Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
AlicetheCurious wrote:Oh boy. This is a very informative thread. I've learned that Nancy Pelosi is a whore, and that she is a whore because of her clothes. Wowza.
And to think that I just complimented this forum for the "intelligence" of its posters...
*choice.*yathrib wrote:I had this dream that there was a thread on this board where the posters were savaging Nancy Pelosi for the way she dresses, and discussing whether or not it was whorelike, just like any common bunch of Limbaugh troglodytes. Thank god it was only a dream!
posting tulpa wrote:and yes, nomo, NY is full of hookers from what I hear. Just because a woman doesn't do it for a living doesn't mean she's not a whore, if her objective of wealth is obtained through means of sex.
MASONIC PLOT wrote:Alan, that fresh air smells so good...keep bringin it my friend.
nomo wrote:posting tulpa wrote:and yes, nomo, NY is full of hookers from what I hear. Just because a woman doesn't do it for a living doesn't mean she's not a whore, if her objective of wealth is obtained through means of sex.
Well, thanks for outing yourself as the sexist pig that you are. Saves me the trouble. You realize, of course, that in a line reasoning similar to yours, whatever else you might have had to say is now clouded by the way you "dressed" this argument?
posting tulpa wrote:I=sexist pig and you=dipshit....now there! We're all happy!
nomo wrote:posting tulpa wrote:I=sexist pig and you=dipshit....now there! We're all happy!
With the difference being that your very own words illustrate your male chauvinism, whereas my dipshittiness is based on my disbelief of preposterous 9/11 collapse alternatives. Gotcha.
Hey, nomo. What would it take for you to affirm controlled demolition of the WTC?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest