by OnoI812 » Mon Feb 06, 2006 1:30 am
<br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>You think they PLANNED it that way?</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>YES the calls were clearly bias toward Pitt<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>The receiver did shove off...but it was a ticky tack call.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>Not my words, those were the words of the announcers at halftime , and they went on to add that it was clearly a Touchdown...not my words , again theirs.<br><br>If you watch the play again , the steeler was grabbing for the reciever with both arms right before he entered the endzone. That is my observation. The Steeler was not called.<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>You couldn't tell exactly where the ball was at the time. Not enough evidence to overturn the call. Has to be indisputable</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>I agree completely here , and I'll add they probably would have made it in on the next try. BUT the call went Pitts way.<br><br>so I won't fault Pitt for those 7 points.<br><br>Madden clearly pointed out that the holding call was bogus..<br><br>I believe his words were -OOOh. that's not holding.<br>It would have put them on the 1 yard line and there likely would have been no interception , no gadget play. and we'll never know if Seattle would have crossed the goal... a potential 14 point swing.<br><br>Superbowl Steve never said anything would blow up at the superbowl... I 'm not sure where you get that from...he said it completes the satanic miracles relayed to him in 1988 and has since written a book about...<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>