by jc » Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:14 am
back to topic. been thinking some more on this and i have this to add. <br><br>i think we've all seen or read about the five dancing israelis and the art school students. the most common reactions to these facts have been either "they dun it! they run the guvmint. they's behind everthang, elmuh! i's tellin ya!" or silence.<br><br>i have a different take. jonathan pollard as i recall was busted for handing over info on the sales of US arms to israels enemies: neighbouring arab countries. (the US PsTB (or Imperial Rome out Heroding Herod, to drive the analogy down through the centuries) playing both sides against the middle here.) as with the running AIPAC spy case downplayed for the most part what does get out is "why? why would israel spy on a friendly nation?"<br><br>and what comes to my mind is "what do you mean by friendly?" <br><br>if the reputations of bush co and partners are anything to go by then i think the israeli gov (no angels for sure) know who they're dealing with, that's why they spend the amount of rescources and manpower keeping an eye on the "friendly nation" that they do. protection.<br><br>that's where the reports of israeli agents keeping an eye on a number of hijackers and the mossad early warnings come in. they wanted to know what was going on. and that's why they were speedily let out of the country. (this can be mojoed: "we had to let them go, they was in control, but now that we're free of their influence we can tell you they were behind 911. they forced us into it." like abe foxman and the adl, aipac and hollywood card can be played to show the extent of their power over the US when the backlash is run.)<br><br>they know, or at least they're as close to knowing as anyone can get about what went down on 911 and by whose hand without being on the inside.<br><br>of course this doesn't stop parts of the "911 truth" community from repeating over and over "they dun it!" which, although familiar, must be frustrating but at the same time i figure they're playing their knowledge card to the max.<br><br>thing is they may be too smart for their own good. you've heard that sharon quote: "america will do what we tell her to do"? (i paraphrase from memory.) this is usually provided as proof of zionist control of the world and the US. in my mind though it sounds like hubris, exaggerated self-regard, like a man clinging to the scales on leviathan's back hollerin' "ah'm in control! ah'm in control! ah'm a break this heah hoss if its the last thing ah do!" incredibly stupid. typical of sharon.<br><br>the problem is, i think, that israel figures it can outwit mephisto. i doubt that. the thing about most israeli intelligence ops, and i've heard their american counterparts say as much, is that they're too sexy by far, too convoluted, way too "smart" and "cunning." they buy their own propaganda/BS which is always a sign of danger. it's their weakness here.<br><br>it's being played back at them too, if i'm to go by the eyewitness accounts of the type: "i got a friend whose a joo and he says they do control everthang, they started all them wars and they owns the money and banks and they proud of it too. they think us go-yim is jus cattle" that have been popping up lately.<br><br>they're being played. i think they're gonna live to regret it.<br><br>* * * * *<br><br>help me out here and pull this apart if you think or know different. read the first part too. point out the weaknesses. or just plain tell me i'm paranoid but make sure you show me how and why.<br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=jc@rigorousintuition>jc</A> at: 8/8/06 9:49 am<br></i>
