Lawsuit: Whistleblower Seeks Restraining Order Against Bush

by **Martin F Abernathy** » Wed Oct 19, 2005 9:41 pm

>You've been investigating this guy Charles Schlund's > story all this time, and you haven't visited him > personally in almost 3 years? I don't have a lot of money, I live in Rhode Island and cannot afford to visit Arizona on a regular basis. I would *like* to see Charles Schlund again > What's his relationship to you? Legal client? Do you bill > him by the hour? I am not a lawyer, and have never been one. I am a researcher. I do all that I can to publicize Charles Schlund's case because I understand how important it is to ALL of the American people. I strongly advise you to read his affidavit. +++++++++++++++++++++ CHARLES AUGUST SCHLUND, III, AND RANDY D. LANG v. UNITED STATES, ET AL. 00-1603 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 532 U.S. 1052; 121 S. Ct. 2194; 149 L. Ed. 2d 1025; 2001 U.S. LEXIS 4025; 69 U.S.L.W. 3748 May 29, 2001, Decided PRIOR HISTORY: [*1] Reported below: 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 33858. Table Reported below: 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 38177. JUDGES: Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer. OPINION: Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied. +++++++++++++ CHARLES AUGUST SCHLUND, III, AND RANDY D. LANG v. UNITED STATES, ET AL. 00-1603 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 533 U.S. 964; 121 S. Ct. 2625; 150 L. Ed. 2d 777; 2001 U.S. LEXIS 4922; 69 U.S.L.W. 3808 June 29, 2001, Decided JUDGES: [**1] Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer. OPINION: [*965] The petition for rehearing is denied.

by **robertdreed** » Wed Oct 19, 2005 11:17 pm

What's the nature of the research you've been doing on his case, if you haven't seen him in 3 years?

by **michael meiring** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 7:58 am

<a href="http://cvilleindymedia.org/newswire.php?story_id=1895">cvilleindymedia.org/newsw...ry_id=1895</a> <a href="http://www.whale.to/b/wall2.html">www.whale.to/b/wall2.html</a> The mind-altering mechanism is based on a subliminal carrier technology: the Silent Sound Spread Spectrum (SSSS), sometimes called "S-quad" or "Squad". It was developed by Dr Oliver Lowery of Norcross, Georgia, and is described in US Patent #5,159,703, "Silent Subliminal Presentation System", dated October 27, 1992. The abstract for the patent reads: "A silent communications system in which nonaural carriers, in the very low or very high audio-frequency range or in the adjacent ultrasonic frequency spectrum are amplitude- or frequency-modulated with the desired intelligence and propagated acoustically or vibrationally, for inducement into the brain, typically through the use of loudspeakers, earphones, or piezoelectric transducers. The modulated carriers may be transmitted directly in real time or may be conveniently recorded and stored on mechanical, magnetic, or optical media for delayed or repeated transmission to the listener." According to literature by Silent Sounds, Inc., it is now possible, using supercomputers, to analyse human emotional EEG patterns and replicate them, then store these "emotion signature clusters" on another computer and, at will, "silently induce and change the emotional state in a human being". Silent Sounds, Inc. states that it is interested only in positive emotions, but the military is not so limited. That this is a US Department of Defense project is obvious. Edward Tilton, President of Silent Sounds, Inc., says this about S-quad in a letter dated December 13, 1996: "All schematics, however, have been classified by the US Government and we are not allowed to reveal the exact details... ... we make tapes and CDs for the German Government, even the former Soviet Union countries! All with the permission of the US State Department, of course... The system was used throughout Operation Desert Storm (Iraq) quite successfully." <a href="http://www.surveillanceissues.com/">www.surveillanceissues.com/</a> The Neurophone US Patent # 3,393,279. July 16th, 1968 US Patent # 3,647,970. March 7th, 1972 The Neurophone was developed by Dr Patrick Flanagan in 1958. It's a device that converts sound to electrical impulses. In its original form electrodes were placed on the skin but with defence department developments, the signals can be delivered via satellite. They then travel the nervous system directly to the brain (bypassing normal hearing mechanisms). Dr Flanagan's "3D holographic sound system" can place sounds in any location as perceived by the targeted / tortured listener. This allows for a variety of deceptions for gullible victims. Today, the CIA, DIA (etc) use satellites and ground - based equipment to deliver verbal threats, deafening noise and propaganda; using neurophone technology. Anything from TV's/radio's appearing to operate when switched off through to "Voices from God" and encounters with "telepathic" aliens are all cons using neurophone technologies to torment, deceive and (most importantly) discredit agency/criminal targets. Naturally, the system can mimic anyone's voice and automatic computer translations (into any language) are incorporated. Anecdotal evidence indicates that people like David Koresh, Martin Bryant and others could have been programmed then remotely triggered (or tricked) using harrassment technologies like the neurophone. (Although most of the targets are intelligent and law-abiding). For example, John Lennon's killer, Mark Chapman, reportedly heard voices before and after silencing the agency-hounded peace advocate. "God" apparently told him to confess verbally. To explain why others physically moving into the path of the laser (or whatever) do not pick up the signals, please note the following "possibilities"... a) Kirlean photography may be an ancillary system so it's attuned to the targets personal energy field (their unique EM waves). b) The magnetite in our brains can act as a detectable fingerprint. c)Equally each of us has a unique bioelectrical resonance frequency in our brains. EMF Brain stimulation may be encoded so that pulsating EM signals sent to the targets brain cause audio-visual effects which only the target experiences. This, to me, is the best explanation. d) The individuals "vibrational pattern" could be used as a signal filter like a radio receiving only the sound modulating the frequency of the station it's tuned to. e) The monitors simply adjust the volume downwards when you're in a position where the signal could hit someone else's body. Even if they heard it (briefly) they'd attribute it to another voice in the crowd etc. As with the final proof, the definitive answer lies in the actual blueprints; secreted in the bowels of the Pentagon or some similar facility. Nonetheless, there is no report of ANY intercepted neurophone signals. If it wasn't so effective it would not have been used to facilitate silent communications between U.S. government agents/military personnel. Psycho-Acoustic Projector U.S. patent #3,566,347, (23/2/71) A device/weapon which can actually deafen the target. Silent Subliminal Messages US Patent # 5,159,703. October 27th, 1992 Inventor - Dr Oliver M. Lowery Non aural carriers in extreme audio frequency ranges are amplified or modulated with the desired material and propagated acoustically for direct inducement into the brain. This is an excellent method of influencing people without their knowledge. An alert reader would recognise how this could create coincidences and stir up conflict; especially if what's fed to one person corresponds with what's gathered (via surveillance) from another. It can also help to create coincidences of the sort the media creates (through surveillance feedback) only in reverse... where the subjects are fed information prior to the event (eg. a news story) and coerced into believing they are psychic. Patented devices known to facilitate subliminal message delivery are too numerous to list. However, examples include: - Auditory subliminal message system and method. U.S. patent #4395600, Rene Lundy and David Tyler, 26/7/83. A system to mix messages into background music (ala the subliminal transmissions used in some U.S. department stores to prevent shoplifting or boost sales). - Subliminal message generator. U.S. patent #5,270,800, Robert Sweet, 14/12/93. To be used with TV, cable TV and computers. (A visual medium). - Superimposing method and apparatus useful for subliminal messages. U.S. patent #5,134,484, Joseph Wilson, 28/7/92. Relates to video signals. The subliminal data can be from a prerecorded or live signal. And yes... the entertainment industry can use such technologies to boost sales of CD's, movie tickets etc. As intimated earlier, the criminals involved not only operate in media/political circles, they seek total control of everything. In time they may win due to suppression of information and their terrorist tactics. N.B Sound can also be induced by radiating the head with microwaves. One unpublished application was the Gulf War but, more times than not, the targets are mostly innocent/oppressed civilians trying to exercise their basic rights to free speech in so-called western democracies. Methods and Systems of Altering Consciousness US Patent # 5,123,844. June 23rd, 1992 US Patent # 5,289,438. February 22nd, 1994 These systems stimulate the brain with different frequencies and wave forms to alter the subject's state of consciousness. Electro Magnetic Field (EMF) monitoring/interference is one of the most insidious and secretive of all methods used by the agencies. N.B. Similarly, EEG cloning feeds back the results of EMF monitoring in an attempt to induce emotional responses (e.g. fear, anger, even sleep etc.). This could possibly work on certain members of a crowd or audience....again this could facilitate scams etc. Dr Ross Adey concludes that all aspects of human behaviour can be affected, even controlled. He used 0.75 milliwatts per square centimetre of pulsed, modulated microwave at a frequency of 450 MHz. Notably the Alaskan HAARP project (featuring the B.J.Eastland patented technology - U.S. patent #4,686,605, 11/4/87 - "Method and Apparatus for altering a region in the Earth's atmosphere, ionosphere or magnetosphere". AND others) also facilitates experiments in the disruption of human mental processes. It's the largest, most versatile radio frequency radiation transmitter in the world also allowing experimentation in weather "modification", wireless, electrical power beaming and communications "disruption". Its systems like this which could one day see attempts made to brainwash/control entire populations. And that is just as feasible as a wholesale nuclear holocaust. Microwave Weapons Twenty years ago a scientist, Allan Frey, found that if a microwave carrier were to be sliced and carried audio modulation, that modulation could be heard by someone in the signals path. The thin pulses of radio carrier wave cause currents to flow through the nervous system - the result is a remote transmission; no wires or contact is needed. "A hearing system" U.S. patent #4,877,027, 31/10/89. Wayne Brunker. "A hearing device" U.S. patent #4,858,612, 22/8/89. Philip L.Stocklin. Eg. The latter involves microwaves aimed at the auditory cortex. A mike turns the sounds to electrical signals which are treated so as to provide multi frequency microwaves which are applied to the brain area. Whatever sound the mike picks up (like a voice) is relayed to the target. The first known experiment with microwaved voices was conducted by Sharp and Grove in the early 70's. However, the Defence Intelligence Agency and ARPA (The Advanced Research Projects Agency) are principally to blame for the abuse of such technologies since. eg Project Pandora etc. The CIA's Langley Research Centre as well as an army of "mad" scientists working in Energy/Defence department labs across the U.S. are also responsible. As with the NASA Apollo program, many of those originally involved were ex Nazi or Russian Cold war scientists (even WWII Japanese) recruited, regardless of their earlier crimes, to commit more crimes, this time for the U.S.A. It's worth noting the reported experiments carried out in bygone days included The MKULTRA (mind control)/LSD experiments, germ and nuclear fallout testing (on military and civilian personnel), electro-shock treatment on institutional victims and so on. The U.S. Energy and Justice departments are now involved in such programs so the U.S. can escape violation of international defence/agency treaties. That's also why the "D" for "defence" was dropped from DARPA. In any event, once a technology is labelled "Top secret-classified" they can use it any way they like on anyone. God Bless America. Brain Wave Monitors / Analysers Lawrence Pinneo, a neurophysiologist and electronic engineer working for Stanford Research Institute (a military contractor) is the first "known" pioneer in this field. In 1974 he developed a computer system which correlated brain waves on an electroencephalograph with specific commands. In the early 1990s, Dr Edward Taub reported that words could be communicated onto a screen using the thought-activated movements of a computer cursor. (Currently under secrecy provisions; "Classified") In 1994, the brain wave patterns of 40 subjects were officially correlated with both spoken words and silent thought. This was achieved by a neurophysiologist, Dr Donald York, and a speech pathologist, Dr Thomas Jensen, from the University of Missouri. They clearly identified 27 words / syllables in specific brain wave patterns and produced a computer program with a brain wave vocabulary. It does not take much thinking to realise that the US agencies have access to a perfected version of this technology. In fact the relevant computers have a vocabulary in excess of 60,000 words and cover most languages. In fact, the NSA's signals intelligence monitor the brainwaves of their targets by satellite and decode the evoked potentials (3.50Hz 5 milliwatts) that the brain emits. So, using lasers / satellites and high-powered computers the agencies have now gained the ability to decipher human thoughts - and from a considerable distance (instantaneously).

by **robertdreed** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 4:33 pm

"a considerable distance" Given the inverse square law, that distance is how far? As for the choice of targets- why Mr. Schlund, and not, say, "michael meiring"? It sounds as if this technology makes a lot of surveillance, like wiretaps, obsolete. If "the government" really has these capabilities, it really is "game over", isn't it? Except- a tinfoil hat really will throw this off, won't it?

by **robertdreed** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 4:41 pm

( Currently under secrecy provisions; "Classified" )  LOL In 1994, the brain wave patterns of 40 subjects were officially correlated with both spoken words and silent thought. This was achieved by a neurophysiologist, Dr Donald York, and a speech pathologist, Dr Thomas Jensen, from the University of Missouri. They clearly identified 27 words / syllables in specific brain wave patterns and produced a computer program with a brain wave vocabulary. It does not take much thinking to realise that the US agencies have access to a perfected version of this technology. In fact the relevant computers have a vocabulary in excess of 60,000 words and cover most languages.  Hogwash. The technology to translate an EEG waveform into verbal language isn't even close to being available. Not even if one is undergoing an MRI. Anyway, why rely on sophisticated technology to produce panic and paranoid states in the susceptible, when it's sufficient simply to use textual suggestions given a veneer of "speculative fiction" plausibility? Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=robertdreed>robertdreed</A> at: 10/20/05 2:47 pm

by **robertdreed** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 4:45 pm

Can I get a pinch-hitter in here?

by **michael meiring** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 5:21 pm

It seems obvious that some people havant read a single patent. to help the discussion along. Who is applying for these patents? and is the technology capable off? <a href="http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/p/uspre36,348.htm">www.mindcontrolforums.com...36,348.htm</a> United States Patent RE36,348 Carter , et al. October 19, 1999 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Method and apparatus for changing brain wave frequency Abstract A method for changing brain wave frequency to a desired frequency determines a current brain wave frequency of a user, generates two frequencies with a frequency difference of a magnitude between that of the current actual brain wave frequency and the desired frequency but always within a predetermined range of the current actual brain wave frequency, and produces an output to the user corresponding to the two frequencies. One apparatus to accomplish the method has a computer processor, a computer memory, EEG electrodes along with an amplifier, a programmable timing generator responsive to the computer processor for generating the two frequencies, audio amplifiers and a beat frequency generator driving a visual frequency amplifier. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Inventors: Carter; John Leland (Harris County, TX); Russell; Harold Laverne (Galveston County, TX); Ochs; Len (Contra Costa County, CA) Assignee: Neurotrain L.C. (Galveston, TX) Appl. No.: 490116 Filed: June 12, 1995 Related U.S. Patent Documents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Patent No.: Issued: Appl. No.: Filed: Reissue of: 05036858 Aug 06, 1991 497426 Mar 22, 1990 Current U.S. Class: 600/545; 600/27 Intern'l Class: A61B 005/04 Field of Search: 128/731,732 600/26-28,545,544 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A lomg document, but number 8 states this. 8. An apparatus for urging the brain wave frequency of a user toward a desired brain wave frequency, the apparatus comprising in combination: a computer processor; .[.a memory which can be written to and read from the computer processor;.] . means .Iadd.in communication with the computer processor .Iaddend.for determining a current brain wave frequency of the user.[., which communicates with the computer processor.].; a programmable timing generator .Iadd.operatively connected to and .Iaddend.responsive to the computer processor .[.and.]. .Iadd.for .Iaddend.generating a first signal at a first frequency and a second signal at a second frequency wherein .[.the.]. .Iadd.there is a .Iaddend.frequency difference between the first .Iadd.frequency .Iaddend.and .Iadd.the .Iaddend.second .[.signals.]. .Iadd.frequency and the frequency difference .Iaddend.is between the current brain wave frequency and the desired brain wave frequency and is within a predetermined range of the current brain wave frequency; .Iadd.and .Iaddend. means .Iadd.responsive to the programmable timing generator and .Iaddend.detectable by the user for producing an output corresponding to the first and second signals.

by **robertdreed** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 5:32 pm

I suggest taking your concerns to the Electrical Engineering Department of the nearest university. You'll be able to find a professor, or at least one grad student, with whom to share your concerns. I'm not going to read some document that's out of my area of expertise, especially when littered with transliterated artifacts like "addend", apparently substituted every time parenthetic quotes appear. I do, however, know enough electronics to know what the inverse square law is, placing me comfortably above the mean in terms of people attempting to figure this phenomenon out from "secret" on-line texts. Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=robertdreed>robertdreed</A> at: 10/20/05 3:32 pm

by **michael meiring** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 5:55 pm

robert, QUOTE ''I suggest taking your concerns to the Electrical Engineering Department of the nearest university. You'll be able to find a professor, or at least one grad student, with whom to share your concerns.'' LOL, theres thousands of patents out there, my intention was to merely highlight the technology out there, But at least we seem to agree on somthing, its all way too much for your limited intelligence to digest. But hey buddy, you have out debated me, you win. Those patents are clearly figments of my imagination. And all those government sites etc with the information on must be lies, along with all the information about the patents. I suppose if the government lied to us, we could just go to a court, hey or even a university and speak to a law proffesor ? and justice would be done, oh it must be so easy.

by **robertdreed** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 8:12 pm

No man, speak to an electrical engineering professor, have him look at the nuts and bolts of the technology, to see at what range those gimmicks work, if they work. Or better yet, build a working model...emphasis on the word "working." A patent application isn't the same thing as a working patent. There are all sorts of "patent applied for"'s out there for perpetual motion machines. As for the rest of it, I defer to those of Unlimited Intelligence. Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=robertdreed>robertdreed</A> at: 10/20/05 6:24 pm

by **Martin F Abernathy** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 8:41 pm

You seem to insist that Charles Schlund's claims have no merit, so why don't YOU explain why it was appealed all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court?

by **robertdreed** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 8:52 pm

Short answer: because he had lost all previous appeals in the lower courts.

Lawsuit: Whistleblower Seeks Restraining Order Against Bush

Charles Schlund

Re: Charles Schlund

EEG mind invasive technology

Re: EEG mind invasive technology

Re: EEG mind invasive technology

Re: EEG mind invasive technology

Patents.

Re: Patents.

my concerns

"michael meiring"

Charles Schlund Lawsuit (2001)

Re: Charles Schlund Lawsuit (2001)

Who is online