Economic Aspects of "Love"

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Economic Aspects of "Love"

Postby American Dream » Mon Jun 20, 2011 12:29 pm

The Commodification of Friendship


Q. What's the difference between a good-friend and a therapist?
A. About $250/hr, less working hours, and usually easier access to drugs.



(I don't personally think this is always true of psychotherapy, though I do think this sort of criticism is sometimes valid.)




.
Last edited by American Dream on Mon Jun 20, 2011 1:23 pm, edited 2 times in total.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Economic Aspects of "Love"

Postby American Dream » Mon Jun 20, 2011 12:44 pm

http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/content/ ... n/2142903/

Phoenix Goddess Temple's "Sacred Sexuality" Is More Like New Age Prostitution

By Niki D'Andrea

published: February 17, 2011

Image
Goddesses" gather in one of the temple's rooms.


On a brisk Sunday morning in mid-January, Wayne Clayton arrives at work at Phoenix Goddess Temple wheeling a brown piece of luggage.

"These are all my healing tools," he says.

Among them are a clear plastic bag stuffed with white latex gloves and a bottle of lubricant. He will use them later in one of his "trauma healing" sessions. But first, he'll receive his own session with a temple "goddess" who calls herself Aphrodite. Clayton says it's common for practitioners at Phoenix Goddess Temple to do sessions for each other. It helps "recharge energy" and maintains an all-important balance.

Practitioners at this self-styled church near 24th Street and Thomas Road say that what they do is sacred work to balance energy and heal people, and Clayton really seems to believe it — at least enough to let New Times watch two of his all-too-revealing sessions.

Clayton's title is "touch healer." He's in his 50s, about 5-foot-8, heavyset, with glasses and salt-and-pepper hair. Aphrodite is one of about 14 women who work at the temple. Like the majority of the goddesses, she appears to be in her late 30s to early 40s. She's tan, blond, and blue-eyed, with faint crow's feet in the corners of her eyes. She says she conducts up to three sessions per day.

Just what is a "session," you ask? Step into the "Persian Room" with Aphrodite and Clayton.

This room is light blue, with accents that include billowy white curtains tacked across the ceiling. Books by Persian poet Rumi adorn the end tables, and sounds drift from a boom box — mostly birds chirping, combined with the sound of a sitar. A stick of Nag Champa incense fills the room with an earthy, spicy smell.

Clayton gets butt-naked and belly-down on a massage table. Aphrodite runs her hands over his back, then takes off her sarong and drapes it over him. She's wearing only a black G-string that reads "I O French  ." She tells him she's going to run the sarong across his body a few times, and each time, he should imagine some pain he's had going away. She rubs coconut oil on him while saying things like, "We're all deserving of pleasure."

About 40 minutes into the session, Clayton turns over on his back. He doesn't have an erection. Aphrodite proposes a prostate massage. She puts on a "finger condom" and inserts a finger into his anus, while simultaneously gripping and stroking his penis.

Five minutes of this, and Clayton's whole body starts shaking. He lets out several loud moans, and Aphrodite cleans him up with a wet towel.

After he's dressed, Clayton tries to explain his session from a spiritual perspective.

"The start with the sarong was awakening my skin," he says. "We were developing a relationship, when I started to feel tingling sensations of yin-yang balance. Then she sent meridians up and down my spine to move internal energy better, and we had chakra-to-chakra contact."

Aphrodite's interpretation of what happened sounds less ethereal. She says what New Times witnessed is typically what she does in a session, but regarding the prostate massage, she says, "I don't always do it. Some guys are uncomfortable or they're already erect. Usually, once I rub my breasts on that area, it's over. But if it's a little limp, I'll ask to do the prostate."

"The prostate is a sacred male spot," Clayton adds. "I had stuff there I needed to release."

Phoenix Goddess Temple claims to offer "touch healing" to the sexually wounded and disenfranchised. But really, it appears to be nothing more than a New Age brothel practicing jack psychology techniques.

Licensed psychologists say the "healing" could be damaging, and legal experts say the touching could be illegal. But the temple has been operating mostly trouble-free for almost three years and raking in an estimated $20,000 a month in "donations."

Women at the temple take names like Magdalena, Shakti, and Devima. There's also a high priestess named Gypsy, and a tall, lithe blonde named Leila, who advertises her measurements (36-26-37) on her page at the temple website, which includes photo galleries of each goddess.

The goddesses practice techniques that include genital touching for a "religious offering" of money that generally ranges from $204 to $650. Their advertisements go in the adult sections of local newspapers, including New Times, but Phoenix Goddess Temple founder Tracy Elise says the temple is not a brothel — it's a church, and the services offered are religious rituals to enrich people's lives.

The women at the temple have mostly male clients, while Wayne Clayton (one of the few male practitioners at the temple) works primarily with women, particularly the sexually abused. His form of "healing" work includes spanking and exploring "energy spots" inside vaginas and anuses. He has no license or certification in psychology, but says he offers an alternative approach to solving some of the same problems addressed in sex therapy.

Sex therapy is a relatively new field. Until the 1960s, sexual dysfunctions were generally treated with psychoanalysis. The pioneers of modern sex therapy, William Masters and Virginia Johnson, began doing laboratory observations at Washington University in St. Louis in 1957. They studied things like vaginal lubrication and orgasm, and established the "four stages of sexual response" (excitement, plateau, orgasm, resolution). Their early work advocated therapists as sex surrogates, a technique now shunned in licensed sex therapy.

Subjects commonly addressed in sex therapy include premature ejaculation, erectile dysfunction, sexual trauma, and intimacy issues between couples. Common techniques include cognitive-behavioral therapy, hypnotherapy, and sensual exercise homework for couples. Phoenix Goddess Temple addresses some of the same issues and uses some of the same methods but also incorporates "magnetic energy healing" and "sacred water ceremonies," both of which involve sex acts for monetary donations.

Licensed psychologists interviewed for this story won't definitively say sex therapy works, let alone validate alternative methods. But what they hear is happening at the temple scares them, they say.

"[Sex therapy] works for my patients, but it all depends on people's motivation," says Dr. Marcus Earle, a licensed sex therapist in Scotts dale. "Sometimes, outcomes can be equally effective not doing therapy as doing therapy. There's a chance that going someplace like the temple might be helpful for some people. On the concern side, not having people who are trained to walk people through difficult things in their lives could make things more difficult."

Licensed sex therapists are certified by the American Association of Sexuality Educators, Counselors, and Therapists (AASECT). To be certified, a person must have a master's degree in some area of psychology and a minimum of 50 hours of supervised practice. There are currently about 500 sex therapists in the United States certified through AASECT, including no one at Phoenix Goddess Temple.

But despite treating some of the same issues, nobody at the temple claims to be a "sex therapist." Rather, they are "touch healers" who facilitate spiritual and emotional releases through sexual practices, and accept monetary "donations" for their services.

Whether or not temple practices have any therapeutic benefit, beyond facilitating orgasms, is debatable but highly unlikely. Clients and practitioners claim "energy healing" works, but there have been no empirical studies. "It sounds kind of hokey," says Phoenix psychologist Martin Keller, a diplomate of both the American Board of Professional Psychology and the American Board of Sexology.

"If they're doing sex therapy, sex counseling, or even sex education, they need to be a licensed mental-health provider." He says the alternative "trauma healing" techniques like those described at Phoenix Goddess Temple "sound scary. I see it as dangerous."

And in the eyes of the law, taking money for sex acts — even under the guise of "sacred healing" — is prostitution.

"If these places operate in such a way that I go there and pay money and then a tantric healer touches my genitals, that could be considered prostitution," says James Hays, assistant city attorney for Phoenix. "If I have to pay $60 or whatever to go to a class and, at the end, she rubs my genitals and tells me it's helping my life force or whatever, I've really got to question that."

There's a history of sacred sex temples throughout the world and about a dozen modern versions in the United States. In the past two years, at least three of them have been raided on suspicion of prostitution. Phoenix Goddess Temple was investigated for city code violations, including inadequate parking, in 2009 but has not been charged with prostitution.

Hays worked in adult-business regulations for more than a decade and remembers sting operations on massage parlors in Phoenix in the 1990s, and the prices for services at the time, which ranged from $60 for a handjob to $200 for intercourse. Phoenix Goddess Temple's suggested donations of anywhere from $200 to $650 for their services may seem high in comparison, but Hays has an explanation.

"They're skating on thin ice, so they need to make money to hire a lawyer when the house of cards comes tumbling down."

Phoenix Goddess Temple looks like a New Age resort. The hallways are painted an earthy copper shade and adorned with paintings by Sedona artist Paul LaWrence Curtis depicting scantily clad women playing with fire. Statues and tinkling fountains loom around the corners.

There are two floors and eight rooms called "transformation chambers," each decorated in a different theme, including the "Judeo-Christian room" (all white with paintings of Jesus), the "Egyptian room" (black and gold), and a blue "water chamber" featuring a big bathtub. Every room includes a massage table (which they call an "altar of light"), as well as a bed (called the "grand altar").

There's a euphemism for everything in temple-speak. There are no johns, but "seekers." No sex, only "sacred union." There are no handjobs, only "tantric touch." No payment is accepted, but hefty "donations" are expected. There are no hookers, just "goddesses." They don't work with penises, but "wands of light."

Phoenix Goddess Temple bases its practices on the Hindu concept of chakras, powerful energy centers believed to permeate from points on the physical body. The system as employed in the West names seven chakras, each associated with a color.

There's the Crown Chakra, associated with violet and located on top of the head, as well as the purple Third Eye, located between the eyebrows. There's also the blue Throat Chakra, the green Heart Chakra, the yellow Solar Plexus Chakra, the orange Sacral Chakra, and the first chakra, the red Root Chakra. It covers everything from the waist down, including the genitals.

Temple mother Tracy Elise says their work focuses on the Root Chakra. The idea is that women take energy in through their hearts and men's energy flows out through the Root Chakra. And if a man's root energy is blocked, it creates problems.

"Lately, I'm seeing so many men who actually have no red ray energy. Their red ray magnetic has been off, meaning what's supposed to be a positively charged channel has been neutralized — neutered," Elise says. "They're cut off, because there's so much guilt and shame and fear around the energy of the root."

"There's no science and provability about this [healing system]," she acknowledges. "But it works."

Or at least it's working for them. Phoenix Goddess Temple isn't a registered 501(c)3 nonprofit, although it generates substantial revenue. "Suggested donations" range from $204 for a one-hour introductory session to $600 for a one-hour "Sapphos Duos" session (with two goddesses) to $645 for the three-hour "Sacred Cacao Hot Chocolate Ceremony."

It's been said prostitution is the oldest occupation in the world. Turns out, people have been doing sexual/spiritual work for a long time, too. Historian Herodotus (circa 490 to 425 B.C.) described prostitution at the Temple of Ishtar in Babylon, where the Assyrian goddess of sex was worshiped. The cult of Ishtar eventually spread to Greece, where she was renamed Aphrodite.

The Temple of Aphrodite at Corinth was imagined as a magnificent palace of lusty abandon, where a thousand beautiful women serviced men who came to worship the goddess. But excavations in the 1990s revealed the temple was too small for even a hundred women, and modern historians say the temple women were not high-society beauties but slaves purchased by rich Greeks and donated to the temple as religious offerings.

There's a tradition of "sacred sex" in India, a country known for its ancient sex manual, the Kama Sutra, as well as its temples dedicated to tantra, an esoteric branch of Hinduism that seeks spiritual power and union through rituals that include sex. The Hindu devadasi system — in which a girl was dedicated to a deity's temple — was customary until the 11th century, when invaders from West Asia began destroying temples across India and forcing devadasis into prostitution. India outlawed the devadasi system in 1988.

"In the United States, modern "goddess temples" rooted in female-positive spiritual traditions began popping up around the beginning of the current millennium -- without offering sex. Temples in the U.S. include The Goddess Temple of Orange County and the Chico Goddess Temple in California; the Asheville Goddess Temple in Asheville, North Carolina; the Highland Goddess Temple in Michigan; and the Sedona Temple in Sedona. In 2009, three temples in Seattle -- the Sacred Temple and two Moon Temple locations -- were raided on suspicion of being brothels. All three were run by a woman named Vivian Ellis, who legally changed her name to Rainbow Love. According to Love's Web site, she was "mentored" by Tracy Elise for five years."

Elise, 50, has shoulder-length blond hair and wears a variety of flowing sarongs, some with glittery accents. Between her eyebrows, she wears a jeweled forehead decoration called a bindi. She claims she's had sex with more than a thousand people and had as many as 80 orgasms in one month.

She was once Miss Harvest Queen at the Alaska State Fair. Her transformation to temple mother started in Fairbanks, Alaska, in 1995, when she had what she calls "a kundalini awakening." (Kundalini is a Sanksrit word describing powerful but unconscious energy.)

At the time, she was married with three children and felt stuck. Then she had an enlightening experience with another man. "It actually happened not in a sexual moment, but the first time we held each other," she says. "It was almost like a special effect in a movie — where you see it, and then suddenly it's glass and it shatters to pieces and falls to the floor. It was just like that. I could almost see and sense all of my structures just shattered."

Elise found herself on a new path, one on which she could manifest her inner goddess. "Certainly, I couldn't have become this and stayed married to a very moderate Catholic man," she says. "I prayed the prayer of no return . . . I drove away from my home, my husband, my [catering] business, everything."

Elise landed first in Washington State, where she worked at a massage parlor, then at the Tantra Temple in Seattle for six years.

Seattle has a number of temples, but Phoenix didn't have anything quite like it in 2008, when Elise drove here in her Dodge Caravan with a new mission: bring "sacred sexuality" to the Valley.

Phoenix Goddess Temple began in the spring of 2008, in a Scottsdale residence near 68th Street and Exeter Boulevard. In February 2009, Scottsdale police visited the residence after neighbors complained. Sergeant Mark Clark told media that police couldn't determine whether allegations of prostitution were true, but officials charged the temple with city code violations, including inadequate parking for a home-based church.

Unable to operate under Scottsdale's zoning code, Elise moved the temple to a larger residence near 59th Street and Shea Boulevard. The temple went through two more homes in upscale Phoenix neighborhoods before opening at its current commercial location near 24th Street and Thomas last March. One of Elise's three children, a grown son, also lives in Phoenix and works at the temple.

Six months ago, Wayne Clayton moved from Chicago with his wife to become director of the temple's new learning center, the School of 1 (his wife is the school administrator). He teaches courses such as "Stem Cell Reactivation" and "Spanking as a Healing Modality."

Clayton specializes in "seekers" who have been sexually abused and people suffering from illnesses like cancer, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson's disease. He's been practicing his techniques — which include role-playing and "yoni release" (yoni is the Sanksrit word for vagina) — for 20 years.

He says he first tried these techniques after surviving years of sexual abuse at the hands of his late father. He tried psychotherapy and says that at one time in his 30s, he was on 37 different medications. None of it worked for him, so he started looking into things like acupuncture, massage, and shamanism. He says they worked for him, and they work for others, too.

But some of Clayton's claims go far beyond therapies, like acupuncture, that are now considered almost mainstream. He says one of his clients in Chicago lost a breast to cancer, and after several healing sessions with him, she grew her breast back. He says another woman in Chicago, this one suffering from cervical cancer and a subsequent hysterectomy, grew her female organs back through energy work. Eventually, she bore children.

"You're a liar and a pervert!"

The naked woman draped across Wayne Clayton's lap screams at him. He's spanking her. It's a sunny Sunday afternoon in January, and they're in the "Red Room" at Phoenix Goddess Temple. This is the role-playing part of one of Clayton's "trauma healing" sessions. He's pretending to be an abusive male figure from her past.

The woman is a 40-year-old "seeker" who says she was sexually abused by her stepfather and grandfather. She wishes to remain anonymous, so we'll call her Jane.

Jane's been having weekly sessions with Clayton for the past three months. Each session lasts two to three hours. The session starts with 10 to 15 minutes of talking before moving to role-playing.

"I'm your father! Have respect!" Clayton yells, smacking Jane's butt. Jane's crying when Clayton strips and they switch roles. Now, she spanks him to let her "anger out."

She smacks Clayton's ass with both hands repeatedly. "I'm 2 years old, and you're rubbing your penis on me!" She screams.

"I'm doing what's best for you," Clayton deadpans.

Jane continues smacking Clayton with tears streaming down her face. "I should have told on you — you ugly, ugly man! I just hope you're burning in Hell! That's all I have to say to you!"

After the role-playing, it takes a while for Jane to calm down. Clayton typically does deep-breathing exercises with her to "isolate energy."

Then he asks Jane whether she's ready to move into the "release" part of the session.

She says she's on her period, but he says that's okay and asks her to lie down and remove her tampon. He gets a latex glove, puts it on his right hand, and grabs his bottle of lubricant with the other. "Can I enter?" he asks.

Jane nods, and Clayton inserts two fingers into her vagina. "Okay, first I'm going to ground your energy," he says. "I'm grounding you to the Earth. I want you to think about the physical release you're going through, and how it will help the emotional release."

He pushes his fingers a little deeper and says, "Now we're going to bridge — feel the sensation? Feel the burning? I'm pushing on your urethra."

Clayton tells Jane he feels her having all these "amazing energy releases," though there's no change in Jane's movements or expression. But twice she does say, "That's too much."

"I'm gonna pull out," Clayton says. "Keep the breathing going. I want you to turn over and we'll do some anal release, get the anger out of there. Then you'll be cooked."Jane says she feels "cooked" already. "We don't want you to leave lopsided," Clayton says, changing gloves.

And so the session ends with Clayton inserting his finger into Jane's anus, holding it there for several minutes and telling her to "feel that energy spot."

After the session, Jane says she feels better. She had a headache when she came in, and now it's gone. Though she hasn't eaten, she isn't hungry. "My body's still vibrating," she says. "I feel energized."

Clayton says he does "yoni work" and "anal release" because those points on the body are important energy channels. He does "cervical work," too. "Every part of your body needs to be touched," he says, "including those inside."

Diane Genco is founder of the AZ Center for Change in Phoenix and a licensed professional counselor who specializes in treating sexual abuse and trauma. She says a licensed therapist would "lose their license in a heartbeat" for touching a patient's genitals, and before a patient can begin to deal with the physical aspects of trauma, a lot of mental and behavioral things need to be addressed. "If these non-traditional healers are not qualified or credentialed in understanding post-traumatic stress disorder and all the things that go with that — the ripple effects of trauma — it could be harmful," Genco says. "If they're just dealing with the sexual aspects of [PTSD], they could do more damage than good."

Genco says part of her practice does involve helping clients "re-learn how to be sexual without trauma being triggered," but "I can't even imagine any kind of therapy that involves touching a victim," she says. "It should never involve directly touching a patient in a sexual way. That is exploitation."

A few days after New Times watched Wayne Clayton's prostate massage, he sent an e-mail stressing Phoenix Goddess Temple is not a massage parlor. "We do not do massage in any form," he wrote. "We don't even use the word massage."

But they do. As of this writing, on the temple's website under "General FAQs," they advertise "prostate massage." And the definition of "massage therapy" under Arizona law is pretty broad. It includes things like hydrotherapy, skin wraps, and the application of essential oils.

James Hays helped rewrite the city massage ordinance in 1989. He says avoiding the word "massage" means nothing. "They're using their narrow definition," he says. "You don't make up your own rules as to what massage is or isn't — the state does."

"Massage" may have a broad legal definition, but "prostitution" does not. According to Arizona law (Title 13), "prostitution" is defined as "engaging in or agreeing or offering to engage in sexual conduct under a fee arrangement with any person for money or any other valuable consideration."

New visitors to Phoenix Goddess Temple sign a form before their first session that states, "I acknowledge I will not receive any type of sexual gratification in exchange for money during my session." But that doesn't mean there's no sex.

"Some of our practitioners do operate with sacred union as part of what they offer, but it's never, ever guaranteed," Tracy Elise says. "You don't want to identify the people who sometimes have sex as people who always have sex, because they don't."

Practitioners at the temple do not receive "payments" but accept "donation only." That could give them some defense, Hays says, "But if it's really a donation, then I should be able to go in there and say, 'I don't feel like giving a donation. Give me the services for free,' and then if there's no services — that's not a donation. It's like a forced gratuity."

But Phoenix Goddess Temple is "really just a business modeled as something they're not, so they can get money," Hays says. "It happens all the time."

Last year, tantra practitioner Janae Thorne-Bird of Heartsong Healing Center in Salt Lake City was jailed on prostitution charges. In 2009, three goddess temples in Seattle — all run by Elise's former student, Rainbow Love — were raided on suspicion of being brothels. Love was charged with three counts of promoting prostitution and attempting to promote prostitution. Love claims authorities violated her civil rights; Thorne-Bird claims freedom of religion — a tricky defense, Hays says.

"The intersection between government regulation and religious expression is very complicated," Hays says. "I can't think of a case here where someone claims to offer sexual favors as part of their spiritual expression. It would be an interesting case, but I don't think it would work well for the church. The sex would be ancillary . . . you can do all your religious things without selling sex acts."

But freedom of religion has trumped the law before, Hays says, pointing out some Native Americans are legally protected in their religious use of peyote, an otherwise illegal substance. And in North Phoenix last spring, a federal judge ordered the city not to enforce its noise ordinance code against a church called Cathedral of Christ the King, which was ringing church bells several times a day. The judge ruled penalizing the church was a violation of their right to religious expression.

Hays says there might be some protections for Phoenix Goddess Temple if they claimed to be a private club, and points out many adult businesses — including theaters, cabarets, and escort services — are legal in Phoenix "if they operate in compliance with the law."

But despite the obvious eyebrow-raisers at the temple, Elise says she's doing nothing wrong. "The temple is really a church for us," she says. "We open ourselves with love as an empty channel, and that's the authority by which I heal. I don't get my credentials on the ground level. I get my calling and I am under the jurisdiction of the most high."
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Economic Aspects of "Love"

Postby American Dream » Mon Jun 20, 2011 2:36 pm

http://endofcapitalism.com/about/2-what-is-capitalism/

What is Capitalism?


In simple terms, capitalism is a society ruled by money and those who possess it. The wealthy hold disproportionate power within capitalism and use it to preserve their interests, especially the ability to make more money. But in generating these profits, the system causes various forms of social and ecological trauma. Socially, human potential is absorbed by a relentless cycle of work and consumption, while ecologically, nature is torn from its surroundings and packaged as lifeless products to be sold and eventually discarded as waste. Today, capitalism is the dominant social, political and economic system in the world, affecting every corner of the Earth, every government and peoples.

Commodity Production

We are all familiar with commodities (coffee, clothing, gasoline, computers, etc.) and consume them every day, but we don’t usually think about where they come from. Let’s look behind the logo and investigate the back-story. It is a story that reveals not only the origin of our “stuff,” but also the mystery of the inner workings of the world we live in.

Capitalism is a system entirely built around selling commodities – this is how it makes profits. To produce them requires human labor, and energy and material taken from the natural world. For example, a bottled water might be produced by taking water from a spring in Maine and putting a plastic bottle and label around it. The bottle in turn was produced from oil pumped in Saudi Arabia, chemically altered in Louisiana and given shape in China. The bottle is shipped to a store for you to spend $1 on water (which used to be free). Each of these steps creates pollution and waste, much of which will never biodegrade. Likewise, every step of the process uses human labor, from the factory workers to the oil workers to the truck drivers and the supermarket clerks, but none of them feels any connection to the final product or to you, the consumer. It is probably fair to say they would be doing other things if they didn’t need the money. They work dull jobs because they have to. Of your $1, perhaps 10 cents is divided between them. Some money goes into manufacturing, shipping, packaging, and management costs. The majority likely goes towards advertising and profit. Much of the profit will be reinvested to produce more bottles of water so that the company can attain a greater share of the beverage market.

This is a simplistic example but it shows that the true cost of a commodity is not reflected in its price. Ecological and social damage created by the production process is hidden from the consumer, who sees only the commodity, and perhaps an upbeat advertisement.

Greed is built into the system, not merely a trait of individual businessmen/women. Private companies must constantly compete with one another to achieve greater profit, which generally means producing as many commodities as possible at the lowest cost. This is accomplished by increasing the scale of production. Those that fall behind will go bankrupt and likely be swallowed up by their competitors. This ultimatum to grow or perish drives more and more capital (money and productive capacity) into fewer and fewer hands. A mega-industrial scale is reached, and companies remain competitive by producing not hundreds, but millions, of identical commodities – requiring huge factories, global lines of distribution, and enormous quantities of cheap energy. To feed this system, the ecological trauma therefore expands far beyond a sustainable level.

Humans lose the self-sufficiency they once found in their communities and their connection with nature, when they are pushed into the urban workforce. Here to sustain themselves and their families they must sell their time and energy for a wage. Much of their wages are sunk into necessary costs like housing, food, water, clothing, transportation and health care. Millions cannot afford even this and are swept into poverty, hunger and disease. Others afford the necessities easily and new “needs” must be fabricated in order to capture their remaining wages through consumption of luxuries. (How necessary is the Snuggie, really?) Buying things becomes the way humans express themselves and their social standing, and even if they can survive with less, people work longer and longer hours to afford an ever-increasing array of products and services. Working long hours places stress on the family and helps break down the community, causing widespread mental and psychological distress. Surrounded by strangers but rarely feeling human connection, inevitably loneliness and depression emerge, and sometimes lead to worse emotional disorders. Subject to a tidal wave of advertisements and mass media daily, people struggle to avoid becoming hypnotized by the spectacle of consumerism. Human life therefore becomes commodified as well – rented for a wage then sold back through consumption.

As the system grows, more and more of the world and its peoples become commodified. Continents are conquered for agriculture, forests are felled for lumber, animals are caged as livestock, and whole populations spend their lives behind computer and TV screens, desks and steering wheels. Under capitalism, life becomes property. Nature becomes “natural resources.” Humans become “human resources.” They exist to be profited from.

Image

A System in Crisis

As each individual company expands its production to overcome its competitors, so too must the system as a whole grow in order to survive. Whenever there is a slight downturn of profits, elites rush to counter the danger by boosting consumer spending. Remember President George W. Bush’s message after the September 11th attacks, “Go shopping!” Buying things became the patriotic duty of every American. The reason is that declining profits jeopardize the system as much as any terrorist.

Today, at this late stage of global capitalism, the largest owners of productive capacity are inhuman complexes called corporations, which are structurally and legally bound to be concerned only for their short-term stock values at the expense of everything else. In the words of the poet Wendell Berry, “A corporation is essentially a pile of money with the single purpose of becoming a bigger pile of money.” No individual in the corporation would dare challenge this imperative to grow. Even high-level managers will lose their jobs if they do not faithfully serve the demand of the investors that their stocks go up in value, each and every quarter.

The financial markets largely dictate the fortunes of corporations. As mentioned, it is imperative to each company for its stock value to increase, which happens when it receives more investment. If a corporation has a scandal or receives bad press, investors will sell its stock and the value will go down. At the same time, other investors place bets on whether companies will become more or less valuable in a given time. This gambling is called speculation. Although individual investors sometimes lose money on investments or speculation, they only invest their money in something with the expectation of a higher return. In other words, no investments are made with the expectation that they will lose money. This is why confidence is so important. When markets are bad, investments don’t occur, and companies can’t get capital to expand their production. Bankruptcies ensue, values crash, loans default, factories halt, workers lose their jobs, and the media tries to keep a smiling face while delivering the news.

What this reveals is that capitalism is in perpetual crisis. The system is in a never-ending race against time and every year, every week, profits must be larger, faster and cheaper than before. To survive, capitalism must grow. And grow, and grow, at all costs. Where does it end? The system must grow to such an extent that it quite literally exhausts the energies of humanity and the earth in the frantic scramble for profit.

Image
Viewed from space, industrial capitalism appears like a cancer on the Earth.


The State

Life does not submit itself to trauma voluntarily. Humans have a natural tendency towards freedom which makes it difficult for rulers to direct their behavior into desired outcomes, like wage labor and consumerism. Therefore an important strategy of the powerful is to demand more control once the population is already shocked into inactivity by other crises. Naomi Klein defines this strategy The Shock Doctrine, and exposes how capitalist elites have taken advantage of natural disasters, terrorist attacks and other calamities to push through unpopular and exploitative policies, usually backed up by brute force. This strategy has been around at least since capitalism was first initiated in 15th – 17th Century Europe in the wake of the public spectacle of several hundred thousand women and community leaders being burned at the stake as “witches.” The mass violence of the witch burnings helped facilitate land enclosures, which pushed disillusioned and terrified peasants from their lands and left them with no options but to sell their labor for a wage in the cities.

It is imperative for those in power to maintain a monopoly on the use of violence within their territory. This role is filled by the creation of the State, usually known as the government. In our time, the State is an extraordinarily large and complex bureaucratic machine, as opposed to the earliest manifestations of a privileged warrior class. Its goals however are largely unchanged since its invention: to manage and control the population, with force if necessary; to determine how resources and wealth are distributed; and to compete with other states for dominance over foreign resources and markets. An important example illustrating the interconnection of capitalism and State is the growing prison-industrial complex in the US. Now confining over 2 million Americans, the prison industry has become big business as large companies now own and operate many federal and state penitentiaries. These corporations use their profits to lobby for harsher sentencing and drug laws to increase the number of prisoners, so constructing more prisons is needed. Today four times as many Americans are behind bars as in 1984, but many critics, most recently Senator Jim Webb of Virginia, have warned that this prison strategy has not reduced crime. According to Sen. Webb, “We are wasting billions of dollars and diminishing millions of lives.”

Governments and the wealthy have an easier time controlling affairs when the population is divided along real or imaginary differences. For example, in the U.S., racism (or white supremacy) benefits workers with light skin by giving them privileges like higher wages, better education and housing, lower chance of arrest and imprisonment, and also more subtle advantages like thinking of themselves as “attractive.” This comes at the expense of the oppression of people of color – so to keep these privileges whites are made to feel antagonism towards their fellow workers. Racism, which is institutional and not merely a matter of individual prejudices, continues to make it more difficult to unite the public against common dangers, such as reckless wars or rising poverty.

Image

Gender, heterosexuality as “the norm”, citizenship, class and others systems of oppression are similarly constructed to pit segments of the population against one another. The only way to achieve the freedom of all is to dismantle these oppressive systems and unite in common cause. It is also important to recognize that racial and ethnic minorities, women, transgender folks, queer folks, immigrants, workers and the poor each deserve justice and empowerment for their own sake, not only because overturning capitalism requires it.

Imperialism

Capitalism has been the dominant social system in the world for roughly the last 500 years. An early “mercantile” version was spread by the European conquistadors to much of the world. Then the more developed industrial capitalism we are familiar with crystallized in the United States following the genocide of the native indigenous people and enslavement of millions of Africans.

Theoretically founded on the principles of freedom, justice and democracy, the US has yet to fulfill that radical promise. Today the US government stands over the world like a behemoth, imposing economic policies and institutions like the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and World Bank, which facilitate the exploitation of natural resources and cheap labor markets around the world. This US dominance is backed up by military might in the form of over 700 US military bases on foreign soil, while the US spends more money on the military than every other nation in the world – combined.

Together with cultural/language dominance, this global supremacy makes up what many have rightly called an Empire – one that has a much longer history than the aggression against Iraq and Afghanistan. In fact the US has been intervening militarily in hundreds of nations since its founding, including invading and annexing almost half the country of Mexico in 1846, and since then overthrowing dozens of countries’ governments. A relevant example now is the CIA’s involvement in the toppling of Iran’s democratically-elected Prime Minister Mossadegh in 1953, which led to the country’s oil wealth being sold to US corporations at the hands of the pro-US Shah dictatorship.

Although US imperialism appears strongest today, its dominance is in fact teetering alongside the global capitalism that it protects. The hope of the entire world is that the decline of US imperialism will be as swift and peaceful as possible so that people in poorer parts of the world can reclaim their self-determination. In the words of Vandana Shiva, “At this point it so happens America is the empire. But one thing we learned with the British Empire is that empires rise and empires sink.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Economic Aspects of "Love"

Postby American Dream » Mon Jun 20, 2011 4:05 pm

As far as the article on the Phoenix Goddess Temple goes, I should add that I certainly favor the rights of sex workers- and healers- to work safely and in good working conditions. I do think there are legitimate concerns about whether these people are qualified to treat folks with serious problems though.

That said, I'm not impressed by the Phoenix New Times trying oh-so-hard to get them busted (just so they can make even more money?). That seems kinda sleazy to me.

However, a really important perspective through which the Goddess Temple can be understood was expressed in the most recent post:

Humans lose the self-sufficiency they once found in their communities and their connection with nature, when they are pushed into the urban workforce. Here to sustain themselves and their families they must sell their time and energy for a wage. Much of their wages are sunk into necessary costs like housing, food, water, clothing, transportation and health care. Millions cannot afford even this and are swept into poverty, hunger and disease. Others afford the necessities easily and new “needs” must be fabricated in order to capture their remaining wages through consumption of luxuries. (How necessary is the Snuggie, really?) Buying things becomes the way humans express themselves and their social standing, and even if they can survive with less, people work longer and longer hours to afford an ever-increasing array of products and services. Working long hours places stress on the family and helps break down the community, causing widespread mental and psychological distress. Surrounded by strangers but rarely feeling human connection, inevitably loneliness and depression emerge, and sometimes lead to worse emotional disorders. Subject to a tidal wave of advertisements and mass media daily, people struggle to avoid becoming hypnotized by the spectacle of consumerism. Human life therefore becomes commodified as well – rented for a wage then sold back through consumption.

American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Economic Aspects of "Love"

Postby American Dream » Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:53 am

American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Economic Aspects of "Love"

Postby American Dream » Tue Jun 21, 2011 9:24 am

Image

Image

Image
"If you don't stand for something, you will fall for anything."
-Malcolm X
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Economic Aspects of "Love"

Postby crikkett » Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:18 am



The Phoenix sex temple story got 'Rock Island', the opening cut from 'Music Man', stuck in my head. Now I have to go play the whole album or I'll be mumbling to myself all day.

Cash for the merchandise
Cash for the buttonhooks
Cash for the cotton goods
Cash for the hard goods
Cash for the fancy goods
Cash for the soft goods
Cash for the noggins
And the pickins
And the frickins
Cash for the hogshead cask
And demijohn
Cash for the crackers
And the pickles
And the flypaper
Look, whaddaya talk
Whaddaya talk, whaddaya talk
Whaddaya talk, whaddaya talk
Where do you get it?
Whaddaya talk?
You can talk, you can talk
You can bicker, you can talk
You can bicker, bicker, bicker
You can talk, you can talk
You can talk, talk, talk, talk,
Bicker, bicker, bicker
You can talk all you want
But it's different then it was
No it ain't, no it ain't
But you gotta know the territory
Shh shh shh shh shh shh shh
Why it's the Model T Ford
Made the trouble
Made the people wanna go
Wanna get, wanna get
Wanna get up and go
Seven, eight, nine, ten, twelve,
Fourteen, twenty-two,
Twenty-three miles
To the county seat
Yes sir, yes sir
Who's gonna patronize
A little bitty two by four
Kinda store anymore?
Whaddaya talk, whaddaya talk,
Where do you get it?
Gone, gone, gone
With the hogshead cask
And demijohn
Gone with the sugar barrel
Pickle barrel, milk pan
Gone with the tub
And the pail and the tears
Ever meet a fellow
By the name of Hill?
Hill?
Hill?
Hill?
Hill?
Hill?
Hill?
Hill?
Hill!
NO!
Just a minute
Just a minute
Just a minute
Never heard of any salesman Hill
Now he doesn't know the territory
Doesn't know the territory?!?
What's the fellow's line?
Never worries 'bout his line
Never worries 'bout his line?!?
Or a doggone thing
He's just a bang beat, bell ringing,
Big hole, great go, neck-or-nothing
Rip roarin', every time a bull's eye
Salesman.
That's Professor Harold Hill
Harold Hill
What's the fellow's line?
What's his line?
He's a fake
And he doesn't know the territory!
Look, whaddaya talk, whaddaya talk,
Whaddaya talk, Whaddaya talk?
He's a music man
He's a what?
He's a what?
He's a music man
And he sells clarinets
To the kids in the town
With the big trombones
And the rat-a-tat drums
Big brass bass
Big brass bass
And the piccolo, the piccolo
With uniforms, too
With a shiny gold braid
On the coat
And a big red stripe runnin'
Well, I don't know much
About bands
But I do know
You can't make a living
Selling big trombones, no sir.
Mandolin picks, perhaps
And here and there a Jew's harp
No, the fellow sells bands
Boys' bands.
I don't know how he does it
But he lives like a king
And he dallies
And he gathers
And he plucks
And he shines
And when the man dances
Certainly, boys
What else?
The piper pays him!
Yes sir, yes sir
Yes sir, yes sir
When the man dances
Certainly, boys
What else?
The piper pays him!
Yessssir, Yessssir
But he doesn't know the territory
crikkett
 
Posts: 2206
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:03 pm
Blog: View Blog (5)

Re: Economic Aspects of "Love"

Postby American Dream » Tue Jun 21, 2011 12:06 pm

http://boingboing.net/2004/02/15/james- ... scend.html

James Joyce's descendants are copyright jerks
POSTED BY CORY DOCTOROW, FEBRUARY 15, 2004


James Joyce's terrible descendants have decided to use the newly extended Euro copyright to bully anyone who publicly reads his work, in Ireland, on Bloomsday, into silence.

Christ, this makes me angry enough to spit. Note to my literary executor: if you ever dream of doing anything like this after I die, I'll come back from the dead and reach out of the toilet and unspool your guts while dragging you down to hell. Sheesh.
...[T]he Joyce estate has informed the Irish government that it intends to sue for copyright infringement if there are any public readings of Joyce's works during the festival commemorating the 100th anniversary of Bloomsday this June.

James Joyce died in 1941 and the copyright in his work expired in 1991. Then the EU extended terms to life+70 years, and the work went back into copyright in July 1995. The estate has been very active in enforcing their copyright, suing regularly.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Economic Aspects of "Love"

Postby norton ash » Tue Jun 21, 2011 12:16 pm

^^
Ireland is the old sow that eats her farrow.
- James Joyce
Zen horse
User avatar
norton ash
 
Posts: 4067
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 5:46 pm
Location: Canada
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Economic Aspects of "Love"

Postby American Dream » Tue Jun 21, 2011 12:18 pm

American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Economic Aspects of "Love"

Postby American Dream » Tue Jun 21, 2011 12:44 pm

http://libcom.org/library/anarchism-and-sex

Anarchism and sex

The Anarchist Federation outline anarchist views and debates on sex and sexuality.


Image


Anarchist views on sex can range from the idea that ‘anything goes’ between consenting adults, to the more traditional approaches of what constitutes free love between individuals. One thing these diverse opinions do have in common, however, is the idea of sexual freedom and the opposition to sexual exploitation. Nevertheless, being pro sexual freedom and anti sexual exploitation is open to wide interpretation and can encompass diverse, and sometimes conflicting, analyses from one anarchist to the next.

Within certain historic anarchist traditions (as well as within the left), there has often been a significant strand of ‘puritanism’ towards sex and any activities deemed generally frivolous.

We all know the story about Emma Goldman dancing all night with the blokes at an anarchist social event, then being chastised for behaviour not befitting a revolutionary (we know about her subsequent outrage too). We also know that some sections of the anarchist movement in the Spanish revolution have been accused of similar puritanism, and the idea that anarchist and communist revolutionaries should somehow live their lives like ascetic monks or nuns still, in some quarters, continues to this day.

The novels of 19th century anarchist writers like Octave Mirbeau were classed as pornography by the literary establishment of the time. The Diary of a Chambermaid portrayed the sexual habits of the bourgeoisie in such a way that Jean Grave commented, “What filth and decay there is under the pretty surface of our society”. To be fair, Mirbeau’s proletarian anti-heroine, Celestine, was certainly no sexual saint either, but the emphasis on the so called sexual ‘perversity’ and ‘depravity’ of the rich at play clearly implies the notion that sexual waywardness is in some way bourgeois. This is really not that dissimilar from the old Militant Tendency (now the Socialist Party) telling us a few years back that homosexuality was nothing but a bourgeois disease.

Victorian values

Added to this, is the enduring effect of certain elements within the women’s liberation movement, which led many feminists and their male supporters to adopt ‘puritanical’ attitudes towards sex and sexuality, and to embrace censorship against pornography and all kinds of erotica.

Without doubt, many positive things came out of feminism and the women’s movement in general, yet a major downside was the growth in the belief that men in general are inherently exploitative towards women (admittedly based on the very real fact that many men do actually behave in this way for much or at least some of the time), whereas women were always seen as victims of male domination and oppression. For some feminists there followed from this view a giant leap of faith, in which it was alleged that all men were either actual or at least potential sexual abusers of women, while women, on the other hand, were seen as fundamentally saintly and almost asexual beings open to corruption by men; and those women who, by doing things like actively going out, picking up and fucking blokes (or even entering into relationships with ‘the enemy’), were in fact merely living as the dupes of men and their patriarchal system. Subsequently, this ‘asexual exploitee’ view of women holds much in common with the bog standard religious ‘woman as Madonna or whore’ mythology and contains more than a hint of good old ‘Victorian values’. Sadly, even the occasional anarchist still clings to some of this patronising moral baggage.

Under capitalism, everything and everyone is a commodity, we all have our market price. And whether by selling our labour power as workers, or by buying things necessary (and some things not so necessary) as consumers, we all exist as part and parcel of the commodity system, of world capitalism.

Sex then, is no different and is something that is not only marketable but aggressively marketed under capitalism (as we all know, sex sells). However, when sex is bought and sold – whether via pornography, prostitution, etc. – the left, pro-censorship feminists and some anarchists have a tendency to see this trade as somehow worse than many other forms of capitalist exploitation.

Lapping it up

As an example, a lap-dancing club recently opened up in Nottingham and a campaign was promptly organised to shut it down. Now, I don’t know whether anarchists were actually involved in this campaign, but I do know that some anarchists see such a campaign as a worthy cause.

I understand the arguments of the pro-censorship feminists. However, the view that pornography (and in this case lap-dancing) in some way incites men to commit violence or rape against women is very dubious. Also, the simplistic overview of pornography and the sex industry in general – which is seen as a place where the women involved are super-exploited victims – seems to me to be one built on a form of conservatism or liberalism, crypto-religious moralism, with a large helping of sensationalistic media mythology thrown in for good measure. But only a smattering of this view is based on the actual reality of sex work or the sex industry, which, in truth, is extremely broad and multifaceted. Yes, sections of it are horrendously exploitative, sometimes tantamount to real (non-wage) slavery, and being little more than a means for commercial interests big and small, legitimate and illegal, to coin it in.

But I’d say that (certainly in this country) many sections of the sex industry are no more, no less exploitative than any other capitalist concern and other sections still are about as unexploitative as you can get under capitalism.

So to generalise about the sex industry too much leads to a very limited and naive understanding of it and says nothing about actual conditions there.

Now I tend to think of lap-dancing clubs as, well... crap. But in the socio-economic scheme of things, within capitalism, I’d put them in the above ‘no more, no less’ category of the system’s exploitative industries. In lap-dancing clubs, there are usually strict safety rules of ‘no physical contact’ between dancers and spectators and if you don’t mind being gawped at by some bloke or blokes, then the money isn’t that bad and pays a lot better than most other working class jobs. It’s also the kind of job where you can come and go as you please and the hours can often be quite flexible. True, employers usually discriminate by only employing women deemed stereotypically ‘attractive’ or ‘sexy’ and by having an upper age limit – on the basis of that being what brings in the paying punters.

So as anarchist communists, our attitude to a lap-dancing club should be pretty much on a similar basis to our attitude to a cinema or a foundry or a supermarket – in other words, it’s about business as usual. But, of course, it isn’t that simple, is it? Why do people get so up in arms about these clubs that they want to campaign to shut them down more than they do the local rag trade sweat shop that pays ‘illegal’ workers a quid fifty an hour for a 12 hour day? Is it because in the former a woman has the audacity to dance naked or semi-naked for a few hours for a half-decent wage? Or is it because the campaigners don’t want to have (admittedly not very) naughty goings on behind closed doors in their neighbourhood?

And why are people much less inclined to bother about campaigning against the local rag trade sweat shop? Is it because it’s ‘just a bunch of foreigners’ working there and they actually don’t give a shit about refugees working long hours, in awful conditions with little or no health and safety regulation, and getting paid piss poor money? Is it because working in the rag trade is at least ‘honest toil’ where no one has to get their kit off? Or are people just OK about having those kinds of seedy things going on behind closed doors in their neighbourhood?

Now when talking about what I call this middle bracket of ‘no more no less’ exploitative sections of the sex industry (e.g. lap-dancing clubs), I get the sneaking suspicion that what it all comes down to is morality. What’s really at issue here is that people use their bodies in a sexual manner for money. “And only a really, really exploited person would do that, wouldn’t they? Or someone psychologically damaged… sexually abused as a child… a helpless dupe… someone on the side of the enemy… Well, how can any self-respecting woman allow herself to be objectified in such a way?”

Well I’m sorry to say this, but it’s as if some of us haven’t really moved on from Queen Victoria’s day and sex is still the big taboo it always was. Sex for sale, sex as a commodity, sex in public, sex in print and on film, offbeat, bizarre, kinky, fetishistic, wayward sex, missionary style sex, in fact any kind of sex at all in a public arena is the issue.

People who choose to attack the local lap-dancing club but not their local petrol station do so because of personal morality/moralism about sex. Sex makes it a moral issue because if we were just talking about a simple economic relationship, then it really is as humdrum as the next industry. But we’re not, are we? So, when certain anarchists single out the lap-dancing club or the adult bookshop, they’re not basing their actions on a class analysis, but on what they think is morally good or bad for the rest of us (which actually brings into question their interpretation of anarchism). This elevation of their opposition to the sex industry is a personal moral choice, but it’s got absolutely nothing to do with either a revolutionary class analysis or with anarchism itself.

Revolutionary skin flicks

Another disturbing thing about procensorship ideology is its (possibly wilful) ignorance of sexual openness as a liberating even revolutionary force. It’s no coincidence that during many revolutionary episodes, pornography and erotica have played a significant role in popular revolutionary culture. Sexual images created for pleasure have of course been around for millennia but usually they were only accessible to the well-off, the educated, and the high clergy. But during the French revolution, greater free sexual expression and the distribution of pornography really came to the fore. In other words, it became freely available to us plebs as well. I remember reading about the early days of the Portuguese revolution of 1974, when the fascist dictatorship had just fallen and all the forbidden literature was suddenly becoming freely available, so one could find works by Bakunin, Kropotkin, Marx and Lenin sitting alongside an assortment of porno mags!

And historically, it’s also no coincidence, that when the reaction begins to reassert itself, both Bakunin and the sex magazines are the first to go under the proverbial counter. Neither is it a coincidence, that pornography and so called ‘illicit sex’ is illegal and severely punished under some of the most repressive (and incidentally anti-women) regimes in the world.

That’s not to say pornography is a wonderful liberating thing in itself. It isn’t. The vast majority of pornography (particularly the soft-core variety produced by the big corporate media empires) is absolutely dreadful, reflecting very sexist capitalistic values and only seems geared to appeal to the dreariest most sexually repressed conformist male. Hence, if pornography were the food of love, this would be a Big Mac.

It’s interesting to note that such soft-core trash is quite freely available in any newsagent or high street WH Smiths; it is actively promoted by mainstream media and distribution networks and is seen by the establishment as acceptable and pandered to by some of the most conservative of institutions. On the other hand, hard-core pornography is seen as dangerous, subversive and is usually a police matter to be dealt with under the Obscene Publications Act. While some of the material classed as hard-core can be decidedly dodgy, and even dangerous, it’s also no surprise that some of the more interesting, non-mainstream, least stereotypical and sexually diverse erotic material finds itself put neatly under this heading.

Anarcho-sex with bread and butter!

Having said all this, pornography (good and bad) is of course just more spectacle; something to be used by the passive (usually) observer. Sex and sexuality, however, are not passive, but things we do, things we actively participate in. Which leads me to the question, can there be such a thing as an anarchist view of sex or even an anarchist sexuality?

The fact that certain readers may profoundly disagree with some of the points raised in this article means it’s very tempting to answer no.

Also some comrades may argue that it’s all just a diversion from the real struggles against capitalism and the bread and butter class issues.

Yet I don’t think that an anarchist view of sex and sexuality is in any way a diversion.

Moreover, I believe it’s not that far away from the so called ‘bread and butter’ class issues as some comrades might think.

Food, drink, a roof over our heads and sex are all basic human needs. OK, the lack of sex doesn’t generally kill you (as is the case with starvation), but being sex-starved can seriously fuck you up mentally. Having said this, many adults do participate in fairly regular sexual activity and of course sometimes it’s all very good, while at other times it’s not at all enjoyable. Added to this, the fact that more open and diverse sexualities are vigorously repressed not only by the family, church, state, the education system, peer group pressure, the mass media and of course capitalism in general, but also by some of those who adhere to apparently more progressive ideologies; rebels, radicals, leftists, anarchists and communists.

Consequently, although not exactly starving, I’d guess that much of the world’s adult population is at least sexually malnourished or undernourished (which can lead to problems such as lack of self confidence, depression and other mental illnesses, alcoholism, drug addiction, suicide). So I’d say this situation is something definitely worth addressing by revolutionaries.

Deviancy

There’s also the problematic view which I mentioned earlier, that any sexual waywardness (usually labelled ‘deviance’, ‘depravity’ or ‘perversion’) is in some way a product of capitalism, a bourgeois trait. If this is the case, will sex in an anarchist society only be the kind which is firmly rooted in anarcho-communist social reality? Or more bluntly, does this mean that any possible future anarchist communist society would be relatively ‘kink free’? I, for one, sincerely hope not. A sexual future like that, sort of reminds me of the childhood view of the Christian ‘Heaven’, where you have to sit on a cloud all day playing a harp. And, quite rightly, Hell always seemed much more appealing to me. Hmmm... unless you’re into sexual fantasies based on the socially just and egalitarian cummings and goings between the workers’ assembly member and the mandated local delegate... or maybe a little ‘mass action’ would appeal?

Sex, of course, can often reflect social realities, but it doesn’t have to and can be totally unrelated to anything we know or have experienced. Anyway, let’s face it, sex doesn’t always work too well on the rational and philosophical level (except in articles such as this). And people do all sorts of inexplicable, weird and wacky things when they’re in their purely sexual mode. This may involve things like playing out sexual power exchange fantasies, fetishism, transgendered activities, etc. Often, the reasons we like doing the things that we do cannot actually be explained, nor would we necessarily want to explain them either (just in case it makes something we find really exciting, suddenly seem mundane). Nor does that mean it’s unhealthy sexual tastes or activities we are indulging in (or want to indulge in).

Unfortunately, psychiatry has traditionally offered medication and the asylum for any wayward and ‘bizarre’ sexual tendencies in people (particularly in working class people), and bourgeois society at large and its media likes to label such divergent people as ‘perverts’.

It’s important that we never fall into this line of thinking. If revolutionary anarchists were ever to start denouncing anyone with a ‘nonmainstream’ sexual orientation or preference, it would be a total disaster not only for anarchism as a philosophy, but also for our class and for future humanity. For me, the revolutionary anarchist attitude to sex and sexuality has to encompass the belief that sexual activities and relations should be safe, free, diverse and consensual; acknowledging that people are queer, bi or hetero, ranging from the monogamous to the polyamourous, from the disinterested asexual to the rampant polysexual, and from the softest vanilla to the hardest edge playing SM-er. At the end of the day, if it’s a safe and mutually consensual activity (however weird it may seem) and all parties involved enjoy themselves, then what’s the big deal?

Hopefully anarchism is about sexual freedom, openness, honesty and equality. And when I say this, I’m not talking about everyone devising rota systems to see whose turn it is to go on top. The honesty is when people are truly and non-judgementally in a position to sexually express themselves without fear of being labelled a pervert, a deviant or a poof.

And when people are really being sexually honest, some weird shit can start to happen. And that, in its own way, can be quite revolutionary.



This article originally appeared in Organise #59
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Economic Aspects of "Love"

Postby American Dream » Tue Jun 21, 2011 2:36 pm


American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Economic Aspects of "Love"

Postby American Dream » Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:46 pm

http://blogotariat.com/node/218236

Of dogs and alienation
en Passant - June 12, 2011


The domestication of canines began before the development of class society. In a world of scarcity the relationship could only survive if both parties did, literally, survive and both parties contributed to that survival.

Dogs were the acute eyes, ears and nose of homo sapiens groups 15,000 years ago for hunting and protection. In some cases they were beasts of transport, and were often early warning guards. In return they received food and warmth with man and woman as leader of the pack. There was a two way relationship of companionship.

The rise of class society on the back of beasts of burden like cattle saw the nature of this canine-human relationship expand to the new ruling elites. Some dogs even became gods.

For the ruling class, dogs could be a status symbol, a sign of wealth and control. The ability to feed and house them and keep their dogs reasonably well was a sign of someone who had access to a share of the social surplus, of someone who lived off the labour of others.

The rise of capitalism and with it the nuclear family changed again the relationship between humans and dogs. Capitalism created pets as pets.

At first the poverty of the working class meant that most dogs were the plaything of the ruling class. The working class had pets, if they did, for local security or as part of their work or as some form of companionship in a cruel world.

The long post war boom made it easier for workers to pay for the upkeep of pets like dogs and cats. The pet ownership industry exploded and pets became commodities.

But there was another aspect to this. Some comrades describe pets as an example of our profound alienation under capitalism. In The Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844, Marx described alienation in these terms:

The fact that labour is external to the worker, does not belong to her essential being; that she therefore does not confirm herself in her work, but denies herself, feels miserable and not happy, does not develop free mental and physical energy, but mortifies her flesh and ruins her mind. Hence the worker feels herself only when she is not working; when she is working she does not feel herself. She is at home when she is not working, and not at home when she is working. Her labour is therefore not voluntary but forced, it is forced labour. It is therefore not the satisfaction of a need, but a mere means to satisfy need outside itself. Its alien character is clearly demonstrated by the fact that as soon as no physical or other compulsion exists it is shunned like the plague.

This alienation finds many outlets. Religion for example is an attempt to explain a world turned upside down. The family is a haven in a heartless world, although that world manipulates and distorts all relationships. Thus the nuclear family is not only a refuge but also a prison.

Within that prison other humans provide some escape from the brutal alienation of the world around them, but are of course also shaped by that brutal alienation.

Pets are and can be another avenue of escape from an alienated world. But again they form part of the prison from which we are trying to escape.

The love of a dog is real enough. It brings joy to both owner and dog in a joyless world; love in a loveless society. It doesn’t challenge that heartless world; it at best provides an avenue for ameliorating it outside the seeming boundaries of its brutality – the workplace and the production of profit.

But there are questions of dominance too that could be explored in this context. Unable to be free, we free ourselves through others. Dominance over dogs seemingly empowers us. It is an empowerment of sorts, much like the use of illegal drugs or legal ones like alcohol.

Does this mean that pets will be liberated with us? No. Animals cannot liberate themselves. Only humans can do that.

However democratic working class revolution offers us the opportunity to change all societal relationships, including that of humans and pets and in doing that liberate us and them.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Economic Aspects of "Love"

Postby American Dream » Tue Jun 21, 2011 5:04 pm

Hi, Bye (1:44)

Creator: Social Security
From the Album: Free Speech for Sale
"If you don't stand for something, you will fall for anything."
-Malcolm X
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Economic Aspects of "Love"

Postby American Dream » Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:19 pm

Puppy Mill Awareness Meetup: Don't Look for Love at the Pet Store
by Stephanie Feldstein · February 14, 2011


Image


This evening, while other people are inside warm restaurants having candlelit dinners, a group of dedicated activists from Puppy Mill Awareness Meetup have a date outside of the Paws N Claws pet store in Eastpointe, Mich., where they'll encourage potential puppy buyers to have a heart and say no to puppy-selling pet stores.

Valentine's Day is a busy holiday for puppy peddlers. But there are better ways to say "I love you" than supporting an industry that deals in animal cruelty and treats dogs as nothing more than commodities.

Pet stores tend to stock their cages from commercial breeders, a.k.a. puppy mills, who keep dogs in deplorable conditions and breed them over and over again without regard for the moms' or the puppies' health and well-being. They churn out as many dogs as they can — without wasting expenses on providing decent care — just so they can make a profit.

As a result, many of those puppies with the cute red bows on their collars will develop health or behavior problems due to inbreeding, overbreeding, and early neglect.


Continues at: http://news.change.org/stories/puppy-mi ... -pet-store
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to Data & Research Compilations

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests