
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
compared2what? wrote:I think you might enjoy the [url=http://www.loc.gov/rr/rarebook/rosenwald.html]Lessing J.
Rosenwald Collection[/url] over at the Library of Congress, OP ED.
In fact, they have quite a bit of interesting material all over that site.
annie aronburg wrote:I'm saving this one for later.
Perelandra wrote:Indeed.OP ED wrote:I don't put much stock in the opinions of robots personally.
(you get what you pay for)
I haven't forgotten, but have been busy with assorted things. Hopefully, I'll have some time to spend on it this week.
zhivkov wrote:Thanks for the new stuff OE! Interesting information. The background to the Fantasia music was interesting-sometimes I feel positively uncultured around this place! Still can't thank you enough for W.Blake-got his biography at the library the other day haven't read much yet-very interesting so far though. Funny how Star Wars has been in the backgound of the American psyche for so long. That was a movie I watched 8 times at the theater when it came out (77 I think?-I was young)-it led me to become interested in science fiction. I remember having the John Williams score on vinyl. Tony Blair's voice always reminded me of the Star Wars character C-3PO and there is a
picture of Vlad Putin taken with our so very cultured prez himself- in which Putin reminds me of Yoda! If I weren't going to be so busy today I would finally try to learn how to do images and download it. Best to all of you!
zhivkov wrote:Interesting times indeed! First image Dee and Kelley? Thanks for the Crowley! I guess I am off to argue with Hugh or probably should just go to bed. Before I do that I am going to try to find some Blake that might fit into my father's bday card. The poor man turns 70 today and has had to put up with me all his life. Thanks again for keeping this going-forgot to mention that I love the astronomical images also. The Egyptian images are fantastic too. Did you draw the last image?
OP ED wrote:and that, my friends, is why it is bad strategy to mix stimulants and depressants.
OP ED wrote:Paul Laffoley.
that's what it reminded me of.
zhivkov wrote:The esoteric question I was going to ask-don't really know if it is esoteric or paranormal is: The older I get the more I am convinced of the existence of beings (non-physical) that feed off of human emotions whether they be good or bad. I don't know why I sense this-I think I have always felt it on an intuitive level. Do any of you feel this or do you think it is nonsense?
I have a bit of time tonight as bf is working and just typed out a long preface about some writing I have done and was going to post it. The paragraph was from the chapter that involves Diegos (bf) name changed to protect the innocent-place in my life. Several things have reminded me of our on and off romance (the least of which has been being around him so much) and also the Tiger poem will introduce his character in the book. I got to thinking though-does this really fit here at all? and also this paragraph or two was rather saucy-not pornographic really but it involved a conversation between me and a friend about him after we first met. Maybe if i have time i will try to do an image again instead, but I definitely wanted to post the question. Beautiful and thought provoking words and images here! I hope these words find you all well and happy whenever you see them-may be back in a bit with an image or something depending on how late bf is working.
OP ED wrote:Yes. The most common term for them as a general subcategory of phenomena is "inorganic beings" (or "intelligences" but I personal think this is a further subset) although who and/or what they are is certainly open to interpretation. From my own experience, I'd venture that there are almost always more sides than is readily obvious, and that if one sort of semi-coherent (life "imitating") phenomenon can be experienced/accessed/measured/whatever that it implies the equivalent existence of an "etheric eco-system" for lack of better terminologies. Which is to say that not only may the Extradimesional jellyfish be our eternal overlords, but they themselves may not neccessarily be the final authority. (just don't tell 8bit I said that)
They (at least some of them) appear on this level of interaction to be dependant in some regard on humans for their existence, and on some level may be entirely egregoric and/or emergent side effects of human consciousness. which reminds me.
Love is Law,
SHCR
Return to Data & Research Compilations
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests