rigorousintuition.ca • View topic - Is discussing an article's source threadjacking?

Board index Locked Forums FIRE PIT

Is discussing an article's source threadjacking?

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

3 posts • Page 1 of 1

Is discussing an article's source threadjacking?

1) Sources are irrelevant to a story and should be ignored.: 0; No votes

2) Sources tell lots about a story and should be discussed.: 1; 50%

3) Sources are not the whole story but important enough to discuss.: 1; 50%

4) Sources are not the whole story and should be ignored.: 0; No votes

: Total votes : 2

Is discussing an article's source threadjacking?

by Hugh Manatee Wins » Mon Jun 02, 2008 1:58 pm

Is discussing an article's source threadjacking?

Hugh Manatee Wins: Posts: 9869; Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm; Location: in context; Blog: View Blog (0)

by barracuda » Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:03 pm

Somewhat pedantic.

The most dangerous traps are the ones you set for yourself. - Phillip Marlowe

barracuda: Posts: 12890; Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm; Location: Niles, California; Blog: View Blog (0)

by Occult Means Hidden » Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:03 pm

Discussing sources are the story. You're right. But - I feel Jeff would probably want this closed for now. Can we keep the discussion in the original thread?

Rage against the ever vicious downward spiral.
Time to get back to basics. [url=http://zmag.org/zmi/readlabor.htm]Worker Control of Industry![/url]

Occult Means Hidden: Posts: 1403; Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 1:34 am; Blog: View Blog (0)

3 posts • Page 1 of 1

Return to FIRE PIT

Jump to:

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest