Anything to lose ?

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Anything to lose ?

Postby slimmouse » Mon Jul 18, 2005 5:14 pm

<br> Just recieved this in my 9/11 truth email.<br><br> Sounds like a promising concept, and well worthy of a perusal.<br><br> Can it work ? would it work ? Hell, have we anything to lose by showing some support and passing on the message ?<br><br> <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.iwtnews.com/">www.iwtnews.com/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br> PS i nominated Jeff for the first interview <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :D --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/happy.gif ALT=":D"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

Taking on the old media on their own terms seems a bad idea

Postby glubglubglub » Mon Jul 18, 2005 6:58 pm

Much better is to supersede them entirely. For the 'awakened' blogs have started to do this, but arguably stronger forms of supercession are required.<br><br>Not a bad project, though, just unlikely to succeed. <p></p><i></i>
glubglubglub
 
Posts: 328
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 5:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

an idea whose time has come (hopefully not gone)

Postby zangtang » Mon Jul 18, 2005 10:39 pm

i emailed them as soon as i saw them, it tickles me it happened to be the first day they went public - i said be warned, they'll try to strangle you at birth - you should have seen the responses from industry professionals asking/offering to get on board.Inspiring!!!!! <p></p><i></i>
zangtang
 
Posts: 1247
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:13 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: an idea whose time has come (hopefully not gone)

Postby slimmouse » Mon Jul 18, 2005 11:47 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>i said be warned, they'll try to strangle you at birth - you should have seen the responses from industry professionals asking/offering to get on board.Inspiring!!!!!<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br><br> And aint that the truth !<br><br> Ive just been looking at the site, and a thread on the London Bombing. It strikes me that theres an absolute plethera of people who KNOW what the score is, but who feel that they are still in relatvie Isolation. Some smart thinkers too. This caught my eye ;<br><br> <br>I wonder if you are aware of the Iron Mountain report . ..."A "Top Secret" study commissioned by the Kennedy administration (1961), to determine what problems the United States would face if the world moved from an era of war to a golden age of peace. "...<br><br>..."A study group consisted of 15 experts in various academic disciplines, were selected for their expertise in their various fields. The first and last meetings were in an underground nuclear survival retreat called Iron Mountain"....<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>President John F. Kennedy made an astounding statement. On November 13,1963 while speaking at Columbus University, Pres. Kennedy stated, "The high office of the President of the United States of America has been used to foment a plot to destroy America's freedom, and before I leave office, I must inform the citizens of their plight! Ten days later, President John F. Kennedy was shot and killed.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> ...<br><br>"The study was completed in 1966. President Johnson gave the order that the report was never to be released, due to the nature of the conclusions reached. The purpose of this Report was to see what it would take to bring the United States into a New World Order. The "experts" decided that the American people were not intelligent enough to understand what "big brother" had decided for them; and what "big brother" would need to do to accomplish what was decided for them. If the truth came out too soon, the American people would be able to stop it...."<br><br> On the thread regarding the London attacks.<br><br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p097.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=slimmouse@rigorousintuition>slimmouse</A> at: 7/18/05 9:49 pm<br></i>
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

Re: Iron Mountain report

Postby Qutb » Tue Jul 19, 2005 12:00 am

is <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>satire</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END-->. It's a work of fiction, but sadly taken to be true by too many. <br><br>Or, come to think of it, is it? What do we really know? Hmm. <p></p><i></i>
Qutb
 
Posts: 1203
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 2:28 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Iron Mountain report

Postby slimmouse » Tue Jul 19, 2005 12:31 am

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>is satire. It's a work of fiction, but sadly taken to be true by too many<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br> Well im just gonna leave it there, as a lesson to myself not to be so intellectually Lazy and verify my sources in future <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rolleyes --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/eyes.gif ALT=":rolleyes"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

Iron Mountain

Postby jfshade » Tue Jul 19, 2005 12:58 am

"The publication of the report caused a sensation. So many copies of it were sold that it made its way onto the New York Times bestseller list, and it was eventually translated into 15 languages.<br><br>"The report caused panic among many government officials. President Johnson supposedly "hit the roof" when he learned of it. Cables were sent to U.S. embassies throughout the world instructing them to play down public discussion of the report, and to emphasize that the report had nothing at all to do with official U.S. policy.<br><br>"The media, meanwhile, frantically searched for and speculated about who had written the report. On November 20 Eliot Fremont-Smith wrote a review for the New York Times in which he declared that the report was a hoax. He speculated that it had been written either by John Kenneth Galbraith, Kenneth Boulding, or Leonard C. Lewin. However, he had no evidence to prove his speculations.<br><br>"The suspicion that Galbraith was the author stemmed from the fact that he had written a review of the report under the pseudonym "Herschel McLandress". This review had appeared in the Washington Post and the Chicago Tribune. Lewin was suspected because besides having written the introduction to the report, he had also authored a book of political satire.<br><br>"The mystery of who had written the report was revealed in 1972 when Lewin declared in an article in the New York Times that he had penned the entire report. In other words, there was no Special Study Group and no government plot to maintain a state of war. The entire report had been a hoax. More details of the creation of the hoax were given in 1996 when Simon & Schuster reprinted the Report with a new introduction.<br><br>"Apparently, the genesis of the report occurred in 1966 when Victor Navasky, editor of the Monocle, a magazine of political satire, noticed a New York Times article reporting that the stock market had dipped because of a 'peace scare.' Navasky mentioned this to Lewin who then wrote the report. The two of them presented the report to E.L. Doctorow, editor of the Dial Press. Doctorow agreed to publish the work as nonfiction.<br><br>"Navasky claimed that the purpose of the hoax had been "to provoke thinking about the unthinkable—the conversion to a peacetime economy and the absurdity of the arms race."<br><br>"Even though Lewin and Navasky admitted that the report was a hoax, there still remain some who believe it to be an official government document that was leaked to the public. An ultra-rightwing group known as the Liberty Lobby is one such group. Believing that the report was evidence of a secret government plot, the group printed their own edition of the report. When Lewin found out about this, he sued them for copyright infringement. The case was settled out of court with the Liberty Lobby agreeing to pay Lewin an undisclosed sum."<br><br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/iron.html">www.museumofhoaxes.com/iron.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
jfshade
 
Posts: 98
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 1:20 pm
Location: Chicago
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Iron Mountain

Postby slimmouse » Tue Jul 19, 2005 3:52 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>"Even though Lewin and Navasky admitted that the report was a hoax, there still remain some who believe it to be an official government document that was leaked to the public. An ultra-rightwing group known as the Liberty Lobby is one such group. Believing that the report was evidence of a secret government plot, the group printed their own edition of the report. When Lewin found out about this, he sued them for copyright infringement. The case was settled out of court with the Liberty Lobby agreeing to pay Lewin an undisclosed sum."<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br> I realised my boo boo as soon as I did a search for the Quote I highlighted, which was what prompted me to post it lol.<br><br> Tired as I was, I never for one moment sought to ask myself why, having read for hours about the whole kennedy episode, that Id never come across this quote before. <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :\ --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/ohwell.gif ALT=":\"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br> With a date, location etc all attatched it struck me as an extremely credible read. Lesson learned for sure lol. <p></p><i></i>
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)


Return to The "War on Terror"

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests