I do too.
...
Honestly, I'd say that the emotional toll of being picked on by only one person can be just as bad.*** But maybe that's just me. And anyway, it's immaterial.
Because nobody was picking on or ganging up on Canadian_watcher on that thread. I mean, she and I fight all the time. And (at least as far as the topic goes), for most of the thread, even I was on her side and/or had her back more than the other way around.
So I'm not trying to be obstructive or mean. I want her to come back. But the truth is that this:
MIB, Brekin?
Where are you big swinging dicks now? Let's have your answer to my question.
LET's HAVE IT.
...is not exactly the portrait of somebody who's
being assaulted. ****
The reason she had to post asking AD, MiB, and brekin if they believed she was an anti-Semite or not was:that nobody had called her one.
And the reason she addressed the question to those posters was that they were the only three people on the board who had made ANY sustained or serious objections to Icke, atlhough -- as it happens --
MiB wasn't arguing that he was anti-Semite; brekin was only arguing it incidentally; and AD wasn't arguing it exclusively. Or even primarily.
I'd say that the reason it became such a disproportionate focus of attention was that as far as this board is informally concerned, there's no difference between suggesting that "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" and Holocaust revisionism/denial are anti-Semitic and being a fucking latter-day member of the Irgun.But if anybody who disagrees can show me that I'm wrong, I'd actually be grateful not resentful. FWIW.
______________
***ON EDIT: Um....It belatedly occurs to me that there's a whole thread about exactly that down in the Posting Guidelines subforum, actually. Full disclosure.
****(Messed up the formatting on her quote, sorry. It was similar to that, but not precisely that.)