Pissing astonishing levels of Uranium

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Pissing astonishing levels of Uranium

Postby Gouda » Wed May 24, 2006 6:28 pm

<!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3050317.stm">news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/scien...050317.stm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Afghans' uranium levels spark alert</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>By Alex Kirby<br>BBC News Online environment correspondent<br><br>A small sample of Afghan civilians have shown "astonishing" levels of uranium in their urine, an independent scientist says.<br><br>He said they had the same symptoms as some veterans of the 1991 Gulf war.<br><br>But he found no trace of the depleted uranium (DU) some scientists believe is implicated in Gulf War syndrome.<br><br>Other researchers suggest new types of radioactive weapons may have been used in Afghanistan.<br><br>The scientist is Dr Asaf Durakovic, of the Uranium Medical Research Center (UMRC), based in Canada.<br><br>Dr Durakovic, a former US army adviser who is now a professor of medicine, said in 2000 he had found "significant" DU levels in two-thirds of the 17 Gulf veterans he had tested.<br><br>In May 2002, he sent a team to Afghanistan to interview and examine civilians there.<br><br>The UMRC says: "Independent monitoring of the weapon types and delivery systems indicate that radioactive, toxic uranium alloys and hard-target uranium warheads were being used by the coalition forces." There is no official support for its claims, or backing from other scientists.<br><br>Shock results<br><br>It says Nangarhar province was a strategic target zone during the Afghan conflict for the deployment of a new generation of deep-penetrating "cave-busting" and seismic shock warheads.<br><br>The UMRC says its team identified several hundred people suffering from illnesses and conditions similar to those of Gulf veterans, probably because they had inhaled uranium dust.<br><br>To test its hypothesis that some form of uranium weapon had been used, the UMRC sent urine specimens from 17 Afghans for analysis at an independent UK laboratory.<br><br>It says: "Without exception, every person donating urine specimens tested positive for uranium internal contamination.<br><br>"The results were astounding: the donors presented concentrations of toxic and radioactive uranium isotopes between 100 and 400 times greater than in the Gulf veterans tested in 1999.<br><br>"If UMRC's Nangarhar findings are corroborated in other communities across Afghanistan, the country faces a severe public health disaster... Every subsequent generation is at risk."<br><br>It says troops who fought in Afghanistan and the staff of aid agencies based in Afghanistan are also at risk.<br><br>Scientific acceptance<br><br>Dr Durakovic's team used as a control group three Afghans who showed no signs of contamination. They averaged 9.4 nanograms of uranium per litre of urine.<br><br>The average for his 17 "randomly selected" patients was 315.5 nanograms, he said. Some were from Jalalabad, and others from Kabul, Tora Bora, and Mazar-e-Sharif. A 12-year-old boy living near Kabul had 2,031 nanograms.<br><br>The maximum permissible level for members of the public in the US was 12 nanograms per litre, Dr Durakovic said.<br><br>A second UMRC visit to Afghanistan in September 2002 found "a potentially much broader area and larger population of contamination". It collected 25 more urine samples, which bore out the findings from the earlier group.<br><br>Dr Durakovic said he was "stunned" by the results he had found, which are to be published shortly in several scientific journals.<br><br>Identical outcome<br><br>He told BBC News Online: "In Afghanistan there were no oil fires, no pesticides, nobody had been vaccinated - all explanations suggested for the Gulf veterans' condition.<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>"But people had exactly the same symptoms. I'm certainly not saying Afghanistan was a vast experiment with new uranium weapons. But use your common sense."</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>The UK Defence Ministry says it used no DU weapons in Afghanistan, nor any others containing uranium in any form.<br><br>A spokesman for the US Department of Defense told BBC News Online the US had not used DU weapons there.<br><br>He could not comment on Dr Durakovic's findings of elevated uranium levels in Afghan civilians. <hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br>Ah, now I see why the great powers are cutting secret deals to massively arm the afghan "national" army over the next few years: to put the peasants out of their misery. Mighty kind of them. <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Gouda
 
Posts: 3009
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:53 am
Location: a circular mould
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Pissing astonishing levels of Uranium

Postby Ike Broflovski » Wed May 24, 2006 6:37 pm

What an unlucky country. <p></p><i></i>
Ike Broflovski
 
Posts: 45
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 8:31 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Pissing astonishing levels of Uranium

Postby StarmanSkye » Wed May 24, 2006 7:24 pm

Military denials about the use of DU weapons in Iraq are flat-out lies -- as we know.<br><br>The bastards think they can lie with impunity -- and Congress lets them get away with it. Can't speak to the British arsenal <br>-- But American munitions feature DU, all the way down to M-50 and M-60 machine-gun rounds, and I've even heard about .223 and 30-calibre DU-rounds.<br><br>The DU poisoning of Afghanistan and Iraq are not only war-crimes (of many), but constitute ecocide and genocide, following the tradition of chemical warfare in SE Asia via Agent Orange dioxin-poisoning, which is STILL killing people and causing genetic defects and childhood illnesses today. America's war crimes will haunt future generations, tracing horrors to the repugnant, illegitimate Bush Dynasty and their cronies.<br>Shame.<br>Starman<br>******<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.thedubyareport.com/wmd1.html">www.thedubyareport.com/wmd1.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>From Major Doug Rokke:<br>--quote--<br>Each individual tank round that's fired by the Abrams tank is over 10 pounds of solid uranium 238. We know from US Department of Energy reports and also from the US Army Environmental Policy Institute report it is also contaminated with plutonium, neptunium, and americium in many cases. Uranium munition that's fired by the A10 "Warthog" aircraft, is approximately 3/4 of a pound for each individual round, and the A10 can fire at a rate of up to 4000 rounds a minute. That's a ton and a half of solid uranium fired into a target per minute. The uranium munitions are also contained in a lot of the bunker buster bombs, and also sub-munitions -- land mines -- such as the ADAM and PDM. We also have it in a 25mm round that is fired by the Bradley fighting vehicle, and also by the US Marine Corps's LAV. In addition to that we have a 20mm round that's fired by the Navy --- that's the Phalanx Naval System. So what we're seeing is because uranium munitions are absolutely effective in combat, they are an absolute killer and destroyer, the military has put them into almost every munition they can think of. It's extremely effective. It kills and destroys everything that it hits. <br> <br>[W]hen you use uranium munitions, what happens is each individual round, once it leaves the barrel of the gun that fired it, catches fire, 'cause uranium is pyrophoric. So it's already on fire as the round races down range to hit any target. It can be a building it can be a lightweight vehicle, a car or a truck, it can be a tank or it can be an armored personnel carrier. It's effective on everything.... Now when it impacts, you have a 10 pound round of solid uranium, that's fired by the Abrams tank. When that impacts, about 40% or about 4 pounds turns into what we call uranium spalling and oxides. That stuff is on fire, moving extremely high velocity across a confined space, and causes secondary detonations, either due to concussion, or due to ignition (burning). <br>Within 25 to 50 meters of such an impact, the contamination from uranium oxides is so extensive that military regulations require that soldiers operating in the area must have skin and respiratory protection. Without such protection, the body suffers the combined effects of heavy metal ingestion and radiological toxin. Health effects include: <br><br>Rashes <br>Cataracts <br>Neurological problems <br>Fibromyalgia <br>Respiratory problems <br>Cancers <br><br>Government awareness of some of these heath effects was documented as early as October 1943. Rokke and members of the team that were tasked to clean up the DU "mess" from Gulf War I, themselves suffered health problems typically associated with heavy metal and radiological toxins. Rokke's own exposure was from inhalation due to faulty gas masks -- masks he asserts are still faulty today. All the members of his team were sick within 24 hours of exposure to DU contamination. Cancers began to appear among members of his team within 8 or 9 months. <br><br> <p></p><i></i>
StarmanSkye
 
Posts: 2670
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:32 pm
Location: State of Jefferson
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to The "War on Terror"

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests