Page 1 of 2

apologydue

PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 10:05 pm
by Jeff
What's your vigilant-dar saying?

Re: apologydue

PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 10:41 pm
by barracuda
I've had a slight pain in my eyetooth since his first post. Could be the weather, I suppose. But I continue to read his work diligently.

Have you a bite? Or just a nibble? Sometimes a maybe is a lot around here.

Re: apologydue

PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 10:50 pm
by barracuda
I think it was the style of this post:

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=27470&p=325184#p325184

that made my ears prick up a bit with regard to the big V. But not enough to really make the call.

Re: apologydue

PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 10:54 pm
by Jeff
His oddly-constructed ineffectual sparring with Jack tripped a wire for me.

I checked the IP of this post:

viewtopic.php?p=332702#p332702

It's a bastard proxy, through anonymizer2.blutmagie.de, so there's uncertainty here, but the IP has also been used by

Howling Rainbows [ 24 Posts ]
vigilant [ 3 Posts ]
eyepen [ 3 Posts ]
psynapz [ 1 Post ]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but Howling Rainbows and eyepen were both vigilant. (And what do you think, psynapz too?)

Re: apologydue

PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:16 pm
by barracuda
Psynapz, hmmm, I don't know. I'll review that. I'd be willing to give apologydue more time. Waiting is. Banning on the basis of an evil proxy is a bit beyond my paygrade.

However, I am going to warn isachar about the rule on calling disinformation. He needs a brushback from the plate.

Re: apologydue

PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:35 pm
by Jeff
Yeah, I'm fine too with having apologydue's file flagged for possible auditing at a later date.

And fucking isachar. He needed a warning, thanks.

Re: apologydue

PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:48 pm
by barracuda
isachar needs a week off. I'm going to give him a vacation unless you say no.

Re: apologydue

PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:53 pm
by Jeff
Image

Re: apologydue

PostPosted: Sat Apr 24, 2010 12:22 am
by barracuda
Image

So let it be written - so let it be done.

Re: apologydue

PostPosted: Sun Apr 25, 2010 12:02 am
by barracuda
Jeff wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but Howling Rainbows and eyepen were both vigilant.


You're not wrong. And apologydue has really grabbed the brass ring now, too. Hoo-boy.

Re: apologydue

PostPosted: Sun Apr 25, 2010 12:59 am
by Jeff
It was impulsive, but I thought the calls for Jack to play nice deserved to be met with a demonstration of why nice isn't always called for. I hate seeing trusted members take fire from likely trolls who shield themselves behind my house rules.

Re: apologydue

PostPosted: Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:15 am
by Jeff
I think apologydue is done. I'm going to deactivate and run a Voight-Kampff Empathy Test on the suspect replicant.

Re: apologydue

PostPosted: Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:22 am
by Jeff
Fucking yes.

Looked into his mailbox:

Message subject: quotes
From: apologydue
Sent: Tue Mar 30, 2010 1:30 pm
To: AlicetheKurious

XXX.the7thXfire.com/new_world_order/XXXzionism/a_short_history_of_the_jeXws.htmXX

XXX.biblebelievers.org.auXXX/proof.htmXXX

These two links are full of interesting information and blistering quotes straight from the horses mouths. If these quotes from the perps themselves are legit then wow...The first link has some amazing quotes, especially in the last third of the article, that boggle the mind. Thought you might be able to make use of them in your battles. I have not researched these quotes to verify their authenticity, so I am not 100% sure they are legit. You might want to research the quotes before using them. I put X's in the links to prevent link back. Replace the X's at the front of the quotes with W's, and remove the rest of the X's in the links.

your buddy,
XvigilantX

Re: apologydue

PostPosted: Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:40 am
by barracuda
Happy days!

I wonder how many other usernames he's got up his sleeve. It's getting easier to spot him, though, as each generative iteration successively deteriorates away from the original.

Nicely done.

Re: apologydue

PostPosted: Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:42 am
by barracuda
Why is he worried about the url in a pm?