraq invaded both Iran and Kuwait, neither Iran nor Kuwait has made any claim on Iraqi territory (nor are they entitled to do so, given that they are also signatories to the United Nations Charter). That is right. Iran has reacted more properly in the aftermath to the 8-year-long Iraq-Iran War (which Iraq launched) than Israel reacted to the 1967 war (which the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza did not launch). And, after all, the United States conquered Iraq in 2003. Would it be all right to kick the Basrans out of their homes and settle, say, the displaced New Orleans folks in Iraq, just because of this American military victory?<br><br>Isikoff is careful to avoid trouble by depicting the weaponry sent by Abramoff as essentially for self-defense. But the colonists are often aggressive, and anyway would not need to defend themselves if they weren't squatting on other people's land. And, Israel does have an army. Private militias are always an ugly thing, and have been used by Israeli colonists ethnically to cleanse nearby Palestinian villages.<br><br>The Hill reported on June 23, 2005 that some of the money Abramoff embezzled from the charity contributions of the Indian tribes "paid a monthly stipend and Jeep payments to a high-school friend of Abramoff who conducted sniper workshops . . ." The Hill suggested that the workshops were for Israeli army personnel, but the Israeli army does not need shooting lessons from Yitzhak Pindrus. The sniper lessons were for the colonists, practice for shooting Palestinians.<br><br>The Jerusalem Post added on April 24, 2005 of Abramoff's funding for sniping lessons and "security equipment":<br><br><br>"Emily Amrussi, a spokeswoman for the Council of Jewish Communities in Judea, Samaria and the Gaza Strip, known by its acronym, Yesha, said, I have never before heard of this episode." The Yesha Council under increasing financial scrutiny itself now receives its entire budget - in the millions of dollars this year, - from charity she said. "But it is often impossible to know where the funds originated she added. She said that this particular case has no bearing on the Yesha Council because it is specific to a single West Bank community.<br><br>The Interior Ministry froze all state funding to the Yesha Council following a petition to the High Court of Justice last month by the settlement watch-dog group Peace Now. The petition accuses the settler leadership of chronic improper use of state funds for allegedly illegal activity such as setting up unrecognized outposts."<br><br><br>Illegal outposts, i.e. establishing foreign colonies on stolen land, is a way of terrorizing the indigenous inhabitants, and it requires a local militia to defend the colonists, along with sniper lessons and night-vision binoculars.<br><br>Now here's the thing. If a Palestinian-American had diverted $140,000 from a Muslim charity to "security equipment" and "sniper lessons" for Palestinians on the West Bank, that individual would be in Gitmo so fast that the sonic boom would rattle your windows.<br><br>In fact, it seems to me that Sami al-Arian is the mirror image of Abramoff.<br><br>But here's a prediction. None of the Jewish extremists, some of them violent, who are invading the West Bank and making the lives of the local Palestinians miserable will ever be branded "terrorists" by the US Government, and Abramoff's foray into providing sniper lessons will be quietly buried. <br><br>Terror isn't terror and aggression is not aggression when it has lobbyists in Congress who can provide luxury vacations and illegal campaign funding.<br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=seemslikeadream@rigorousintuition>seemslikeadream</A> at: 1/5/06 9:10 pm<br></i>
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Abramoff & al-Arian Lobbyists Charity Front for Terr

Postby StarmanSkye » Fri Jan 06, 2006 12:45 am

Good article, further showing what a thoroughly reprehensible thug Abramoff is as well as the immense double-standards that protects pro-Zionist terrorism supporters like Abramoff and his cronies -- But I have to take exception (it's a minor but principled point, perhaps) with Jaun Cole's claims that Kuwait didn't benefit from land redistribution following the Gulf War.<br><br>He states: "You will note that even though Iraq invaded both Iran and Kuwait, neither Iran nor Kuwait has made any claim on Iraqi territory (nor are they entitled to do so, given that they are also signatories to the United Nations Charter). That is right."<br><br>But this is contradicted by land concessions granted to Kuwait, as per the following from: <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-93659">www.britannica.com/eb/article-93659</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <br><br>--excerpt--<br>"In 1992 a United Nations commission formally delimited the Iraqi-Kuwaiti border in accordance with a resolution of the UN Security Council passed in April 1991, which had reaffirmed the border's inviolability. The commission's findings were generally favourable to Kuwait, moving the Iraqi border slightly to the north in the area of Safwan and slightly north in the area of the contested Al-Rumaylah oil field and thereby giving Kuwait not only additional oil wells but also part of the Iraqi naval base of Umm Qasr. Kuwait accepted the UN's border designation, but Iraq rejected it and continued to voice its claim to Kuwaiti territory." <br><br>Nevertheless, Cole's points remain re: the gross illegality of Israeli's territorial aggression in the occupied Palestinian lands which flies in the face of International Law, agreements and longstanding treaties.<br><br>Starman<br> <p></p><i></i>
StarmanSkye
 
Posts: 2670
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:32 pm
Location: State of Jefferson
Blog: View Blog (0)

George and Laura Bush with Sami Amin Al-Arian

Postby seemslikeadream » Fri Jan 06, 2006 12:57 am

<!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.sullivan-county.com/bush/al-arian3.htm" target="top">www.sullivan-county.com/bush/al-arian3.htm</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.sullivan-county.com/bush/samibush.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--><br><br>George and Laura Bush with Sami Amin Al-Arian, who is<br>charged with 50 counts of terrorism. Al-Arian even<br>went to a White House briefing with Karl Rove. <br><br>Bush, Al-Arian photo resurfaces<br>By MARY JACOBY, Times Staff Writer <br><br>© St. Petersburg Times published February 25, 2003 <br><br>WASHINGTON -- With the arrest of Sami Al-Arian on terrorism charges last week, an old family photo of the University of South Florida professor with then-candidate George W. Bush is popping up again in print. The photo, taken on March 12, 2000, at the Florida Strawberry Festival in Plant City, shows Al-Arian holding a child and standing with family members next to George and Laura Bush. It's the kind of photo that presidential candidates pose for hundreds of times as they campaign for office, White House spokesman Jeanie Mamo said. <br><br>"In a crowd like that, anyone can come up and take their picture with you," Mamo said. The photo, previously published in the St. Petersburg Times and elsewhere, appeared on Saturday in the Washington Post with a story about Al-Arian's access to the White House complex in June 2001. Al-Arian was among a group of Muslim activists who met with Bush's senior political adviser Karl Rove in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building. Vice President Dick Cheney also was scheduled to meet with the group but canceled after Jewish and conservative activists protested. At the time, Al-Arian had been under federal investigation for six years for suspected ties to the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, a group credited with more than 100 suicide-bombing deaths in Israel. <br><br>Among the others who met with Rove in 2001 was Abdurahman Alamoudi, who last year came under federal investigation in a Customs Service terror financing probe. In 2000, Alamoudi was videotaped at a rally outside the White House saying, "We are all supporters of Hamas." Hamas, known formally as the Islamic Resistance Movement, is responsible for suicide bombings in Israel. During the 2000 campaign, both Bush and Senate candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton returned $1,000 contributions from Alamoudi after his pro-Hamas comments were publicized. With the government formally accusing Al-Arian of a leadership role in the Islamic Jihad, that 2000 photo of Bush with Al-Arian has become an embarrassment to the president. <br><br>But having a photo taken with someone who later becomes involved in scandal is an occupational hazard for presidents. During his second administration, Bill Clinton, for example, repeatedly was embarrassed by photos showing him with various Chinese-American businessmen later determined to have contributed illegally to his re-election campaign. More famously, there was the photo of Clinton with White House intern Monica Lewinsky, with whom he had a sexual relationship that led to his impeachment by the House in 1998. <br> <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Safavian

Postby seemslikeadream » Fri Jan 06, 2006 3:11 am

<br>Abramoff Story? Google THIS:<br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ned=&ie=UTF-8&q=Alamoudi+abramoff+Safavian+Norquist&sa=N&tab=nw" target="top">www.google.com/search?hl=en&ned=&ie=UTF-8&q=Alamoudi+abramoff+Safavian+Norquist&sa=N&tab=nw</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br>And be sure to read THIS hit:<br><br>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/20... <br><br>A Detour in The Corridor Of Power<br>Indictment Snaps Rapid Rise of Republican Star<br><br>By Thomas B. Edsall<br>Washington Post Staff Writer<br>Wednesday, November 16, 2005; A17<br><br>...<br><br>An Iranian American, Safavian was a founding member of the board of Norquist's Islamic Free Market Institute, when the Bush campaign was targeting Arab American voters in key states such as Florida and Michigan.<br><br>Norquist, who welcomed Safavian to the board of the institute in 1999, declined to answer questions about Safavian.<br><br>In 2001, Safavian began a remarkable, four-year ascent in government. He first served in 2001-02 as chief of staff to Rep. Chris Cannon (R-Utah). Then, in June 2002, Safavian moved to the executive branch with a plum assignment: chief of staff at the General Services Administration. GSA is the government's bread and butter agency, letting contracts for construction as well as buying goods and services.<br><br>Safavian's big break came on Nov. 4, 2003, when President Bush nominated him to become the powerful administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy. The post is crucial to the information technology, contracting and services industries, whose contractors can have millions of dollars riding on every OFPP decision.<br><br>The Safavian appointment brought immediate plaudits from the government contracting community. Larry Allen, executive vice president of the Coalition for Government Procurement, described Safavian as "a good man, and he's aware of the policies in play."<br><br>Safavian, however, needed Senate confirmation and ran into problems. One involved representation of a client at Janus-Merritt. The firm listed Abdurahman Alamoudi as a client starting on Sept. 18, 2000. Safavian was one of five lobbyists listed as working on the Alamoudi account.<br><br>Alamoudi, a prominent Muslim activist, was sentenced last year to 23 years in prison for conspiring to assassinate then-Crown Prince Abdullah of Saudi Arabia. In July, the Treasury Department charged that Alamoudi "raised money for al Qaeda in the United States."<br><br>Before those troubles, Alamoudi spoke at an October 2000 rally in front of the White House, where he declared his support for the Islamic Resistance Movement, or Hamas, which has been designated a terrorist organization by the United States.<br><br>Janus-Merritt Strategies continued to identify Alamoudi as a client in its next two reports to the Senate, listing receipt of two $20,0000 payments. But in December 2001, it declared that "an error" had been made and that Alamoudi was not a client. <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Abramoff a whore for more than one bunch of TheoCon lunatics

Postby emad » Fri Jan 06, 2006 2:37 pm

A former journo colleague of mine who works at The Scotsman is currently digging away at the Abramoff link to 'suicided' London-based US lawyer Katherine Ward.<br><br>See Wednesday's UK news about the suicide: <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1970806,00.ht...">www.timesonline.co.uk/art...6,00.ht...</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <br><br>Ward was reputedly a former business consultant to Abramoff during Bush1/Quayle's unsucessful 1992 WH Campaign and in 1996 his official client adviser to UK-based Republicans Abroad campaigning for election funds to get Clinton out of office.<br>[SOURCE: StrategyReview, bi-monthly US/UK political newsletter published in London since 1979. Not published online]<br><br>TWO items of information doing the press rounds in London at the moment. No1 is that Ward was briefly married to Abramoff in 1972, marriage dissolved after seven months. No2 is that Ward provided Abramoff with client connections to wealthy Opus Dei members in New York, some of whom were major financial contributors to the funding of the newly erected $40million+ Opus Dei HQ building in Manhattan.<br><br>I can't believe that Abramoff was a one man show.<br><br>He may have done a plea bargain to name names in his client list.<br><br>WHO actually hired him in the first place is probably closer to Fitzie's investigation than anyone else's.<br><br>Karl Rove and Joseph Ratzinger must be shitting themselves, IMHO.<br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=emad@rigorousintuition>emad</A> at: 1/6/06 11:39 am<br></i>
emad
 
Posts: 600
Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 12:03 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re:emad send me some links about the marriage

Postby seemslikeadream » Fri Jan 06, 2006 3:18 pm

when you can, thanks :hi:<br><br>Here's a working link from your post<br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1970806,00.html" target="top">www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1970806,00.html</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://images.thetimes.co.uk/TGD/picture/0,,256203,00.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re:It seems Abramoff would have been 14 in 1972 emad

Postby seemslikeadream » Fri Jan 06, 2006 3:28 pm

what's ya think? <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re:Johannesburg, South Africa

Postby seemslikeadream » Fri Jan 06, 2006 3:40 pm

<br><br> Guys, last one. But please read this. OMG! <br> Apartheid Front Mulled Funds For Kemp Team <br>Newsday, HOME, Sec. NEWS, p A06 07-23-1995 <br>By Dele Olojede. AFRICA CORRESPONDENT; Susan Page of the Washington Bureau and Ron Howell contributed to this story. <br><br>Johannesburg, South Africa<br><br>Johannesburg, South Africa - A Washington foundation that was set up as a front for apartheid South Africa's military intelligence considered giving a substantial contribution to Jack Kemp's 1987 presidential campaign in the hope of buying influence in American politics, according to documents obtained by Newsday.<br><br>As a reward for help in supplying a campaign airplane, costing $450,000, officials of the International Freedom Foundation expected automatic membership in Kemp's "kitchen cabinet," according to the documents. South African officials also thought they could win a voice in picking a sympathetic assistant secretary of state for African affairs, according to a former South African spy who covertly helped guide the foundation's work in the 1980s.<br><br>The foundation rejected the proposed contribution, made at the request of a Kemp campaign staffer, because officials thought it unlikely that the former Buffalo congressman could win the Republican nomination. The donation would have been a violation of federal law, which prevents tax-exempt not-for-profit organizations from making such contributions. Vice President George Bush went on to win the presidency, and Kemp served in his cabinet.<br><br>Kemp, who voted for economic sanctions against the apartheid regime over then-President Ronald Reagan's veto, vehemently denied Friday that he had anything to do with the request for a plane and said that the aide who wrote the letter acted without authorization.<br><br>"I've made a lot of mistakes in my life, but that's not one of them, tying myself to South African intelligence," an anguished Kemp said in an interview.<br><br>The maneuverings between the foundation and the campaign provide an unusual look behind the scenes into how a foreign government tried to influence the direction of U.S. policy. Last week, Newsday revealed that the foundation, supposedly a conservative Washington think tank, was part of an elaborate intelligence-gathering and propaganda operation largely funded by the South African military. It drew in many prominent conservative politicians and served as a South African weapon to fight the growing influence of anti-apartheid activists and black liberation movements on U.S. policy.<br><br>Prominent Republican and conservative figures associated with the foundation, such as Sen. Jesse Helms of North Carolina, have denied any knowledge of the hidden hand behind the foundation.<br><br>According to the documents, Colleen Morrow, then foundation treasurer, argued strongly in an internal memo to the foundation's operational headquarters in Johannesburg for $450,000 to be committed to buying the Kemp campaign a plane. The memo was dated May 26, 1987, in response to a same-day letter from the Kemp campaign, asking Morrow's "assistance with helping the Jack Kemp for President Committee find the use of a jet." That letter was signed by Michael Simpfenderfer, finance coordinator for the Kemp campaign, whom Kemp described Friday as "a rogue elephant" who was subsequently fired.<br><br>"We can be the 'kitchen cabinet' types of the Kemp administration," Morrow said in her memo to Russel Crystal, head of IFF Johannesburg who had served in various capacities with security police and the military.<br><br>"Due to a loophole in FEC (Federal Electoral Commission) law, one person - the person who provides the plane - has the capacity to become the largest donor to the Kemp campaign," Morrow said in the memo. Kemp said he never heard of the foundation, never met Morrow and did not even know Simpfenderfer, who could not be reached for comment.<br><br>"I am embarrassed," Kemp said. "I can't apologize because there is nothing in my background that would tie me to the apartheid regime," he said. "I take responsibility, I guess, for my campaign. If I had known then what I know now, a) it wouldn't have happened, and b) if it did happen without me authorizing it, I would have fired him."<br><br>Craig Williamson, commonly known in South Africa as the superspy who ran aspects of the South African military's foreign intelligence operations, said he scuttled the request because he did not think that Kemp had any chance of winning the Republican nomination.<br><br>"The IFF came to me to say, 'Can we get $400,000?' " said Williamson, now retired. "If we've got to put in $400,000, we would have put it in Bush's campaign, but they couldn't give me a line into the Bush campaign."<br><br>Williamson at that time ran another front corporation for military intelligence known as Long Reach, a British-registered firm that supposedly specialized in security-risk analysis in dangerous neighborhoods around the world. Williamson said Long Reach was in fact an intelligence-gathering outfit that set up listening posts around the globe and that the IFF generated vast amounts of information that was then passed to Long Reach for intelligence evaluation.<br><br>But Crystal, who first denied any connection with South African intelligence and later admitted that IFF undertook many assignments for it, said Williamson didn't know what he was talking about. When presented with copies of the letters, Crystal admitted that they were genuine but pleaded a failing memory.<br><br>"As far as I know, nothing ever came of this," he said Friday.<br><br>On further prodding, Crystal said he recalled talk about a campaign plane.<br><br>"Craig at one stage had a plane available somewhere in Africa that he was trying to rent or something," he said. "Whether the available plane was a South African plane or not, I can't tell you."<br><br>Crystal added, however, that Williamson was unlikely to have turned down an offer to pay for the aircraft.<br><br>Having denied that the IFF "branch" in Johannesburg was actually pulling the strings, Crystal minimized the request from the Washington foundation. "We were a team; we were all friends," Crystal said of IFF officials worldwide. "We shared everything together. We were board members. For something like this to come to us was not unusual."<br><br>Despite using foundation letterhead, Morrow said the request for the plane was a private effort by the movie producer Jack Abramoff to aid the Kemp campaign. She at first blamed the whole thing on Abramoff, whose movie, "Red Scorpion," was apparently financed in part by South African intelligence, as reported last week by Newsday. Morrow finally admitted that she was probably skirting with illegality. "It sounds to me from what I know now what I was suggesting didn't sound legal," she said.<br><br>Abramoff, a former IFF official who has denied receiving money from South African intelligence, also said he did try to organize a plane for the Kemp campaign but couldn't because "a lawyer told me it couldn't be done." At one point, he said the deal fell through simply because "I didn't personally have the resources."<br><br>Newsday revealed last week that South Africa's Military Intelligence spent up to $1.5 million a year on the IFF project, which was code-named "Operation Babushka." Crystal, who ran it from Johannesburg, was code-named "Gypsy." The operation targeted respectable conservatives like Kemp and influential - and currently powerful - ones like Helms, Reps. Dan Burton of Indiana, Robert Dornan of California and Philip Crane of Illinois, all Republicans.<br><br>While all have denied any knowledge of the IFF's true motives, their public association with it lent enough credibility to the foundation that it was able to attract upfront donations from individuals and institutions in the United States.<br><br>According to several former South African spies and spy chiefs, the South African authorities sometimes moved money from Johannesburg and Pretoria to Washington through a local financial institution, the Volkskas Bank. They also transferred money through the South African Reserve Bank under the guise of "strategic procurements," and through various "dead" accounts in Europe, to the IFF in Washington.<br><br>Occasionally, IFF officials hand-carried cash from Johannesburg. Wim Booyse, at the time an IFF official in Johannesburg, said he once saw Crystal carry $30,000 in cash through U.S. Customs undetected while both of them were on a trip to Washington. Williamson said the fraud-riddled Bank of Credit and Commerce International also was sometimes used. The Arab-owned bank collapsed after being subjected to intensive FBI and multi-national investigations into allegations of money laundering.<br><br>Williamson said the foundation was invaluable to Long Reach's intelligence-gathering operation.<br><br>"You'd have an agent who would use IFF cover but was controlled by Long Reach," he said. "There were games within games and wheels within wheels."<br> <br><br><br>It's a little puff piece from the Wash. Times in 1992. It's just so cute and priceless.<br><br>JACK ABRAMOFF <br>Washington Times, Final, Sec. E LIFE ABOUT TOWN DOERS PROFILE, p E2 12-11-1992 <br><br><br>OCCUPATION<br><br>Motion picture producer<br><br>BIRTHDAY<br><br>Feb. 28, 1959<br><br>HOMETOWN<br><br>Beverly Hills, Calif.<br><br>MARITAL STATUS<br><br>Married, three children<br><br>SELF-PORTRAIT<br><br>Tenacious, balanced, studious<br><br>MOTTO<br><br>The world is based on gratitude and indebtedness<br><br>WALTER MITTY FANTASY<br><br>Conducting the Metropolitan Opera<br><br>INSPIRATION<br><br>My family, the Lapin Opus, classical music, Howard Phillips<br><br>GREATEST FEAT<br><br>Climbing Mount Whitney; producing "Red Scorpion" and getting it distributed into 1,400 theaters in the United States<br><br>BAD HABIT<br><br>Trying to please those who should remain displeased<br><br>PET PEEVE<br><br>Contemporary mores and music<br><br>HOBBY<br><br>Reading, studying, racquetball<br><br>LUXURY DEFINED<br><br>Being happy with what I have<br><br>DRINK OR WINE<br><br>Passion-fruit iced tea<br><br>FAVORITE RESTAURANT<br><br>Pat's in Los Angeles, Levana's in New York<br><br>VACATION SPOT<br><br>Home<br><br>CLOTHING STORE<br><br>Visa in Kuala Lumpur<br><br>BOOKS AT BEDSIDE<br><br>The Bible, "The Generation," "All for the Boss," "Rabbinical Mathematics and Astronomy"<br><br>LAST WORDS<br><br>"Into thy hand I commit my spirit, oh Lord." <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=seemslikeadream@rigorousintuition>seemslikeadream</A> at: 1/6/06 1:09 pm<br></i>
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

State by State GOP-Abramoff Scandal Scorecard

Postby StarmanSkye » Sat Jan 07, 2006 5:24 am

Abramoff-connected Politicos, fraud and corruption chart:<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.insider-magazine.com/AbramoffScorecard.html">www.insider-magazine.com/...ecard.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>This who's who list of tainted 'conservative' political whores and their trail of indiscretions (in which Abramoff is consistently involved) is most probably just the so-far visible tip of endemic rot that infects big centralized US gummint -- we'll have to see if if by some miracle truth and justice prevail and bring down some let alone most of these major players -- or if the PTB have enough juice and connections to quash indictments limiting damage to a few expendable functionaries.<br><br>I hardly expect the mainstream prostituted press will dig very deep into these stories and tell the American public what these thugs have really been 'up' to while betraying and selling-out their constituents' public interests. It's as IF the Free Market model has created a sense of popular expectation for everyone to exploit their personal-benefit opportunity for profit -- ie., the Gangster Ideal, in which privelege equals whatever you can get away with.<br>Starman<br> <p></p><i></i>
StarmanSkye
 
Posts: 2670
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:32 pm
Location: State of Jefferson
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: State by State GOP-Abramoff Scandal Scorecard

Postby Dreams End » Sat Jan 07, 2006 5:48 am

Here's a Salon.com article about "Red Scorpion". I can't read all of it. I click on the "read for free by watching an ad first"...the ad comes, but I can't access the article.<br><br>The gist is that it was Abramoff's only film. It glorified UNITA and the funding of the film was "mysterious". <br><br>Love to know if the rest of the article is of interest if anyone can access it.<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/feature/2005/08/17/abramoff/index_np.html">www.salon.com/ent/feature...ex_np.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.soundtrackcollector.com/images/cd/large/Red_scorpion_Varese_VSD_5230.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <p></p><i></i>
Dreams End
 

SEEMS: Will check that 1972 date with my source.

Postby emad » Sat Jan 07, 2006 1:11 pm

This info came from details about Ward's former US passport issued just after her 18th birthday in 1971 and stamped with visa permit for visit to Estonia and Ukraine in USSR on student cultural exchange trip. Visa amendments for subsequent student exchange trip to Prague, in former Czechoslovakia, in 1976, marked as 'travel documents for Mrs J Abramoff'.<br><br>That '72 date: agree, it would be a little premature for a marriage! Am double checking with my source/sources at The Scotsman. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=emad@rigorousintuition>emad</A> at: 1/7/06 10:15 am<br></i>
emad
 
Posts: 600
Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 12:03 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Here is the salon article Dreams End

Postby seemslikeadream » Sat Jan 07, 2006 4:11 pm

The tale of "Red Scorpion"<br>The strange Hollywood interlude of the most scandal-ridden man in Washington. <br><br>- - - - - - - - - - - -<br>By James Verini<br><br><br><br>Aug. 17, 2005 | Before fallen lobbyist Jack Abramoff assumed his role as the most scrutinized man in Washington, he had a brief career as a budding Hollywood producer. He made just one movie, the 1989 Cold War bomb "Red Scorpion." With its blatant propaganda, its collaboration with the apartheid South African government, and financial misdealing, it's notable, even for Hollywood, for being one of the seamiest productions in recent memory. <br><br>Last week, Abramoff was arrested by the FBI after a grand jury indicted him and a partner on fraud charges (he's out on $2.2 million bail). In Washington the Senate Indian Affairs Committee has been holding hearings on whether Abramoff, 46, bilked millions out of tribes he represented, and a joint task force is picking through his personal papers, including his credit card records, which show Abramoff purchased trips for members of Congress (including Tom DeLay). His days in the Capitol, it seems, are numbered. (Abramoff's spokesman, Andrew Blum, responded to inquiries from Salon for this article with a written "no comment.") <br><br>But long before he became the poster boy for the Beltway's back door, the young Jack Abramoff was at a crossroads. It was 1987, he was in his late 20s, and the presidency of his political hero, Ronald Reagan, was winding to a tarnished close. The Iran-Contra hearings covered the front pages, and Oliver North, whom Abramoff knew and admired, was about to be indicted. The Republicans were disillusioned, and after years of service to the party -- as chairman of the College Republicans from 1981 to '85, he'd mentored Grover Norquist and Ralph Reed, had worked for one right-wing think tank, and founded another -- Abramoff apparently was no longer sure he wanted to go into politics full time. <br><br><br> <br> <br> <br> <br><br><br>Site Pass Presented by<br><br> <br> So he took a detour, doing what any other kid from Beverly Hills might when finding himself at a loss: He decided to try his hand at show business. Why not? Hollywood was no more than Washington for good-looking people, as the saying goes, and Abramoff, a student government officer and a football player at Beverly Hills High School, class of '77 (he graduated from Brandeis University in '81), was smart and charismatic and, if not actor handsome, at least physically imposing enough to be a producer. Through his father, a high-up executive at the Diners Club, he'd rubbed shoulders with some of L.A.'s elite. <br><br>Abramoff moved back to Los Angeles from Washington after finishing Georgetown Law School, and he and his brother, Robert, formed a production company, Regency Entertainment. They set to work on an action picture, a story about a rogue Soviet Spetsnaz soldier who is sent to quell a rebellion in a fictional African country -- one that very closely resembled Angola -- only to find that he sympathizes with the rebels. "Red Scorpion," starring Dolph Lundgren, would be released in April 1989. The Abramoff brothers raised $16 million for it -- the sources of the funding remain unknown -- an impressive sum for a B-picture with an unproven star. It made a poor impression on audiences and critics. "The movie's reflective moments belong to Mr. Lundgren's sweaty chest," wrote Stephen Holden in the New York Times. <br><br>But the story behind "Red Scorpion" is far more captivating. The film was to be a manifesto for Abramoff; a Rambo-like morality tale and a grand indictment of communism -- his Reagan Doctrine parable in action-packed Technicolor. And in the process of conceiving of and making it, Abramoff helped groom an African despot, rose to high levels in the K Street food chain, and got to play international spy. <br><br>"There was some indication even in those days that he was not the sort of person who would feel overly constrained by the rules," said Jeff Pandin, who worked closely with Abramoff in the 1980s. <br><br><br><br>The tale of "Red Scorpion" | 1, 2, 3, 4 <br><br><br><br><br>The roots of "Red Scorpion" took hold in the early 1980s, when interventionist-minded folk in Washington had an array of global conflagrations to obsess over. The mujahedin were battling the Soviets in Afghanistan and the Contras were fighting the Sandanistas in Nicaragua. Some circles felt the United States was not doing enough to help them. The gripe heard in the office of CIA chief William Casey and among Oliver North's cabal in the National Security Council was that Reagan was not fully Reagan when it came to foreign policy. A cottage industry of think-tank intellectuals and private crusaders sprouted up to build support for one or another set of freedom fighters. Abramoff was among the most active. <br><br>In Angola, the rebel group du jour, the National Union of Total Independence for Angola, or UNITA, had been taking on the Soviet- and Cuban-backed government since the 1970s. UNITA's leader, a savvy warlord named Jonas Savimbi, had become a darling of the right. Savimbi received millions in aid and had even retained Washington lobbyists to press his case. Abramoff was interested in Angola, too. So was Lewis E. Lehrman, the millionaire behind the Rite Aid drugstore chain and the founder of the right-wing group Citizens for America, who made an unsuccessful run for governor of New York in 1982. Through Republican circles, Abramoff met Lehrman at some point in the early '80s, and in 1985 Lehrman hired him. Abramoff came to Lehrman with an idea: What about a convention of disparate anti-communist rebel leaders, put together and paid for by Americans? It screamed of Abramoff's cartoonishly outsized ambitions and worldview, and Lehrman liked it. <br><br><br>Jack Wheeler, a California entrepreneur and anti-communist activist who enjoyed deep entree in Washington at the time, had met Abramoff through the College Republicans in 1984. He immediately took to Abramoff, who had charmed him with a story about scandalizing fellow members of a Beverly Hills athletic club by wearing a T-shirt that read "I'd Rather Be Killing Communists." <br><br><br> <br> <br> <br> <br><br><br>Site Pass Presented by<br><br> <br> Wheeler and Abramoff began discussing the idea of the rebel convention. "The whole point of the Reagan Doctrine was to fight the phenomenon of communism, and if one regime fell, they'd all fall," Wheeler said. "No Afghan knew where Nicaragua was, and no Contra knew where Angola was." <br><br>Amazingly, they made it happen, and quickly. In the first week of June 1985, mujahedin, Contras and Laotian rebels joined Savimbi and his men in Jamba, Angola, UNITA's jungle headquarters, for the Democratic International, as Lehrman had titled the event. For several days they commiserated and compared notes, huddling together in thatched huts and signing an anti-Soviet pact. Wheeler organized transportation, and Abramoff dealt with the money and logistics from Lehrman's end. Lehrman himself read a letter of support from Reagan and handed out framed copies of the Declaration of Independence. It received some press coverage. Abramoff had pulled off his first far-right adventure. <br><br>In the eyes of many in the administration, particularly in the State Department, Abramoff and groups like Citizens for America were only serving to subvert years of careful negotiation. "These people were trying to undercut and divert official policy," said Chester "Chet" Crocker, assistant secretary of state for African affairs from 1981 to 1989. "Our policy worked because we got Castro to decide the jig was up and go home -- not because of the conservative activists." (Cuba began pulling out of Angola in 1989.) <br><br>Loved or hated, Citizens for America was short-lived. Not long after the Democratic International -- or the Jamboree in Jamba, as it was pejoratively known -- funding for the group dried up. "Lehrman pulled the money out all of a sudden, and then Jack dropped out of it, and that was that," Wheeler said. "Then Jack went to make his movie." <br><br>According to Pandin, who went to work for Abramoff in 1986, Abramoff and Lehrman had had a falling out. "He was always looking to push the envelope," Pandin said. "It was seen among Jack's friends as a coup -- he got stabbed in the back by people who weren't comfortable with him." When contacted by Salon, Lehrman submitted a short statement via a representative: "I was recruited by President Reagan to set up Citizens for America in 1983. It was a voluntary, part-time position which I held for about three years. Among the paid staff, Jack Abramoff came in well after CFA was started, was there only for a short while, before his termination." <br><br>But Lehrman may have also gotten cold feet because it had become clear by the mid-1980s that Savimbi was not a paragon of democratic ideals. There were allegations of murderous purges in his own ranks. It is commonly agreed in Washington that it was Savimbi himself, and not the government of Angola, who in July 1991 had UNITA's envoys to the United States and the United Kingdom, Tito Chingunji and Wilson dos Santos, and their families, killed. <br><br>Crocker described Savimbi, who was killed in 2002, as "a brilliant military warlord who operated by the gun, lived by the gun, and died by the gun and ultimately had a failure of judgment, like warlords often do." <br><br>Others are less charitable. "He was the most articulate, charismatic homicidal maniac I've ever met," said Don Steinberg, ambassador to Angola during the first Clinton administration. <br><br>With Citizens for America disbanded, and law school done, Abramoff moved to Los Angeles. He came up with the premise for "Red Scorpion" and hired Arne Olsen, a young screenwriter with no credits to his name, to write it. The Abramoffs told Olson they wanted to base the fictional African country in the film, Mombaka, directly on Angola, and the rebel leader on Savimbi. Olsen said he churned out a baldly propagandistic script. <br><br>"It definitely was an anti-Soviet thing," Olsen said. "It was an easy target." <br><br>Of the Abramoff brothers, he said, "This wasn't their profession, what they'd do for the rest of their lives. It was a lark. They wanted to get a message across, but at the same time they were going for exploitation and of course trying to make some money." <br><br>Initially, the movie was set to shoot in Swaziland, but at the last minute Abramoff moved the production to Namibia, which was occupied by South Africa's apartheid government. Congress had passed (over Reagan's veto) the Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act in 1986, making it very frowned-upon, when not illegal, to do business with South Africa or its proxies. This did not seem to bother Abramoff, who planned to use South African Defense Force vehicles and equipment on the set and soldiers as extras. By 1988, when shooting started on the film, Abramoff likely had connections in the South African government. For a decade, after all, South Africa had been Savimbi's main backer, and according to Crocker and others, Abramoff would not have been able to put together the Democratic International without extensive help from the SADF. <br><br><br>But Abramoff's plan backfired: it was not long before anti-apartheid activists were protesting at the "Red Scorpion" set, and Warner Brothers, who had signed on to distribute the film, pulled out. <br><br><br> <br> <br> <br> <br><br><br>Site Pass Presented by<br><br> <br> James Glickenhaus, whose company, Schapiro Glickenhaus Entertainment, ended up distributing "Red Scorpion" after Warner Brothers jumped ship, said he was not aware of the help provided by the SADF, but he was aware of the controversy over the location. "Look, had the film been made in Nazi Germany, I wouldn't have distributed it," he said. "But I personally felt upon investigating that the Namibian government was more simpatico than the South African government." <br><br>The movie seemed like an opportunity to turn a buck -- if not win any awards. "There's some fish for eating and some fish for buying and selling," Glickenhaus said. "This was a fish for buying and selling." In typical Hollywood tradition, Glickenhaus threw a party for the film at Cannes, his feelings about its quality notwithstanding. The Abramoff brothers came, but, he said, they "looked totally out of place." <br><br>The actor Carmen Argenziano, who played the villainous Cuban colonel, said he knew that many of the men playing Russian and Cuban soldiers were actual SADF soldiers. There were also rumors going around the set that some of the funding for the film, not just props and extras, was coming from South Africa. <br><br>"We heard that very right-wing South African money was helping fund the movie," Argenziano said. "It wasn't very clear. We were pretty upset about the source of the money. We thought we were misled. We were shocked that these brothers who we thought were showbiz liberals -- Beverly Hills Jewish kids -- were doing this." <br><br>But there was a lesser-known connection between the apartheid regime and Abramoff. <br><br>In the late 1980s, some conservatives in Washington saw P.W. Botha's apartheid government in Pretoria as the last bulwark against communism in Africa. Certain Reagan domestiques had even gone to work for it. "The South African government was the only one that was, shall we say, anti-communist," said Stuart Spencer, who'd help run Reagan's 1980 and '84 campaigns and later became a lobbyist for Pretoria. <br><br>Abramoff seems to have shared the sentiment. In 1986, he founded the International Freedom Foundation, whose stated goal was "to foster individual freedom throughout the world by engaging in activities which promote the development of free and open societies based on the principles of free enterprise." More specifically, among the IFF's aims were to oppose the Anti-Apartheid Act and other sanctions and to urge greater support in Washington for Pretoria and less support for the African National Congress, the party that would come to power in 1994 under Nelson Mandela. At its height, around the time "Red Scorpion" was released, the IFF employed about 30 young ideologues in offices on G Street in Washington, Johannesburg, London and Brussels. Churning out reports and presentations (for one such presentation on the Contras, it borrowed the slide show that North had used to raise money for his arms-deal network, according to Pandin), the IFF attracted notable members such as Sen. Jesse Helms, R-N.C., and Rep. Dan Burton, R-Ind. <br><br>"It was meant to be a way to institutionalize the contacts he'd made abroad -- people who were interested in anti-communist stuff, democracy building, that kind of thing," said Pandin, who held directorships at the IFF from its inception until it shut down in the early 1990s. "We were skeptical of the ANC," he went on. "We did not want to see the U.S. imposing sanctions on South Africa." <br><br>The IFF, however, could not claim impartiality on the subject. It was, in fact, clandestinely funded by the SADF's military intelligence arm, according to former U.S. officials, ANC documents, and reports published in U.S. and U.K. According to a 1995 Newsday report, the IFF received up to $1.5 million a year from the SADF from 1986 through 1992, as a part of Operation Babushka, a smear campaign meant to discredit Mandela and the ANC by portraying them as allied with communist regimes. An SADF intelligence chief also told the Newsday reporters that the SADF helped fund "Red Scorpion." <br><br>"We knew that the IFF was funded by the South African government," Herman Cohen, who ran Africa operations for the National Security Council, told Salon. "It was one of a number of front organizations." <br><br>"I would not be shocked if some of the money they were raising in the Johannesburg office was coming from those kinds of channels," Pandin said, referring to the SADF. <br><br>Pandin recalled that Abramoff enlisted Russell Crystal, the head of the IFF's Johannesburg office and an advisor to F.W. DeKlerk, to be an informal producer on "Red Scorpion" (whether this meant Crystal helped fund the film, Pandin did not remember). But Pandin says Abramoff refused to compensate Crystal afterward. "It wasn't a good experience," Pandin said of the film. "A lot of people didn't get paid. Russell wasn't entirely enamored of Jack after that." <br><br>"Jack was always looking for angles and ways to do interesting things until people slowed him down," he said, obliquely, when asked whether Abramoff, who resigned from a day-to-day position at the IFF in 1987 but remained a chairperson and closely oversaw operations, knew of the connection to the SADF. "He needs somebody to cool him down sometimes. Left to his own devices he'd be inclined to go a little crazy." <br><br>"Maybe he should have paid more attention in some of his law school classes and spent less time making movies." <br><br>Peter Roff, who is listed as Abramoff's personal assistant in the credits of "Red Scorpion," said he worked for Abramoff out of the latter's Washington office during the time of the production in 1987 and '88. Roff, however, recalled doing more work for the IFF than for the film. Indeed, he only vaguely remembered the name Regency Entertainment. He never went to L.A. or to the set in Africa. But Roff, who worked on George H.W. Bush's '88 campaign, claimed he too was unaware of the source of the IFF's funding. <br><br><br> <br> <br> <br> <br><br><br>Site Pass Presented by<br><br> <br> "I thought he was an exceptional person," he said of Abramoff. "Creative, good person to work for, very encouraging of my ambitions to be part of something that helped make the world a better place." <br><br>The SADF stopped funding the IFF in 1992. Apartheid had come to an end. By 1994, the organization closed its doors. <br><br>Asked by Newsday about the South African government's connections to the IFF and "Red Scorpion" in 1995, the last time he seems to have entertained questions on the subject, Abramoff called the allegations "outrageous." <br><br>When, inevitably, "Red Scorpion" was released, it was no study in nuance. Directed by Joseph Zito, whose previous credits had included the Chuck Norris movies "Missing in Action" and "Invasion U.S.A," the dramatis personae consist of scheming, cackling communists on the one hand -- the Russians not only tear apart the rebel village with attack helicopters, but also randomly gas a band of peaceful Bushmen and their animals -- and noble guerrillas on the other, and the barely intelligible Lundgren in between. The action sequences have all the panache of a subpar "A-Team" episode. <br><br>There are some inspired moments, such as the climax, when Argenziano's character, Col. Zayas, is left groping for his own dismembered arm, which clutches a live grenade (he doesn't reach in time). There is also a rousing speech delivered by the token freewheeling American, a foul-mouthed, boozing journalist played by M. Emmet Walsh: "As a matter of fact, in America, an American can swear whenever, wherever and however much he or she fucking well pleases!" he yells at Lundgren. "A little something called freedom of speech, which I'm sure you Russians aren't real familiar with!" In another nice touch, the closing credits roll over Little Richard's "All Around the World," remixed to include machine-gun and exploding-bomb sound effects. <br><br>If only things were as jovial off the set. They weren't. Actors went unpaid; Argenziano said that although he was paid his initial salary, he has never received a residuals check for "Red Scorpion." The manager of one of the major cast members, who did not want to be named, said that, according to her client, many of the actors and crew were never paid at all. <br><br>"I just wanted to get the hell out of there," Argenziano said. "It was a very hard shoot. We were all worn out, so no one made a stink." <br><br>Glickenhaus, who knew of crew and cast going unpaid, claimed that despite its poor box office receipts, "Red Scorpion" did well in video, television and foreign sales. Nonetheless, at some point prior to its release in April 1989, the Abramoffs and Regency found themselves in enough debt that the film went into the possession of Performance Guarantees, a completion bond company. <br><br>Abramoff also borrowed money from friends that he never repaid. During the production, he took a $50,000 personal loan from Ralph Nurnberger, a Georgetown professor and consultant. Nurnberger and Abramoff later worked together (from 1999 to the end of 2000) at Preston Gates Ellis. Abramoff has still not repaid the loan. <br><br>Remarkably, there was a "Red Scorpion 2." It went straight to video in 1994 and did not star Lundgren. Abramoff is listed as an executive producer, but he had only a nominal connection to the film, according to its other producers. But by then, Abramoff had decided politics and not political movies were his true calling, and he was back in Washington, a lobbyist at Preston Gates (the lobbying firm run by the father of Microsoft founder Bill Gates). Now, of course, his decades-long ascent into Republican power circles is coming to a crashing end. Investigators are combing through every aspect of his life. He has become Washington's summa persona non grata, disowned even by Rep. Tom DeLay, R-Texas, for whom he is alleged to have purchased a trip to Scotland. <br><br>After Jack returned to Washington, Robert Abramoff stayed in Los Angeles and continued to produce films. He is now a full-time lawyer. Reached at the offices of Burgee & Abramoff in Woodland Hills, he refused to speak about his brother or "Red Scorpion." "It's a family matter and I prefer not to comment on anything," he said. <br> <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Abramoff - at it again

Postby Byrne » Sun Jan 08, 2006 11:17 am

I found this today, from Scotland's Sunday Herald<br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.sundayherald.com/53433" target="top">www.sundayherald.com/53433</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Top Scots Tories caught up in US corruption probe</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> <br><br>By Paul Hutcheon, Scottish Political Editor <br><br>THREE Scottish Conservatives, including the party’s former leader, have been questioned by police as part of a corruption investigation in the United States.<br>David McLetchie and ex-Tory MSP Brian Monteith, were interviewed about a dinner they attended with a Republican Congressman and his associates.<br><br>The Lothian and Borders Police probe is part of a US Justice Department inquiry into an alleged “trips for votes” scandal involving lobbyist <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Jack Abramoff</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->.<br><br>US authorities want details of a trip Abramoff made to the UK five years ago, when he was accompanied by his commercial clients and former House majority leader Tom DeLay.<br><br>Part of the visit included a golfing trip to St Andrews, where the US delegation dined with a small group of senior Tories, including McLetchie and Monteith.<br><br>Prosecutors are examining whether the trip to the UK, which was paid for by Conservative groups close to Abramoff, was part of a concerted attempt to influence Republican senators.<br><br>DeLay is reported to have accepted a $120,000 (£68,000) all-expenses trip to the UK that included a stay in London’s $790-a-night Four Season’s Hotel and a $5000 golfing spree at St Andrews.<br><br>Interest in the junket was heightened last week when Abramoff pled guilty to corruption charges as part of a plea bargain to help the Washington investigation.<br><br>The St Andrews inquiry was triggered when the Crown Office recently received a request for “mutual legal assistance” from US federal authorities to gather evidence on the dinner.<br><br>Officials in Edinburgh passed the case to Lothian and Borders Police, who have since questioned the Scottish Tories who attended the event.<br><br>A spokesman for the Edinburgh-based force confirmed that McLetchie and two other Conservatives had been “interviewed” before Christmas as part of the corruption probe. “Lothian and Borders Police have been carrying out enquiries on behalf of the Crown Office,” he said.<br><br>Monteith, who quit the party after he was caught calling on McLetchie to resign as leader, confirmed his discussions with police and defended the dinner. He said: “I have been in contact with Lothian and Borders. It was entirely appropriate for leading Conservatives to welcome Congressman DeLay, share dinner with him and mull over the political situation in America and Scotland.”<br><br>The Sunday Herald understands that the controversial dinner took place in 2000 at Strathtyrum House, a retreat on the outskirts of St Andrews.<br><br>John Crawford, McLetchie’s then chief of staff, drove his boss and Monteith to the venue that charges £75 a head for the use of its dining rooms.<br><br>The former Tory leader is then thought to have made a presentation on Scottish politics to his Republican hosts, before he and his group enjoyed a three-course meal and drinks.<br><br>Lothian and Borders detectives have quizzed the Scottish contingent on their hosts, as well as on the subjects that were discussed at the dinner. Both parties were said to have indulged in “liberal bashing”, with the Americans mocking non-conservative Democrats and former President Bill Clinton.<br><br>The probe follows news that former Tory Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher has also been quizzed by police about the controversial trip.<br><br>A spokesman for Lady Thatcher confirmed that police had contacted her office in order to clarify details of her meeting with Mr DeLay in May 2000.<br><br>Abramoff, who once described his Native American clients who run casinos as “monkeys”, is a former member of Citizens for America, a group that helped Oliver North build support for the Nicaraguan contras.<br><br>His connection to Scottish politics is through Monteith, with whom he has enjoyed a long-standing friendship that dates back to student politics.<br><br>DeLay is a staunch opponent of abortion and gay rights. He also described the Environmental Protection Agency as “the Gestapo” and blamed the Columbine school shootings on the fact that evolution is taught in schools.<br><br>Confirmation of the Tory MSPs’ attendance at the St Andrews dinner also raises the question of whether they should have declared the hospitality in the register of interest.<br><br>Parliamentary rules require disclosure of any gift or hospitality exceeding £250, and it is unclear whether the lavish food and facilities provided are registrable. <br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>08 January 2006</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Byrne
 
Posts: 956
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2005 2:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to The "War on Terror"

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests